For the first time in the course of the military defense, the RF Armed Forces used a new generation of ammunition "Grom-1"

March 13 2023 16

According to sources, for the first time in the course of a special operation, Russian troops used the Grom-1 missile and bomb weapon system (UK RBV), which is a high-precision gliding munition. His remains were found on the battlefield.

For the first time in the course of the military defense, the RF Armed Forces used a new generation of ammunition "Grom-1"

Grom-1 was developed by the Russian Tactical Missiles Corporation and is designed to equip Su-57 fighters and other combat aircraft. The height of the launch of the ammunition is about 12 km, which allows covering a distance of 120 km. The mass of the warhead "Thunder-1" reaches 315 kg, UK RBV is induced by the GLONASS system.

For the first time, a new generation of ammunition was tested in 2018 and has not been used in real combat conditions since then. It is expected that its use against Ukrainian formations will significantly increase the combat potential of the Russian Aerospace Forces.

Earlier, Ukrainian troops lost about 150 Switchblade 300 kamikaze drones because they were mistakenly transported to the wrong warehouse. As a result, the place of concentration of aircraft in the village of Malinovka, Zaporozhye region, was successfully attacked by Russian units. The cost of one such device is about 6-7 thousand dollars.

Tactical Missiles Corporation

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Orange bigg

0

13 March 2023 20: 07

Isn't Grom-1 a guided missile? Guided planning bombs are Grom-2 and Thunder-3.

Created "Thunder" on a modular basis, which allows it to use three types of aviation ammunition.

The first is the 9-A-7759 guided missile with a warhead weighing 315 kilograms. In terms of its combat effectiveness, it is 1,8 times superior to the free-falling aerial bomb OFAB-250-270.
The second is a guided bomb 9-A1-7759. It has two charges with a total mass of 480 kilograms. The maximum flight time is about 260 s. During this time, it can cover up to 65 kilometers. The bomb in terms of its combat performance is 1,5 times superior to the OFAB-500U bomb.
The third type of ammunition in Grom's arsenal is also the 9-A2-7759 bomb, but with a volume-detonating warhead weighing 370 kilograms. That is, we are talking about the so-called vacuum or thermobaric bomb. It is equipped with a laser sensor that allows you to determine the optimal height of the explosion. The effectiveness of the bomb is two times higher than the conventional KAB-500OD corrected air bomb.

https://rg.ru/2023/03/12/novejshij-vysokotochnyj-boepripas-grom-primenili-v-hode-specoperacii.html
1. Nikolaevich I
  
  +1
  
  14 March 2023 11: 00
  
  The designation "Thunder-3" is not used! "Thunder-1" -rocket (with engine)> (9-A-7759) ... "Thunder-2" - planning bomb in two "variations": 1. high-explosive fragmentation (HE)> (9-A1- 7759) and 2. volumetric detonating (OD)> (9-A2-7759) ... The difference is in the full (alphanumeric) designation of the ammunition! And by the way! "Volume-detonating" ammunition and "thermobaric" ammunition are 2 "Odessa" differences! A knowledgeable person will not confuse them!
vlad127490

+1

13 March 2023 23: 36

There are a lot of bombs in storage. Take an example from amers, hang a planning and guidance system, a control unit on an old bomb. All old bombs can be used. It's cheaper than making new ones, at the same time upgrade the bombs in the warehouse.
1. Orange bigg
  
  0
  
  14 March 2023 10: 33
  Quote: vlad127490
  There are a lot of bombs in storage. Take an example from amers, hang a planning and guidance system, a control unit on an old bomb. All old bombs can be used. It's cheaper than making new ones, at the same time upgrade the bombs in the warehouse.
  
  According to your requests.
  
  In the course of the NMD in Ukraine, the Russian Aerospace Forces acquired a system similar to the American JDAM kit, which allows you to turn a conventional free-fall bomb into a guided precision-guided munition. The presented picture shows that the FAB-500 is equipped with a planning and correction module. Retractable wings were attached to the unguided aircraft weapon (pictured below). This indicates that this particular FAB-500 is now able to plan. However, the characteristics are not yet known.
  
  https://topcor.ru/30753-vks-rossii-obzavelis-sistemoj-analogichnoj-amerikanskomu-komplektu-jdam.html
Foe Pshekov

+3

14 March 2023 00: 28

Too expensive fun. For the sake of a shot at 120 km, raise aircraft 12 km. We need our own hymers with such a firing range to come, hit them with a package, drive off, change the package, hit it again for lunch.
1. Orange bigg
  
  +3
  
  14 March 2023 10: 25
  
  Quote: Foe Pshekov
  Too expensive fun. For the sake of a shot at 120 km, raise aircraft 12 km. We need our own hymers with such a firing range to come, hit them with a package, drive off, change the package, hit it again for lunch.
  
  They already have their own Hymers. These are Tornado-S and Hurricane-1M with high-precision satellite-guided missiles. But the same Hymers has a warhead of only 90 kopeck kilograms and in terms of explosion power it is clearly inferior to even the lightest bombs, not to mention the range defeat. You won’t destroy any concrete opornik with Hymers, but with the help of planning bombs UPAB-1500B or Thunder-2 completely.
Insolent in a jacket

+1

14 March 2023 10: 02

... Only not "remains", but parts or debris! The remains of you "author" will turn out if you fall under the blow of such a weapon ...
About other stylistic and other errors in this (and other) "scriptures" - "descriptions" - I will squeamishly keep silent ...
You take on serious topics, and the level of professionalism corresponds to a sixth grade student of the USSR school ... NO MORE!

...Yes!
EGE - sabotage from "partners", unfortunately, CLEARLY turned out to be very effective! ..

You “write” for a very respectable audience, people who really support the Just Cause ...
So have elementary respect for them ... - raise your very mediocre "writing" level.
Jarring already from your blunders ... from article to article ...
1. Nikolaevich I
  
  +1
  
  14 March 2023 10: 28
  
  I understand you! Numerous "blunders" in publications on military topics "enrage" himself! The level of journalism has clearly "fallen" (!) ... however, like the level (quality) of education in Russia in all "ranks"!
asr55

+2

14 March 2023 12: 26

Quote: Insolent in a Jacket
... Only not "remains", but parts or debris! The remains of you "author" will turn out if you fall under the blow of such a weapon ...
About other stylistic and other errors in this (and other) "scriptures" - "descriptions" - I will squeamishly keep silent ...
You take on serious topics, and the level of professionalism corresponds to a sixth grade student of the USSR school ... NO MORE!

...Yes!
EGE - sabotage from "partners", unfortunately, CLEARLY turned out to be very effective! ..

You “write” for a very respectable audience, people who really support the Just Cause ...
So have elementary respect for them ... - raise your very mediocre "writing" level.
Jarring already from your blunders ... from article to article ...

The noun REMAINS (of something) is applied to the word or name of something that once had its original form. The remains of an animal corpse, the remains of an aircraft, the remains of a ship, etc. takes place.
1. Boa kaa
  
  +2
  
  14 March 2023 18: 31
  
  Quote: asr55
  The remains of an animal corpse, the remains of an aircraft, the remains of a ship, etc. takes place.
  
  The well-established concept of "remains" is more suitable for the once former living organisms.
  But the expression "what is left of ..." rocket, aircraft, ship. Usually called "skeleton", "details", etc. This is by the way.
  But I'm talking about something else. It is very doubtful that during the explosion of the warhead of the product 9-A-7759, which has an explosive mass of more than 300 kg, there would be something left of it. And in the photo, the middle part of the bomb (rocket) is practically untouched, where, in theory, there is a warhead weighing 315 (or 480!) Kg.
  My grandfather, a participant in the Second World War (2nd Tank Shock Army), told me when I was 5 years old that when a 50-100 kg air bomb exploded next to a tank (!) This tank, like a toy, turned over ... And certainly, no There were no "spare parts" left from such a bomb. And here - 315 kg (yes, with a coefficient = 1,7 according to TNT!) - and the body of the product lies intact!
  "I do not believe!" - as Stanislavsky said!
  1. Saffron
    
    0
    
    15 March 2023 10: 00
    
    This is the propulsion module from fig. 1
  2. Prost Okvashin
    
    0
    
    16 March 2023 10: 39
    
    Not every missile reaches its target in its original form. Some propulsion module is thrown back on approach.
2. Insolent in a jacket
  
  +3
  
  14 March 2023 22: 16
  
  ... Actually, normal, cultured, educated and believing in God people at all times, by the word "remains" they meant not just what was left of a dead living organism, but exactly what was left of dead (dead) people ...
  ... No wonder this word is often used in conjunction with another ... - "mortal", mortal remains ...
  It is unlikely that in serious Classical Literature you will find the application of these concepts (mortal, remains, mortal remains) to the remains (debris) of something inanimate, for example, to the remains (debris) of any mechanisms ...
  ... However, in SERIOUS TECHNICAL literature, the use (replacement) of the concept of "debris" with remains is also hardly to be found ...
  
  ... I agree, sometimes (it happens) the word (concept) "remains" refers to the skeletons of dead large-capacity ships ...
  But precisely, large ships ... This is due, first of all, to the fact that often these sunken ships store dead people in their bowels ..., their remains ...
  
  Secondly, for many, and especially for sailors, pilots, cosmonauts, a ship, an aircraft (airliner), a spacecraft - there is something animated, there is something more significant (that into which a lot of work, emotions, experiences are invested ... , a "part of the soul" is invested - as normal people usually say ... Plus, years of work on this ship, an airliner - also make the perception of this huge mechanism as something animated ...) than, say, a car, tram, microwave, refrigerator , trolley, etc., etc.
  
  To apply the concept of "remains", which always carries (for normal and cultured people) - FUNERAL SHADING ("subtext") to the wreckage, surviving details, trash ... etc. - can only be a different kind of careerist, stupid and soulless " education"...
  The one that broadcasts in recent times is "location", instead of the Russian concept of "location" or "location" ...
  Or yells "WOWWOW" (Gow!) place "GREAT!" in our, in Russian ...
  
  And the thing is, it’s not at all in this one, specific word - “remains” ...
  The fact is that writings (this and others) as a whole are of a very, very low level ...
  In the old days - by reading newspapers one could get a certain level of education ... It was not for nothing that the position of Chief Editor of the Main Printed Publications was approved almost at the level of the Central Committee ...
  Now, if you don’t look up from various “sites”, “resources”, reading mediocre scribbles like: “The RF Armed Forces used the new generation Thunder-1 ammunition for the first time during the NMD” and other things in the same vein ..., - you can the real just DUMP...
  
  I (For the "fun"!))))) could, of course, "rewrite" (in a bully way of saying) this scribble, that is, rewrite it completely (expressed in the normal NATIVE ... RUSSIAN LANGUAGE .. .) more or less competently ...
  But the question is - why on earth should I waste My Time on different (loafers and illiterate half-educated idiots)? ..
  To teach "education"? .. For what? .. Why ..? What is the point?..
  1. Yuriy_6
    
    0
    
    18 March 2023 20: 00
    
    not in the eyebrow but in the eye! especially about our Russian language is great! keep it up!
asr55

+1

14 March 2023 12: 36

Quote: OrangeBigg
Isn't Grom-1 a guided missile? Guided planning bombs are Grom-2 and Thunder-3.

Created "Thunder" on a modular basis, which allows it to use three types of aviation ammunition.

The first is the 9-A-7759 guided missile with a warhead weighing 315 kilograms. In terms of its combat effectiveness, it is 1,8 times superior to the free-falling aerial bomb OFAB-250-270.
The second is a guided bomb 9-A1-7759. It has two charges with a total mass of 480 kilograms. The maximum flight time is about 260 s. During this time, it can cover up to 65 kilometers. The bomb in terms of its combat performance is 1,5 times superior to the OFAB-500U bomb.
The third type of ammunition in Grom's arsenal is also the 9-A2-7759 bomb, but with a volume-detonating warhead weighing 370 kilograms. That is, we are talking about the so-called vacuum or thermobaric bomb. It is equipped with a laser sensor that allows you to determine the optimal height of the explosion. The effectiveness of the bomb is two times higher than the conventional KAB-500OD corrected air bomb.

https://rg.ru/2023/03/12/novejshij-vysokotochnyj-boepripas-grom-primenili-v-hode-specoperacii.html

GROM is a project that provides for the modular construction of aviation ammunition, i.e. a complex of missile and bomb weapons that has its own specific index. Using several basic modules for different purposes, the manufacturer will be able to produce products of different classes and purposes. First of all, this makes it possible to release unified missiles and bombs. In addition, ready-made weapons may have different combat equipment. In practice, this will provide flexibility in the use of the RBV CC and will allow solving a wide range of combat missions.
The comment was deleted.
Azvozdam

0

31 March 2023 20: 48

It’s cool to read how paronyms squabble. If they are sent “to the front end”, will they argue there too? from the context, as a rule. IMHO.