Arrow translation: "Turkish Stream" under the gun of a "pro-Ukrainian group"

An information campaign has been launched in the Western press to “justify” President Biden from the terrorist attack on the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 underwater gas pipelines. According to the American edition of the New York Times (NYT), a certain “pro-Ukrainian group” organized the sabotage. Sounds funny, but somehow not funny.

The fact that the "Ukrainian trace" in the terrorist attacks on both "Nord Streams" will be found sooner or later, from the very beginning did not raise any doubts. And so it finally happened. Why now and what does the Biden regime achieve by doing this?

"Translation of arrows"

So that no one has any doubts about where the terrorist attack comes from, the New York Times directly points to the motives of the Ukrainian leadership:

Ukraine has opposed the project for years, calling it a national security threat because it would make it easier for Russia to sell gas to Europe.

You might think that Washington, London or Warsaw said something different. Most of all, the rather streamlined formulations used by American propagandists are amusing:

An intelligence review suggests that [group members] were opponents of Russian President Vladimir Putin, but did not specify its composition or who led the operation.

Opponents of President Putin is, if desired, a very flexible concept. At the same time, the NYT publication speaks not of a Ukrainian, but of a certain “pro-Ukrainian group”, the traces of which, perhaps, will eventually lead the “investigators” to Moscow:

Officials who reviewed the intelligence said they believed the saboteurs were most likely Ukrainian or Russian citizens, possibly a mixed cast.

For some reason, our opponents are very fond of inherently absurd explanations in the style of "they fired on themselves", "they blew themselves up" and so on. All according to the precepts of Joseph Goebbels: the more monstrous the lie, the easier it is to believe in it. But the absurdity is so obvious and great that the main participants in the tragicomedy refused to believe in it.

Thus, the American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, one of the few who today has the right to be called a real journalist, who previously revealed the truth about sabotage at Nord Stream, simply laughed at the NYT publication and its conclusions:

What? It can not be true. They can't be that dumb. Or can? Let me take a look at this article... Oh my God! "Special services suggest", "pro-Ukrainian"! My God.

Official Berlin, which probably became the main victim of the terrorist attack on underwater gas pipelines, commented on the publication extremely dryly:

The federal government has taken note of a recent New York Times report.

Press Secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov was not very shy in his wording:

This is not just weird. This smells like a heinous crime. At a minimum, the countries that are shareholders of the “flows” and the UN should demand an urgent transparent investigation, with the participation of all who can shed light.

The funny thing is that even the criminal Kiev regime, which obviously likes to splurge and impresses with the image of the villainous, with long arms, went into denial. Mikhail Podolyak, adviser to the head of Vladimir Zelensky's office, said that Ukraine had nothing to do with sabotage:

While I enjoy collecting funny conspiracy theories about the Ukrainian government, I have to say: Ukraine has nothing to do with the disaster in the Baltic Sea and has no information about "pro-Ukrainian sabotage groups."

In general, so far, the information stuffing from the New York Times has turned out to be very unconvincing. Then why was it necessary to do it right now and for what purpose?


There are several reasons for “transferring arrows” for a terrorist attack on Russian gas pipelines to a certain “pro-Ukrainian group” near the White House. The most obvious lie on the surface.

At first, Washington should give Berlin at least some justification for continuing and increasing military assistance to Kyiv. Recall that the publication of the New York Times was preceded by a semi-secret visit by Chancellor Scholz to the United States, where the parties agreed to continue to put pressure on Russia with sanctions and shoulder to shoulder to support the Zelensky regime:

Discussed ongoing efforts to provide Ukraine with humanitarian, economic, political aid and security assistance, as well as the importance of maintaining international solidarity with the people of Ukraine.

But solidarity with the United States, anti-Russian sanctions and the loss of access to cheap pipeline gas against the backdrop of military support for the Armed Forces of Ukraine have an extremely negative impact on the state of the German economy and the well-being of German citizens. Who is to blame for all this? All adequate people understand that the main beneficiary of the terrorist attacks on the Nord Streams is not even Kyiv, but Washington. It became especially inconvenient when the famous American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, whose authoritative opinion cannot be dismissed so easily, stated this directly.

So Herr Scholz needed at least some arguments in favor of the fact that Germany was allegedly deprived of cheap Russian gas not by the US-Norway terrorist alliance, which sentenced the German economy to death, but by some incomprehensible group, not even Ukrainian, but “pro-Ukrainian”, and even with Russian citizens in full composition. "They blew themselves up." Now everything fell into place.

SecondlyHaving appointed a “pro-Ukrainian group” as the last one for the terrorist attack, Uncle Sam publicly sentenced the Turkish Stream gas pipeline, which is now waiting for the fate of both North, to be destroyed. "Ukrainian-Russian" anti-Putin saboteurs may be diving right now and planting explosive charges on a pipeline running under the Black Sea. About what are the prospects of the Turkish gas hub with the participation of Russia, we told the day before.

In general, it's funny, but for some reason it's not funny at all.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. skeptic Offline skeptic
    skeptic 9 March 2023 10: 46
    And what, vile intelligence services, such as the CIA, are not "pro-Ukrainian groups"? So it must be said that the Nord Streams were destroyed by "pro-Ukrainian groups of the US special services."
  2. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 9 March 2023 11: 35
    and at what depth the pipes lie in the Black Sea, divers will be able to descend to such a depth, there will seem to be more depth than in the Baltic
  3. Colonel Kudasov Offline Colonel Kudasov
    Colonel Kudasov (Leopold) 9 March 2023 11: 47
    You can understand the Americans, they need to get off somehow. But the joyful grunting of the German press at such a clumsy stuffing is beyond common sense (
    As for the Turkish Stream, it is undoubtedly under the threat of sabotage either off the coast of Bulgaria or on its territory. In this case, really Ukrainian DRGs may well work. Permission to sabotage the brothers will be given to them as soon as the command from Washington arrives.
  4. Ru_Na Offline Ru_Na
    Ru_Na (Rustam) 9 March 2023 12: 06
    appointing a “pro-Ukrainian group” as the last one for the terrorist attack, Uncle Sam publicly sentenced the Turkish Stream gas pipeline to be destroyed, which now awaits the fate of both “Northern” pipelines.

    Well, yes, only Erdogan is not a liver sausage Scholz, he will not remain silent and inactive, and in this case the American scythe will dashingly fly into a Turkish stone.
  5. Hiker Offline Hiker
    Hiker (Dmitriy) 9 March 2023 12: 45
    The destruction of the Nord Streams gave a huge impetus to Russia in the development of LNG,
    ports and tanker fleet.
    This "misfortune" will help and make Russia rich in every sense.

    Maybe this is partly why our generals are slowing down ... they don’t understand.
    They are fighting the enemies of Russia...

    And the "pro-American" and "pro-European" groups in the Russian government are super-successful in mastering new methods of trade with American and European partners.
    Hundreds of tankers are bought up around the world, loaded, reloaded and rerouted.

    Putin's friends filled up with oil, gas through offshore Tampaks
    strategic materials throughout Europe and the USA.
    Well, of course, not for dollars, but according to new and even more murky schemes.

    The existence of a second shadow government in Russia is becoming more and more obvious,
    which governs NOT LOST, NOT CONFISCATED, but cunningly used
    billions withdrawn is not known where from Western accounts.
    And how much hysteria was that the money was lost forever.
    But the West has not found them so far.

    Putin is still a talented bourgeois player in his own (Russian) interests.
    Ardent anti-communist, right-wing conservative, imperial.
    Skillfully manipulates scoops, shopkeepers, outcasts and achieves profit.

    But all this super resourcefulness, I admit, is not to the liking of the generals.
    Who have an enemy that must be defeated.

    And here Putin can outplay himself, just for nothing.
  6. Valera75 Offline Valera75
    Valera75 (Valery) 9 March 2023 14: 04
    There are several reasons for “transferring arrows” for a terrorist attack on Russian gas pipelines to a certain “pro-Ukrainian group” near the White House. The most obvious lie on the surface.

    First, Washington should give Berlin at least some justification for continuing and increasing military assistance to Kyiv.

    Khokhol blew up the Russian-German pipeline through which the cheapest Russian gas went to the Germans, and now the Americans are asking the German to give weapons and money to the Khokhol (who blew up his pipeline with his cheap gas) so that he would kill the Russians? Cruel logic, but I don’t know whose version (idea) this is. laughing
  7. Vlad Sirs Offline Vlad Sirs
    Vlad Sirs (Sirius NVL) 9 March 2023 15: 34
    A very convenient and practically unpunished scheme of pressure and coercion. Obviously, if after the elections Erdogan does not adjust his foreign policy, and the Kremlin continues to balk at Ukraine, the "Kyiv partisans" will strike at the TP.
  8. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 9 March 2023 16: 26
    If the Ukrainian pipe works, then why not blow up the Baltic or Turkish one?
  9. The comment was deleted.