Nuclear threat will force Russia to liberate all of Ukraine

38

Since the beginning of 2023, President Putin has made several important statements regarding the goals and objectives of Russia in conducting a special operation in Ukraine. If we compare them with the formulations with which it all began on February 24, 2022, it becomes obvious that the SVO has long objectively moved to a fundamentally different level.

Historic territories?


Even during a meeting with veterans dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the breaking of the blockade of Leningrad, Vladimir Putin called the Donbass a historical territory of Russia:



In fact, full-scale hostilities in the Donbass have not stopped since 2014 - with the use of heavy equipment, artillery, tanks and aviation. <...> Everything we do today, including a special military operation, is an attempt to end the war. That's the point of our operation. And to protect our people who live in these territories. These are our historical territories.

Thus, he again repeated the NVO formula as a defense of Donbass, without mentioning, however, about the denazification and demilitarization of the rest of Ukraine. However, a few days later, at a meeting with students at the Sparrow Hills scientific and technological center of Moscow State University, President Putin spoke about the goals of the special operation in Ukraine in a much broader sense:

The goal, as I have said many times, is first of all the protection of people, and above all, the protection of Russia from the threats that they are trying to create in our own historical territories adjacent to us. We cannot allow this.

The threat to Russia's national security posed by border Ukraine has now been discussed at the level of the head of our state. A striking transformation of the position compared to how everything “successfully and rollickingly” began almost a year ago. With what it can be connected?

It seems that over the past year, the Kremlin has gone through all the main stages of accepting the impossibility of a small and victorious Ukraine - denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. At first, apparently, there was a real shock from the realization that the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, “reformed” by Serdyukov, could not immediately defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Because of this, Russian troops for some time to no avail trampled around Kyiv and Kharkov, suffering painful losses. Then there was a lengthy bargaining with Kyiv and the Turkish and "Western" partners behind them, to which Medinsky, Abramovich and other negotiators were sent. The Kremlin was most likely driven into depression by the large-scale counter-offensives of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which forced them to make decisions on the withdrawal of the RF Armed Forces from Kharkov, and then the Right-Bank part of the Kherson region.

In September 2022, obviously, it was accepted that it was necessary to record losses and draw some kind of line under the CBO. Then a partial mobilization was started and referendums were held on the accession of the DPR and LPR, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions to Russia. Apparently, it was decided to confine ourselves to a tit in the hands, liberating and holding only the Donbass and the Sea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbAzov, and agree on a certain status quo and further coexistence with the Kyiv regime and its puppeteers. The key problem of the transition to strategic defense was that the collective West staked on the military defeat of Russia and is not going to agree on anything with the Kremlin.

On the contrary, deliveries of heavy weapons to the Armed Forces of Ukraine have begun, which should recapture Crimea with their help, inflicting the heaviest militarypolitical defeat. German Foreign Minister Annalena Burbock publicly agreed that the EU countries "wage war against Russia, not against each other." As you can see, the Nazi underdogs in Germany waited in the wings and again raised their heads, dropping their masks. The world does not smell.

From first aid kits to tactical nuclear weapons


The fact that the liberation of the Donbass and the Azov region alone will not achieve the goals of the NWO declared by President Putin was made very clear by US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, who undertook to publicly discuss how Ukraine would be reorganized after the completion of the Russian NWO:

The Biden administration <...> has begun planning for a possible post-conflict balance that would help Kyiv contain any repeat of a brutal Russian invasion.

To "deter" the repeated NMD, the United States intends to provide Kyiv with heavy offensive weapons:

Maneuverable weapons are important not only to give Ukraine strength now to retake territory, but also as a deterrent against future Russian attacks. Maneuver is the future.

It is obvious that these "maneuverable weapons" will fit not only for defense, but also for the subsequent offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the new Russian regions of Donbass and the Sea of ​​\u2b\u16bAzov. The first heavy tanks "Abrams" and "Leopard-XNUMX" have already gone to Ukraine, now we are talking about the fourth-generation American fighter F-XNUMX. What's next? Tomahawks and tactical nuclear weapons?

Yes! Former US President Donald Trump wrote about this directly on the social network:

Tanks first, then nuclear bombs. End this crazy conflict now. It is so simple!

That is how it will be. In a year or two, domestic military experts, who are now promising to easily “snap” Abrams and Leopards and knock down F-16s, will say that Ukraine’s tactical nuclear strike on Russia is not so scary, and our air defense system / PRO will definitely intercept it. However, so far, the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile systems, located on the roofs of Moscow's administrative buildings, do not inspire much optimism.

It must be assumed that the realization of the impossibility of reaching an agreement with the "Western partners", except for their surrender, began to come to our nomenklatura. As long as the Nazi regime exists in Ukraine, there will be no peace and tranquility in Russia, as follows from President Putin's statement. The only question is which territories of the modern Independent Kremlin considers to be primordial Russians.
Nuclear threat will force Russia to liberate all of Ukraine

Draw a border along the Donetsk-Krivoy Rog People's Republic? But Odessa was not included in it, which is a pity. According to historical New Russia? And what about the epic Russian cities of Chernigov and Kyiv? Then remember the Pereyaslav Rada? Maybe we will roll back even further back in history to the Russian kingdom of Ivan the Third? Or will we count immediately from Rurik? The fact that it is necessary to liberate the entire territory of present-day Ukraine is beyond doubt. Tactical nuclear weapons in the future may well be used in Russia and from Galicia, which received the status of a quasi-state under the patronage of NATO. The main thing is that the Kremlin should have a clear understanding of what to do with all this stuff later.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    28 January 2023 11: 22
    All these dirty tricks are created by the organizer and beneficiary of this campaign - the United States and nuclear weapons are his.
    As long as he feels safe, he will naturally continue to do so and aggravate it. He has very little time left to draw us in Ukraine into a deadly war with NATO for us. Then much (if not all) will become irreversible for us.
    This war is beneficial for him not only by the destruction of Russia "by proxy", but also by the weakening of Europe in order to turn a potential geopolitical competitor into its industrial appendage. Our actions in Ukraine help him in this, and enrich his military-industrial complex.
    Let's open our eyes. The operation pursuing the goal of "protecting our people" so far only leads to their death and an increase in danger to the country from all sides, because it has nothing to do with it.
    The whole point is that we direct our efforts not at the enemy, but at the instruments of his evil will. Thus, we allow our main adversary (the "partner" of our government) SAFE AND SAFE TO CONTINUE THIS WAR until his complete victory over us
    1. +2
      29 January 2023 10: 55
      The problem is that we cannot do anything to the United States. Nothing. Except ... a massive preventive nuclear strike. Precisely a preventive one and nothing else
    2. +3
      29 January 2023 11: 40
      After all, it is elementary! The key word is "As long as he feels safe"! Only when we threaten the United States with a massive nuclear strike will this war end. And nothing else.
    3. -1
      29 January 2023 18: 57
      The Poseidons are somewhere nearby, they probably forgot about it ...
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. -1
    28 January 2023 13: 22
    In general, when everything goes wrong as promised from cozy places of power, there are always a lot of explanations ...

    Import substitution has failed, the population is declining, HIV and the Corona are growing, NWO has been growing for a year, the allies do not recognize anything, losses are unknown, money is flowing out of the country, which means ....

    it's all "Nuclear threat, chemical threat, missile threat, space threat, bacteriological, dirty bombs, selling for organs, spreading HIV, we are for world peace, but they do not understand, even the closest neighbors ....."
    1. 0
      29 January 2023 16: 00
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      Import substitution failed

      Yeah, we have everything imported, and without imports, all industry / transport / infrastructure stood up, the remnants of Russians wander in the dark and pull out the last hedgehogs from a friend ....

      Or is the picture slightly different?
      But the fact that it is different is just the result of the fact that a lot has been done in the economy. And in a drastically changed environment, the skippers of the Russian economy are looking for opportunities.

      But of course, 146% of localization has not been achieved, and such a goal is not set and was not set in view of its impossibility and irrationality.
  4. +1
    28 January 2023 15: 06
    The navel will be untied instead of the liberation of all of Ukraine. hi
    Remember? "There is no money, but you hold on!" ?

    To occupy the whole of Ukraine - it just needs HUGE funds, and then again 10 times more will be needed to restore all this. And we have no money. hi
    1. -1
      29 January 2023 15: 24
      Well, who said that Ukraine would be restored even in the event of an unrealistic complete capture / liberation? They will demolish and clean up what is destroyed, and this territory will exist with a new urban and demographic layout. There are sparsely populated territories in Russia itself, such as Tyva, Altai Territory, northern regions such as Arkhangelsk and Karelian, Tver region. Nobody seriously worries about them that they are sparsely populated and depressive, because there really is nothing to take from them. And the same Ukraine may well become such a large agricultural Krasnodar region, with a small population, except for Kyiv. The rest of the cities, through refugees in all directions and the dead already in the cities themselves, will be greatly reduced in population, but this will simply be a fact that does not require any special further actions. Some destroyed infrastructure, such as trams and trolleybuses, will simply be scrapped and will not be restored - again, in the Russian Federation itself, for example, there are whole million-plus people without electric transport - Voronezh. So it is with the energy infrastructure - they will be heated with coal, as in the same Krasnoyarsk, the private sector.
    2. -2
      29 January 2023 15: 46
      That's right! Walk, walk like that. Shoot, shoot like that.
    3. 0
      29 January 2023 17: 41
      Rainy who has it with us? Here we have it, but you don’t, so we work and we have it, and you beat your thumbs and you really don’t. Maybe you will already start working so that you will be?
    4. 0
      29 January 2023 20: 01
      Restore And also debts to the West, banks, etc. of this under-country, how do you like that?
  5. 0
    28 January 2023 15: 52
    Russia needs to test tactical nuclear weapons like air for a start at the test site. Firstly, to understand how nuclear weapons will work (they have not been tested for a long time), and secondly, to really raise the stakes. The reaction of the West will no doubt be very interesting.
    1. +4
      28 January 2023 18: 56
      there is nowhere to hit in Ukraine with tactical nuclear weapons. weapons and money from the west.
    2. -5
      28 January 2023 19: 20
      With the supply of more than 300 tanks and Western-made APU, and then aircraft, long-range missiles will go ... It looks like the time has come to hit a significant target on the border with Poland with tactical nuclear weapons to make it clear that all red lines have been violated and the edge has already come, and the next will be multiple nuclear strikes, including those against countries that are already directly at war in Ukraine (Poland, Lithuania, Estonia ...) Strategic forces with nuclear weapons are ready to hit the United States as well. Soft S. Shoigu and with an oligophrenic look Gerasimov should also show fangs, because they have not been afraid for a long time and are considered soft-bodied whipping boys.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  6. +2
    29 January 2023 00: 02
    liberate all Ukraine

    "to liberate" is not a relevant term for a long time, and even more so a task ...
    cleaning is the task...
  7. +4
    29 January 2023 00: 08
    The nuclear threat to the Russian Federation already exists. What keeps the "elite" of the Russian Federation from defeating Ukraine is fear for themselves, for their money, which is in the West, hope for, "maybe we can agree."
    1. -2
      29 January 2023 17: 35
      Vlad, do you and people like you want to think that Russia is ruled by a mythical elite with its money in the West? Yes, give me the lists of this elite, how long can you already ride on this dead donkey?
  8. -2
    29 January 2023 02: 12
    One and a half billion Europe "We can repeat" (c)
    2nd time "The Capture of Paris" (1814) consequences of the Decembrists and the revolution
    3rd time "Raid on Berlin" (1760, 1945) perestroika-color revolution

    nuclear threat will force Russia to liberate all of Outlying Europe

    Only who and to whom was threatened more often? Maybe this is a consequence of constant demonstrations?
    1. -1
      29 January 2023 17: 29
      Shuev, where did you count one and a half billion people in Europe, if 750 million live there, huh? AND...
      4th time trip to Europe - the end of Russia? Smart ass!
  9. 0
    29 January 2023 07: 19
    All statements are muddy, ambiguous. What about Red Rus, Transcarpathian? The question is always about the ratio of the number of personnel to the enemy. What is our advantage? If the approximate parity, it means prolonging the conflict.
  10. +1
    29 January 2023 08: 21
    If you don't want to, you will either become a philosopher or a strategist. For thirty years we have plunged into the world in which our opponents are located. Analytical intelligence should report to the leadership all the weak and strong points of the future enemy. There should be no small-town sentiments in the army. Everyone should obey the same leadership. In times of Covid, we saw that no one wants to take responsibility for fighting it. Neither health care, nor government. Everything was entrusted to the governors. And they are very different from the Soviet leaders in terms of organization. They didn’t even divorce the time to go to work. Oh, this is hard work...
    1. -1
      29 January 2023 18: 11
      unc-2 put forward your candidacy for governor and if the people choose you, show everyone your Soviet hardening, what's the problem?
  11. -2
    29 January 2023 10: 25
    Respect to the author for a good article, I read a long time ago that everyone’s beloved Serdyukov headed the Sukhoi Design Bureau and the MIG Design Bureau, if this is true, then I can’t imagine what kind of firewood this figure will break, who has a place on the bunk with confiscation, due to the fact that it comes to the use of nuclear charges by the West against us, and don’t go to the grandmother.
  12. 0
    29 January 2023 11: 42
    Only the complete destruction of the so-called state of Ukraine.
  13. -2
    29 January 2023 11: 51
    When exactly will Russia announce an ultimatum to NATO: either stop deliveries, or use tactical nuclear weapons. Most likely, such a forced ultimatum will have to be announced already in the spring - in March, April, May, since bridges are not being destroyed now, a second mobilization won has not been announced, and the existing forces are clearly not enough to win and even to significantly push back the front line (or the line for launching NATO missiles), then in the coming months, with the advent of modern tanks and aircraft in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, there will be a direct threat to Crimea. Another question is how to dispose of tactical nuclear weapons? How to properly use its destructive power so as not to harm your own troops and destroy the enemy on a large scale?
    1. -2
      29 January 2023 18: 04
      Vadim, who told you that our current forces in Ukraine are enough for a complete victory? No one has told you this and cannot tell you for the simple reason that the conquered territories increase the area of ​​​​necessary control. More territory more troops. It is natural! And mobilization will take place commensurate with the increase in these areas. At present, there are enough forces for this territory for a larger territory, there will no longer be enough and there will be a saturation of the necessary troops. There will be as many mobilizations as necessary for the conduct of hostilities commensurate with the theater of hostilities and the liberated territories. In my opinion, the number of our troops should be 5 million soldiers.
    2. 0
      29 January 2023 19: 09
      Quote: Vadim Sharygin
      How to properly use its destructive power so as not to harm your own troops and destroy the enemy on a large scale?

      Do not apply without thinking
  14. +2
    29 January 2023 12: 38
    No big words about ya.o. The operation is going in the right direction. Liberate, clean up, consolidate, launch the economy of the annexed areas (mainly agriculture), etc. Stop, apparently it will not. It's all for the long haul. States of course need to be scared. How effective - you need to think. Underwater communications. Streams have not yet been answered.
  15. DO
    -1
    29 January 2023 14: 09
    Still, we will separate cutlets from flies, and nuclear weapons from Ukraine.
    So far, the main goal of the United States is to bleed the Russian army in Ukraine as much as possible. For Russia in Ukraine is actually opposed by the entire West. The demographic resources of countries correlate with their mobilization resources. The population of only NATO countries is about 6 times larger than the population of Russia, and this is not counting the mobile resource of Ukraine itself and the ability of the United States to hire soldiers of fortune around the world (for the world currency, the dollar, which the United States prints unlimitedly as they need). Powerful Western industry will produce as much heavy weapons and ammunition as needed.
    And so far, the Americans have succeeded in this plan. The logistics of Western artillery, air defense systems and MANPADS, anti-tank systems, ammunition and other things through Western Ukraine took place almost unhindered. The Russian army either advances or, after another "gesture of good will," surrenders the territories conquered and blood-stained by Russian soldiers back to the enemy. And such an SVO can last for years, as a result of which the Russian army will sooner or later put all its combat-ready soldiers and officers in Ukraine.
    Now the Russian army, it seems, has begun to systematically push the enemy. The US responds by counterbalancing the Russian offensive with the supply of tanks, in an attempt to increase the infliction of casualties on the Russian army in the same place.
    What can the Russian army oppose to such a technique of the United States? The answer is obvious.
    First, the Russian Armed Forces must stop the movement of vehicles on the railways and roads of Western Ukraine in the direction from the Polish and other western borders to the front, as far as possible. As - yes, as you like, except for the use of tactical nuclear weapons. Bomb railway depots, car parks, gas stations, tunnels, interchanges, bridges (with the exception of bridges across the Dnieper, on which a Russian offensive should be planned - why do the work for the enemy?), destroy all trains and all trucks moving in the direction from the west to the line front. Inhumane? And what, is it better for Russia to lose the entire combat-ready personnel of the army, with predictable consequences?
    Secondly, not a step back. Only advance, perhaps slowly but surely, to the very Polish border. Attaching the liberated territories to Russia (as it is absolutely right and being done), or to allied Belarus, of course, if the Belarusians want to annex Western Ukraine to themselves.
    Thirdly, most of the losses of the Russian army personnel come from the use of precision Western weapons using GPS, multiplied by intelligence information received in real time by the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the West via satellite systems. To reduce these losses, it is necessary to strengthen the electronic warfare as much as possible, massively destroy the Starlink terminals used by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and be technically ready to destroy the entire satellite constellation of the West, starting with Starlink, to destroy the Western submarine fiber optic cables.
    --
    Now about nuclear weapons.
    The use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine will not reduce the losses of Russians, but increase them. For the West, one way or another, will definitely use tactical nuclear weapons in response, on Russian territory.
    Here, some commentators dream of using nuclear weapons, up to the strike of strategic nuclear forces on America. But then we will inevitably receive a massive retaliatory strike by strategic nuclear forces.
    Of course, it is possible that the United States will be the first to use tactical nuclear weapons against Russia. This can happen in the Far East, as part of the confrontation for the Northern Sea Route. The US can launch a TNW strike against Russia from the territory of Western European NATO countries. In all such hypothetical cases, it is necessary to respond to tactical nuclear weapons not only in countries from whose territory (or from whose ships) tactical nuclear missiles are launched, but also necessarily in the United States, where all significant military decisions are made. However, and this is vitally important for the Russians, SYMMETRIC and PROPORTIONATE. For a limited strike by the enemy of tactical nuclear weapons against Russia will bring orders of magnitude less losses than a massive strike of strategic nuclear forces.
    The destruction of the Western constellation of satellites will radically reduce the intelligence capabilities of the West and the accuracy of targeting nuclear missiles.
    1. +2
      29 January 2023 22: 27
      The Russian Armed Forces must stop the movement of vehicles along the railways and roads of Western Ukraine in the direction from the Polish and other western borders to the front, as far as possible.

      But this is impossible. Bridges, tunnels can really be destroyed either by a large number of missiles (which are not so many) or by heavy bombs (which cannot be delivered due to the actions of Ukrainian air defense). Exit only to TNW.

      The use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine will not reduce the losses of Russians, but increase them. For the West, one way or another, will definitely use tactical nuclear weapons in response, on Russian territory.

      With what fright did you decide that the West would enter the TY war for Ukraine? After all, after the war, neither Russia, nor the United States, nor Western Europe will have prospects to the delight of China. And Ukraine is a consumable, suitable only for a thorn in the ass of Russia.
      1. DO
        -1
        30 January 2023 00: 58
        But this is impossible. Bridges, tunnels can really be destroyed either by a large number of missiles (which are not so many) or by heavy bombs (which cannot be delivered due to the actions of Ukrainian air defense). Exit only to TNW.

        Come on. The Antonovsky bridge was closed even after being hit by highmars missiles with 90 kg warheads. And tactical missiles have a "TNT" warhead of the order of half a ton.
        To collapse the tunnel, it is enough to get a cruise missile with a "TNT" warhead inside it. If they don’t hit the first time, they will hit the second, the third. The goal is worth it.

        With what fright did you decide that the West would enter the TY war for Ukraine? After all, after the war, neither Russia, nor the United States, nor Western Europe will have prospects to the delight of China. And Ukraine is a consumable, suitable only for a thorn in the ass of Russia.

        What does TN (thermonuclear war), that is, the use of strategic nuclear forces, have to do with it? TNW is not strategic nuclear forces at all.
        In response to Russia's use of the first tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine, the United States will simply announce the delivery of tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine, and US instructors in Ukrainian uniforms will begin to launch tactical nuclear weapons at Russia from Ukrainian territory. And this is the desired scenario for the US. And the US really doesn't give a damn about Russia's nuclear bombing of Ukraine, and even Western Europe. As for Russia, as the first striker, there will be no grounds to respond with a limited strike on the United States. And no one really needs an insane exchange with the United States of massive strategic nuclear forces strikes.
  16. +2
    29 January 2023 16: 03
    The gentlemen who write here about the supposedly necessary preventive use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine, on the campaign, are poorly aware of the consequences and, in general, the complete stupidity of this. Firstly, for the time being, the Russian Federation does not have an existential threat to existence and the tanks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are not standing near Moscow. Secondly, the effect from the use of several units of tiao will be very limited due to their weakness (tiao in most variants of existence is hundreds of times weaker in power than mbr) and then they must be used en masse. annexed Kherson, etc. to itself) or which they want to annex to the Russian Federation in the future. Every sane person can imagine all the consequences of using nuclear weapons.
    So the stuffing, including from the Russian media, about the use of tyao and the creation of the necessary and necessary background for this, has already begun. generally.
    1. -1
      29 January 2023 22: 34
      If tactical nuclear weapons are such a weak weapon, then what did our ancestors think when they created it? Regarding the rationality of its use: what is better - to kill 200-400 thousand of our soldiers and the economy in 2-5 years of war, or still bang with the loss of 50-100 thousand Ukrainians and force Ukraine to capitulate.
  17. -1
    29 January 2023 17: 46
    Another porridge about nothing! The author, go at least once to the line of contact and just silently look at what and how on the ground, listen to the soldiers.
  18. -1
    29 January 2023 18: 25
    Russia is already liberating Ukraine and will continue to liberate it until it liberates the entire territory of the former Ukraine!
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. 0
    30 January 2023 00: 11
    Quote: Alexey Lan
    If tactical nuclear weapons are such a weak weapon, then what did our ancestors think when they created it? Regarding the rationality of its use: what is better - to kill 200-400 thousand of our soldiers and the economy in 2-5 years of war, or still bang with the loss of 50-100 thousand Ukrainians and force Ukraine to capitulate.

    It was created mainly during a GLOBAL nuclear war (the Americans' response to their tyao, including nuclear land mines in Europe, which the Americans considered effective in leveling the numerical advantage of the USSR Armed Forces), on the European theater to destroy large targets and concentrations of enemy forces at the front and in the immediate rear, as well as to destroy especially important and well-defended targets. At the moment, there are no million armies against each other (so far anyway) with tens of thousands of tanks and so on. AFVs against each other. And this is only ONE of the aspects why is this a stupid idea (currently using tiao).
  21. -1
    30 January 2023 01: 48
    Quote from Adm Hts
    liberate all Ukraine

    "to liberate" is not a relevant term for a long time, and even more so a task ...
    cleaning is the task...

    At you, you got hot! How can you protect something that no longer belongs to you (the Russian Federation) (Kherson, etc.)? It seems, logically, it would be nice to release him for a start (not bad for the Russian Federation).
  22. +1
    1 February 2023 21: 50
    You just need to clearly and clearly convey to the US authorities that in the event of a nuclear strike on the territory of Russia from the territory of any state, in response, Russia will strike precisely at the United States, as the owner of its weapons. Of the Western countries, only Britain and France have their own nuclear weapons, all the rest have American ones. And if it flies from these two countries, then it will follow them and the United States in any case, as the decision-making center in the West. For persuasiveness, it is necessary to conduct demonstration exercises with an imitation of this answer.