Where do Russians come from who want to turn their Motherland into radioactive ashes


One of the most resonant events of recent days is the scandalous interview of the fugitive Russian actor Artur Smolyaninov, given to a foreign media agent, in which he expressed his readiness to fight against the Russian Federation on the side of Ukraine, and also wished his former homeland to turn into radioactive ashes. We are interested in the reaction of the Russian authorities in this vein.


What is wrong with them?


The fact that he is now “on that front line,” the actor said in an interview with the editor-in-chief of Novaya Gazeta. Europe” to Kirill Martynov (recognized as a foreign media agent in the Russian Federation):

At this moment, I understand that I have nothing but hatred for people on the other side of the front. And that, in general, of course, if I were "on the ground" - no mercy.

To the question of an inquisitive interviewer, on whose side he is ready to fight, the former star of the "9th company" answered as follows:

If I would have gone to this war, it would be on the side of Ukraine. Of course. Definitely. For me, this is even “not on the side of Ukraine”, for me it is on the side of my brothers, who were attacked by my other brothers.

At the same time, the fugitive Russian actor said that he was ready, without any doubt, to shoot at his former filming partner Soslan Fidarov, whom he recorded as dead in the NVO zone. Note that, unlike Smolyaninov, Fidarov went to fight in Ukraine on the right side. Fortunately, the rumors about his death turned out to be groundless, and Soslan quickly got in touch, turning to his former comrade:

Arthur, you have a multi-million audience. They believe you, and you deceive them. Arthur, don't do this....

About the fact that you shoot me on the battlefield ... Arthur, we both understand that you will never do this just because you will never be on the battlefield.

And that's right. People like Smolyaninov and others who sincerely consider themselves an "elite" will never voluntarily find themselves in a trench knee-deep in mud, risking falling under a large-caliber artillery shell.

Unfortunately, Smolyaninov is far from being the first and certainly not the last of the self-proclaimed "creative intelligentsia" who have undertaken to sling mud at their own country. We have already touched on this topic in article titled "High Treason: Why Russians Betray Their Homeland". In it, we rather posed questions to which the readers themselves had to find answers. Now the theme has been developed.

Where do such inadequate characters come from?

During the investigation, the main thing is not to go out on yourself⁠⁠


The reaction of the Russian authorities to Smolyaninov's provocative interview is highly indicative. State Duma deputy Sultan Khamzaev promised to appeal to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. The former president of Russia, and now deputy head of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Medvedev, spoke in the wake of the incident with the fugitive actor and his Russophobic statements even more harshly:

There, on the Internet/Telegrams, the discussion about how to deal with the traitors who have defected to the enemy and wish their Fatherland to perish has resumed. Including some insignificant bits of shit, who until recently considered themselves to be among the so-called intellectual elite. I have recently commented on this topic. Well, then a serious conversation began between the bosses, how to act: “according to the law” or “justice”. I'll have to give a clarification.

Of course, only by law. But if the law does not work or does not reach the goal, then according to the special rules of wartime. Let us recall the experience of the Great Patriotic War, and other countries as well. In times of war, there have always been such special rules. And quiet groups of impeccably inconspicuous people who effectively perform them.

A little earlier, Dmitry Anatolyevich proposed declaring all Russians who call for the defeat of our country in the NVO as enemies of the people and forbidding them to return from abroad, where they are known to become as sharp and bold as Smolyaninov. And here I would like to ask a few counter questions to Mr. Medvedev himself and his like-minded liberal colleagues.

Why is state ideology banned in Russia at the level of the Constitution? Why does the modern Russian Federation, existing on the economic basis of the USSR, in fact deny the Soviet past? Why, for more than 30 years of “independence” of the Russian Federation, Comrade Stalin was portrayed in cinema and on television exclusively as an anti-hero who allegedly repressed half of the country, and Comrade Beria as the one who allegedly raped the other half?

Who, all these decades, has allowed the free movement of overt foreign propaganda, praising only the advantages of the Western world and denigrating the Soviet past and the Russian present? Who gave budget money for these films and series, who allowed these performances and books? Who has publicly stated that labor emigration is normal?

Why was the feat of the Soviet military personnel in Afghanistan turned upside down in the same “9th company” of Bondarchuk? And what did Mikhalkov shoot in "Burnt by the Sun - 2" and "Burnt by the Sun - 3" with budget money? And what kind of mess can be in the head of the obviously small mind of the actor Arthur Smolyaninov, who starred in all these "masterpieces"? What kind of moral guidelines should he and others like him have?

Yes, he himself answered this question, barely crossing the border with Norway:

There are other people in front of you, they just have a different software in their heads, a different look. I stand and look at them and think: “What is wrong with us? Why can't we do that? Why can't we just live humanly? What's stopping us?"

And about the future of the Russian Federation, he speaks as follows:

To be honest, I don't give a damn what form Russia will remain in. It will fall apart, it will not fall apart. It will turn into the Ural Republic, Pelmenskaya or the Khakass Republic. Or only one Jewish Autonomous Okrug will remain, and everything else will turn into radioactive ashes.

It turns out interesting. At first, for more than 30 years, they grew up such characters with natural porridge from liberal propaganda myths in their heads, whose name is Legion. And now, when they behave exactly within the framework of the program laid down in them, they are declared "enemies of the people" and prohibited from entering. Maybe we should start with ourselves, with the restructuring of the System itself and the return of an adequate state ideology, so that later there would be something to present to these “mankurts”?
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Snail N9 Offline Snail N9
    Snail N9 (Snail) 9 January 2023 10: 53
    0
    Well, let's just say, a radioactive sword is being brandished here, just by many of those who are on the "right side".
    Here, I have more than once encountered those who want to strike with thermonuclear missiles at "decision-making centers" overseas and in Europe. And they also do not care that this will be followed by a nuclear war, in which, guaranteed, neither they nor their families will survive. They, like the person mentioned in the article, don't give a damn about it. Here, again, the question is: "Where do these come from?" Just like in the song: "We need a victory, but we won't stand up for the price"? "The whole world is in ruins" - the most "our thing"? Well, about the ideology, I do not agree with the author. It exists, this ideology, it’s just that they don’t directly voice it, but it climbs from all the cracks, this ideology is “White Guardism”. In vain, "SAM" mentioned the books of Ilyin, Dugin, Solzhenitsyn standing on his shelf. So there is an ideology. And finally, about the fact that someone has a different opinion. To have one's own opinion is, in general, one of the fundamental qualities that make a person a person. Otherwise, it will already be a biological robot. Although, it is preferable for some to deal with robots and they really want it - with them (with robots, and not with individuals) it is more convenient and easier.
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 9 January 2023 13: 06
      +8
      Snail N9 (Snail)
      And they also do not care that this will be followed by a nuclear war, in which, guaranteed, neither they nor their families will survive.

      You are wrong, Snail.
      The threat of nuclear war against the United States by the USSR in 1962 saved the world from a global nuclear war, which they were already ready to launch against the USSR by deploying decapitation missiles in Turkey and Italy. Now the United States is ready to destroy us in the war with NATO, after sitting overseas. This war will also become nuclear and turn into a world war. They don't care about it. They are pushing us and Europe into it with the help of Ukraine. By the threat of nuclear war, we will force the United States to abandon its plan and at the same time save the world from World War III. Thus, nuclear weapons in the hands of Russia, as before, will again become a factor of peace
      1. Nelton Online Nelton
        Nelton (Oleg) 9 January 2023 14: 25
        -9
        The threat of nuclear war against the United States by the USSR in 1962 saved the world from a global nuclear war, which they were already ready to launch against the USSR by deploying decapitation missiles in Turkey and Italy.

        Well, how can I say ... in 1962, except from Cuba to hit the US itself (except for Alaska), the chances were minimal.

        The United States, in addition to missiles in Turkey, had powerful strategic aviation based in Europe.
        There were rockets in Britain that also reached Moscow.
        The Navy had 8 SSBNs with Polaris missiles with a range of 1600 km - they finished off to Moscow from Danish waters.
        well, the basis is ICBMs Atlases and Titans

        It was all this that was the reason for the deployment of freshly baked R-14s (range 4500 km) in Cuba.
        We removed them - and again there was nothing to hit the USA, and the USA could still hit with intercontinental missiles, and from bombers, and from nuclear submarines. And in Turkey, the missiles were dismantled only a few months later, when ours were all taken out of Cuba.

        But already in 1963, she was on duty with the R-16 ICBM, which in 1962 was undergoing the final stage of testing (and the management was aware of these works).
        Was it necessary to force events in 1962? That's not a fact....

        KMK, it was worth waiting a year, deploying R-16s, deploying conventional troops and air defense in Cuba, and already under the cover of all this - deploying those R-14s in pre-equipped positions.

        And now you are delighted with this very ambiguous maneuver ...

        They are pushing us and Europe into it with the help of Ukraine

        The NWO was started by the Supreme Commander of the Russian Federation, not the United States.
        The United States, even for the 11th month of that NWO, continues to prohibit the use of its weapons on the territory of the Russian Federation (within the borders of 2021). Precisely fearing a vigorous loaf.
        1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
          Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 9 January 2023 17: 04
          +5
          Nelton (Oleg):
          in 1962, except from Cuba to hit the United States itself (except for Alaska), the chances were minimal ...

          You "forget" about the famous R-7 and R-7A deployed at that time at 4 sites in Plesetsk and 2 at Baikonur. In March 1962, on the basis of the R-7, a system of a partially orbital combat system was created that did not have a maximum range. Several dozen missiles were manufactured, throwing 3 mt with a CEP of 2500-5000 m. This was quite enough to destroy large US cities. The missiles were constantly on combat duty. In addition, there were already nuclear submarines with ballistic missiles

          ... it was all this that was the reason for the deployment of freshly baked R-14s (range 4500 km) in Cuba.

          No Oleg. The reason was different.
          The missiles of the "decapitation" strike in Turkey and Italy, with their flight time, did not allow the then leadership of the USSR to decide on a retaliatory nuclear strike, decapitating the country and opening the way for the main massive nuclear strike. The advanced division in Cuba "balanced" this danger with a counter danger, because. he was given the right to independently decide on a strike on the United States under certain conditions, in particular - during an attack.

          We removed them - and again there was nothing to hit the USA

          Again not true. There was the same R-7, and in February 1963 the R-16 was put on duty with a range of 13000 km.

          Was it necessary to force events in 1962?

          The introduction of automated control systems in the USSR at all levels of control of the Strategic Missile Forces, which reduced the time for making and executing a decision on a retaliatory strike, occurred 1-1,5 years later. The "window of decapitation" created a temptation for the enemy and increased the likelihood of an attack during this period.

          The NWO was started by the Supreme Commander of the Russian Federation, not the United States.
          The United States, even for the 11th month of that NWO, continues to prohibit the use of its weapons on the territory of the Russian Federation (within the borders of 2021).

          From the bunny mask you're trying to put on the US still sticking out wolf ears
          1. Nelton Online Nelton
            Nelton (Oleg) 9 January 2023 17: 53
            -8
            Quote: Alexey Davydov
            the famous R-7 and R-7A, deployed at that time at 4 sites in Plesetsk and 2 at Baikonur.

            Too open areas, too much time to prepare the start, only 6, no attack warning system.
            those. with a preemptive strike, intercontinental ships would be carried out at a time.

            Quote: Alexey Davydov
            in February 1963 of the year was put on duty R-16 with a range of 13000 km.

            Here I am writing about her that it made sense to wait only a year - one and a half, for the deployment of the R-16, and for this year and a half to refrain from sudden movements.

            decapitating the country

            Nothing prevented the organization of a reserve headquarters somewhere near Krasnoyarsk (how good was the bunker in Kuibyshev for these purposes - x / s).
            The Americans created just such a one then.
            By the way, it is relevant now.
            And then Ukraine is Ukraine, but from such a NATO country as Latvia, to Moscow, the same is only 600 km.

            Quote: Alexey Davydov
            The advanced division in Cuba "balanced" this danger

            Undoubtedly.
            But in fact, it had to be removed, and the United States remained able to cover Moscow and the R-7 sites even without missiles in Turkey.
            And maybe if they hadn’t rushed in 1962, in 1964 they would have put short-range missiles in Cuba.

            Quote: Alexey Davydov
            Wolf ears are still sticking out of the rabbit mask that you are trying to pull on the USA

            Do not distort.
            The USA is certainly not a rabbit, but not a mad maniac either.
            The actions of the United States are completely miscalculated by the logic of "nothing personal, just business."
            And in this business, the risks that Russian nuclear weapons will end up in the hands of Kadyrov are still excessive for them.
            And it also costs them a lot of resources to bend half the world to sanctions, and it will also come back to haunt the fact that they will look for / create an alternative to everything that they use for coercion.
          2. borisvt Offline borisvt
            borisvt (boris) 10 January 2023 00: 28
            +3
            I often disagree with you, here I fully support it. Nelton is very reasonable and makes good use of factual material, a good debater. At the same time, it is precisely as a debater, and not a seeker of truth, that he often distorts the facts and leaves the fundamental essence of the discussion.
            Just ask him about Crimea - he will avoid the question with the phrase that the Crimeans themselves wanted to come to us. And if we didn’t introduce the regime of little green men there, the horses would immediately show the active Crimeans where the crayfish hibernate. And calm ordinary citizens would look at the flags over the administration, and they went to work
        2. Vladimir80 Offline Vladimir80
          Vladimir80 9 January 2023 18: 45
          +2
          The United States, even for the 11th month of that NWO, continues to prohibit the use of its weapons on the territory of the Russian Federation (within the borders of 2021). Precisely fearing a vigorous loaf.

          no, they are not afraid of this, knowing the weakness and gentleness of the decision-makers in the Russian Federation, with strikes from the Hymars deep into the Russian Federation, they can wake up part of the sleeping leadership and the population, which they do not need
          1. guest Offline guest
            guest 10 January 2023 15: 52
            0
            Quote: Vladimir80
            strikes from the Hymars deep into the Russian Federation, they can wake up part of the sleeping leadership and the population, which they do not need

            Come on, there have already been enough strikes into the depths of Russia, but those who slept like that and continue to sleep.
      2. Ilya Zyuzin Offline Ilya Zyuzin
        Ilya Zyuzin (Ilya Zyuzin) 15 January 2023 08: 42
        0
        In any hands, even the DPRK, nuclear weapons are a priori weapons of the world, since they keep a potential aggressor from the risk of receiving unacceptable damage.
    2. Spetr Offline Spetr
      Spetr (Sergei) 12 January 2023 22: 54
      0
      Calm down, Snail, "they are taken" thanks to people like you.
  2. Yuri Nemov Offline Yuri Nemov
    Yuri Nemov (Yuri Nemov) 9 January 2023 10: 54
    -1
    Why is state ideology banned in Russia at the level of the Constitution?

    Because any ideology divides. For example, ~70% of Russian citizens consider themselves Orthodox. I propose to accept Orthodoxy as a state ideology. Do you agree?
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 9 January 2023 13: 58
      +5
      Because any ideology divides.

      In the USSR and the world socialist system, ideology united peoples against development animal nature of humanity. We see now where the world ended up after it succumbed to this beginning.
      He really is on the brink of death. Socialist ideology is not only the unification of peoples on the path of building a just society on Earth, but also the salvation of mankind from death
      1. Vladimir80 Offline Vladimir80
        Vladimir80 9 January 2023 18: 48
        -3
        What is socialist ideology?
        P.S. They say socialism in Sweden, is it suitable ???
        1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
          Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 9 January 2023 19: 37
          0
          Vladimir80
          They say socialism in Sweden, is it suitable ???

          And where does this "socialism" lead humanity, or at least Swedish society? How does he oppose the bestial principle implanted by the Anglo-Saxons? And in general - is it capable of it?
          Satiety is not everything, and not the most important thing - the development of society and man is more important. I'm afraid that this "socialism" will easily sacrifice satiety and its people too, for the sake of a common bestial "Western" goal
        2. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
          Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 10 January 2023 08: 33
          +6
          socialism is public ownership of the means of production ... hence there is no socialism in Sweden.

          and yes, socialism is really suitable ... there’s nothing wrong with the fact that Norilsk Nickel, oil and gas will belong to the people in deed, and I don’t see it in words ... all these Potanins, Abramoviches and other "raw materials" did nothing to create their assets
          1. Ulan.1812 Offline Ulan.1812
            Ulan.1812 (Boris Gerasimov) 10 January 2023 14: 20
            +1
            Quote: Nikolai Volkov
            socialism is public ownership of the means of production ... hence there is no socialism in Sweden.

            and yes, socialism is really suitable ... there’s nothing wrong with the fact that Norilsk Nickel, oil and gas will belong to the people in deed, and I don’t see it in words ... all these Potanins, Abramoviches and other "raw materials" did nothing to create their assets

            Socialism is generally different. Let me remind you that the NEP was under socialism.
            Under Stalinist socialism, state property also coexisted quite well, mainly large enterprises, heavy industry, and so on.
            And private property is mainly in the production of consumer goods.
            Various, cooperatives, artels, etc.
            For example, in agriculture before the war there were two million private peasant farms.
            Personal farmsteads of peasants gave up to 50% of the volume for some types of products.
            During the war, private enterprises produced both uniforms and equipment, and so on. I read that shells were produced.
            Private traders produced the entire range of consumer goods. Shoes, clothes and more.
            There was no shortage. Moreover, they produced goods according to the latest fashion.
            Those who traveled abroad brought fashion magazines with patterns and so on.
            Everything was banned and liquidated by Khrushchev.
            And he transferred all these cooperatives and artels into local industry.
            I still got these.
            But something has survived. For example, in 1980, I was traveling on the Vorkuta-Mrskva train and met a peasant worker in a private gold mining artel.
            He also gave me a piece of rock crystal.
            So they handed over the gold to the state according to the state. price, but they shared the profit themselves.
            What about salaries, what about equipment, what about deductions for geologists, and so on.
            So private production does not contradict socialism at all.
            The question is in what sectors it should exist and in what proportion.
            So let them sew clothes and shoes, private cafes, etc., but the oil industry, the gas industry, enterprises such as Norilsk Nickel, metallurgy, etc. are state property.
            Hence we come to the conclusion that a revision of predatory privatization is necessary and inevitable if we want a just and strong state.
    2. ivan2022 Offline ivan2022
      ivan2022 (ivan2022) 10 January 2023 06: 56
      +1
      Quote: Yuri Nemov
      Why is state ideology banned in Russia at the level of the Constitution?

      Because any ideology divides. For example, ~ 70% of citizens
      .....

      That is why the police, the courts, the army, the prosecutor's office, the riot police exist .... because no one has ever managed to unite everyone with an idea.

      But the ideology should unite those who command on the ground. Otherwise, there is no consistency in actions.

      The problem is that our compatriots live differently. When the boss comes, he starts by demanding: "Now you will breathe as I say, otherwise it's a mess"...

      The arbitrariness of the boss, as in feudalism - - - this is our "ideology" - if you don't lie !!
      From this very moment, the real general mess begins ...
    3. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
      Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 10 January 2023 08: 45
      +4
      Russia without an ideology has such a cohesive society, it’s just where to go ... especially the 22nd year showed this “rallying” ...

      Second, Orthodoxy is a religion, not an ideology. and to impose Orthodoxy on a country with a significant Muslim and Buddhist population is to destroy the country ...

      The ideology for Russia (since if you don’t like socialism and you want to continue to plow for the Rotenbergs, Timchenkos, Grefs and other Abramoviches) can, for example, be saving and developing the population. and under this ideology it is already possible to set goals: for example, to bring the number of inhabitants of the Russian Federation to 160 million in stages DUE TO THE BIRTH AND REDUCTION OF DEATH. and for this purpose, already think about what to do ... so that people die less, we need hospitals, high-quality devices, doctors. Accordingly, it is necessary to develop science and education. the population is increasing, which means you need to build comfortable houses, for the construction of houses you need equipment, you need building materials, and, accordingly, you need factories and factories. children need to be occupied with something, which means we need circles and sections, etc., etc. ...

      and in the end you yourself will come to socialism when you realize that "efficient oligarchs" only interfere with your program by buying yachts, football clubs and other luxuries ...

      well, with the ideology of 70% of citizens, seasoned with capitalism in the Russian Federation, only the number of churches is growing (of which, as Gundyaev said, 200 are being built in Moscow alone, and even more are needed (where????) ... and the number of schools and hospitals is only decreasing .. .
      1. Nelton Online Nelton
        Nelton (Oleg) 10 January 2023 11: 35
        0
        Quote: Nikolai Volkov
        DUE TO FERTILITY AND DECREASE IN MORTALITY. and for this purpose already think what to do ..

        For this purpose, modern perinatal centers have already been built and infant mortality has been reduced to European levels.

        https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/child-mortality-ranking
        1. Ulan.1812 Offline Ulan.1812
          Ulan.1812 (Boris Gerasimov) 10 January 2023 13: 55
          0
          Quote from Nelton.
          Quote: Nikolai Volkov
          DUE TO FERTILITY AND DECREASE IN MORTALITY. and for this purpose already think what to do ..

          For this purpose, modern perinatal centers have already been built and infant mortality has been reduced to European levels.

          https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/child-mortality-ranking

          This alone does not solve the problem.
          As well as purely financial support.
          There are two more resources that are practically not used.
          This is the attraction of compatriots, who seem to be about 20 million abroad, and the most important is the reduction in abortions.
          This is what the ROC could do, and not get involved in state affairs.
          These three areas can help overcome the demographic hole of the nineties and start population growth.
          1. Nelton Online Nelton
            Nelton (Oleg) 10 January 2023 14: 08
            0
            Quote: Ulan.1812
            This alone does not solve the problem.
            As well as purely financial support.

            I agree.

            Quote: Ulan.1812
            There are two more resources that are practically not used.

            Yes, there are many other resources involved in one way or another.
            Perinatal centers cited simply as an example that refutes the thesis

            only the number of churches is growing in Russia
      2. Ulan.1812 Offline Ulan.1812
        Ulan.1812 (Boris Gerasimov) 10 January 2023 13: 58
        +1
        There is an ideology in Russia, although it is not declared, but in fact it is.
        Aggressive-liberal, which they continue to look for Russians from all the irons.
        The ban on ideology in the Constitution was adopted for only one purpose - a ban on communist, socialist ideology.
    4. Ilya Zyuzin Offline Ilya Zyuzin
      Ilya Zyuzin (Ilya Zyuzin) 15 January 2023 08: 46
      +1
      The ideology of profit lives and thrives in Russia. Moreover, it is encouraged by power circles. In this regard, the ideology of all the peoples of Russia - brothers is much more preferable. Do you agree?
  3. DeadPahom Offline DeadPahom
    DeadPahom (Eugene) 9 January 2023 11: 00
    -2
    Mikhalkov is not going to dump from Russia? It was he, with his Cinema Fund, who filmed a bunch of shit, along the way nurturing crowds of scum of all sorts.
    1. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
      goncharov.62 (Andrei) 9 January 2023 11: 24
      +1
      His films are better than all your nasty liberal bunch. It is in relation to such people that you manifest yourself. Poverty of spirit and wretchedness of thinking are your characteristic features. You are dead man...
      1. Carmela Offline Carmela
        Carmela (Carmela) 9 January 2023 12: 38
        +8
        Mikhalkov's films were the best in Soviet times. And then everything changed.
      2. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
        Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 10 January 2023 08: 31
        +2
        see first Burnt by the Sun Anticipation and burnt by the sun citadel. and then tell tales about "his films are better" ...

        it's like with Ilyin and Solzhenitsyn ... no one read it, but it was ordered to admire
    2. Carmela Offline Carmela
      Carmela (Carmela) 9 January 2023 12: 37
      0
      Mikhalkov is doing well here too. Why fall? And he lobbied the current Minister of Culture for this position. He is fine.
      And in general, he is now seriously ill. Have pity on grandpa. If he dies, he will be buried at the Novodevichy Cemetery, next to his father. And Putin will express his condolences and send a wreath.
  4. ont65 Offline ont65
    ont65 (Oleg) 9 January 2023 11: 25
    +3
    Of course, the author is right, there is a contradiction between the hatred of former lovers of the West and his lies about the USSR with the absence of an actual change in pro-Western ideology in the domestic media, school programs, and so on. The same Medvedev, at least in words, is not Medvedev of the 2010 model. There is nothing more dangerous than illusions broken by life, but on the other hand, it is not a problem to acquire them if they are returned to the lover with hope. There is no such faith. Differences? The actor, as it turned out, on the contrary, lost his illusions about his own country. Whether one of them suddenly became a patriot, and the other a traitor, is not worth asserting. Their position is generally a meteorological phenomenon, and not a position in life in which your country, this is your common house with fellow citizens, which only a madman will call to burn, no matter what this house is today.
  5. Dan Offline Dan
    Dan (Daniel) 9 January 2023 11: 42
    0
    Maybe we should start with ourselves, with the restructuring of the System itself and the return of an adequate state ideology

    It's already late. All this must be done simultaneously and urgently. Because as soon as the development of a coherent ideology will be long and painful for many. In general, I don’t understand what you don’t like about Medvedev’s latest pearls? And only him? It seems to me that today everything that Medvedev writes and says on the topic of the day is the thought of the entire leadership, including Putin. It's just that one, by virtue of his position, cannot be expressed so categorically. And the disputes around Stalin and Beria, I'm afraid, are eternal, and they must be taken out of the brackets of issues of relations with Ukraine and Europe + the United States as a whole. I think that Medvedev correctly defined the framework for resolving the issue - the current legislation and the necessary additional norms. It is very harmful to search for "excuses" for traitors in the form of a difficult childhood and misunderstandings in history in the 90s. This is how any crime can be justified. Peacetime will come, then it will be possible and necessary to ask questions to all active defendants, including from the President. And today is not the time to distract them from difficult matters.
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 9 January 2023 12: 37
      +5
      Dan (Daniel)
      It seems to me that today everything that Medvedev writes and says on the "topic of the day" is the thoughts of the entire leadership, including Putin

      We have heard a lot from him and from Putin over the years. Adults judge not by words, but by deeds and their results.
      It is easy to deceive someone who wants to be deceived himself. In life, you cannot choose "on your own shoulder" the complexity of the situation in which you find yourself. You can only "hide your head in the sand." However, everything will fall into place when the rest, having been plucked well, begin to fry
  6. Yuri Nemov Offline Yuri Nemov
    Yuri Nemov (Yuri Nemov) 9 January 2023 11: 42
    0
    Sergey Marzhetsky: - you are engaged in ordinary manipulations

    You see, there are already disagreements. And I just do not like your ideology and where to get the ideal that will suit everyone?
  7. Mihail55 Offline Mihail55
    Mihail55 (Michael) 9 January 2023 11: 44
    -1
    Quote: Yuri Nemov
    Because any ideology divides.

    Is the presence of a traditional family in the country divides??? And if we get separated from the blue ones ... trouble ???
    1. Yuri Nemov Offline Yuri Nemov
      Yuri Nemov (Yuri Nemov) 9 January 2023 11: 54
      -2
      That is, you offer as a state. ideology to prescribe one point - "The presence of a traditional family" ??? Is that all? What is stopping us from living like this? Of course, you can still prescribe - "Do not steal, do not lie, do not commit adultery" - but this will turn out to be what I originally proposed, to be accepted as a state. ideology of Orthodoxy, everything is spelled out there, why reinvent the wheel. Or do you still want to invent?
  8. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 9 January 2023 12: 16
    +5
    Where do Russians come from who want to turn their Motherland into radioactive ashes

    Where from?
    They were brought up and brought up by Putin's Russia.
    1. Vladimir80 Offline Vladimir80
      Vladimir80 9 January 2023 13: 35
      +2
      I don’t justify anyone, but who raised Solzhenitsyn, Gorbachev, Yakovlev and Rezun ??? traitors have always been and will always be, and even worse traitors - who, screaming about patriotism at every corner, secretly ruin the military industry and squander state. budgets!!!
    2. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
      Dart2027 9 January 2023 20: 08
      -2
      Quote: prior
      They were brought up and raised by Putin's Russia

      Smolyaninov was born in 1983, and Putin since 2000. And at that time there were only Soviet teachers in schools, because there were no others.
      1. prior Offline prior
        prior (Vlad) 10 January 2023 08: 56
        +1
        Not an argument.
        Ukrainians were turned into fascists in 8 years.
        The generation of the nineties - the lost generation, experienced it for myself.
        For them, all Soviet people are losers. Both teachers and parents.
        For them, money is the only value.
  9. Hiker Offline Hiker
    Hiker (Dmitriy) 9 January 2023 12: 20
    +1
    Only a strong government can not pay attention to any scum.
    Relax and climb so much that Rwanda will seem like a paradise ....

    Weaken the USA and whites will begin to be cut for slavery, for genocides, for the memory of grandfathers and benches only for whites .... In the meantime, the slave owner on the dollar does not interfere with anyone, although ....
    Weaken Germany and the Turks, Jews, Ukrainians and all others will fly in all directions from the burgher who has awakened from sleep and beer. The Germans are the most explosive nation for cosmopolitans, refugees, etc.
    Weaken Russia and no, it will not fall apart .... but will receive a military dictatorship, junta, Gulags and a card system.
    The discord in Russia is its renewal, expansion and the end for many who bullied it ... through sacrifices and wars.

    Kissinger was right when he inserted a quote from Catherine.

    If Russia is threatened, then Russia expands its borders...

    And in all this the voices of some clowns.
    But in fact, they admit that Russia is a normal country, because otherwise no one would blather, looking back at the fate of Trotsky and Stalin's hatchet ....
  10. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 9 January 2023 12: 30
    +4
    Good, honest article.
    One can imagine what a powerful layer of various kinds of traitors has been formed and grown on our soil, more than 30 years of subordination of the country to the States. People like Medvedev have stood and are at the top of the power pyramid, subordinating the country to the interests of their "partners" all these years. The masks gradually fly off their faces, and the secret comes to the surface. An attempt is inevitable to ride the wave of "discontent" of the people and lead it with hastily "changed shoes" characters. There may be new ones too.
    It is necessary to be vigilant so as not to completely surrender Russia to the enemy, and ourselves along with it.
  11. Vladimir80 Offline Vladimir80
    Vladimir80 9 January 2023 13: 32
    +3
    I propose to look at the informational occasion from a different angle - in ancient times buffoons and actors (actors) were buried behind the church fence, in modern times - even reasonable and thinking people discuss "which of the actors / musicians / blochers said what, who named whom, etc. .d.". Those. every loafer entertaining the public is under the close attention of the population "what he said, what he wore, what he rides, etc." You just need to exclude them as much as possible from your own information field (for starters). At the state level, the lack of a coherent ideology affects - so such characters become "idols of youth" and "rulers of thoughts."
  12. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 9 January 2023 13: 57
    -2
    And, again, manipulation and switching attention from the main one to some kind of switchmen and psychos.
    Who knows this Arthur? Yes nobody
    And which of the more famous ones said - let's hit nuclear weapons? Kadyrov and a number of jingoistic bloggers. And there are always a lot of commentators like that ...

    In general, there are always psychos and it is convenient to purposefully switch attention to them .....
    1. Alexander Tutunenko (Alexander Tutunenko) 9 January 2023 22: 54
      +1
      Solovyov daily calls on his show to start a nuclear war with the West, and none of those in power pulls him up. Why?
  13. Maxim A Offline Maxim A
    Maxim A (Maksim) 9 January 2023 15: 12
    +1
    How long ago did the wonderful patriots of the Russian Federation leave and sell their property in unfriendly countries? Have you withdrawn funds from offshore? Stopped going on vacation? The speed of changing shoes goes off scale. How does Smolyaninov differ from Solovyov? Basically like in that movie.

    ... Give the morons an incentive and an idea and they will row without a break for two weeks. And in two weeks we will come up with something new or the situation will change
    And you? And I'm smart. I can't.
  14. In passing Offline In passing
    In passing (Galina Rožkova) 9 January 2023 15: 59
    +6
    Smolyaninov is simply a hero of our time, almost according to Lermontov. And if it's just - snickering. Let it roll without the right to return. And that's it. Ideology same need the most simple - patriotism. Quiet, knowing his history not from the Solzhenitsyns, but from documents. Steadfast and hardy, like a soldier Terkin, not Chonkin. Smart as Korolev, not Kasparov. Kind, like Dr. Lisa, not Mengele. Our choice is Russia, not the West. That's all.
    1. borisvt Offline borisvt
      borisvt (boris) 10 January 2023 00: 37
      0
      Good comment. The ideology should be concise, unifying and implying internationalism, like Trump's "magician". I believe that the socialist idea, due to convention and unnaturalness - everyone wants to live better - is not viable. But something like "Raga" - Russia is great egen, in Russian RVS - Russia is great again - it might go
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 10 January 2023 11: 30
        0
        borisvt (boris)
        I believe that the socialist idea, due to convention and unnaturalness - everyone wants to live better - is not viable.

        Unnaturalness and conventionality are features not of socialism in general, but of its "standard" model in the USSR.
        As the negative part of the experience of the USSR and the positive part of the experience of China showed, there is no standard model of socialism.
        Each nation must build its own national model of socialism. Socialism is simply a stage in the development of society and man. It can take completely different forms in the development of different nations.
        Naturally - convenience and viability should be the main qualities of any national model of socialism.
        Its required components:
        - the ideal goal of building a just society on the planet
        - the rise of society and man to it along the stages of development
        - the formation and expansion of the world socialist system, isolated from the "wild" part of the world
        - scientific management of the state
        Faith in God should organically enter the social model as the foundation of a system of moral coordinates
  15. Pro100 Offline Pro100
    Pro100 (Vladimir Babaev) 9 January 2023 17: 09
    +3
    In fact, artists are in the past jesters and buffoons. They exist to entertain the public, let off steam, relieve stress, etc. but not for ideology. They were even allowed to carry heresy in the courts. Ideology requires other institutions. Just now, in society, they were elevated to such a rank, due to their social position. For example, if there had not been a fuss, many would not have known who it was, what kind of artist it was. Yes, and the elite, it's different.
    1. kapitan92 Offline kapitan92
      kapitan92 (Vyacheslav) 9 January 2023 21: 16
      +1
      Quote: Pro100
      In fact, artists are in the past jesters and buffoons. They exist to entertain the public, let off steam, relieve stress, etc. but not for ideology. They were even allowed to carry heresy in the courts.

  16. Alex D Offline Alex D
    Alex D (Alex D) 9 January 2023 19: 53
    -1
    And who said that a raw colony can like it? Can a normal person enjoy life in prison? On the other hand, it is clear that this prison was created by the Americans and it would be logical to wish death on the Americans, and not on their own country.
  17. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
    Dart2027 9 January 2023 20: 05
    -1
    Why is state ideology banned in Russia at the level of the Constitution? Why does the modern Russian Federation, existing on the economic basis of the USSR, in fact deny the Soviet past?

    And what was wrong in Soviet times? That the Soviet intelligentsia was not saturated with this poison?
    1. ivan2022 Offline ivan2022
      ivan2022 (ivan2022) 9 January 2023 22: 08
      0
      Quote: Dart2027
      And what was wrong in Soviet times? That the Soviet intelligentsia was not saturated with this poison?

      In Soviet times, after the 20th Congress of the CPSU, not all of the Soviet intelligentsia became anti-Soviet. And there have always been an order of magnitude more idiots among both intellectuals and non-intellectuals.

      Christ himself had only 12 apostles, and then there was one traitor among them .... So what's next!?
      1. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
        Dart2027 9 January 2023 22: 35
        -1
        Quote: ivan2022
        In Soviet times, after the 20th Congress of the CPSU, not all of the Soviet intelligentsia became anti-Soviet.

        So now, not all traitors.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. ivan2022 Offline ivan2022
    ivan2022 (ivan2022) 9 January 2023 22: 02
    +1
    The image created by the actor can be known to everyone. But why on earth to listen to this silly type is not clear. Who is he, what is the use of his antics?

    In addition, he is in Latvia!
    This simple circumstance explains everything ........
  21. kriten Offline kriten
    kriten (Vladimir) 9 January 2023 22: 10
    +4
    indeed, for 30 years they brought up moral freaks who valued only loot. And everything was measured only by them.
  22. Alex D Offline Alex D
    Alex D (Alex D) 9 January 2023 23: 02
    +2
    Quote: kriten
    indeed, for 30 years they brought up moral freaks who valued only loot. And everything was measured only by them.

    Do you think television with its "Dom-2" and the Internet with its abundance of information will now be dealt with?
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 10 January 2023 16: 20
      0
      Alex D (Alex D)
      Do you think television with its "Dom-2" and the Internet with its abundance of information will now be dealt with?

      These won't do it because it serves them.
      Television now, like all these 30 unfortunate years, engages in brainwashing, debilitation and disunity of the people. Since Western technology came into it during Yeltsin's time, all this is being done by the "fifth column" of the Anglo-Saxons on a grand scale and on a scientific basis.
      As for the Internet - here they have a little more difficult
  23. Watching Offline Watching
    Watching (Alex) 10 January 2023 00: 22
    +1
    This person is wondering "why can't we live like normal people?" The question is reasonable. What is a "normal person"? This is simply the mentality of the majority of the population in the opinion of the majority of the population. Are Russians and Norwegians different? Of course. It seems to this fool now that he is the same as the Norwegians, good, smooth, correct, civilized, etc. He will very, very soon understand his deep delusion. Now they smile at him and take interviews about the terrible kingdom of subhumans in the vast snowy steppes of Asia in order to scare even more of their Vikings, already fucked up with propaganda ... but he will understand one fine day that for them he is and will forever remain subhuman. I wish it for him.
  24. usm5 Online usm5
    usm5 (George) 10 January 2023 00: 47
    +2
    I want to say in justification of all those who destroyed the USSR. In the last years of the USSR, all or almost all of the ruling elite has decomposed. Nobody believed in the state ideology. Not only the children of party officials, but also the vast majority of young people quite sincerely believed that the USSR was really an evil empire, which, together with the Warsaw Pact, should fall apart and be disarmed to save humanity from a thermonuclear war. Therefore, no one defended the USSR with weapons in their hands, a couple of politicians squeaked something there and then quickly shut up. We have already sacrificed ourselves once and the sacrifice was most likely stupid. The blade of our new NATO friends was not sheathed, it moved even closer to our heart. That is why all these people, who have betrayed the interests of the country, seriously think that they have taken the side of the winners and are zealously gaining points. But their calculations are not groundless. NATO is more than three times the size of Russia in conventional weapons, and there are very troubling issues on nuclear weapons. We have really unique air defense with excellent missiles that hit targets at 500 km, if there is targeting. It is in this targeting that the devil is buried. Our glorious air defense sees low-flying targets with its locators at a distance of 25-30 km. This is funny. That is why the low-flying "Swifts" saw the air defense of the airfield in Engels five minutes before the moment of defeat. That is why the fragments fell on the airfield and damaged the planes. And now let's imagine that 2500 Tomahawks fly at strategic military and civilian infrastructure almost at the same time. Where will we see them and where will these missiles go down? Big question. Personally, my answer is no. And what does NATO have in this sense?
    For detection and targeting, they have long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft and drones with a horizon of 400-500 km, satellites with a horizon of 1300-1500 km, and soon there will be stratospheric airships with a horizon of 800-1000 km. And all this is watching us almost around the clock. We seem to have all this too, but many times less and so much less that we cannot even close all the holes in the defense of the airfield of strategic bombers. I am afraid that even what flies in our space will be disabled before a massive global strike. They have an X-37 space fighter with a railgun on board that shoots small balls that mimic a micrometeorite. Is it not such a micrometeorite that hit our cargo ship, and are not such meteorites the cause of the mysterious failure of the military satellites of the Russian Federation. In a word, they are really preparing to turn us into radioactive dust. Of course, we can feverishly build up means of early warning and targeting, but most likely we will not have time. I think that our chances of salvation, no matter how scary it sounds, in a global preventive strike by all strategic means, our few guidance means are still functioning.
    1. ivan2022 Offline ivan2022
      ivan2022 (ivan2022) 10 January 2023 07: 09
      -2
      The USSR was not a car to be driven in until it fell apart. The USSR is the laws of Soviet power above all. They can be done well, badly, or not at all.

      And if the people did not like to live according to these Soviet laws, but wanted to live according to the capitalist laws, the USSR has nothing to do with it at all.

      Well, now let everyone get what they deserve, let it fall into all places ... That's right ....
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 10 January 2023 16: 50
        -1
        ivan2022 (ivan2022):
        ... And if the people did not like to live according to these Soviet laws, but wanted to live according to the capitalist ones, the USSR has nothing to do with it at all.

        The Strugatskys give an epigraph to one of their novels:
        "To understand is to simplify"
        By turning their humor into a boring moral, it can be completed:
        "To simplify is to deceive"
    2. Ilya Zyuzin Offline Ilya Zyuzin
      Ilya Zyuzin (Ilya Zyuzin) 15 January 2023 09: 08
      +1
      Everything is relative. Sausage and jeans have such cute applications as total corruption, LBGT, maniacs, oligarchs withdrawing funds from the country, the collapse of production and the funeral of the rural way of life. So what are you dissatisfied with compatriots.?
  25. Foxsvl Offline Foxsvl
    Foxsvl (Vladimir) 10 January 2023 04: 46
    0
    They don't think they have to answer. Traitors in the Second World War also thought that Giler was forever. Only at the end of the war nobody needed them except our investigators.
  26. ivan2022 Offline ivan2022
    ivan2022 (ivan2022) 10 January 2023 07: 42
    +1
    From the author's article and comments it follows that the collapse of the USSR was in our history something like a general betrayal and fall into sin.

    And seemingly normal and, as it were, Soviet people turned, some into animals, some into psychopaths, some into maniacs.

    As was said in the Soviet military oath?

    If I break this oath, let me befall .... the wrath and contempt of the workers ..

    They betrayed the Oath and everyone began to hate everyone so much that they began to kill ... Everything came true ... Hurray, comrades !!!
  27. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
    Sapsan136 (Alexander) 13 January 2023 14: 11
    +2
    From my own experience, I can say - All those who want to see the destruction of the Russian Federation today are people who are not related to the indigenous population of the Russian Federation ... So the question in the Soviet questionnaires is, “Do you have relatives abroad? '' and about the surnames and nationality of the parents, was and remains a very relevant topic ...