Why is a peace treaty delayed with Japan?

1
Peace agreement with Japan at the cost of returning the islands of the Lesser Kuril Ridge? Is the game worth the candle? This is one of many issues that President Vladimir Putin has to resolve today.


Japan’s desire to conclude a peace treaty on the basis of the 1956 declaration signed with the USSR is understandable and is due to the desire to regain the islands of the Lesser Kuril Ridge, which, according to the results of World War II, were transferred to the Soviet Union.



However, Vladimir Putin believes that this issue is not so simple and requires additional study, as the declaration does not address a number of issues that are important:

But this, of course, requires a separate additional, serious study, bearing in mind that not everything is clear in the declaration itself. It basically stated the problem that the Soviet Union is ready to transfer the two islands, but it is not said on what grounds under whose sovereignty they fall. This is a matter of serious study. Moreover, once Japan itself refused to implement these agreements


It is difficult to argue with the arguments of the Russian leader, since Japan, after ratifying the declaration by both countries, itself refused to implement these agreements and preached the principle of "first returning the islands, then a peace treaty."

It is likely that Shinzo Abe will leave his post without becoming a "collector of Japanese lands."
1 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    15 November 2018 18: 13
    Gorbachev also began with this. What does this contract give me, how is it beneficial? The salary will increase, the sea fish will become cheaper, the housing and communal services will become cheaper? On the contrary, the more Putin negotiates, at least about what and at least with whom, then this affects the citizens of his country. How is Russia different from other countries? The fact that all other rulers care about the welfare of their citizens! Therefore, if Putin spoke correctly, he did not have to be justified.