Russia wants to restore Libya. And who will restore Russia?

November 13, 2018 10

The Russian government is ready to begin restoration work economics and the social sphere of Libya. This was stated by Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev at a conference held in Italy and dedicated to solving the Libyan issue.

The head of the government of the Russian Federation believes that our country should address this issue. He believes that Libya has a rich tradition of cooperation with Russia, so we must develop our economic projects here.

True, the Prime Minister noted that the solution of the issue is possible only in conditions of national reconciliation in this country.

At the moment, Libya does not have a centralized authority. In the east of the country, in Tobruk, the parliament rules, and the western part is led by the government of national consent, located in Tripoli.

According to a statement by Dmitry Medvedev, Russia should cooperate with Libya. Since cooperation always involves mutual efforts, then, reasoning logically, we can understand the strategic plan of the Russian government. Perhaps it is that Russia will make every effort to rebuild Libya, and then restored Libya will begin to rebuild the Russian economy and social sphere, which also urgently need it.

Well, but seriously, our government should first deal with the restoration of the Russian social sphere, and then stutter at the expense of financial investments in foreign economies.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

vit670

+1

14 November 2018 00: 09

It seems that enemies rule Russia - the Russians have no money, but you hold on! But we are rushing to restore Syria, Libya, and God knows who ... When will we restore our villages and villages destroyed by shit, and factories and factories destroyed throughout the country?
Bulanov

0

14 November 2018 10: 31

That's right, Russia will restore Libyan oil wells so that oil is cheaper in the world! And then too much income goes to Russia from oil. Yes, and then the EU and the States will take Libya for themselves, as was usually the case with everyone who was restored by the USSR and Russia. Russia is not sorry.
kriten

+1

14 November 2018 17: 31

We have already built there for 4 billion railways, for which Yakunin bought a lot in England. Companion of the king from the time of "By the lake", drove fire, a patriot .... It turned out to be a thief and a traitor. The example is contagious. so do other future participants in the reconstruction of Libya want to steal. And what patriotic songs you will hear.
Strannik

+1

14 November 2018 18: 39

First, the Russian elite surrenders Libya and Gaddafi to the amers .... And now what is the Kremlin’s interest in Libya now? Oil and gas....

like this they handed over Libya ....
Strannik

0

14 November 2018 18: 43

First they handed over Libya, then Syria stood in line .... Many have already forgotten this .... Now will we restore all this? At whose expense is this banquet? And who will restore Russia after Putin?
1. Kuzmitsky
  
  +1
  
  14 November 2018 21: 51
  
  Perhaps Russia has some kind of economic interest in this story. For example, we are restoring the oil and gas industry in Libya, but in part it will belong to the Russian Federation. But we will not touch our deposits yet. Plus organize a naval base in the Mediterranean. Something like this.
  
  I do not pretend to the truth, just one of the versions.
2. Anchonsha
  
  +2
  
  15 November 2018 11: 22
  
  You tell our GDP thank you for staying alive. It would have been okay for a long time after the dashing 90s. And you roll a barrel on him. Would come such as Potroshenko, or Misha and a half percent with Yavlinsky and there would not be you, Strannik. And you still think so. Put forward your program, see if you pull instead of Putin to restore how you say Russia.
Anchonsha

+1

15 November 2018 11: 12

The answer to the question is in the heading about the country. But try not to restore our country. Just because the goal is blurred - to rebuild the country. But if we are going to do something outside the country and we need resources, not necessarily finance, then we will open production in this direction. This will be the development of the country when there is a clear goal. And without doing anything outside the country, Medvedev will not have a goal. for internal development. You cannot even shake our officials into fulfilling presidential decrees on the election program for the country's development.
1. Anchonsha
  
  0
  
  15 November 2018 11: 30
  
  There was no mate. Yes there was an incorrect expression, but not a mat. So sort it out. There were not one administrators here. The previous one lifted its ban.
Evgeny Pelevin

+1

16 November 2018 12: 44

What to do first, and then what Putin knows without the hints of any clever people. Let me remind you of something that the author of this post apparently does not know about.
Now we all do not rejoice at the time of Ust-Luga near St. Petersburg, we are proud that we have got rid of the dependence of the ports of the Baltic countries. But Ust-Luga began in 1993. And it was also out of time. The confrontation between the president and parliament, the shooting of the White House, rampant inflation and centrifugal forces in the regions, and the drunkard (as he is called by such clever people now) Yeltsin already thought about the future of Russia and was preparing workarounds around the Baltic republics.
We are currently discussing SP (Nord Stream) -2, Turkish Stream, talk about SP-3. Meanwhile, the first joint venture was launched in 1998. The country defaulted, the Chechen war was at its height, crime was rampant in cities, oligarchs were tearing the country apart, the president was undergoing heart surgery, the prime ministers were changed like gloves, and ... the traitor to Russia Yeltsin (quite not at the time) begins preparations for the construction of the Nord Stream.
I can still give examples, but I think these two are enough.
In Russia, there have always been enough advisers on what to do and where to spend money. But ... the dog barks, and the caravan goes on.