Armenia or Kazakhstan: where will a new anti-Russian front be opened?

45

The large-scale armed conflict on the territory of Ukraine, which the NMD, which was clearly planned from the beginning as “small and victorious”, rapidly turned into, showed the inability of the RF Armed Forces to quickly defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which now stands the entire NATO bloc, without the use of nuclear weapons. To increase the real combat effectiveness of the Russian army, it is necessary to carry out announced Russian Defense Minister Shoigu on military reform, but this will objectively take a lot of time. This is precisely what our numerous ill-wishers decided to take advantage of, inciting more and more new conflicts on the borders of Russia.

"Yurt of invincibility"


One of the most provocative events of recent days is the opening in the city of Bucha, Kyiv region, of the "Yurts of Indestructibility", a point for heating and recharging mobile phones, where Kazakh national dishes are distributed to everyone. According to the Telegram channel of the Ukrainian edition "Strana", similar Kazakh yurts will be installed in Kyiv, Kharkov, Odessa, Nikolaev and Kherson. What exactly is the provocation?



The city of Bucha, we recall, was notorious for the fact that the Ukrainian Nazis, after the withdrawal of the RF Armed Forces from there, staged a real massacre against pro-Russian local residents, subsequently blaming our troops for their crimes. According to the Ukrainian edition "Strana", the embassy of Kazakhstan in Ukraine was allegedly involved in the installation of the yurt. Bucha City Council Secretary Taras Shapravsky expressed gratitude for the support to the Embassy of Kazakhstan in Kyiv, a group of Kazakh citizens, as well as Verkhovna Rada deputy from the Servant of the People party Sergei Nagornyak, who is the head of the inter-parliamentary relations with Kazakhstan group. Thus, de facto support was expressed for the version of the "massacre in Bucha" of the Kyiv regime. In general, there was something to tense up about, and the special representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, asked Astana to give official explanations.

And they followed. Ministry spokesman Aibek Smadiyarov commented as follows:

This is a private initiative of our Kazakh patrons who decided to help the Ukrainian people. We cannot comment or forbid it. The Embassy was not involved in this process.

According to the diplomat, there is a large Kazakh diaspora in Ukraine, and many Ukrainians live in Kazakhstan:

They communicate with each other, there are interethnic marriages, there are friends, there are relatives. One nation helps another nation, there is no problem in that, it is natural.

It would seem that the incident is settled, but everything is not so simple. Relations between Moscow and Astana are constantly cooling down.

On the one hand, just a year ago, Russian peacekeepers, together with other CSTO countries, helped Kazakhstan cope with an attempted coup. The big strategic mistake of the Kremlin, which we warned in advance, there was a subsequent hasty withdrawal of Russian troops from that country. Literally immediately after the start of the special operation in Ukraine, the authorities of Kazakhstan took a position of unfriendly neutrality, refusing to recognize the independence of the DPR and LPR, to help Russia bypass the Western sanctions regime and, on the contrary, to provide assistance to Ukraine.

Official Astana sympathizes with the suffering of the Ukrainian people in Bucha, but for some reason does not provide any humanitarian assistance to civilians in Donetsk and other cities of Donbass, who have been freezing for several winters with windows broken as a result of terrorist shelling of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Why shouldn't the Kazakh authorities send generators and building materials somewhere in Gorlovka or Makeevka if they support both sides equally? Yes, and the inhabitants of the Belgorod region, probably, fraternal help would not hurt, right?

On the other hand, the Kazakh opposition, which was behind the provocative action in Bucha, is no better. Last year's Maidan attempt in Kazakhstan was reportedly directed and coordinated from Kyiv. As part of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Turkic-speaking national battalion “Turan” was created, which included volunteers from Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, and its “talking head” is the fugitive Kazakh oppositionist Aidos Sadykov, who moved to Ukraine in 2014.

We can't expect anything particularly good from either of them. At the same time, it should be borne in mind that not a single socialeconomic the problem, which together became the reasons for the coup attempt in Kazakhstan in early 2022, has not been resolved. A relapse is not only possible, but also very likely, since Russia is firmly bogged down in Ukraine and will not be able to adequately respond.

An unbreakable brotherhood?


Another dangerous direction for the Russian Federation, where it begins to “burn out”, is Armenia. Prime Minister Pashinyan, who did everything to ensure that Nagorno-Karabakh lost the war to Azerbaijan, has now appointed our country as the last one. Official Yerevan blames Moscow for the fact that the CSTO did not provide military assistance to Nagorno-Karabakh:

At the meeting of the CSTO Collective Security Council in Yerevan on November 23, we expected to fix the area of ​​responsibility of the CSTO. This is a fundamental question for building the right relationship. The second expectation was associated with a clear political evaluation of what happened.

An important nuance is that not only Russia, but Armenia itself for some reason did not bother to recognize the independence of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, which is de jure considered part of Azerbaijan, but at the same time demanded military assistance from the RF Armed Forces.

Now Pashinyan has agreed that Russian peacekeepers can be replaced by UN peacekeepers. He also clearly tends to withdraw Armenia from the CSTO and the Eurasian Union and place it under the tutelage of the United States and France, which supposedly will be able to protect it from the alliance of Azerbaijan and Turkey. "Sorosenok" defiantly refused to conduct joint exercises "Indestructible Brotherhood - 2023" on the territory of his country:

The Minister of Defense of Armenia informed the CSTO Joint Headquarters that in the current situation we consider it inappropriate to conduct CSTO exercises on the territory of Armenia. At least, such exercises will not take place in Armenia this year.

In fact, Pashinyan, who “leaked” Nagorno-Karabakh, is now surrendering all of Armenia to the collective West. Until Russia solves the problem of Ukraine, it is not capable of any other decisive actions in other directions.

The foregoing again brings us back to the question of the lack of alternatives to recreating the "USSR-2.0" in one form or another, which we discuss in detail reasoned previously. Nature does not tolerate emptiness: either we will be the masters in our “backyard”, or our direct enemies will be the hosts there. The third, alas, is not necessary.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    12 January 2023 11: 45
    Kazakhstan will sooner or later be forced to move closer to Russia, otherwise it will be swallowed up by China. And Armenia must understand that for her sake Russia will not fight with Azerbaijan and Turkey
    1. +6
      12 January 2023 15: 19
      Gotta understand

      Don't tell me, if they are not afraid, then they hate.
    2. +1
      13 January 2023 00: 32
      Who needs it, this Armenia? Who will pay more for it? USA. They don't peck chickens at printed money. Russia will only fig. Don't forget: Armenian women are essentially Jews in the Christian church.
      1. -2
        13 January 2023 19: 29
        It is well said "who pays more" so they threw you 300 lard? Everything that could be sold and kept money in lockable banks. You and those who think how you keep money over the hill, and we Armenians have lived for 3000 years and will continue to live.
  2. +12
    12 January 2023 11: 54
    To me it's a stupid question. If the SVO drags on, then both there and there. If we achieve victory, then neither there nor there.
    1. -2
      12 January 2023 14: 52
      It's a stupid question for me

      If the SVO is delayed

      You yourself answered. And our "type" of CBO did not drag on? That's just the point, that the further, the more terrible. And nothing good is planned for Russia in the future.
      1. -7
        12 January 2023 16: 43
        Who said it took too long? Did the Supreme Commander-in-Chief announce the terms from the very beginning?
  3. +5
    12 January 2023 11: 59
    And politicians have driven themselves into a puddle, now they blame everyone
    Not only did no one recognize Karabakh, but Russia itself did not recognize the LDNR until the "non-war"
    (There, she already entered the EDRO, but she did not recognize everything ...)

    But real countries, such as Belarus and China, do not recognize even now ...
    1. 0
      12 January 2023 16: 46
      So what? LDNR is now part of Russia. What - real countries refuse to recognize Russia?
  4. +2
    12 January 2023 12: 18
    We are confidently moving towards a big war. Last .
  5. +1
    12 January 2023 12: 58
    The "second front" will be opened wherever they can.
    In Kazakhstan, up to 70% of Western investment, and therefore nothing surprising in social unrest and the fight against the personality cult of Nazarbayev.
    Armenia and all Transcaucasian state formations are included in the Western project "Eastern Partnership", and as a result - a color revolution in Georgia, constant unrest and unrest in Armenia, a war with Azerbaijan, which gravitates more towards Turkey.
    The most important priority for Russia is Kazakhstan, because if NATO starts to “master” it, then the Russian Federation will be forced to start a new NWO but already in Kazakhstan, at a distance of a cannon shot from which there are such urban settlements and industrial centers as Stalingrad, Samara, Orenburg, Magnitka , Chelyabinsk, Kurgan, Omsk, Novosibirsk, Barnaul, not to mention the Trans-Siberian
    1. -5
      12 January 2023 16: 50
      Kazakhstan is not Ukraine. There is no such rabid Bandera. The population is three times smaller. Much less weapons. And there are no common borders with NATO. It is unlikely that the globalists will go there!
  6. oao
    -1
    12 January 2023 13: 17
    And how interesting will the escalation be? Unlike Ukraine, we have no disputes over territory with them. Will they be asked to leave Baikonur and Gyumri? Yes, for God's sake. What's next?
    1. +4
      13 January 2023 02: 08
      In Kazakhstan, there is both rabid nationalism and territorial claims. Recently they announced that the Orenburg region is primordially Kazakh lands.
      But dates and samurai, Chukhons and Labus have claims to Russia. If they pile up in a crowd, how to fight back? There is no army and navy from the word at all, the liberoids tried ... Only the airborne forces and marines showed something intelligible, and of course the PMC, that's all. The contractors fled from Kyiv, Izyum, Kharkov and Kherson so quickly that they provided the Armed Forces of Ukraine with equipment for six months. And there are no censorship words about the Navy at all!
  7. +10
    12 January 2023 13: 31
    If you think about it, then Kazakhstan is a "tidbit" for the United States. This is an opportunity to have military bases near the Caspian Sea (near Russia) and in southeastern Kazakhstan on the border with China. So far, of course, they don’t talk about it out loud, but I’m sure that Kazakhstan is in the minds of the Americans
    1. +4
      12 January 2023 15: 34
      Quote: Colonel Kudasov
      Kazakhstan is a "tidbit" for the USA. This is an opportunity to have military bases near the Caspian Sea (near Russia) and in southeastern Kazakhstan on the border with China.

      what the fuck is the Caspian...

      from Kazakhstan - a stone's throw to the strategic mines of Dombarovsky and a little further to Uzhur.
      And what saves us from the Americanization of Kazakhstan is China, which really doesn’t need US bases on the western border either.
      And China in the US is much more respected ...
      1. +1
        12 January 2023 19: 30
        what the fuck is the Caspian...

        Very even nafig. Americans are very interested in what and how Russia and Iran trade in the Caspian. At one time, they put pressure on Baku with plans to place a coastal tracking station, but Aliyev refused, but the idea itself undoubtedly remains. The US base in the Caspian is control over both Russia and, to some extent, Iran
      2. +1
        12 January 2023 23: 24
        what the fuck is the Caspian...

        the flotilla of the US Navy in the Caspian Sea is a bone in the throat of Russia and a real threat to Iran.
  8. +4
    12 January 2023 13: 41
    All former Soviet republics of the Soviet Union that seized the lands of Russia are enemies of the Russian Federation (excluding Belarus). Someone is potential, and someone has become an open enemy.
    The trouble is that during Putin's rule, the legal issue of belonging to the territories of the former republics of the Soviet Union was not resolved, and a legal assessment of the events of the 1990s was not given. Putin and all his entourage have a very negative attitude towards the USSR. They have a fear of the USSR.
    The territories of the former Soviet republics of the Soviet Union, whose property is this? Who gave the right to dispose of this property? Show documents? Putin is afraid to answer these questions. Hence the superficial solutions that bring troubles and problems to all peoples living on the territory of the former USSR. NATO from within, with the help of traitors, killed the USSR, but could not kill all the Russians. The state coup committed in the 1990s, the murder of the USSR, has no statute of limitations.
    The Russian Federation has big problems with each former Soviet republic of the Soviet Union, and NATO uses them according to the "Divide and Rule" principle, and the comprador bourgeois power of the Russian Federation helps them in this.
    The anti-Russian front exists in all the former Soviet republics of the Soviet Union.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  9. -1
    12 January 2023 13: 43
    The first was June 12, 1990. Come on. Dugin says that we will go to the West until we hit our stride. What about in the East? This is a bad sign. In Chechnya, we watched how Ukrainians were in the ranks of the Chechens. Now Ukraine. It seems that an uncontrolled skating rink was launched from the mountain ... But in fact it is controlled. The only question is who.
  10. +1
    12 January 2023 14: 44
    The will of the Anglo-Saxons so far dominates around Russia.
    Russia does not offer them any resistance. Its government diligently protects its "partners" from threats and military pressure.
    On the contrary, it follows their plan in Ukraine, and is already ready to drag the country into a deadly war with NATO, for the glory of its organizers and beneficiaries.
    Russia's obedience to its slaughter in the European slaughter makes a corresponding impression on its partners, who choose a different, "more successful" side.
    1. -2
      12 January 2023 16: 54
      Fuck you, dear!
      1. +2
        12 January 2023 19: 51
        I write as is. Object to the case, or be silent
        1. -3
          13 January 2023 08: 39
          Do you speak the truth? Presumptuous, however! It smacks of liberal cretinism! Are you pouring water on the globalists' mill?
    2. +1
      12 January 2023 22: 11
      Well, the war with NATO is already TMV, they also no longer have special weapons for crests. There will be no war with NATO if we win, now. I really, really hope so.
      1. +2
        13 January 2023 08: 05
        Galyna Rozkova:
        Well, the war with NATO, this is TMV

        Did this stop the Anglo-Saxons in the 30s of the last century? For the sake of advancing to world domination, they are ready for anything. Then the goal was the USSR. It didn't grow. Now they have Russia and China at stake.
        Nuclear weapons fundamentally changed the situation.
        Now they can be threatened directly to the beneficiary and the organizer. The one who had already retreated before this threat in 1962.

        Galyna Rozkova:
        they also don’t have special weapons for crests anymore

        Where does this data come from? From themselves. Useful disinformation that helps to draw us into a war with NATO and receive money from the budgets for our military-industrial complex

        Galyna Rozkova:
        There will be no war with NATO if we win, now

        Why? Ukraine and Europe - a ring belonging to the Anglo-Saxons. How can a boxer in the ring beat his master? Lie down with the bones and bring him profit - maybe.

        I really, really hope so.

        Hope must be backed up by sensible action.
        Our enemy is the owner of the ring and this whole gang
  11. +4
    12 January 2023 18: 54
    Kazakhstan is understandable: a long border, it borders in the middle of the south of Russia. In the case of US or NATO bases, this is a natural expensive splinter. And why do we need Armenia, if they themselves are so smart: they wanted us to fight for them. Let them roll sausage. Moreover, Russia is separated from Armenia by pro-NATO Georgia and Armenia's enemy Azerbaijan.
    1. +1
      12 January 2023 22: 06
      Therefore, Erdogan walks in friends, and all the hubs are for him, despite the knife in the back. He's better than the British. But then they will appear.
  12. +4
    12 January 2023 20: 08
    The war could have ended quickly if the Russian president had more connections to reality. The tactics used in the first days of the SVO showed the entire rotten core of the RF Ministry of Defense, where parquet generals occupy the highest posts, and officers with combat experience go to the maximum in swing. Therefore, given the spinelessness of power, the second front will be in Kazakhstan, not Armenia. The more such a front causes damage, the more likely it is to be organized.
  13. 0
    12 January 2023 20: 40
    All the former republics of the USSR will be hostile to us, Washington will pay for everything, and we even have no hope for Belarus, and China is the second enemy after the West! We would bring Iran and Syria closer ..
  14. DO
    +2
    12 January 2023 21: 39
    The big strategic mistake of the Kremlin, which we warned about in advance, was the subsequent hasty withdrawal of Russian troops from this country.

    Learn from mistakes. And the reason to correct them may well still present itself, because of the unceasing "war of clans" in Kazakhstan. For not stopping the possible next bloody chaos in this country, part of the former USSR, would be a humanitarian crime.

    Pashinyan, who “leaked” Nagorno-Karabakh, is now surrendering all of Armenia to the collective West. Until Russia solves the problem of Ukraine, it is not capable of any other decisive actions in other directions.

    Moreover, the longer the liberation of Ukraine from Ukrobander Nazism is delayed, mainly due to "gestures of good will", the less likely Russia itself is to survive.
    And the same Pashinyan is closely monitoring the situation, keeping his nose to the wind.
  15. +1
    12 January 2023 21: 58
    The conclusions are once again delusional.

    First, the West will not allow the creation of any new USSR. And the West cannot be broken by the power of Russia. We can’t even break Ukraine for almost a year, what can we say about the West ...
    Secondly, none of the former participants wants to go to the "new USSR", and you will not be forced to be nice.
    Thirdly, I repeat, everything is decided by personnel. Who will be in charge of this education? Really Putin?
  16. +3
    12 January 2023 22: 00
    Everywhere there is also about Russian forces and anti-Russian ones. Let's show strength, everything will be fine, no, then no, it will not be good. No one, moreover ... At the same time, the elite with the stolen from their people will be generally not bad, someone will even be in gauleiters. It doesn't matter if it's Russia or a republic. So far, nowhere in the republics has it reached the state of Ukraine, and it’s not the Russians there who are “non-brothers”, the ethnic factor. This is precisely the whole point, that the peoples have nothing to share, the division is due to the loot by the elites from their people. It doesn't matter if it's Russia or a republic. But specifically, a certain national elite may well "drag" NATO, Turks, British, Americans, international peacekeepers into the country, precisely to protect the loot from their people. So yes, you have to win.
    1. DO
      0
      13 January 2023 03: 44
      At the same time, the elite with the stolen from their people will be generally not bad, someone will even be in gauleiters.

      In Gauleiters hardly. More like a capo in a barracks.
  17. +1
    12 January 2023 23: 00
    Pashinyan is a creature of the West. Having come to power, he did not act straightforwardly like crests. He was waiting for an opportune moment to finally cross over to the West. For this, Karabakh will have to be abandoned. The whole problem is that in Armenia there is a very powerful lobby in support of the independence of Karabakh. Therefore, now Pashinyan will seek to blame the Russians for the surrender of Karabakh. With Aliev on this subject, he most likely agreed.
  18. +1
    13 January 2023 00: 26
    Will be. The Russians have a characteristic feature of arguing, not taking into account current trends. Dream of the USSR 2.0? She went. This will never happen. Those regions that the Russian Empire conquered in the 19th century are not friends of the Russians. This must be recognized and accepted. There are no friends, no allies - this is a reality from which one must proceed.
  19. +1
    13 January 2023 09: 31
    We need to prepare for the fact that in Asia and the Caucasus we have no friends among the former.
  20. 0
    13 January 2023 10: 21
    Now Pashinyan has agreed that Russian peacekeepers can be replaced by UN peacekeepers.

    The problem is that in order for UN peacekeepers to come to some region of the world, the consent of both warring parties is needed. So, without the consent of Azerbaijan, not a single blue helmet can appear in Karabakh.
  21. +2
    13 January 2023 10: 22
    Quote: Kazimir Prutikoff
    Pashinyan is a creature of the West.

    The only difference between Pashinyan and Sargsyan is that Pashinyan sometimes allows himself to say what he thinks. True, the further - the less. Is it under Pashinyan that the US Embassy in Armenia reached 2,5 thousand staff? Is it Pashinyan who allowed the United States to equip American bacteriological laboratories in Armenia that collect human DNA samples?? No, Sargsyan did it. Moreover, Sargsyan began to launch American bacteriological laboratories on the territory of Armenia as soon as he sat in the presidential chair in 2008. Namely, since 2009. And by the end of Sargsyan's presidency, there were already 12 US bacteriological laboratories in Armenia. Is it Pashinyan in the United States who was awarded a special medal: "Ellis Island Medal" (a public medal, but recognized by the US Congress and highly respected, there is practically no former US President who has not been awarded this medal), which is given "for a special contribution to the development of relations of one state or another with the United States". But Sargsyan received such a medal back in 2011, during his visit to the United States. Apparently just for allowing the activities of US bacteriological laboratories on the territory of Armenia. By the way, Sargsyan is still the first and so far the only foreign president honored to be awarded this medal. Pashinyan does not have such a medal. Is it Pashinyan, on the day of the national state holiday of Armenia on May 28, 2016, in the center of Yerevan, with his entire retinue, who opened a monument to the Nazi Nzhdeh? No, Pashinyan was then nobody. He wasn't even close. The monument to the Nazi Nzhdeh was opened by Sargsyan with his retinue. Yes, I am aware that for Armenians this Nzhdeh is half-saint. Or even for some completely holy. But for us, he is a Nazi !!!! And at the same time, the Armenians want us to help them and consider them friends? Where is the logic ? That is, Sargsyan, like all previous presidents of Armenia, just like Pashinyan, focused exclusively on the United States. But Sargsyan knew how to keep his mouth shut and did not forget to praise Russia loudly from time to time.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. 0
    14 January 2023 18: 02
    And why can't the coup d'état of the Kazakhs be done in favor of Russia? It’s high time to sweep Pashinyan out of Armenia with a filthy broom, give the unshaven bum for free to the French, let them gnaw him instead of a frog.
    1. 0
      15 January 2023 00: 15
      What a coup our bald sheep can make, they can only bleat and get out of the noose at the expense of the lives of ordinary people in the trenches, who have been spread rot and robbed for more than 30 years, and are still doing it!
  26. +1
    15 January 2023 00: 13
    All the dummies have whipped, soon the last Chukchi will run away from Russia and this is a fact!
  27. +1
    15 January 2023 00: 27
    As they say, since such a thing, it is necessary to drive the entire Armenian, Azerbaijani, Kazakh, and other diasporas to their native Palestinians for feeding, it’s enough in Russia to earn money and raise their economy at the expense of us, let America and Europe feed them and we are more satisfying and calmer without the Churk fifth column with which even Patrushev cannot cope! Expel everyone, even those who have taken Russian citizenship, they will never become Russian and will shit anywhere!
  28. 0
    15 January 2023 18: 45
    Another question on the topic of the day

    Armenia or Kazakhstan: where will a new anti-Russian front be opened?

    OF COURSE RUSSIA WILL WIN! Of course, there will be no USSR, BUT ......
  29. 0
    18 January 2023 01: 00
    Azerbaijan will enter the CSTO, and Armenia will leave? Ha ha ... This is all to the fact that Turkey will leave NATO and create its own anti-Western bloc south of our zone, will be our ally. What does Syria, Egypt, Libya, Algeria and Tunisia can enter the Turkish bloc. That is, all the countries of the Mediterranean are of the Arab type.