Bloomberg: The world war machine is running out of ammunition

3

As the Russian sting operation in Ukraine drags on, both sides are using more rounds than they can buy or produce, meaning that economy and manufacturing facilities become as important as troops. An analysis of the potentials of the parties is carried out by Bloomberg Business.

According to statistics, on average, opposing armies fire up to 30 shells at each other per day in Ukraine. That's over 000 a week, almost 200 million a month, not counting bullets, mines, hand grenades and other ammunition. Simply put, the world war machine is running out of ammunition, and quite quickly. And this becomes a problem, although potentially good for the cause of conflict resolution.



In this case, the experts of the publication believe, the issue of resources and their "depth" arises with particular obviousness - economic and political the interests underlying the conflict have now become the cause of its stalemate, an end in itself. Strategy, tactics, military actions, possible scenarios - everything fades into the background, because without connecting the reserves of the peaceful rear and ensuring an exorbitant appetite for war, it cannot be won. In this sense, nothing has changed in the centuries-old history of wars.

In fact, an arms race began in the world (which ended with such pathos three decades ago), the American and European military-industrial complex felt the possible benefits and prepared to receive billions in profits. Russia is also gradually transitioning to a military economy and increasing the production of weapons, Bloomberg experts say.

In other words, such production stress is a real test for the entire state system, even the Western one (NATO countries), even the Russian one. It tests the ability of the entire state machine to reorganize itself, to rein in the bureaucracy, to overcome the inertia of peacetime.

Now only time will tell which of the opponents, each of which has allies and helpers, will be able to adapt to the changed realities. It is not worth hoping that economic difficulties will lead to a diplomatic solution to the issue. The benefit of continuing hostilities is too great for the military-industrial complex, which has a lobby in high offices.
  • pxhere.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

3 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    17 February 2023 11: 29
    Almost the entire modern history for the mob (this is us, who are not in the know) is played out a show - a good-bad cop. For what? The stable existence of elites is possible only with a two-party system (as in the United States) or the so-called system of "checks and balances". Now this system (and before) is us and the West. As time shows, if there is no enemy or antagonist, the system (the world) quickly degrades. We (our elite) wanted to become part of the West, and the balance was disturbed - the USSR collapsed and the system lost stability. Now there are attempts to restore it and, as always, at our expense. We are being conditioned to see the West as a threat to our existence, but is it true? But isn't the big threat coming to us from our elite? Perestroika, the destruction of the USSR, Covid, NWO, etc., but aren't these links in the same chain? What would you like to die for? For Ukraine, Donbass, Moscow? Will the elite die for this? In general, you understand me.
    1. GIS
      +1
      17 February 2023 11: 53
      maybe stop posting the same thing. otherwise muddy thoughts evoke the true purpose of your stuffing. if you want to clarify the thief at all times, the people of Russia stood up to defend their fatherland, and it doesn’t matter whether he was satisfied with his elite (party nomenclature) or the boyars.
      so let's deal with our "elite" without you. and somehow you will sort it out with your
    2. 0
      17 February 2023 12: 18
      Dissatisfied with the "Russian elite"?
      Initially, the question is posed incorrectly. Let's not quote Brzezinski or any other Western politician about belonging to the "elite".

      How many millions (I'm not talking about billions) did Russian businessmen transfer to the country's defense fund?

      Your phrase

      But isn't the big threat coming to us from our elite?

      All right. This "elite" poses a huge threat. But this is not Russian, but Western elite. And the threat to Russia comes precisely from the West.

      Small clarification. What is an elite.

      Rigid and harsh laws, according to which the elite is created, are unchanged and eternal for all times and peoples. Bows can be replaced by guns, armor and swords by tanks and fighters, and these canons will not pass away forever and ever.

      The elite, if it wants to be powerful and strong, should not wallow in bliss and depravity. From a young age, aristocrats must get used to deprivation and self-restraint, despise luxury and love combat, being able to pass tests on the verge of human capabilities. Every day she must temper her spirit and body, confirming her title of the best part of the people, their leaders. This is how the Spartans raised their elite, teaching children to endure hunger and pain, cold and exhausting battles, to eat stale bread and, in general, the food of a warrior. For four hundred years Sparta was invincible. But as soon as this system of education broke down, the glorious state perished.

      Principle "the elite must be trained and lean" unshakable. What for the highlanders of the Caucasus, who sent their children to a harsh upbringing in other people's families, what for a state with nuclear warheads and a space fleet.

      So far, only Prigogine has been heard. Perhaps there are other people who do just as much. But today, only Prigozhin belongs to the Russian elite (in the exact sense of the word). The rest are not the elite of the country.