The attack on the Bryansk region requires the creation of a security belt and territorial defense troops of the Russian Federation

16
The attack on the Bryansk region requires the creation of a security belt and territorial defense troops of the Russian Federation

The terrorist attack on the Bryansk region, committed by Nazi militants on March 2, 2023, showed that the confrontation between Russia and Ukraine has moved to a fundamentally new level. Now, not only attack helicopters and kamikaze drones of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, their mines and artillery shells can fly into our territory, but also enemy armed groups can enter, not limited to sabotage alone. The question is what to do with all this?

Two days ago, a group of militants, consisting of Ukrainian and Russian Nazis, crossed the Russian border and attacked two villages in the Bryansk region, killing and injuring several civilians in the process. Having posed against the backdrop of the captured administrative buildings and made a number of radical political statements, the terrorists have returned home. Somewhat earlier, Ukrainian drones, with varying degrees of success, attacked critical infrastructure in the Russian deep rear.



The most deplorable conclusion can be drawn from what happened: our border is not locked. The enemy is well aware of this and has demonstrated in which direction events will develop further. The forecast so far is disappointing - Ukrainian terror against Russia and its population will only increase. And this challenge requires appropriate tough decisions.

Territorial Defense


It is quite obvious that the vast length of the Russian-Ukrainian border is practically impossible to securely close. Even being equipped according to all the rules, the border is not something insurmountable for a well-trained, equipped and armed sabotage group based on the reconnaissance power of the North Atlantic Alliance. This was actually directly stated by the neo-Nazi Denis Kapustin (Nikitin), who led the attack on the Bryansk region:

Yes, of course, this action was agreed, otherwise it could not have happened. How do you imagine that I went through the darkness of the night there? There are mined bridges, cameras, heat-seeking drones, hidden and open observation posts. If I had not agreed with anyone ... I think we would have simply been destroyed.

In other words, if the goal is set to penetrate our territory, the militants will most likely penetrate there. The question is how to respond to it. Unfortunately, you can't put a border guard for every 10 meters. You can’t attach a National Guard officer to every infrastructure facility, there simply aren’t so many of them. This means only one thing: the protection of their cities and towns must be undertaken by the locals themselves. What is meant in this case is not the self-defense units created by the governors, who were even afraid to give out firearms. You understand, there will be zero sense from such vigilantes in a collision with the DRG. Is it possible to whistle the whistle, raising the alarm.

It is necessary to create a new type of troops in the RF Armed Forces - Territorial Defense, the need for which has become obvious even last spring. This should be light infantry, equipped with automatic weapons, subordinate, of course, not to the governors, but to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. TerO should be completed from among local residents, preferably from those who have already served and are in the reserve. If desired, men over 50 years old, who are not taken into the army by age, could go there.

The tasks of the Territorial Defense Troops include the protection of significant objects, the fight against enemy DRGs, the strengthening of the protection of sections of the border, and the performance of certain tasks together with the RF Armed Forces. Its fighters must have contact with the headquarters, transmit information about possible violators to the relevant departments, and promptly respond to them themselves. With well-organized work, TerO could have tied up Ukrainian saboteurs in battle, frustrating all their plans.

Safety belt


Terodefense could significantly increase the security of the Russian border regions, making them a more difficult target for the DRG. However, the prevention of such sabotage raids will be even more important. In order to make it as difficult as possible for the enemy to implement them, it is necessary to create a security belt along our borders on the territory of Ukraine.

Yes, it is necessary to push the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine as far as possible, creating an analogue of the Turkish buffer zone in northern Syria. I remember that during his address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on February 21, 2023, President Putin threatened to do something similar:

But one circumstance should be clear to everyone: the more long-range Western systems will come to Ukraine, the further we will be forced to move the threat away from our borders. It `s naturally.

The other day, Russia was attacked by Ukrainian UAVs, now - DRG. The Kiev regime has crossed a certain line, after which it simply must be thrown back from the Russian borders, preferably to the Dnieper. At a minimum, Kharkiv, Sumy and Chernihiv with the settlements adjacent to them should be included in the security belt near our country. In these territories, it will also be necessary to ensure law and order, which the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the Russian Guard will have to do.

Thus, the national security of the Russian Federation requires the creation of a layered defense system, both in our border regions and in adjacent ones at the expense of the former Square.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +3
    4 March 2023 15: 56
    Maybe it's easier to move the border by 100 kilometers? After all, our command at one time made a brilliant maneuver to give back previously liberated territories? And just because of this, such antics became possible? Wouldn't it be better to reconsider this decision?
    1. +1
      4 March 2023 19: 24
      Then no one expected a blow. That is why we managed to reach Gostomel. Now the situation is reversed - no one expects an attack on Bryansk. And if it happened, it would take no more than 5-7 hours to fight in the Sheremetyevo area.
      1. +3
        5 March 2023 10: 57
        Daria Dugin was blown up in the Moscow region.
        Where is the Moscow and Moscow region terrorist defense?
        Give weapons to the people!
        And who will give it?
        That's all about the terrorist defense, you can disagree.
  3. +4
    4 March 2023 16: 56
    The belt must be built from Belarus to the Black Sea. Then there will be a sense. And so it is in the sense of a virginity belt that anyone can take off. Otherwise, a year or two and no one will prove anything to the local population. And the Americans will not give up Ukraine just like that. Only in the form of ruins and ashes.
    1. +3
      5 March 2023 01: 20
      Or maybe build a fence 3 meters high from Belarus to the Black Sea? This is where the Rotenberg brothers will roam! A buffer zone of 100 km is beyond our power, this is a task for 50 years, but the budget for a fence can be met in a couple of years. Our sawmills are the best sawmills in the world...
  4. +4
    4 March 2023 18: 36
    Why territorial defense? For these purposes, we have border troops? So you need to additionally call in the border troops of people. Give them the right weapons. How else? Breed partisanship and violate the law on weapons.
  5. +4
    4 March 2023 18: 53
    Yes, everything will be as before, the borderlands are shelled every day, and that unless someone even lifted a finger
    1. -3
      5 March 2023 10: 37
      The answer flies instantly
    2. -1
      5 March 2023 11: 17
      Quote: rotkiv04
      Yes, everything will be as before, the borderlands are shelled every day, and that unless someone even lifted a finger

      What do you offer: 40 km. Move people out? This cannot be done in one day: completely transferring production, building housing, and where else they will "cut down" more money.
      There are documents that evacuated enterprises to an open field and did not think about people.
      If the authorized GKO was sensible and enterprises and people did not find themselves in an open field, but now just give me the opportunity, do you know how much they will plunder on the ground?
      Even if everything is honest on the ground (which is doubtful), but how can cities be transferred?
  6. +4
    4 March 2023 19: 02
    The population was talking about evacuation, a security belt and weapons from the age of 14, and from the 22nd.
    As long as the movement is minimal.
    It is also necessary to work, to allocate money for resettlement, for the creation of jobs .... Who cares.
    It is much more convenient to optimize money and take a nap on the message ...

    And the population ... But who will remember him? Look, in Chechnya it is still unclear how many children, civilians, military, militants died ... All services have their own numbers.
    Tajiks will still be brought in (mentioned in the media many times). and the rest - hold on ..
  7. 0
    5 March 2023 09: 02
    What a chastity belt... Just not fascist Ukraine... Otherwise, everything is as always... And if you can't leave...
  8. +1
    5 March 2023 10: 24
    The author, I agree with you: "we need parts of territorial defense" - 100%
    Similar parts existed and exist in many countries of the world. But they are subordinate to local governors and the Ministry of Internal Affairs
    Recall that the experience of RI: the governor could call: Cossacks, form a territorial militia. Similar parts to interact with the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Minister of War
    Let's take the period after the Civil War, when it was impossible to breathe from bandits of various stripes, they formed CHON detachments, they obeyed the local provincial committees.
    WWII, following the example of the CHON, extermination battalions were created from pre-conscription youth and older people, the head of the district NKVD, the pre-district executive committee, could raise the "hawks" on alarm. These "hawks" acted jointly with the NKVD or NPOs.
    In Israel, almost every enterprise has self-defense units.
    If such parts are "closed" to MO - clerical work. Until the duty officer gets through, until the coordination and etc. Too bulky structure.
    According to the Israeli principle or according to the principle of "hawks" is more practical
  9. 0
    5 March 2023 10: 52
    Quote: Alexey Lan
    Why territorial defense? For these purposes, we have border troops? So you need to additionally call in the border troops of people. Give them the right weapons. How else? Breed partisanship and violate the law on weapons.

    Have you forgotten how much you rushed from partial mobilization: Georgia, Kazakhstan?
    An example from my village: in the spring of last year, a 19-year-old girl, a nurse, covered the wounded with herself, from mines. They talked about her on TV.
    When the partial started, her brother, aged 25, was a boxing graduate. He rushed to Kazakhstan and dad had "heel inflammation"
    But to issue weapons to the population, that would be good. But as in 1961, weapons were banned in this way as well.
    PS. There were advances, but what kind of mothers and liberals raised. Do not give weapons!
    And to think, okay: the weapon was completely taken away, but what will prevent the psycho from taking a knife and going to school?
    1. -2
      6 March 2023 13: 10
      They rushed from mobilization abroad, mainly those who came in large numbers, and not the indigenous population of the Russian Federation ... They left, they didn’t let them go back, to deprive them of citizenship of the Russian Federation and property in the Russian Federation ... it would not be customary for others ... army of the Russian Federation, and in a hot spot ... and not for beautiful eyes, then there will be fewer runners ... whose entire attitude towards the Russian Federation is exclusively parasitic ... Make dual citizenship in the Russian Federation illegal ... The motherland, like the mother, should be one who does not like it, let them get out of the Russian Federation for good and never appear here again ...
  10. 0
    6 March 2023 13: 05
    The border in the first echelon is covered by frontier posts, in the second echelon by frontier detachments (regiments of border guards) ... If the border has turned into a passage yard, the commanders of the frontier outpost and the frontier detachment, at least, should be demoted to the rank and file and dismissed from the civil service with a wolf ticket ... The border command service of the Russian Federation in the Bryansk region and their Moscow bosses should be severely reprimanded ...
  11. +1
    7 March 2023 07: 48
    The attack on the Bryansk region requires the creation of a security belt and territorial defense troops of the Russian Federation

    but before that it was impossible to figure it out - they thought for a whole year, and only now they came up with it. A fried rooster pecked in the ass.