START Suspension Will Allow Russia to Arm Burevestnik

February 21 2023 17

On February 21, Russian President Vladimir Putin, during the announcement of the message to the Federal Assembly, announced the temporary suspension of Russia's participation in the START-3 treaty. The head of state stressed that Moscow is not withdrawing from START, but only stops its participation, as some want to inflict a strategic defeat on the Russian Federation and climb on Russian nuclear facilities.

The Russian leader also pointed out that if the United States goes to test nuclear weapons, the Russian Defense Ministry and Rosatom should be ready for similar actions. In addition, the Russian Federation wants to understand how exactly the total nuclear arsenal of NATO countries will be taken into account, because the said agreement was signed between Moscow and Washington and does not affect others.

It should be noted that after Russia began the NWO in Ukraine, the collective West demonstrated to Moscow the full range of its “partnership”, from sanctions to the supply of weapons to Kyiv. Therefore, the suspension of Russia's participation in the START will allow for a qualitative rearmament of nuclear forces, increase the country's defense capability and influence further arguments of insolent Russophobes about the dismemberment of Russia.

Moscow will be able to put into service many types of long-range nuclear warheads. For example, the Soviet Kh-102 air-to-ground strategic cruise missiles with thermonuclear warheads, which have been collecting dust in arsenals for several decades. Nuclear warhead missiles for the Iskander OTRK, as well as sea-based hypersonic Kinzhals and sea-based Zircons, will be put into service. Do not forget about the underwater "Poseidons".

Moreover, Russia will be able to carry out full-fledged tests, establish production and deliveries to the troops of a promising ground-based intercontinental subsonic cruise missile of unlimited (global) range Burevestnik. Work on the missile began after the US withdrew from the 2001 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 1972. The missile will be equipped with a nuclear power plant and carry a thermonuclear warhead. Thus, the RF Armed Forces will be equipped with extremely useful ammunition for the country's defense capability, including those capable of unexpectedly hitting the territory of American "partners" from any direction.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Irek

+6

21 February 2023 17: 58
He knows what to do...
Constantine N

-8

21 February 2023 19: 08

Probably the United States plans to destroy strategic nuclear weapons even before takeoff, so they reacted quite calmly to the suspension of START-3.
1. Vladimir Tuzakov
  
  +3
  
  21 February 2023 19: 45
  
  With the development of nuclear weapons carriers, there can be no guarantees .. The reaction will be later, now the NATO members are thinking how to react and what to do next.
blackcat190463

+5

21 February 2023 19: 45

Quote from Constantin N.
Probably the United States plans to destroy strategic nuclear weapons even before takeoff, so they reacted quite calmly to the suspension of START-3.

Hope dies last
Sergey Latyshev

-7

21 February 2023 19: 56

Taki Garant again scares nuclear weapons. Claims about a dirty bomb and nuclear weapons in Ukraine did not work, I decided to "suspend".

Alas, nothing concrete, the flow of water, but the nerves will shake everyone.
Vox_Populi

0

21 February 2023 20: 02

Russia will be able to conduct full-fledged tests, establish production and deliveries to the troops of a promising ground-based intercontinental subsonic cruise missile of unlimited (global) range Burevestnik. Work on the missile began after the US withdrew from the 2001 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 1972. The missile will be equipped with a nuclear power plant and carry a thermonuclear warhead. Thus, the equipment of the RF Armed Forces will be extremely useful for the country's defense capability of ammunition, including those capable of unexpectedly hitting the territory of American "partners" from any direction.

To assert this, you need to be sure that there are no problems with this rocket (and there are some) ...
1. Anatoly Mikhailenko
  
  0
  
  23 February 2023 18: 19
  
  The key word in the quote is "will". And how many years will pass - we'll see.
Zenn

+3

21 February 2023 21: 42

The author, consciously or unknowingly, singled out only the issue of carriers, missiles for various purposes. The main question is the number of warheads and the ability to increase their production, or at least maintain the number. It is connected with the fact that, after a certain time, for simplicity, let's say 20 years, a nuclear warhead is subject to processing. In this area, the United States simply lost its competence, existing production facilities and personnel, among which 40% are 70-80 year olds. And it is almost impossible to attract American youth to work with nuclear materials. As a result, the number of nuclear warheads in the US arsenals has been declining over the past two decades. And not because the United States is for a nuclear-free world, but simply there is no way to even maintain the current number of nuclear warheads. Putin chose a very painful option for the US.
1. legal
  
  0
  
  22 February 2023 22: 31
  
  I was thinking that the Tactical Nuclear Device installed on Burevesnik is actually becoming a strategic one. Yes, and installed on the Zircon on a submarine near the mouth of the Tokamak, too. Charges do not need to be done .... The contract should have been liquidated, which, in general, has been done.
  And now we follow the handles: with a slight movement of the hand, tactical nuclear weapons turn into strategic nuclear weapons.
  1. Anatoly Mikhailenko
    
    +1
    
    23 February 2023 18: 17
    
    Wow - in our time, "great" geographical discoveries are being made: "the mouth of the Tokamak". Or maybe the Potomac (with the accent on the second syllable, by the way)? But then there will be no "discovery".
2. Boa kaa
  
  +1
  
  23 February 2023 13: 49
  
  Quote: Dzenn
  after a certain time has elapsed, let's say 20 years for simplicity, the nuclear warhead must be recycled.
  
  For especially "large" specialists in the field of SBP:
  A nuclear warhead is not "recycled" but re-equipped, while only fissile charge elements and automation are subject to revision. But the degradation of lithium deuterite has a number of features ... Therefore, this mainly concerns tactical nuclear weapons and those strategic nuclear weapons with their plutonium triggers that have crossed the equator of their lives in one body ... But there are also planned works on products when combat equipment is undocked and they are changing for new BBs ... Therefore, Mayak will not be left without work, but the Yankees can change 40 products a year at most ... They have degraded, however!
Tom Gillan

+1

22 February 2023 03: 43

Can we bang? ...
1. Vitaly 314
  
  +3
  
  22 February 2023 08: 29
  
  We'll definitely bang. And not just once.
Alexbf109

0

22 February 2023 09: 43

True step! From the supply of weapons to Bandera, this "collective West" can only be stopped by a real threat of destruction!
If it does not work, then the following logical moves:
1. Tests of nuclear weapons on Novaya Zemlya.
2. Assistance to Iran in the creation of nuclear weapons (and to everyone else who wants! Even Mexico and Venezuela, with Paraguay). Stop playing by American rules, which are supposed to crush anyone, but they won't get anything for it!
3. Strike of nuclear weapons, in the west of Ukropostan, with the complete destruction of all routes for the supply of weapons! (At the same time, a series of high-altitude space explosions is needed. With the complete destruction of the entire space group of NATO and Starlinks, above the dill. At the same time, ground-based electronics and energy of the enemy will be partially damaged and destroyed).
And there is no need to inflate the "pink snot" here! They directly declare that they want to crush and do away with Russia! This will be a step-by-step, adequate answer! Let's see if "Madams and Monsieurs, Ladies and Gentlemen" are ready to die for the sake of the Bandera people!
VAHOKA

+1

22 February 2023 15: 03

It was necessary to suspend these agreements immediately after the delivery of the first T72 to Ukraine
vlad127490

-1

22 February 2023 15: 48

The words will allow, maybe it will be ..... , in 50 years it will definitely be. What is now and what is the ratio? What can we oppose to NATO if now NATO launches a nuclear strike on the Russian Federation? That's what we should be interested in first.
1. Boa kaa
  
  0
  
  23 February 2023 14: 06
  
  Quote: vlad127490
  What can we oppose to NATO if now NATO launches a nuclear strike on the Russian Federation?
  
  In NATO, only the US, France, WB have nuclear weapons. Which of them? In fact, apart from the United States, the rest of the "members" are terribly afraid of the "glazing" of Europe ... They perfectly understand this and in every possible way deny it ...
  At the expense of "oppose". We have 2 times more tactical nuclear weapons (minimum!) Than all low-powered ones from NATO ... And our delivery vehicles are not tactical aviation at all, which may not reach the boundary of solving the problem ... No one has yet intercepted daggers and other Zircons didn't learn. And they are well aware of it. Therefore, "we are ready to suffer and endure, if only not to sweat under the vigorous" sun "! (With)
  But the Yankees, those - yes ... We would like NATO mad dogs to bite Russia, or even better, Kasparov-Khodarkovsky started civil unrest with a shift in GDP. That, by the way, is served by the TROJAN HORSE, whose hooves were blown up by our own ...
  So, do not be sad, but rather get ready to "endure hardships and hardships" for the sake of defeating the enemy!