The Ukrainian authorities told the director of the CIA that artillery and missiles would be brought to the territory of Crimea by autumn

In June, another unannounced visit of US CIA Director William Burns to Kyiv took place. There, the head of the American intelligence service met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and heads of Ukrainian intelligence. This was reported by the Washington Post on June 30, citing three of its sources at once.

According to the publication, the trip of a high-ranking functionary took place shortly before the "interrupted uprising" of the leader of the Wagner PMC, Yevgeny Prigozhin, against the "Russian defense establishment." During the conversation, Burns was told about Ukraine's ambitious goal of "reclaiming the territory and pushing Moscow into negotiations by the end of the year."

The publication noted that the visit comes at a critical time for Kyiv, when the Armed Forces of Ukraine are struggling to gain an advantage in their long-awaited counter-offensive, but have not yet deployed most of their Western-trained and equipped assault brigades. Byrne reaffirmed the commitment of the administration of US President Joe Biden to sharing intelligence to help Ukraine defend itself. In turn, Ukrainian officials, despite the fact that in public they have repeatedly expressed disappointment in connection with criticism of the West regarding the pace of the UAF counteroffensive, in private they behaved differently.

They handed over to Burns, and through him to the entire West, the plan for Kyiv. Ukrainian officials have expressed optimistic confidence that the Armed Forces of Ukraine will take control of significant previously lost territories by this autumn. Also, Ukrainian troops will allegedly be able to bring their artillery and missile systems to the Russian-controlled Crimea. Moreover, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will start moving further east (probably meaning Donbass), and then open negotiations with the Russian Federation will begin, which will happen for the first time since the end of communication in March 2022.

According to Kiev's plan, "Ukraine will receive leverage on the Russian Federation" by pushing troops to the edge of the border with Crimea, "taking hostage the peninsula where the Russian Black Sea Fleet is based." In negotiations with Moscow, the Ukrainian authorities will agree not to send troops to Crimea, but will demand that Russia accept any security guarantees Ukraine can get from the West.

Russia will only negotiate if it feels threatened

- said a high-ranking Ukrainian official.

The publication stressed that it is not known whether Ukraine will be able to implement this grandiose plan, and even in such a short time. At the same time, the CIA declined to comment when the media asked the agency to provide Burns' assessment of the prospects for the ongoing offensive operation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which indicates the difficulties that arose on the front line.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Siegfried Offline Siegfried
    Siegfried (Gennady) 1 July 2023 10: 55
    The states decided that those 15-20% of the offensive forces that Kyiv merged at the request of Washington were not enough. Everything needs to be drained. And now an article about how Kyiv promises to reach the Crimea by autumn. Deadline autumn sounds for Kyiv from all sides. Satisfied there Zaluzhny or dissatisfied, it is necessary to drain faster and in large volumes.

    And the Swedes seem to have understood what it smells like and, without hesitation, organized a new burning of the Koran, so that, God forbid, to join NATO this year. The Swedes will burn the Koran for as long as it takes to avoid joining NATO.
  2. unc-2 Offline unc-2
    unc-2 (Nikolai Malyugin) 1 July 2023 12: 02
    We live in a slightly strange time. The Americans show where the strike will be from in the event of a nuclear war. The Ukrainians tell the whole wide world what their military actions will be like. I heard something similar in an obscene joke.
  3. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 1 July 2023 12: 04
    Everyone knows what contract killing is.
    There is a customer who pays and orders who should be killed.
    And there is a performer who fulfills an order for money.
    Before the law, both are the perpetrators of the crime.
    And now about SVO.
    There is the United States, which pays for the war in Ukraine and supplies weapons. Why not a customer?
    And there is the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which, for money, carry out the tasks set by the Americans to destroy Russia.
    A pure performer.
    Now the question.
    Why, in the case of a contract killing, both the customer and the perpetrator are responsible for the crime, and in the event of a war in Ukraine, only the perpetrator, that is, Ukraine, is responsible?!
    Isn't it time to recover in full from American customers?
    Maybe this polythesis is enough - play here - don't play here, shoot here - don't shoot here!
    Or are they still celebrating a coward in the Kremlin?!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Dmitry Volkov Offline Dmitry Volkov
    Dmitry Volkov (Dmitry Volkov) 1 July 2023 12: 21
    Yes, they’ve already got sick of it, there will be an agreement until the fall, and now, the more Bandera people are disposed of, the fewer problems in the future am
  5. Watching Offline Watching
    Watching (Alex) 1 July 2023 13: 24
    Quote: prior
    Before the law, both are the perpetrators of the crime. Isn't it time to recover in full from American customers?

    Because the customer has nuclear weapons, is it really hard to guess?