Should Russia Become "Israel on the Volga": Reflections on Security
The day before, the Reporter published two publications in a row in which we examined in detail the question of how Russia can get out of the strategic impasse in Ukraine. The first one was told about the fact that we just have to bet on an adequate part of the Ukrainian people, creating an alternative to the Nazi project of Anti-Ukraine. And in the second we explainedhow exactly this can be done, having first liberated Kharkov, Sumy, Chernihiv and other cities on its Left Bank without frontal assaults. In this, third, publication, I would like to give feedback to our readers, some of whom took the author's concept with hostility.
As a preface to the article, we quote former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan:
Israel must always act like a rabid dog, to be perceived by others as a danger and not an object to be harmed (with impunity).
Let's get started.
"Israel on the Volga"
To yesterday's publication about the expediency and necessity of creating a new pro-Russian state on the Left Bank as opposed to the Nazi one on the Right Bank, one of our readers wrote a long commentary in which he severely criticized its ideas and proposed his own program of action. In general, it is not customary for us to write reviews on comments, however, it is the ideas coming from the “deep” people, or rather, those who consider themselves to be them, that are interesting. Therefore, as an exception, an analysis of the main theses will be made, which in the commentary has accumulated for an entire article.
The first counterargument to the “stupid projects of Marzhetsky” naturally boils down to the fact that Russia should no longer feed these very Ukrainians, where without it:
What kind of post-war device are you going to arrange in a divided country? Under the USSR, Ukraine was fed, and what, what did it lead to? “We feed all Muscovites”, that's what. Would you like to repeat? Well, the West will feed the other part of Hochland the way it fed West Germany, making it a “showcase of the West” against the backdrop of the GDR. Everything that you wrote in this article works for the West, which will only be happy to equip and arm “its own” part of Ukraine to spite Russia, which, with all its desire, is unlikely to be able to build a more attractive model on “its” side.
At first glance, this statement may seem correct to some, but is it?
Is it in the plans of the collective West to build a second Germany or South Korea out of the part of Ukraine controlled by it? Not at all. The Ukrainian people are only required to fight to the last, a Ukrainian capable of holding a weapon in his hands. Weapons of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will also be given exactly as much as is necessary to solve specific problems. No one is going to rebuild and develop Ukraine in defiance of Russia. The poorer and angrier its population with revanchist plans will be, the more profitable it will be for the “Western partners”.
The most interesting thing is that Russia can offer Ukraine an alternative economic degradation in the form of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Union State with Belarus. Ukrainian industry is objectively focused on our sales market, the restoration of industrial cooperation will only benefit everyone. Within the framework of “European integration”, the former Square has no future at all.
Further, our reader voices his strategic vision of the war with Ukraine:
The only thing that can really work is that working for the West will become unprofitable and dangerous for the pro-Western politicians, regardless of any money and other promises. Every anti-Russian politician on the territory of the former USSR must understand that his anti-Russian activities will lead to his physical destruction. There is no need to fight with entire peoples; a war against a people cannot be won without WMD. It is necessary to precisely neutralize dangerous elements capable of rallying forces around them, moreover, it is significant. You always have to work according to the godfather, because there is no leader - there is no pack. If we sweep away the leadership of the United States, our little hands are short, then I think we would be able to reach out to this petty-European vile, if desired.
From what has been written, we can agree with only one statement: Russia will not win the war against the Ukrainian people, because on the other side, exactly the same Russians are fighting, stubborn in defense and evil. But it was precisely the solution of this problem that our first publication on this topic was devoted to, how to transfer the format of the “Great Patriotic War-2” for Ukrainians back to the format of the Civil War and help the pro-Russian part of the Ukrainian people defeat the Nazi regime. Unfortunately, not everyone was able to understand this message correctly.
But what is difficult to agree with is the proposal to physically eliminate the "leaders". Firstly, President Putin himself does not agree with this, having issued a “safeguard certificate” to his colleague Zelensky. Secondly, what exactly will Zelensky's death change? Nothing, it will just be replaced by another person. It will even get worse, because propaganda will create the image of a martyr out of Zelensky. Undoubtedly.
Most of the ten points of "successful development of the country for the next 25 years" in the vision of our reader are also devoted to the physical elimination of Russia's enemies:
1. Physical elimination of key elements of anti-Russian activities in neighboring states.
7. Provocations and sabotage in the territories of Russia's enemies, so that they understand that there will be a response. They blew up our pipelines - your nuclear power plant will explode.
8. Physical destruction of identified Western agents in doubtful countries, including citizens of Western countries.
9. A clear demonstration of the possibility of physical elimination of decision makers in the West.
7. Provocations and sabotage in the territories of Russia's enemies, so that they understand that there will be a response. They blew up our pipelines - your nuclear power plant will explode.
8. Physical destruction of identified Western agents in doubtful countries, including citizens of Western countries.
9. A clear demonstration of the possibility of physical elimination of decision makers in the West.
In other words, the Russian special services are being asked to behave in the style of the Israeli Mossad, which, like Jupiter, is allowed more than a bull. That's just the question that the Russian "elites" may receive a "response" for some reason is not touched upon in this strategy. Do you think that Daria Dugina was demonstratively brutally murdered just like that?
Also a lot of attention in this "development plan" is given to the problem of migration:
5. Deprivation of freedom and the right to work in state bodies of persons responsible for the influx of illegal migrants.
6. Expulsion from Russia of all migrants who have committed the slightest violation of the laws of the Russian Federation with a ban on re-entry. After serving the appropriate punishment, of course.
10. Creation of conditions for population growth and high-quality education of state-forming peoples in order to exclude their replacement by foreigners.
6. Expulsion from Russia of all migrants who have committed the slightest violation of the laws of the Russian Federation with a ban on re-entry. After serving the appropriate punishment, of course.
10. Creation of conditions for population growth and high-quality education of state-forming peoples in order to exclude their replacement by foreigners.
Some unpleasant odor was drawn from this strategy. Somehow a bit too much xenophobia for an initially multinational, inherently imperial power. The only thing that the author of these lines can somehow agree with is the last three points:
2. Deprivation of benefits from cooperation with the West of internal anti-Russian elements, including the physical removal of corrupt officials.
3. The exclusion of the entire territory of Ukraine from the influence of the West.
4. Limiting the withdrawal of capital, including by locating foreign production facilities in Russia (this is too difficult for you, but if you try hard, you will understand).
3. The exclusion of the entire territory of Ukraine from the influence of the West.
4. Limiting the withdrawal of capital, including by locating foreign production facilities in Russia (this is too difficult for you, but if you try hard, you will understand).
True, our reader should explain that the “physical elimination of corrupt officials” is possible only by a court verdict, provided that the moratorium on the death penalty is lifted. Otherwise, it will be a criminally punishable act, for the implementation of which the “liquidator” will eventually end up in a firing cellar or in a life sentence. It is also not entirely clear what kind of foreign production should be placed in Russia under Western sanctions.
In conclusion, I would like to say that the implementation of such a “country development plan”, if, of course, it can be called that, with the physical liquidations of foreign politicians and explosions of nuclear power plants, will make Russia not just a “rogue” country, but the same “mad dog” , which a much larger coalition of countries will gather to kill than the United States has now been able to unite because of the NWO in Ukraine. "Israel on the Volga" from the Russian Federation under the current leadership of the country and his style of government simply will not work, and this may not be so bad.
The United States is behind Israel, nobody is behind us. The only way to save Russia in the face of growing international isolation is the one that the USSR has already passed. You can go along it, starting with the gradual liberation and reformatting of post-war Ukraine with its inclusion in the Union State of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus.
Information