Moscow warned the West about the use of "more powerful weapons" in Ukraine

January 22 2023 55

If the United States and NATO supply Ukraine with offensive weapons that will be used to strike Russian civilian cities, Russia will retaliate with more powerful weapons. This was stated by the speaker of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Vyacheslav Volodin in his telegram channel.

According to him, Members of Congress, deputies of the Bundestag, the National Assembly of France and other European parliaments must realize their responsibility to humanity. Viacheslav Volodin added that by their decisions, Washington and Brussels are leading the world to a terrible war: to completely different military operations than today, when strikes are carried out exclusively on military and critical infrastructure used by the Kyiv regime.

Considering technological the superiority of Russian weapons, foreign politiciansthose who make such decisions need to understand that this could end in a global tragedy that will destroy their countries

- said Vyacheslav Volodin.

The speaker of the State Duma of the Russian Federation called the arguments that the nuclear powers had not previously used weapons of mass destruction in local conflicts untenable.

Because these states did not face a situation where there was a threat to the security of their citizens and the territorial integrity of the country

Viacheslav Volodin emphasized.

Recall that a few days ago, the United States announced the provision of the new largest package of military assistance to Ukraine.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

borisvt

+4

22 January 2023 11: 43

It's high time to lay siege to these "friends" as long as our guys can die! Serious destruction of Rzeszow is getting closer, sadly.
1. skeptic
  
  0
  
  23 January 2023 11: 18
  
  Quote from borisvt
  Serious destruction of Rzeszow is getting closer, sadly.
  
  A serious zeroing of the top of the bourgeoisie, as the organizers of chaos, is required. So it will be more environmentally friendly, and more visually, for potential "successors".
Yuriy_7

+8

22 January 2023 12: 29

We must stop carrying this verbal diarrhea, and transgress from words to deeds. The West does not react at all to the threats of Duma speakers.
1. Eduard Aplombov
  
  +4
  
  22 January 2023 13: 08
  
  I agree with you and with the opinion of many that words and threats should be in practice, that is, they said - a demonstrative blow, and not threaten from warm and deep chairs
  besides tactical nuclear, there are, after all, other mom and dad ammunition, or to make it clearer to the West - parent 1 and parent 2
2. Peace Peace.
  
  -5
  
  22 January 2023 17: 47
  
  Well, better with words than nothing.
  1. vladivan
    
    0
    
    22 January 2023 19: 28
    
    The fact that the USA, NATO, Europe can provide 1000 tanks and a couple of thousand infantry fighting vehicles to Ukraine is not a problem for them! It’s easier for them to sell tanks to Ukraine than to modernize and store them at bases for years
3. vladivan
  
  +1
  
  22 January 2023 19: 13
  
  This is how they show "activity"! They essentially have nothing to cover. For 7 years they have not checked anything, how they destroy military developments, under the guise of many years of testing.
4. Sailor_Popeye
  
  -1
  
  23 January 2023 11: 40
  
  From the outside, Volodin's statements look not just ridiculous, but RIDIOUS.
prior

+7

22 January 2023 13: 01

They are afraid of those who do, not those who scare with their mouths.
And with affairs - seams.
Jacques sekavar

0

22 January 2023 13: 03

Speaking about the use of "more powerful weapons" and NATO's responsibility to Mankind, Mr. Duma leader echoes the statement of the ex-president, the boss of the ruling party and the deputy of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, who said that the loss of a nuclear power in a conventional war could provoke a nuclear war, and the talking head of the president noted that the words of the ex-president, boss of the ruling party and part-time deputy of the Security Council of the Russian Federation are fully consistent with the nuclear doctrine of the Russian Federation.
Thus, two leading politicians of the Russian Federation in unison warned their Western colleagues about the consequences of the participation of the West in the war in Ukraine.
The West should listen, and the Russian Federation should finally show determination.
1. Alexey Davydov
  
  +7
  
  22 January 2023 17: 42
  
  Thus, two leading politicians of the Russian Federation in unison warned their Western colleagues about the consequences of the participation of the West in the war in Ukraine.
  
  The boy who shouted "Wolves!" is shouting for the hundredth time. Now in the village only laugh
  1. vladivan
    
    +1
    
    22 January 2023 19: 22
    
    All Duma members, proteges of the Presidential Administration and VVP. They don’t know how to do anything else. For the last 10 years, they have been doing this, that they only scare them in order to shield their patron.
2. vladivan
  
  -2
  
  22 January 2023 19: 15
  
  Aya began to doubt that there are no winners in a nuclear war! Why are our Duma members pushing this wording for us? Maybe they are trying to take the USA and NATO in fear!
3. lord-palladore-11045
  
  +1
  
  22 January 2023 23: 54
  
  It is our authorities who need to show determination, and not chew snot.
In passing

-1

22 January 2023 17: 51

Full of bullshit! Beskydy, Rzeszow, Ramstein, a couple of ports in Holland, the base of the Royal Navy in Scotland, Gibraltar. Do you have the coordinates? In addition to the targets that are now being formed in Romania from the French, Americans and British. These are legitimate military targets. Key West too.
1. Alexey Davydov
  
  -4
  
  22 January 2023 18: 59
  
  Yes Galya.
  Only first, a warning shot from a combat missile with a nuclear charge. Like in 1962. Now they may need much more, such "warnings". But it still needs to be done.
  Instead of hitting allies, threaten and hit ONLY on US and UK territory. The allies, on the contrary, are offered to remain neutral in exchange for the preservation of their territory.
  mechanically, regardless, continuously increase the danger of warning strikes.
  Cling to their throat with a stranglehold and do not let go until ALL conditions are met. To be ready to completely destroy them and perish at the same time, as we were ready to do in the USSR
  1. Nelton
    
    -2
    
    22 January 2023 19: 24
    
    Quote: Alexey Davydov
    Only first, a warning shot from a combat missile with a nuclear charge. Like in 1962.
    
    ??
    
    What kind of warning shot yao in 1962?
    
    Quote: Alexey Davydov
    To be ready to completely destroy them and perish at the same time, as we were ready to do in the USSR
    
    Are you Fidel Castro yourself?
    Alive?
    He was ready to die in a nuclear war in the name of the revolution.
    
    Khrushchev got scared and removed the missiles from Cuba.
    Under the "honest word" of the American president, who allegedly was about to deliver a decapitating blow.
    1. Alexey Davydov
      
      +1
      
      22 January 2023 22: 33
      
      What kind of warning shot yao in 1962?
      
      Read about the Tulip teachings and don't be rude. You are the only one to blame for your limitations.
      1. Nelton
        
        -1
        
        22 January 2023 23: 07
        
        Quote: Alexey Davydov
        about the exercises "Tulip"
        
        Ah... so what?
        They launched a rocket at 3750 km, the territory of the United States (except Alaska) is not threatened by such a range.
        
        And since when did the tests begin to go under the category of "warning shot"?
        
        The Russian Federation launched the "Sarmat" in 2022, were you very impressed by this?
        
        and don't be rude.
        
        And you do not subscribe for everyone in the desire to burn in the fire of war along with the children.
        Moreover, you are not writing from the front line.
      2. isofat
        
        -1
        
        22 January 2023 23: 31
        
        Alexey Davydov, please, where did you read that it was a warning nuclear shot?
        
        No need to flaunt the lack of restrictions, stupid.
        
        Alexey Davydov
        
        0
        
        23 January 2023 02: 12
        
        where did you read that it was a nuclear warning shot?
        
        This data is available to anyone who is interested.
        The Tyulpan exercise with a nuclear strike on an experimental field on Novaya Zemlya with a R-14U missile was carried out on September 8, 1962.
        On the same day, September 8, 1962, the first batch of missiles was unloaded in Cuba as part of the Anadyr operation.
        Such a coincidence is almost unbelievable.
        On the contrary, with the probability of a certain event, these exercises were used by the USSR in accordance with the functions that a "warning shot" usually performs.
        Even if we allow an incredible coincidence, anyway, for the Americans this was a warning shot "in fact."
        You and Oleg seem to be "two boots - a pair" or do one
        
        Nelton
        
        -2
        
        23 January 2023 09: 50
        
        Quote: Alexey Davydov
        These exercises were used by the USSR in accordance with the functions that a "warning shot" usually performs.
        
        These exercises showed that the USSR has New missiles with a range of 3750 km.
        
        "Warning shot" - that would be to slam the already deployed missiles into the area of the oceans bordering the territorial waters of the United States.
        The same R-14 from Cuba.
        
        Returning to - do you consider the launch of Sarmat in April 2022 a "warning shot"?
        
        isofat
        
        +1
        
        24 January 2023 20: 04
        
        This swindler takes advantage of the "naivety" of the administration.
      3. lord-palladore-11045
        
        -1
        
        23 January 2023 00: 00
        
        In order for everyone to understand you, speak more clearly.
        
        Alexey Davydov
        
        0
        
        23 January 2023 02: 17
        
        I try my best, but if a person does not want to understand, he will not understand
    2. Bakht
      
      +4
      
      23 January 2023 10: 48
      
      More precisely, Kennedy got scared and removed the missiles from Turkey.
      1. Alexey Davydov
        
        -1
        
        23 January 2023 12: 45
        
        I don't think I was scared. There was a sober analysis on the part of his team. In fact, we were then ready to start a nuclear war first. The desire of the Americans to use this advantage until it was leveled by us guaranteed us "urgent" decapitation and destruction. For this they would have killed Kenedy earlier
        
        Fourth
        
        0
        
        24 January 2023 20: 22
        
        You don't have to think, remember this fact.
  2. In passing
    
    0
    
    23 January 2023 01: 06
    
    What are the allies?
    1. Alexey Davydov
      
      -1
      
      23 January 2023 01: 54
      
      US allies, of course. Not ours
      1. Fourth
        
        0
        
        24 January 2023 20: 24
        
        What are the US allies?
Vox Populi

-1

22 January 2023 20: 10

The speaker of the State Duma of the Russian Federation called the arguments that the nuclear powers had not previously used weapons of mass destruction in local conflicts untenable

This, to put it mildly, ambiguous statement was followed here by new inadequate comments about the need for nuclear strikes. Yokarny babay, what's going on in people's heads... "Summoners" of the apocalypse, will you have time to wash your pants if it really happens?
1. Alexey Davydov
  
  +1
  
  23 January 2023 02: 36
  
  Do not disguise yourself as a Russian.
  The disguise is in conflict with what you write here. A Russian will not so easily reject a remedy that has already once saved the USSR and the whole world from nuclear war. Only Americans have the opposite attitude towards him. For obvious reasons. Are you by any chance an American?
2. isofat
  
  0
  
  24 January 2023 20: 50
  
  Vox Populi, apparently, the "OPG" appeared again, and Lesha scares everyone.
Adm Hts

+1

22 January 2023 22: 15

yap.. :)
George V Im

0

22 January 2023 23: 32

Actually, the United States is seeking this after all .. They are doing everything to escalate the war in Ukraine .. Americans, modern, not only are they descendants of notorious bandits, they themselves behave openly criminal .. This is how they should be perceived - they are criminals .. They believe that Russia can be destroyed .. And they sincerely believe in it .. This is dangerous - for themselves, for us .. For them, this is their complete destruction, this can bring us a lot of questions .. Therefore, the Russian authorities should behave differently to conduct with America - to carry out exclusively the dictates of their Force .. The Americans don’t understand differently .. They don’t need to be “warned”, it’s already too late .. They need to be beaten .. Only this will stop them .. Preemptive strikes, inflicting them, their interests such a serious blow (s) that it will force the United States to abandon aggression against Russia .. Otherwise, nothing ..
lord-palladore-11045

+3

22 January 2023 23: 48

The united West spit on all the red lines drawn by Putin, and Mr. Volodin is trying to warn them all about something. Gentlemen, Russian officials, it's time for you to grow up and grow wiser, otherwise you are losing authority among your citizens.
cooper

+4

23 January 2023 01: 06

Regular and endless blah blah blah, from which no one is afraid there ..
1. Saffron
  
  +2
  
  23 January 2023 08: 33
  
  Politicians have such a job - to chat. But they have one more job - to make decisions (read - adopt laws, orders) that they must fulfill (the conditional Ministry of Defense, for example). So the trouble is with decisions, only, as they rightly said, blah blah blah
Sergei N

+2

23 January 2023 02: 33

Yes, no one is afraid of these verbal threats. We need to stop talking and start doing!
grandfather Panas

0

23 January 2023 03: 52

Quote: Eduard Aplombov
I agree with you and with the opinion of many that words and threats should be in practice, that is, they said - a demonstrative blow, and not threaten from warm and deep chairs
besides tactical nuclear, there are, after all, other mom and dad ammunition, or to make it clearer to the West - parent 1 and parent 2

What are these, for example? Free-falling bombs like high-powered aviation vacuum bomb (AVBPM)? will arrive. And what?
grandfather Panas

-2

23 January 2023 04: 20

Considering the technological superiority of Russian weapons, what is it? Is it that there are still better hypersonic weapons and there are a few pieces. But there is no sense in this - no war can be won with zircons alone.
Aleks33

-1

23 January 2023 08: 18

How sad from the toothlessness of Russia. But the problem with the West is solved in two ways. At the expense of one blow with a dagger at a nuclear power plant somewhere in distant Europe, for example in France, as the first country to cross the red line. And on the count of two, a warning that all stations are at gunpoint. It is enough, even without using nuclear weapons as such against the troops, to sober up the arsenals of the West, and to reserve missiles for use against the United States, if they suddenly decide to aggravate the situation for Europe with a brainless response. Yes, there is a risk, but it's the lesser of the evils. After all, war and escalation are getting stronger and a nuclear conflict will still happen. And stop and warn him, the leadership of Russia is simply obliged. Will there be an answer from the West? Unlikely. An ecological catastrophe and mass migration will nullify the potential of the West, and probably tomorrow the West itself will propose de-escalation and disintegration of NATO. The West will be empty if you successfully bang a couple of stations, and Ukraine will have nowhere to strive. The war will end. Well, ecology is the payment for the bloodthirstiness of the West, the United States, and the inefficiency of such an institution as the UN.
1. Alexey Davydov
  
  0
  
  23 January 2023 13: 07
  
  But the problem with the West is solved in two ways. At the expense of one blow with a dagger at a nuclear power plant somewhere in distant Europe, for example, in France
  
  We cannot be at war with the whole world, we should not even put ourselves in such a position. It is the Americans who are interested in pushing us against their allies and collecting trophies from both sides.
  The interests of the United States with Great Britain and their allies in this campaign are in fact opposite. This was shown by global sanctions that are detrimental to Europe. We need to use this contradiction by putting pressure exclusively on the US and the UK and try not to create problems for ourselves with Europe. She, like Asia, is a continent that is our home and space for life.
  Our victory in forcing the United States to a just world will free Europe as well. A return to the old mutually beneficial relationship with her is the best scenario for the future. In addition, we will free the world from the prospect of a third world war, which will most likely become nuclear
2. isofat
  
  0
  
  24 January 2023 20: 55
  
  Aleks33you want to be bitten?
Constantine N

0

23 January 2023 08: 18

And for what purposes to use this more powerful weapon? Are you talking about nuclear? The front line is pointless. The production and economy of Ukraine are not important for the war.
Muscool

0

23 January 2023 08: 22

NATO members only burst out laughing at the next "most serious statement." Our bureaucrats openly spit in the face, and they wipe the stinks and once again threaten to beat them.
They look like a small dog with bulging balls (pygmy pinscher), which yaps like crazy, but without risk and damage to itself, you can give a good kick to the asshole. Truly spineless creatures. Only the mobilized can give nightmares, who touched the same spineless officer by the sleeve
Dust

+1

23 January 2023 09: 44

If the West had supplied all the weapons that they supplied at once, then Russia would have reacted. But, the West uses tactics against Russia, "frogs in a heated bowler hat." They hope that Russia will not jump, keep silent, hide in a corner ...
1. Kuramori Reika
  
  0
  
  23 January 2023 20: 25
  
  So be it.
Dmitry Volkov

+1

23 January 2023 09: 47

And I wonder what kind of powerful weapon, bombs? So the Bandera scum has air defense and target designation from Avaks, so it will be, let it be specifically voiced so that they are afraid, and so to speak, it's like farting into the air
Andrey Andreev_2

0

23 January 2023 10: 35

I am for the Eurasian Union from the Atlantic to the Pacific! Only many fascists today (supporting Nazism and Satanism) will have to work as laborers))), because Russia needs to be raised!
kriten

+1

23 January 2023 11: 17

Isn't that blah blah again? Like the red lines with which everyone has already shaded what is possible?
Kuramori Reika

0

23 January 2023 20: 24

Another red line? miserable clowns
Moscow

0

24 January 2023 06: 18

The problem is that Russia, represented by the authorities, has declared and continues to declare a thousand times that they will not use nuclear weapons, especially in Ukraine and in the West they believed them. At the same time, Russia does not withdraw from its own moratorium on nuclear weapons testing. Option: "Hold me, otherwise I'll hit you" - obviously does not work here. The goals of the NWO are not clear, the red lines are not outlined, the enemies are not named, the victories are leveled by retreats. And the threats to the West are crossed out by constant references to negotiations, trade through Ukraine with the West. Hence the lack of fear, the constant pressure of the West and the pushing of new weapons for Ukraine. Maybe it's time to call everything by its proper name? Or do something to make Russia heard in an honest way?
Shuev

0

25 January 2023 22: 41

Moscow warned the West about the use of "more powerful weapons" in Ukraine

Will analogues appear more long-range "unparalleled" Hymars or Peresvet (laser complex) in controlled territories, solving problems with the NATO satellite constellation?