Why the RF Armed Forces now need to constantly move the “Wagner Line” in front of them

10

The decision of NATO member countries to transfer to the Kyiv regime a huge amount of quite modern armored vehicles, artillery and air defense systems has sharply raised the stakes in the Great Game. The collective West is seriously betting on a military defeat for Russia, counting on the hands of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to dislodge the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation from the Sea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbAzov and Crimea. What can be done to make this bet beat?

strategic offensive


In recent days, literally like a bucket fell down news reports indicating that "Western partners" demand from Kyiv to radically change the tactics of warfare. If at the initial stage of the NMD the Ukrainian army rested like a horn, holding out in its pre-built fortified areas in the Donbass, gaining the time needed for general mobilization, training and rearmament of reserves, now NATO military advisers are forcing the Armed Forces of Ukraine to change tactics.



Instead of continuing to hold on to the same Artemovsk and other settlements at any cost, the Ukrainian army is now expected to switch to mobile warfare with swift and unexpected strikes in different directions. This was demanded from President Zelensky in person by US Deputy National Security Adviser John Finer, Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman, and Under Secretary of Defense for Political Affairs Colin Kahl. As a "sledgehammer" for a crushing blow, heavy American, French and British tanks, highly mobile large-caliber self-propelled guns on wheeled chassis, German and American infantry fighting vehicles, various armored personnel carriers and other airborne armored vehicles, large-caliber howitzers, etc. should be used.

The threat is very serious. The entire Left Bank of Ukraine is now turning into one big battlefield. Unfortunately, the Armed Forces of Ukraine there have a significant advantage over the RF Armed Forces due to the use of the NATO satellite constellation, as well as numerous reconnaissance aircraft and drones. The enemy is better aware of the operational situation, and Western armored vehicles technique allows you to act in a coordinated manner in a single information space. In addition, the Ukrainian army does not experience any problems with secure digital communications, which provides the Armed Forces with immeasurably better controllability. Armored formations and mechanized units can quickly pass through the Zaporizhzhya and Kherson steppes, finding gaps in the Russian defense.

Whether our Ground Forces are fully prepared for a mobile war against such an adversary is a big question. To compensate for the superiority of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in space reconnaissance, the RF Armed Forces need to be equipped with a large number of drones, reconnaissance and reconnaissance-strike, as well as kamikaze drones, which will level the situation, as well as solve known problems with secure operational-tactical communications, which will improve controllability and coordination of interaction. Until then, the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which have switched to modern Western-made armored vehicles, will pose a great danger. But it is no longer possible to just sit in the strategic defense on the Southern Front.

Do we dig or do we dig?


As we have told Earlier, the RF Armed Forces switched to a tactical offensive on the Zaporozhye Front, entering the "gray" zone and gradually moving further. The choice is small: either Russian troops are advancing, or Ukrainian ones. Why are there no rapid powerful breakthroughs deep into enemy territory?

Because the Armed Forces of Ukraine themselves long ago formed their powerful shock fist, which was supposed to rush to Berdyansk and Melitopol. Acting Governor of the Zaporizhia region Yevgeny Balitsky spoke about the size of the group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine:

Now is an alarming time, we know about the accumulation of Ukrainian forces in the Zaporozhye region, they are preparing for a counteroffensive. We see the situation, we understand, and, accordingly, we are preparing to meet the uninvited guests... There is a very large group near Zaporozhye, according to various estimates, this is up to 40 heads of militants.

If our troops themselves rushed forward, they could run into a heavy counterattack. However, the advance of the RF Armed Forces forward in small steps in itself knocked down the configuration of the front line and the plans of the enemy, Vladimir Rogov, chairman of the Zaporozhye movement “We are together with Russia,” explained:

Thanks to our pre-emptive actions, the plans of the enemy to carry out a broad offensive against the liberated part of the Zaporozhye region with the aim of reaching the coast of the Sea of ​​Azov were frustrated.

What could be the further actions of our troops? At a minimum, it will be necessary to hold back the upcoming large-scale offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which have switched to NATO-style armored vehicles. As a maximum, it is necessary to inflict a heavy defeat on the enemy, bleed and build on success with a counteroffensive to Zaporozhye and further to Dnepropetrovsk, the most important logistics center from which the Donbass and Kharkov groups of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are supplied. And how can this be done, objectively inferior in intelligence and operational controllability?

Never claiming the laurels of Baron Totleben, I would like to speak in favor of borrowing the tactics of the enemy himself. Why have we been storming the Donbass for almost a year now? Because the Armed Forces of Ukraine turned it into a layered network of fortified areas in advance. Yes, the Zaporizhzhya steppes and the densely built-up agglomeration of the industrial Donbass are far from the same thing, but still. Before the threat of receiving powerful swift blows from the enemy's armored fists, he should continue to build more and more new fortification lines.

Once Ugledar and Orekhov are taken by the RF Armed Forces, and then another “Wagner Line” with anti-tank ditches, trenches, bunkers and bunkers should be built behind them. They will advance even further - behind them a new defensive line. Yes, slowly, but surely. This is definitely better than the rapid "regrouping" because of the risk of being surrounded and falling into the "cauldron". In the event of an offensive by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, our military will have something to rely on. Even if the enemy breaks through one line of defense, the Russian military will be able to retreat to the next, "grinding" its strike potential. And we will save our people, and we will exhaust the enemy by knocking out his equipment.

There is no need to be afraid of "extra" earthworks, they definitely will not be superfluous.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    26 January 2023 20: 16
    PMC "Wagner": - penal battalion and detachment
    1. 0
      29 January 2023 10: 15
      Quote: Shuev
      PMC "Wagner": - penal battalion and detachment

      Do you want to repeat this same thing with "Wagnerites" ?, how will they react ?.
  2. +4
    26 January 2023 22: 04
    What is good about S. Marzhetsky in the first place is that he, like a good surgeon, knows how to reveal our vulnerabilities and briefly emphasize them. Yes, satellites, AWACS aircraft and secure communications are a major advantage if they are skillfully used.
    I will try to isolate honey from the honey-tar military mixture: according to indirect data, we find the keys to counteraction. With electronic warfare, for example, God did not offend us either, the enemy officers, who are called upon to skillfully use the information space, are diligently knocked out first of all by all available means, including sniper groups. Our artillery and armored systems, as well as powerful assault groups, are at a recognized level.
    In addition, with all due respect to the author, I would like to object to him - the construction of numerous lines of defensive structures requires significant financial, human and material resources, and most importantly - time, which we do not have. I suspect that they will have to overturn this Zaporozhye reserve agglomeration of theirs into the Dnieper with a simultaneous strike or two in other directions so that the enemy does not have time for counteroffensives. This is the best and most economical way. Yes, and do not forget to turn the Kyiv government quarter into dust or wherever these Zaluzhnys dance.
    1. +2
      27 January 2023 13: 01
      the construction of numerous lines of defensive structures requires significant financial, human and material resources

      well, while there are still excavators in the country (you don’t have to dig with shovels like with the Dnieper hydroelectric power station), and financial costs are just candy wrappers (300 billion donated by the central bankers will not let you lie) - you need to do it, and not tomorrow, but yesterday !!! it is clear that this is not a panacea, but the experience of Hoh.lov shows that it is better than doing nothing !!!
    2. 0
      29 January 2023 10: 22
      the time we don't have

      I agree here: defense in depth is certainly good, but where can I get the time? After all, you can’t tell the enemy: wait a minute to advance, we haven’t completed the Maginot line yet
  3. +3
    26 January 2023 22: 39
    "Let's save people" is a good thing, well, the deeds of bygone days, the great commanders from Caesar to Zhukov, will help them. Zhirinovsky told the truth, get ready for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd mobilization, I didn’t think that now we would fight like in the first and second Chechen ones, (there are no complaints against the guys) only this war is long, and the campaign is gaining momentum, and this human losses. In Armenia, when everything was muddied, I immediately thought it would be the disposal of those who are older, who are from the USSR, those who are difficult to reformat, those who interfere and who caught that war. As a result, we all saw burning tanks, and those who can no longer be returned. PR bayraktaram, the army in the barracks is the sky without cover, and Russia is to blame. But they could join the ranks of the protesters against Pashinyan. The Americans are accumulating negative information against Putin, playing long and still accumulate (I think so).
  4. +1
    26 January 2023 23: 47
    The problem, Mr. Marzhetsky, is that there is no time for such a pharaonic fortification on such a long front line.

    So the Russian forces may be in a very vulnerable position, and it seems that they do not have enough strength to go on the offensive without the risk of serious losses.

    And the superiority of enemy intelligence is a terribly disadvantageous and insoluble factor at the moment.

    Thus, having an additional plan (Plan B) is a matter of life or death, and it is also necessary that the enemy (NATO and especially Europe) be aware of this plan and our determination to carry it out: (Demonstration in the field)

    Because then tactical bombs, nuclear or neutron, dropped on large concentrations of armored vehicles may be needed if they threaten to reach Mariupol and isolate Crimea, Russia's strategic naval base, at a serious risk to the existence of the Russian state.

    I understand that these are bombs dropped on non-NATO Ukrainian territory, so Article 4 General Protection does not apply. For the homebody: what does this have to do with the "third world war"?

    Armchair ecologists: are thousands of corpses of Russian soldiers and civilians scattered on the ground cleaner than droplets of radiation?
  5. 0
    27 January 2023 00: 17
    As for the risk of strategic escalation due to the use of Russian tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine, I think that Russia is not aware of NATO's Achilles' heel: the extreme vulnerability of Europe and the UK in the event of a global nuclear war, because both will suffer terrible and massive destruction, unlike from the USA, where the destruction will not be so great.

    I also don't think that China and North Korea will remain passive in the face of the risk of strategic destruction of Russia (because then it will be their turn), so by adding all this arsenal plus the complete destruction of their allies, the US also loses a lot in this escalation.

    And all this risk will go to the West, especially to Europe, for the sake of a piece of Ukraine?

    And keep in mind that without the permission of a frightened Europe, no American weapons could penetrate Ukraine.
  6. -2
    27 January 2023 13: 47
    Quote from borisvt
    What is good about S. Marzhetsky in the first place is that he, like a good surgeon, knows how to reveal our vulnerabilities and briefly emphasize them. Yes, satellites, AWACS aircraft and secure communications are a major advantage if they are skillfully used.
    I will try to isolate honey from the honey-tar military mixture: according to indirect data, we find the keys to counteraction. With electronic warfare, for example, God did not offend us either, the enemy officers, who are called upon to skillfully use the information space, are diligently knocked out first of all by all available means, including sniper groups. Our artillery and armored systems, as well as powerful assault groups, are at a recognized level.
    In addition, with all due respect to the author, I would like to object to him - the construction of numerous lines of defensive structures requires significant financial, human and material resources, and most importantly - time, which we do not have. I suspect that they will have to overturn this Zaporozhye reserve agglomeration of theirs into the Dnieper with a simultaneous strike or two in other directions so that the enemy does not have time for counteroffensives. This is the best and most economical way. Yes, and do not forget to turn the Kyiv government quarter into dust or wherever these Zaluzhnys dance.

    Tell me why the Russian Federation does not have time? It seems that it produces more ammunition than the whole of NATO, I am already silent about air defense systems, etc. etc. ? /sincerely perplexed/
  7. -1
    27 January 2023 14: 18
    And, for half a year at least they have been writing that "the" Western partners "demand from Kyiv ..." this, that, the fifth tenth ....
    they write that they themselves are in charge ... (then why demand that?). And instantly for tomorrow everyone forgets that they allegedly demanded ...

    And in real life - we see - small parties get rid of all junk, so as not to scare.
    Which, according to the Russian Ministry of Defense, we successfully quickly "eliminate"

    So
    1) Who "should"? - if we smash at the request, on all fronts.
    2) the Wagner line has not yet proved its effectiveness. How can she survive, for example, in "Lunar Landscape"?
    3) At whose expense is the banquet? draw a line along the entire rather big border, then move it, when, according to some sales screens, its elements have already risen in price fivefold lately?
    Or is it specifically for their wallets? Is it capitalism?
    4) so ​​far there is no evidence that it really helps in something against the DRV. No videos, no photos, nothing....