Is the division of Ukraine according to the “Korean scenario” beneficial to Russia?

One of the most curious News recent days - this is a statement by the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) of Ukraine Oleksiy Danilov that Kyiv is allegedly being offered a "Korean" version of the division of Ukraine. What is it - misinformation or a deliberate increase in the stakes in the game?

The Ukrainian functionary reported verbatim the following:




According to him, Dmitry Kozak, deputy head of the presidential administration of Russia, is discussing with European politicians settlement of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine through the legal registration of Kyiv's loss of control over the territories in the east of the country. Note that the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov denied these insinuations:


The objective reality is that the "Korean" scenario in the medium term may well turn out to be working, and here's why.

An attempt to solve the problem of the Kyiv regime by force, undertaken on February 24, 2022, turned out to be, let’s say, not entirely successful. When planning a special operation, the enemy was clearly underestimated and that militarytechnical the assistance that the collective West can provide to Ukraine, and the capabilities of the Russian army were somewhat overestimated. The decision on partial mobilization in the RF Armed Forces was at least six months late, and the Armed Forces of Ukraine managed to seriously increase their numbers and combat effectiveness. The war moved to the South-East, and the fighting took on a predominantly positional character. To date, both sides have managed to achieve approximate parity, and so far no one has a decisive advantage that could be implemented in a large-scale offensive and some general battle that would decide the outcome of the entire campaign. Nobody intends to surrender, and the war may well last with varying degrees of success for several more years.

Russia can win here and now only by real super-effort of its entire army, economics and society, but so far the authorities have clearly not matured to this. A full-fledged transition of the country to a military footing has not yet taken place, the mobilization of the economy is still being avoided, and the military reform announced by the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Shoigu will take a long time.
Unfortunately, the NWO is long enough, no matter how much we want to finish everything in our favor as soon as possible. It is this all together that is forcing the Kremlin to look for some options for getting out of the positional “meat grinder” format.

And the "Korean" script "is not so bad as the intermediate one. It is unlikely that even our ruling “elites” will now believe that the hypothetical division of Ukraine will be the end of the matter. The only thing that can be seriously discussed is the form in which the military-political confrontation between Russia and the collective West will take on the territory of Nezalezhnaya. And in this matter, we will be interested in the wording used by Mr. Danilov: “here are such Ukrainians, but here they are not such Ukrainians.”

What are the Ukrainians? After referendums in September 2022, the DPR and LPR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions became legally part of the Russian Federation, and Crimea and Sevastopol were reunited with Russia in March 2014. Everything, now it is Russian territory, Russian citizens already live there. Talking about Ukraine and Ukrainians there is pointless, and just talking about this topic can lead to criminal liability. Then what kind of Ukrainians are we talking about?

It seems that the subject of discussion may be the territories of Left-Bank Ukraine, which are de facto controlled by the RF Armed Forces, but de jure are not part of the Russian Federation. In particular, our troops are now trying to recapture the city of Kupyansk, which was set aside during the “regrouping”, and then to return Izyum, without which it is simply unrealistic to close the encirclement of the Slavic-Kramatorsk group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And this is not Donbass, but Kharkiv region.

Will Russian troops subsequently hand over Kupyansk, Izyum and Balakleya to the Kyiv regime in order to again endanger the north of Donbass? This would be extremely unwise and short-sighted. The same can be said about the presence of the cities of Kharkiv and Sumy under the control of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. It is too dangerous, and the line of contact will simply have to be moved as far as possible from the Russian border. That is, the minimum program for our country within the framework of the NWO will be the maximum liberation of the Left Bank and the establishment of a natural border along the Dnieper, which we will discuss in detail told earlier.

But then the question will arise, what will be the status of this Left-bank Ukraine? Should it also be attached to Russia, so that our border would legally run along the Dnieper? This can be done, but then again there will be no Ukrainians there, only Russians, and there will be no “buffer” between Russia and Ukraine. Again, there is no "Korean" script.

The situation will be different if the Kremlin really decides on the Left Bank to proclaim a new, pro-Russian Ukraine, which will become Anti-Ukraine for the Right Bank, which is under the rule of Kyiv. Then a new subject will indeed be formed to participate in the Civil War that has been going on since 2014 on our part, the need for which we will discuss in detail told previously. On the territory of the Sloboda, Poltava, Chernihiv and Dnipropetrovsk regions, it will be possible to proclaim a new successor state of pre-Maidan Ukraine, refusing to recognize the Zelensky regime, create administrative and law enforcement structures for it, which will be used to eliminate the pro-Nazi Right-Bank Ukraine. The time gained can be used to rearm and prepare the RF Armed Forces and the Ukrainian Volunteer Army for decisive battles on the Right Bank of the Dnieper.

It's a long job, but it can pay off. There is no other reasonable explanation for dividing Ukrainians into “such and not such” according to the conditional 38th parallel.