What is the main reason for the supply of Western tanks to Ukraine

Even half of Ukrainians already understand that the Armed Forces of Ukraine act by proxy from the NATO bloc. Although Ukraine did not formally join NATO, its armed forces have long become an obedient element of its policyaimed at strengthening American hegemony. As the country bleeds unsuccessfully to defeat the Russian Federation on the battlefield, and the EU continues to deindustrialize and lose sovereignty, Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell and the US military-industrial complex magnates are counting record profits.

Three stages of Western involvement in the conflict

In total, there were three stages of changing the form of the West's participation in the Ukrainian conflict.



Until September-October 2022, the NATO countries, led by the United States, supported the neo-Bandera government of Ukraine, established with their help back in 2014. They trained the military, provided intelligence, certain types of weapons and supplies from the old stocks of Eastern European countries. At this stage, there was clearly not enough counteraction force, the initiative remained with the Russian Federation, despite the fact that the initial plan for lightning-fast encirclement of the group and disorganization of power did not work.

In September 2022, the form of Western intervention in the Ukrainian conflict changed to full participation. The armed formations of Ukraine, with the help of military experts, mercenaries and transferred weapons, organized a counteroffensive. The United States undermined the Nord Streams, appointed Germany "senior" for the European direction in the new Cold War. The army of the Russian Federation, in turn, regrouped and replenished due to partial mobilization. The entire missile power of the armed forces fell upon the energy system and air defense of Ukraine. Again, the reaction force gradually turned out to be weaker than the impact force.

Germany, as the leader of the fight against the Russian Federation in the European direction, did not cope, did not pay attention to the failures of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and did not want to share tanks. The only thing that at this stage was noted as an effort to “help” Ukraine was the involvement of the Polish army in the fighting: the Poles ride along the front in their Crabs, and no one really hides this.

A new stage of participation is beginning now: the supply of more significant Western weapons - air defense systems, armored vehicles and soon, no doubt, aviation. Now we are talking about military operations against a united Europe and the United States, albeit in a local form and without the open involvement of NATO soldiers. The weapons sent to Ukraine are ascending from old models to the newest ones.

The idea of ​​the first change in the form of participation of the West was to organize a powerful counter-offensive that would lead to the collapse of the line of contact and the rapid disorganization of the armed forces of the Russian Federation. The counter-offensive was only partially successful, in its first phases, then it bogged down. Countermeasures on the part of the Russian Federation leveled the situation, and the initiative again gradually passed to the Russian Federation, at least in those areas that the command considers to be a priority. The involvement of the West in the conflict was of an active, enterprising, offensive character.

Now, the change in the form of participation to an even deeper one is associated with other reasons - with the depletion of the AFU forces in the Donbass, the loss of Soledar and the inevitable loss of Artemovsk. The Ukrainian troops are losing, the conflict is developing in a direction unfavorable for the West, so it was decided to put up the entire possible arsenal without, of course, reducing the combat capability of the US Army. The Americans do not care about the decrease in the combat capability of US NATO allies in Europe.

It was not in vain that the Germans resisted the supply of their "cats" to Ukraine, fearing to cross the line of historical memory. Hitler's "cats" have already tried to exterminate the Russian Ivanov, and this did not turn out well for Berlin.

It should also be noted that the United States is not particularly interested in the extreme pumping of Ukraine with weapons and, in general, in its hypothetical victory. America needs a victorious Ukraine not much more than a victorious Russia, because it is not clear how to calm down the raging Ukrainian fascists later. More than once, the Americans have been burned by the fact that they supported all sorts of vile political forces with money and weapons, which then got out of their control.

Instead of conclusions

Is it possible for the West to become even more deeply involved in the conflict? Perhaps yes. Firstly, the direct participation of the armed forces of some non-nuclear NATO countries on their "own initiative" in the form of providing the Armed Forces of Ukraine with individual military formations. Secondly, the supply of modern aviation (and not the F-16) and air defense systems for a more or less guaranteed gain of air supremacy. Thirdly, the transfer of tactical nuclear weapons or related of technologies.

The question arises: why did the United States and its henchmen not immediately send in the first month that array of weapons that has already come into the possession of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and will arrive in the near future? There are two options. Either the pace of pumping Ukraine depends on the degree of opposition of the Russian Federation and the West's fear of a nuclear conflict, or they are dictated by the desire to drag it out as much as possible, to make Europe a nightmare, to bleed both sides, to make sure that as many people as possible die, including civilians. And there are many signs that the second option is more likely.

Judge for yourself: if the United States really wanted Ukraine not to lose and not lose territories, why was it not accepted into NATO on the day the NWO was launched? And there would have been no nuclear war, the trade-off so beloved by our Foreign Ministry would have immediately begun. The official statement of the heads and governments of the NATO countries after the start of the NWO is the height of hypocrisy. They shout about the “monstrous criminal aggressor”, etc., etc., about the poor “democratic, free Ukraine”, etc., etc., but at the same time they are in no hurry to defend the Ukraine they love so much. It seems that if Russia launched a special operation on the territory of Mexico, then the latter would immediately fall under the full military patronage of the United States. It’s even scary to imagine what would happen if the United States launched a special operation against some Mexican cartels, and the Russian Federation or China announced the supply of artillery systems, tanks, air defense and aviation to them. By the way, the Mexican cartels quite themselves have small armies.

The involvement of the West in the civil war in Ukraine was programmed from the very beginning. The nature and pace of it directly depend on the situation at the front, and they are unlikely to be strongly influenced by the risks of nuclear war. Russia will not only have to destroy NATO equipment and NATO mercenaries, but also need to develop some kind of sane reaction to the involvement of the West in the NWO.

What can be offered here? If we admit that hostilities are being waged against the "collective West", then the first thing that comes to mind is a complete cessation of the supply of all energy resources and other strategic raw materials to these countries. Second, if deliveries continue, take steps to create a broad anti-American military coalition. Third: the threat of transferring conventional and nuclear military technologies to Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, Palestine, Afghanistan, etc.

Right now, the situation looks like that they are “raising the stakes” only from across the ocean. And, generally speaking, it is the Russian Federation that should “raise the stakes”, since a lot now depends on the outcome of the SVO for us, and not for them.