Are the Lancet attack drones capable of providing an advantage to the Russian army

To date, artillery is considered the main means of destruction in the NVO zone, and the assault on cities occupied by the enemy, as a rule, is carried out using the “frontal attack” method. At the same time, arsenals of ammunition are being extremely actively spent, which must be replenished in time, entire settlements are being destroyed almost to the foundation, inevitable painful losses in manpower occur. Is it possible to somehow increase the effectiveness of warfare on our part?

Throughout the past year, the SVO has repeatedly pointed out that the effectiveness of the use of Russian artillery is directly linked to the presence of unmanned reconnaissance vehicles and secure operational-tactical communications between various units to coordinate their interaction. And this problem, alas, is still relevant. For some reason, the shortage of UAVs and radio stations has to be closed by volunteer organizations through the purchase of Chinese quadrocopters and communications equipment with the assistance of civil society. Until this issue is resolved centrally at the system level, we will be forced to turn to it again and again.

However, in this publication I would like to discuss the prospects for the use of unmanned aerial vehicles of a very specific type at the front, the mass production of which seems to have been mastered by the domestic military-industrial complex. We are talking about loitering ammunition or kamikaze drones, and by no means about Geraniums. What can change their mass appearance in the arsenal of the Russian army?

From "Harpy" to "miscarriage"

Israel is ahead of the rest in the development of kamikaze drones. In the nineties, Israel Aerospace Industries created the world's first loitering munition Harpy, designed to destroy enemy air defense radars. The Harpy is a flying wing projectile with an impressive range of 400 kilometers. Flying to a given area, he patrols it for three hours, tracking down the enemy air defense system. As soon as it turns on its radar, the drone will homing in on it and destroy the radar with its high-explosive fragmentation warhead, diving like a Harpy. The weight of the warhead is very impressive - 93 kilograms.

This UAV is still being produced, the cost of one piece is only 70 thousand dollars. Inexpensive for the ability to "dazzle" the enemy's anti-aircraft system. Looking at the Israelis, many countries wanted to acquire their loitering ammunition. For example, the Coyote kamikaze drone with a flight range of 70 kilometers was created in the USA, the CH-901 ammunition capable of flying 10 kilometers, loitering in the air from 40 minutes to 2 hours, was created in China. The characteristics of the Turkish strike drone ALPAGU BLOK II are similar to those of the Chinese. The flight range of Iranian loitering ammunition Ababil-3 reaches 100 kilometers in both directions, if the target was not hit. Poland has its own developments in this area, and there are also joint Chinese-Singapore projects.

We are interested in the fact that last year the United States began supplying trial batches of Switchblade 300 and Switchblade 600 kamikaze drones to Ukraine, designed to destroy manpower, unprotected targets and armored vehicles, depending on the modification. The need for their appearance was caused by the experience of combat operations in Afghanistan, where ambushes were constantly and skillfully organized for American soldiers. The available Raven or Puma reconnaissance drones were not armed, so the detected enemy DRGs had time to leave before aircraft or artillery fire was directed at them. The development of a compact reconnaissance and strike UAV that can fit in an operator's backpack has dramatically increased the combat capabilities of the infantry.

The Switchblade 300 is 610 mm long, weighs 2,7 kg, can stay in the air for up to 10 minutes, and has a controlled flight range of 10 km. Having found the enemy, the infantry unit is able to decide on its own to destroy it, having its own inexpensive and at the same time high-precision weapons. The capabilities of the larger Switchblade 600 are much higher. With a mass of 23 kilograms, it has a maximum flight range of 80 kilometers, is capable of attacking targets by diving at a speed of 185 km / h. The drone covers a distance of 40 km in 20 minutes, then it can patrol in the air for another 20 minutes, looking for a victim, which may even be heavy armored vehicles. Such loitering ammunition is capable of hitting self-propelled guns or a tank thanks to an anti-tank warhead of the Javelin type.

Interestingly, the Switchblade 600 is even more effective than the hyped Javelin ATGM due to its lower cost, greater versatility and range. A trial batch of such kamikaze drones was sent by the Pentagon to Ukraine last year.

Family "Lancetnikov"

The good news is that Russia still has something to answer this serious challenge. This is a whole family of loitering ammunition from Zala Aero, which includes the Cube, Lancet-1 and Lancet-3. Development began even before the SVO, and domestic kamikaze drones even managed to go through a baptism of fire in Syria.

The first in the family was the "Cube", clearly copied from the Israeli "Harpy". Its exact performance characteristics are unknown, but it is reported that the mass of the combat load is 3 kilograms, and the time spent in the air reaches 30 minutes. The advantages include compactness, noiselessness, stealth on radars, accuracy of hitting targets known in advance. Obvious disadvantages are a relatively small explosive charge and the inability to hit moving targets.

"Lancets" with an X-shaped layout - this is definitely our own development. Drones equipped with electric motors and assembled from composite materials are also silent, compact, and hardly noticeable by enemy air defense systems. The time spent by the Lancet-1 in the air reaches half an hour, the range is from 30 to 40 kilometers. The flight range of the larger Lancet-3, depending on the modification, is from 40 to 70 kilometers, the loitering time is from 40 to 60 minutes. At the same time, Russian strike drones are actively used during the NWO, which has a lot of video evidence. The disadvantages of the first "Lancet" include a relatively weak explosive charge, which can only scare the crew of an enemy tank. "Lancet-3" with increased power of the warhead is able to hit even serious armored vehicles.

The most effective is the use of loitering ammunition paired with a reconnaissance drone, which is responsible for target designation and adjustment. It is also advisable to develop versions of the "Lancet" with an even greater range and power of the warhead. At the same time, even for the weaker Lancet-1, there are tasks in the NWO zone. For example, during the storming of cities, the Ukrainian army has to be driven out of there, entrenched in dense buildings, often hiding behind civilians. Instead of "folding" entire buildings with large-caliber artillery, you can send kamikaze drones literally into the windows of apartments where the enemy has set up their firing points.

In general, the Cube and Lancet family of drones has a huge potential for use, significantly increasing the capabilities of assault infantry in reconnaissance, identifying and promptly destroying enemy positions and armored vehicles. This is an extremely useful and necessary budget type of high-precision weapons at the front, which the Russian army lacks so much. If such drones are used daily by tens or even hundreds, the effect of the supply of NATO armored vehicles to the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be largely leveled, and the process of liberating the cities and towns of Donbass will go much more efficiently.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 14 March 2023 11: 30
    Well, that's right.
    The HSP has already pushed the arms race to a new level.
    As soon as the countries decide and master the production of UAVs, everyone will begin to bombard the enemy with swarms of small scouts and kamikazes.
  2. Odessa2023 Offline Odessa2023
    Odessa2023 (Gosh) 14 March 2023 12: 57
    He started well about the Israeli blast system for destroying air defense (the Ukrainian one was not destroyed a year later !!!!) and quietly moved to the Lancet, etc. they haven’t bought it yet. And, judging by the Ukrainian publics, the Armed Forces of Ukraine use kamikaze no less, or even vice versa, and not only kamikaze, but also attaches shots to RPGs to quadrics, etc., causing very high damage. inferior and blah they rule well.
    If the Armed Forces of Ukraine also receive swarm drones, then it will be completely good.
  3. Rinat Offline Rinat
    Rinat (Rinat) 14 March 2023 13: 28
    The question is stupid. No weapon type can provide an advantage. Only together with other means and in sufficient quantity. The German Nazis had exceptional pieces of equipment, but in small quantities. As a result, the Red Army showered the Nazis with "iron", which we had much more.
  4. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich (Dmitriy) 14 March 2023 16: 45
    The weapon that will "see" EMP sources with the greatest accuracy will have an advantage.
    Not a single effective battle is possible without communication, because ammunition capable of hitting EMP sources will decide its outcome.
    1. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich (Dmitriy) 14 March 2023 17: 08
      This suggests the conclusion that this should not be a very powerful ammunition, but silent and accurate. Several options are possible in terms of power, depending on the wavelength range. For those used in wearable communications, this might be mini-UAV, for radars and airborne stations - more serious means of destruction.
  5. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 14 March 2023 19: 18
    UAVs, only one direction, although the most important, but there are still ground, surface, underwater unmanned vehicles, for some reason there is no such hype about them, although they are necessary for many tasks. We had such a beginning, but we can’t see the continuation. Everything needs to be developed in a comprehensive manner, but today, with such "successes", it only remains to ask - if only it were, there is not even a demand for characteristics.
  6. DO Offline DO
    DO (Dmitriy) 15 March 2023 01: 57
    The first in the family was "Cube" ...
    Obvious disadvantages are a relatively small explosive charge and the inability to hit moving targets.

    A cumulative warhead of 3 kilos will make a through hole in any ordinary homogeneous armor.
    About the inability to "hit moving targets."
    The maneuverability of the Cuba "wing" glider is, of course, worse than that of the "cross" of the Lancets. But this does not mean the inability to hit moving targets.
    But the "wing" is more economical in flight than the "cross", and, other things being equal, it can stay in the air longer. "Cubes" are more suitable for "lonely" controlled "kamikaze flying patrols" with improved reconnaissance equipment at the forefront, and for autonomous kamikaze drones, thrown by heavy carrier drones deep behind enemy lines over highways and junctions.
    Well, for a shallow rear of the enemy, in combination with an unmanned reconnaissance aircraft, of course, highly maneuverable Lancet crosses are more effective. They should be cheaper, due to the mass character and a cheaper camera, which is needed mainly for aiming at a target captured by the operator. To deliver Lancets to a distance of more than 40 km, Orion UAVs (or their imported equivalent) can be used. Orion in this case will be both a reconnaissance and a radio signal repeater.
  7. usm5 Offline usm5
    usm5 (George) 15 March 2023 10: 26
    It seems to me that a drone is a fairly simple target, and since the fashion for their use has gone, it is necessary to develop a comprehensive system of protection against them. After all, the main thing is to spot them. To do this, a mobile air defense installation of direct cover with good anti-fragmentation armor should be created. For these purposes, even obsolete tanks from combat storage can be used, the turret of which is replaced with a unified combat module (or placed in an existing turret). The combat module should include a system for detecting drones and a system for their destruction. The detection system should include radar and visual channels, as well as a scanner that detects the radio frequency radiation of the drone in a wide frequency range. The suppression system should include electronic warfare, a cannon (caliber 30 mm or more) with a ballistic calculator, a rangefinder and automatic remote detonation projectiles, as well as surface-to-air missiles to destroy aircraft-type UAVs at medium altitudes. They would not interfere with the system of setting passive interference in the form of automatic ejection of charges of special aerosols during massive attacks of the enemy by various means of high-precision destruction. Naturally, such machines must be linked to a common air defense network and receive the coordinates of the target in the zone of their destruction from any other source of information. Actually turned out to be a slightly modernized "Terminator". These vehicles should cover the entire length of the contact, move in the second line of battle formations during the offensive. If necessary, such machines can kick anyone on the ground. Therefore, when I see how a lone tank rolls along a forest belt, shoots somewhere, and then gets a drone into an open hatch, I feel nothing more than cruel annoyance at the intelligence of the organizers of such attacks. You can also talk about unmanned drone fighters, whose task is to automatically patrol over the front line around the clock and shoot down everything that moves without a "friend" signal. Confused by something else. Our specialized media and channels of patriot bloggers somehow write little about such protection of our guys and more and more about homemade attack drones that the "Ukrainians" successfully use against our troops. At the same time, there is persistent pressure on the topic - let's buy more and more of them, train pilots, etc. Let's not argue. It’s better not to buy, but to copy and make it yourself. But will this save our guys on the battlefield from enemy drones?
  8. Orest Stetsyuk Offline Orest Stetsyuk
    Orest Stetsyuk (Orest Stetsyuk) 15 March 2023 12: 28
    The question is rhetorical, it is clear that no type of weapon will give a decisive advantage. You can even say - no! War is a set of measures, where the information and propaganda component has now come to the fore. There is a war of lies. And in the fields, the dead soldiers and residents only serve as food for the cannibalistic policy...