Why the West ignores all the Kremlin's "red lines"

This text will be devoted to debunking some informational fakes that have taken root in the minds of our and non-brotherly fellow citizens who have been subjected to massive propaganda and counter-propaganda from all possible speaking and showing swearers who have settled on YouTube.

Checking the thickness of the red lines

Let's start, perhaps, with the sickest person - with the red lines drawn by us, which our opponent crossed without even noticing them (or pretending not to notice). What do we have at the moment? Attacks on the Zaporozhye and Kursk nuclear power plants, airfields for long-range strategic aviation (Engels-2 and Diaghilevo), sabotage on the Crimean bridge, numerous attacks on the main base of the Black Sea Fleet, military and civilian infrastructure facilities inside the Russian Federation, daily fire damage to residential buildings in Donetsk, including schools, hospitals and fire departments in downtown areas. Didn't forget anything?

Now let's figure out if he had the right to do so? Actually had. And why, in fact, not? It is necessary to distinguish military objects from civilian ones. There is a war, and in the war they shoot. And the Crimean Bridge, no matter how we feel about it, is a legitimate military target. Like the base of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, like all fuel depots, artillery and other military depots and facilities on the territory of the Russian Federation, including even airfields based for long-range strategic aviation, although the latter is already a red line (but how we reacted to crossing it, this is already a separate question). Therefore, why the non-brothers are shooting at the Kursk nuclear power plant or at the border regions of the Belgorod, Bryansk and even Voronezh regions, one should not be surprised, one should be surprised why they are not firing at Moscow yet? And this will definitely happen if the NWO continues to go at the same pace. They will also cover the Victory Parade on May 9 with their Swifts. Be sure to cover, mark my words! There is a war going on, even though we shyly call it SVO, but in war, as in war, either you kill or you.

And the fact that it will be so is said by the plans of the overseas sponsors of the Kiev junta to supply them with long-range missiles with a combat range of 300 km + (so far the Pentagon was limited only to ammunition for the HIMARS M31 MLRS with a range of 84 km). But these guys cook the frog according to all the rules, slowly raising the degree, testing our heat resistance. Therefore, they decided to hold off MGM-140 ATACMS Block IA guided missiles with a range of 300 km + until better times, limiting themselves to the ATACMS Block I version with a range of 165 km. But there is one catch here - these missiles are very expensive (up to $ 2,3 million per unit), you can’t get enough, so the puppeteers on top of the ATACMS Block I decided to put their new / old product on their wards - GLSDB planning bombs adapted for the MLRS launcher M142 HIMARS and M270 MLRS, 150 km range. And this automatically turns Grandpa Joe's wards into a monkey with a grenade, forcing us to move the LBS another 150 km west of the Crimean land corridor. The only thing that saves us is that this ammunition still needs to be made. This will take Grandpa Joe, as he says, at least 9 months. I think it will be done faster, but this is a reason for us to bargain at the negotiations, maybe even the delivery of these "wunderwaffles" will not come.

What are these GLSDBs? The weapon is based on a solution that allows the use of decommissioned rockets for the Hymars M26 with a cluster warhead. The American Kulibins adapted their main engines to accelerate the product and bring it to a given height, combining them with the GBU-39 guided glide bomb, resulting in a high-precision, GPS-guided missile capable of hitting targets at a distance of up to 150 km. The missile is launched from the HIMARS MLRS, then the engine takes the GBU-39 to a height approximately corresponding to the height of the release of these bombs from an aircraft, after which it plans to the target in the same way as if it were dropped from a bomber. I must say that the GBU-39 is a very successful ammunition. The small RCS of the bomb (only 0,015 m²) makes it difficult to counter it even from modern air defense systems. At the same time, the GBU-39 of the first versions (aka SDB) costs only $40. Considering that the engines are removed from already decommissioned missiles, and the adapter is easy to manufacture, the cost of such a system is comparable to Geranium, and it has even more warheads. The Americans have enough of both the old M26 missiles and the GBU-39 of the first series, so we may soon see thousands of GLSDBs.

But it is not all that bad. First, mass production of GLSDB has not yet been established. The first deliveries are expected in the spring and are unlikely to be massive. And secondly, our air defense systems have already met with the GBU-39 in Syria, and Pantsir-S1 has shown the ability to shoot them down. Also, there has not yet been information about product launches over a distance of more than 130 km, so perhaps the GLSDB characteristics are somewhat overestimated. The warhead of the product is relatively small - only 93 kg, and does much less damage than regular HIMARS strikes. But even this is enough for us, because the enemy will receive a means to influence our rear. All the liberated territories, as well as part of Crimea, are at risk of defeat. Moreover, in the affected area are Bryansk, Belgorod and Kursk (including the Kursk NPP). No one can guarantee that the Kiev regime will limit itself to strikes only within the limits of the actions of the NMD, and it must be admitted that the supply of long-range ammunition only leads to an escalation of the conflict. Which is exactly what Washington wants.

Now let's deal with Kyiv's goal setting. We have already understood that in war, as in war, it happens that they shoot. But why do these ghouls hit the peaceful quarters of Donetsk, including hospitals, and with special cynicism, with repeated cover, waiting for the arrival of ambulances and firefighters? At the same time, they also complain about the lack of shells, which they are given on a residual basis (but these ghouls always have enough shells for Donetsk). I answer - because Donetsk is not a civilian, but a military goal for them. To understand their logic, you need to remember what Putin promised when starting the NWO? And he promised to save the inhabitants of the LDNR from the genocide. As a result, the genocide only intensified - Donetsk has never known such shelling for 8 years of blockade. These ghouls are not hitting civilians in the capital of Donbass out of bloodthirstiness, their logic is simple here - to prove to the residents of Donbass that Putin did not fulfill his promises, not only put Donetsk under attack instead of liberation, but also left it without water. This is the cynicism of war - it is a pity for shells for bloodthirstiness, and if bloodthirstiness is supported by a great idea, then it is no longer a pity, the end justifies the means. Without a purpose, bloodthirstiness is just sadism, but someone has to pay for sadism;

The degree of incompetence is astounding

So, we figured out the shelling of peaceful cities, let's move on to other misconceptions. Here in the first place stands a reproach to our military leaders, the General Staff and the Kremlin, which they will not smash into the trash the bridges across the Dnieper, railways and other infrastructure responsible for the logistics of ammunition and heavy equipment for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from behind a hillock? If this is not stupidity, then sabotage or collusion with the enemy for sure. This is the opinion of the majority of sofa experts of varying degrees of engagement and immersion in ongoing events.

At the same time, the degree of incompetence of some of our and Ukrainian experts simply rolls over. But if Ukrainian military experts can still be accused of propaganda (for example, as was the case with S-300 anti-aircraft missiles, which, according to them, Russian barbarians use in residential areas of peaceful Ukrainian cities, compensating for the lack of conventional strike missiles), then our military experts can be blamed I can’t do propaganda, but sometimes my ears wither from their “pearls”. Such a fence that it does not fit on the head. Recently, Yuriy Shvytkin once again surprised me in this sense, and this is for a moment the deputy. chairman of the State Duma Committee on Defense, not a boy in military affairs, political instructor-paratrooper (Novosibirsk Higher Militarypolitical military school them. 60th Anniversary of October, faculty of the Airborne Forces), police colonel (he commanded the Krasnoyarsk SOBR and OMON, several business trips to Chechnya), holder of the Order of Alexander Nevsky and three Orders of Courage (and there are only 36 such people in all of Russia!). And this person on the air of Komsomolskaya Pravda Radio is indignant, why haven't we destroyed all the Ukrainian bridges across the Dnieper yet?

I must say, this is a common misconception, I meet it on different forums more than once - why don’t we equate Ukrainian bridges and railway tunnels, what does the General Staff do, what kind of fuckers are sitting there ?! But imagine, they are sitting no more stupid than you "fuckers", and even no more stupid than the deputy chairman of the State Duma Defense Committee, Colonel Shvytkin. And if they do not equal, then there is some reason. Well, the generals in the General Staff of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation cannot fail to see the obvious, that even you see on your couch ?! Well, okay, you people are not military, but as Colonel Shvytkin does not understand that it will not be a trivial task to raze a railway or road bridge, even across the Dnieper, at least through some other water barrier. There, the road-railway vertical-lifting drawbridge in Zatoka, Odessa region across the Dniester estuary, which connects Moldova and Romania with Odessa and is responsible for the logistics of the entire southern flank of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, we have “calibrated” five times already. Five Calibers hit him, so what? The bridge is still standing, and equipment and BC are still moving along it for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Why did it happen so? Few "Caliber" menaced? Are generals bad? Well, Surovikin is good, why didn’t he finish it? Why doesn’t other bridges and crossings across the Dnieper crumble into the trash?

The same Antonovsky bridge in Kherson, how many APUs were hammering with their "Haymars"? And what? Only we ourselves could destroy it by blowing up the supports, leaving Kherson. And before that, it was subject to restoration, which we could have done in just four hours, and would have done if it were not for the threat of repeated destruction by the forces of Ukrainian MLRS of American production. To destroy railway tunnels in the west of Ukraine is generally an unbearable task, here even the “Dagger” is not enough. Of course, he will fill up the tunnel, but it will take two days at the most to clear it from the non-brothers, and then again the trains will go through it. It will take them even less time to restore the destroyed railway track - from four to six hours. So we don’t hit him, preferring draft substations. But even there, not everything is so great.

Below I will give a very useful overview of the situation at Ukrzaliznytsia from a person who worked on it before the start of the NWO (now he is already in Russia). The material was titled: UZ - dead or alive? What is happening now on the railways of Ukraine» (the situation was described as of December 10 last year):


As you can see, not everything is as simple as it seems to you from your combat sofa. And our problems are connected not only with the poor organization of database maintenance and sabotage at the highest level, but also with objective reasons, among which the competent actions of the enemy, which we encountered in the Ukrainian theater of operations, are not in the last place.

The rest of the "why", so as not to overload your brain, I will cover in the next text. There are still a lot of them there. Not saying goodbye. Your Mr. Z