Enthusiasts have developed a remote control for the Fagot ATGM


Russian enthusiasts have developed a system for remote control of the Fagot anti-tank missile system. The new device has been successfully tested in real combat conditions.


The 9Sh119M1 device with a display for aiming at a target was taken as a basis. The "start" button is located directly on the remote control, which allows the operator to launch a rocket from a distance of up to 50 meters without endangering himself, since he can be in cover at the time of firing. The image from the ATGM sight is transmitted by wire to the device screen.

Technicians also moved the control channel to an external console and equipped the launcher with a drive system. On the video posted on the Web, the calculation of the ATGM is satisfied with the new product. The fighters noted the simplicity and convenience of the new device, as well as the accuracy of shooting.

Five shots - five hits

- the soldier shares after successfully working out on the position of the enemy.


The developers plan to equip the modern Konkurs-M and Kornet complexes with similar remote control systems. At the moment, work on the modernization of anti-tank systems is being carried out by enthusiasts, but it is obvious that the introduction of such of technologies into mass production.
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Eduard Aplombov Offline Eduard Aplombov
    Eduard Aplombov (Eduard Aplombov) 22 May 2023 10: 56
    0
    war, fortunately or unfortunately, is an incentive for renewal and new achievements
  2. Nikolaevich I Offline Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I (Vladimir) 22 May 2023 11: 29
    0
    Remote control for Fagot? Eh, it would be necessary first to "Baby" to do! Omission, however!
  3. Vasya 225 Offline Vasya 225
    Vasya 225 (Vyacheslav) 23 May 2023 17: 29
    +1
    The remote control for the Stugna anti-tank system has been mass-produced since 2008.
    1. Monster_Fat Offline Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat (What's the difference) Yesterday, 04: 05
      0
      In-in, ours only "stupid" ... Only in the second year, the successfully passing NWO realized that the operator must be protected and hidden away from the launcher .... It is strange that the "stupid", "narrow-minded" "Shumers", We thought about it back in 2008...
  4. wladimirjankov Offline wladimirjankov
    wladimirjankov (Vladimir Yankov) 29 May 2023 12: 34
    0
    mind you "Russian enthusiasts", and not research institutes or design bureaus of factories from the military-industrial complex that were supposed to do this yesterday. Why, then, does the state support them at all, if their work is done by completely different people.
    1. Alexander from the north (Alexander) 30 May 2023 14: 45
      -1
      For what? then they just steal money.
      1. Vdars Offline Vdars
        Vdars (Victor) 30 May 2023 21: 16
        0
        It's just that factories need to bring the appropriate requirements and adjust them to these requirements !!