The magic of numbers: why a united Europe is again at war with Russia

Recently, quite a few publications have begun to appear in which their authors thoughtfully discuss why Russia should under no circumstances use nuclear weapons, because this will immediately make our country a world pariah. Allegedly, then all the countries that are just sleeping and seeing how to escape from the obsessive tutelage of Uncle Sam will turn their backs on the Kremlin, which is possible only if the Kremlin wins in Ukraine and the authority of the “hegemon” as the world gendarme and issuer of the dollar falls. Is it really?

Substitution

As a rule, all talk about the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons takes place in the context of the NMD in Ukraine, and nothing else. Some suggest hitting tactical nuclear weapons on railway bridges across the Dnieper in order to stop the possibility of transferring reinforcements of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the Right Bank to the Left Bank.



Ukrainian bridges are indeed a very difficult target, since they were built under the USSR with a large margin of safety. As a good example of the practice of destroying transport infrastructure, rocket strikes by the Armed Forces of Ukraine by the American HIMARS MLRS are usually cited, which, as claimed, turned the roadbed of the Antonovsky bridge into a kind of sieve, making it impossible to further supply the Russian Armed Forces in Kherson. There is just one caveat.

Let's remember exactly how the withdrawal of Russian troops from the right bank of the Dnieper was carried out, and the RIA report will help us with this. News:


Agency reporter рассказалthat the output of the caterpillar equipment was carried out at night along a pontoon crossing, but wheeled vehicles passed along the Antonovsky bridge. The same one riddled for many months by MLRS HIMARS. So it goes. The capital destruction of the Antonovsky bridge occurred after the withdrawal of our group due to the actions of our sappers-bombers.

Other authors and commentators, in all seriousness, propose to strike tactical nuclear weapons in Western Ukraine, in particular in Lvov, by creating a radiation "sanitary barrier" along the border with Poland. I do not want to comment seriously on such frankly cannibalistic plans. But their authors should take into account that after this, Russia will indeed become a pariah country without any quotes.

What is frustrating in this is that there is a constant substitution of concepts. If anyone really needs to use nuclear weapons, then not against Ukraine, which itself is a hostage of the situation and a victim, but against “Western partners”, and not tactical nuclear weapons, but strategic nuclear weapons. Unfortunately, this conversation is so far pointless, because President Putin, according to former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett, promised the war criminal Zelensky immunity during the NWO. Where can we fantasize about nuclear strikes on Washington, London, or at least on the Russophobic Young Europeans from Eastern Europe?

Therefore, all our publications on the topic of SVR are devoted to treating the symptoms of the disease, but not its cause. What to do, we proceed from objective realities, and do not invent endlessly all sorts of geopolitical "chess games", which not only everyone is able to understand.

Magic numbers

The second question that I would like to discuss in more detail concerns the myth that there, in the collective West, there are supposedly some hidden pro-Russian forces that are just waiting for Russia to come and free them from the American yoke. Undoubtedly, there are normal, adequate people who do not need all this Ukraine with its Nazis and the prospect of being drawn into a war with a nuclear power for nothing. Unfortunately, everything is decided not by them, but by the ruling elites, among whom there is nothing pro-Russian.

For a better understanding of the subject of discussion, let's cite the example of the last chancellor of Germany, Olaf Scholz, who turned out to be a big "joker". If suddenly someone forgot, initially Berlin generally denied the possibility of transferring its tanks to Kyiv, but then nevertheless agreed to supply 14 modern Leopard 2 tanks, and then another 88 more ancient Leopard 1 tanks. What is wrong with these numbers?

And here's what. As the first number, supporters of the ideas of Nazism designate a quote from the infamous American white supremacist ideologue David Lane, which contains exactly that many words:


The value of the second number has at least three interpretations. According to the most famous, it encodes a quote from the leader of the Third Reich and the Nazi criminal Adolf Hitler from his book Mein Kampf, or My Struggle in Ukrainian:


The second interpretation also refers us to Hitler, because the letter "H" in the Latin alphabet takes the 8th place, which means Heil Hitler! ("Heil Hitler!"). Finally, the ideologist of the ideas of white Nazism, already mentioned above, David Lane once wrote "88 Precepts", or "88 commandments of Nazism."

Here is such a “joker”, but in fact the Nazi underdog heads the FRG today, and the Minister of Foreign Affairs of his government, Burbock, without any hesitation, says that a united Europe is again at war with Russia. And so we still supply them with gas, rare earth metals from China go through Russian territory to the EU for the production of armor-piercing shells that are supposed to kill our soldiers. And here some of us talk wisely about some kind of “chess games”. Let us recall that Comrade Stalin put an end to his “multi-move” in Berlin, refusing in principle to negotiate with a representative of the “master race”.

What formula is used to legalize the supply of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with increasingly heavy NATO-style weapons, and what does the Baltic states and other limitrophes have to do with it, whose opinion supposedly should not be heeded, we will talk in more detail in the future.