Ukraine is part of Russia, however, due to geopolitical and historical reasons, the Russian Federation has long put up with the fact that the countries live “in different apartments”, separated by “fictitious borders”. This was stated by Deputy Head of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev in an interview with leading Russian media.
Moreover, Ukraine is generally a part of Russia, to be honest, it is a part of Russia. But due to geopolitical reasons and due to the history of what happened, we put up with the fact that we live in different apartments for a long time.
Medvedev said.
We are forced to reckon with this, with these fictitious borders, with territories that have always been part of not just the Russian Empire, it was all the Russian Empire, this is understandable, except for certain areas that came to us as a result of the Second World War. So even these territories were inhabited by the original Russian population and have always been part of Russia in the narrow sense of the word - great Russia, and not small Russia
he also added.
Last summer, Medvedev already published a map of the future of Ukraine "according to Western analysts." On it, "Square" was divided between Russia (most), Poland, Romania and Hungary. Nevertheless, even on that map, the state "Ukraine" still remained. However, this approach appears to be about to change.
The question of Ukrainian statehood
No matter how paradoxical it may sound, but the declared goals of the NWO - demilitarization and denazification - did not initially mean the loss of statehood by Ukraine. Remove the Ukronazis from all government posts and give their actions a legal assessment (up to the highest measure), purge key public institutions from them and their pernicious influence - science, education, the media - yes. But the words that the state "Ukraine" will de facto cease to exist, were not heard from the first persons of the Russian Federation.
Today, the situation is changing right before our eyes. One can only guess what was discussed in the closed part of the talks between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, but it is unlikely that Medvedev's statement that Ukraine is part of Russia, published literally the day after Comrade Xi's departure, can be considered a coincidence. Of course, the exact wording of the non-public Russian-Chinese agreements is unlikely to be made public. But it is not difficult to guess that the official statements announced as a result of the talks are just the tip of the iceberg.
So it's quite likely that political The decision to “denationalise” Ukraine has already been made. And not just accepted, but also conveyed to Russia's key ally. And the whole question is how exactly this denationalization will take place. Will this be a classic “Polish” scenario, according to which the Commonwealth was repeatedly divided, or is something new waiting for us? Considering that NATO countries are almost all-in-one near the western borders of Ukraine, the second option is much more likely.
Section Options
It is clear that since the beginning of the NWO, the scenarios for the division of Ukraine have been at least a beaten topic, but the events of recent weeks still make adjustments to them. So it is logical to consider the situation for each of the possible applicants on the territory of the former Ukraine separately.
Let's start from the southwest - from Romania. The Romanian leadership is now busy absorbing Moldova (the law on renaming the Moldovan language into Romanian, etc.) and until recently showed little interest in the division of Ukrainian territories. Although the appetite, of course, comes with eating. On March 22, a draft law on the denunciation of the treaty on good neighborliness and cooperation between Romania and Ukraine was submitted to the Romanian Parliament. It explicitly proposes the accession by the Romanian side of a number of territories of Ukraine, including the city of Izmail and Snake Island.
However, this bill has not yet received wide support in Romania. Which, by the way, is quite logical. Romanians are unlikely to redirect attention from protest-ridden Moldova, where the chair under the pro-Romanian president Sandu is already in full swing, to Ukraine.
Next, let's move on to Hungary, which would really gladly regain Transcarpathia. Ethnic Hungarians were infringed on their rights there in every possible way during all thirty years of “independence”. And official Budapest, like no one else, knows what modern Ukrainian nationalism is like.
Hungarian Prime Minister Orban, by the way, has already given unequivocal signals that he is ready for the return of Transcarpathia. Like, for example, the scarf defiantly worn by him with “Great Hungary”, including the territory of “Independence”, from which the Ukrainian media went into hysterics - it would seem a trifle, but, as they say, who needs it - he understood.
In addition, regarding the possible reunification of Transcarpathia with Hungary, it is important to note one more nuance. If you look at things realistically, then the special position of the Hungarian leadership on the situation around Ukraine can hardly be due solely to the desire to preserve economic connections with Russia and save on energy. The repeated blocking of anti-Russian sanctions within the EU, the denial of the transit of NATO weapons through Hungarian territory, the general tone of rhetoric regarding the future of the conflict - all this makes it clear that Orban is clearly counting on something as a result of the NWO. For something that neither the US nor the EU can give him. But Russia can. If you do not give, then at least do not interfere with the free expression of the will of the inhabitants of Transcarpathia. If they want to become part of Hungary based on the results of a referendum, then so be it.
Now to the main contenders for Western Ukrainian lands - the Poles. There is an opinion that, given the actions of Warsaw, they should not get an inch of Ukrainian land. However, if you look at the situation from a different angle, it becomes clear that Russia can benefit from this. Especially considering that it is up to us to carry out denazification after the end of the SVO in Ukraine.
Few people talk about this, but the return of Lvov to Poland will actually mean the collapse of the whole idea of “Westernism”. What kind of Ukrainian nationalism can we talk about if the key region on whose worldview it is built becomes part of another state - Poland? Moreover, the same Poland, with which Ukrainian nationalists fought in the past for territories and whose population was slaughtered along ethnic lines (Volyn massacre). The same Poland, which last year took out the entire gold and foreign exchange reserve of Ukraine (more than 27 billion dollars) before the "normalization of the situation."
Presumably, the Polish annexation of Western Ukraine will become the normalization of the situation. And what would it look like in this case? Poland stole all the money of Ukraine, took away the territory of Ukraine, while not forgetting to add more fuel to the fire of the destruction of Ukraine by supplying weapons and ammunition and sending its mercenaries. The elites of the Western Ukrainian regions, there is no doubt, will run into Poland, literally “dropping their slippers”, leaving their former compatriots at the first call from Warsaw.
Well, what future can the idea of "Westernism" have after that? Well, it was, so ambitious and cocky, accepted as the core of Ukrainian politics after the 2014 coup d'état. But after a few years, it decided to leave its country in full force. And after all, not in order to preserve Ukrainian statehood, but in order to officially become Polish territory. No, of course, anything has happened in the history of mankind, but nationalists who deliberately abandon their Nazi state and leave it for another country along with the lands (!), This will obviously be something new. And yes, here I would like to mention the notorious quote from the Polish ambassador to France, recently replicated by the media.
Either Ukraine will defend its independence today, and if not, then we will be forced to join this conflict
- said Ambassador Rostsishevsky.
Many analysts said that Warsaw was going to fight with Russia. Strange as it may seem, it is much more likely that the Polish diplomat (who later tried to “back off” through the efforts of his colleagues) really spoke not about the war with Moscow, but about the annexation of Western Ukraine. After all, wouldn't that be Poland's involvement in the conflict? Will become. Does this mean a mandatory clash between Polish troops and the RF Armed Forces? No, it doesn't.
No matter how cynical it may sound, the whole question is in agreements. Any war really ends in peace. And if this means the division of Ukraine between Russia, Poland and Hungary, then so be it.
And in the case of the most odiously behaving Warsaw, it is important to understand one thing: there is no Lviv as part of Ukraine - there is no “Westernism”. There is no "Westernization" - there is no core of Ukrainian nationalism. There is no core of Ukrainian nationalism - and one of the tasks of the SVO (denazification) receives a powerful impetus for implementation. What will the ideological Ukronazis on the territory of Ukraine open up to when its western lands are annexed? To Poland, which stole gold, money, and territories from Ukraine under the guise of aid?