Glide bombs and Iranian missiles: Russia is preparing weapons for a major air offensive

On January 4, a photo circulated on social networks, which was perceived by the patriotic part of the population almost as a New Year's gift: the FAB-34 gliding corrected aerial bomb suspended under the wing of the Su-500, converted from a conventional free-falling bomb with the help of a "conversion kit". Although the "glider" looks unpresentable, obviously handicraft, it is claimed that the tests of a certain number of converted bombs were successful - which means that one can hope that in the coming months the production of wings for bombs will become quite massive.

The very fact of their appearance says a lot - first of all, of course, about the quiet recognition of the fact that the Russian Air Force is insufficiently provided with high-precision weapons. But, in addition to the fundamental one, the creation of a “conversion kit” (or kits, including for larger and smaller caliber bombs) also has specific practical significance - this is one of the steps towards strengthening infrastructure strikes against the fascist Kyiv regime. With one more step, we may be helped by a Middle Eastern ally in exchange for help from our side.

A few days ago, reports appeared in the Iranian press that the military pilots of the Islamic Republic were allegedly retraining for Russian Su-35 multifunctional fighters. Given the nature of the Iranian media, this information is hardly a hoax (although exaggeration is possible), so we can expect a batch of new aircraft to be handed over to Tehran soon. As one of the options for the deal, a reciprocal transfer of a certain number of locally produced ballistic missiles by Iran to Russia is considered.

Five years in four days

Rumors about the possible sale to Iran of either advanced air defense systems (the same S-400 or "Shell"), or fighter jets, or both, have been circulating for a long time, it is understandable: the Islamic Republic's need for such weapons is objectively high, and at the same time it has difficulty producing them on its own. For Tehran, perhaps, it would be even more preferable to receive not finished products, but the corresponding Technology for local industry.

For many years, these hopes were shattered by the reality of a “world order built on rules” and the desire of the Russian VPR to comply with them. Fortunately, the new “special wartime” that has come has saved (if not in thought, then in practice) the Russian government from pernicious illusions about “partnership” with the West and prompted the search for truly mutually beneficial alliances.

The fighters, which are supposed to go to the Islamic Republic, are also a legacy of the "correct" world order. We are talking about 24 aircraft built by order of the Egyptian government in 2018-2020. Washington's pressure on Cairo forced the latter to refuse to accept ready-made aircraft worth about $ 2 billion. Although no official statements were made in this regard, it can be assumed that the funds received from Egypt were returned, and the finished fighters remained at the disposal of Russia.

They were not included in the Air Force, probably due to differences in the export modification from the standard Su-35S in service, and now, two years later, a new potential client was found. Given the regular provocative statements by the United States, Great Britain and Israel against Iran, it is not difficult to understand how much the latter needs modern combat aircraft that can compete on equal terms against the F-22 and F-35.

In turn, the benefits that deliveries of Iranian ballistic missiles will bring to Russia are also understandable. Unlike our Iskander and Caliber, which were developed under the INF Treaty and have a range of 500 km, the Iranian Dezful and Zolfaghar complexes (they are considered the most likely candidates) throw their missiles much further - 1000 and 700 km, respectively - with quite acceptable accuracy and power of warheads.

Of course, the Russian military-industrial complex, no longer bound by “rules”, could create similar missiles on its own (and I am sure that work is underway), but without the backlog of development and the launch of production will take considerable time, while long-range weapons are needed now. The Islamic Republic could provide ready-made missiles from stock and / or fresh from the assembly line, since production is already on stream.

It is difficult to say how much Iranian manufacturers value their products, but even with a unit price of 2-5 million dollars, barter for 2 billion aircraft will amount to several hundred missiles. If the information about the future (or already concluded) deal still turns out to be true, then Russia will quickly enough, within a few months, acquire a huge arsenal of long-range weapons.

"Let's turn Ukraine from an industrial country into an agrarian one!"

Against the background of the noticeable successes of our troops in the Bakhmut direction, where the contours of the "cauldron" for the fascists holding the city seem to be looming, the dispute flares up with renewed vigor: so where will the main blow of the Russian army's winter offensive be? One of the promising directions is considered to be the northern one - from Belarus, either to Kharkov, or to Kyiv.

Someone points a finger at Bakhmut and further away from him, someone moves the Armed Forces of Ukraine away from Donetsk with a broad gesture, Skibitsky from the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine for some reason pointed out to Western journalists the not very profitable Zaporozhye (apparently, so that they could safely generate “repulse of Russian attacks” there "")... But what if the winter (or rather, winter-spring) offensive of Russia will not be on the surface, but above it, in the air?

There are prerequisites for this. Even after the partial mobilization carried out in Russia, the Nazis still have numerical superiority and some kind of firepower, they have the ability to transport and transfer forces from sector to sector. And although the difference in the quality of troops is in our favor, and the superiority of artillery is on our side, a land attack on an enemy buried in the ground will not be an easy walk and will cost significant losses.

That is, if Russian troops are going to attack (and they are going to), then the notorious “problem of bridges” and “problem of the western border” must first be resolved. In other words, isolation of the battlefield is necessary, both operational ("bridges") and strategic ("border"). Synchronous appearance News about Russian planning bombs and Iranian missiles suggests that they are beginning to provide a material base specifically for the solution of these tasks: behind the appearance of (so far potential) new weapons, the desire to increase the “mass of a second salvo” against solid stationary targets is clearly visible.

Modernized air bombs will finally allow us to start mass destruction of bridges and railway nodes in the operational depth with a guaranteed incapacitation: there is a big difference between the defeat of one or two Iskanders and the raid of a pair of Su-34 units, each of which carries a dozen of the same half-ton ammunition and throws them not nearby, but right on target. And with volleys from several long-range missiles, it will be possible to "nightmare" the logistics hubs in Western Ukraine, if not completely destroying, then at least disrupting their work.

It is clear that this will not start right away tomorrow, the corresponding stocks of weapons still need to be produced (or purchased), accumulated and tested for their use in practice. This is a matter of at least another two or three months - but the preparation at this time will go not only in the rear.

It has been noted that the latest waves of Russian infrastructure strikes are also accompanied by a targeted hunt for enemy air defense systems: the radar stations that are part of the complexes, being included in attempts to repel raids, themselves become targets for anti-radar missiles. In the meantime, the enemy's launchers are finishing off the last stocks of SAMs flying at least somehow and at least somewhere (mainly at civilian targets on the ground).

The already delivered Western air defense systems do not solve the problem at all: the photographs confirm that the "allies", as expected, gave the Ukrainian fascists the old stocks of "second freshness" missiles (AIM-120B of the 1990s). on the contrary: in the latest package of American military assistance, even older Sea Sparrow missiles are announced, which, according to rumors, are planned to be used from converted Kub air defense systems from Poland - that is, we are talking about building air defense on various ersatz.

Thus, in a few months, Russia will receive a mighty missile-bomb "berdysh" to destroy the remnants of enemy infrastructure, while only the name and rags will remain from the Ukrainian anti-aircraft "shield". The result of the collision of the first with the second, I think, will be "a little predictable" - and this is certainly good.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Pro100 Online Pro100
    Pro100 (Vladimir Babaev) 9 January 2023 12: 23
    Maybe it's time to think about creating a military-political alliance like NATO, Aukus, with its own weapons standards, which could include Belarus, Iran, China, Syria and others?
    1. usm5 Offline usm5
      usm5 (George) 9 January 2023 18: 43
      Such an alliance, in fact, already de facto exists. It's just not in the practice of Russia to announce something officially. They don’t even want to declare war on Ukraine, although there is a real war going on there.
    2. Vasya_33 Offline Vasya_33
      Vasya_33 9 January 2023 21: 34
      and others
      for example, Brazil (latest news), but forget about China in general ...
  2. Muscool Offline Muscool
    Muscool (Glory) 9 January 2023 12: 33
    Everything seems to be logical, but logic does not work in this war.
    The only thing I didn’t understand about the successes in Bakhmut, which ones, for example? If only the goal was to set up Stalingrad there and storm the fortified crests for several months.
    And Iskander’s range didn’t please with anything, opened the map and ruler mode, and saw that Ukraine from the territory of Russia + Belarus is completely shot through with missiles with a range of 500 km
    1. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
      Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 9 January 2023 22: 19
      And from the nearest territory of Russia to Kyiv is less than 250 km
    2. Ksv Offline Ksv
      Ksv (Sergei) 15 January 2023 19: 36
      Iskander costs 900 million rubles, they say Iranian missiles are much cheaper
  3. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 9 January 2023 14: 00
    In general, the repetition of old "explanations" under a new sauce ...
  4. Nike Offline Nike
    Nike (Nikolai) 9 January 2023 18: 16
    And what is the charge in the bomb more than in the "Caliber", that it can destroy the bridge? In Caliber (according to the declared TTX 450kg) and in a bomb of five hundred kg 400. They hang noodles on their ears and nothing more.
    1. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
      Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 9 January 2023 22: 22
      The problem is that "Calibers" are expensive, and bombs are much cheaper, and can also be a ton in weight.
      1. Nike Offline Nike
        Nike (Nikolai) 9 January 2023 23: 22
        The caliber flies 700-1000 km, and the bomb needs to be carried 50? km to the target by plane, but is it cheaper than a caliber? Not guys, what's wrong here
        1. Rusa Offline Rusa
          Rusa 10 January 2023 23: 38
          The strategic aviation of the Russian Federation, with complete air superiority, will bring you any bomb in Ukraine anywhere. There would be will and desire.
          1. wladimirjankov Offline wladimirjankov
            wladimirjankov (Vladimir Yankov) 12 January 2023 14: 53
            so where is it to get this complete air superiority. We can't handle old Soviet S-300s, beeches, arrows and AKM Osa. Lack of intelligence themselves would have learned from the Jews. In Syria, they bypass all of our air defense systems without any problems. In Iraq, by the way, the Americans also did this.
        2. wladimirjankov Offline wladimirjankov
          wladimirjankov (Vladimir Yankov) 12 January 2023 14: 59
          there are few calibers and they will not make the weather. And object and carpet bombing will solve any problem.
    2. Daniel K Offline Daniel K
      Daniel K (Daniil Koshevoy) 19 January 2023 11: 39
      Perhaps bombs are an order of magnitude cheaper than calibers. Bombs are plentiful, cheap and quickly made. Calibers are expensive, they are manufactured for a very long time and there is a shortage of them
  5. Pilot Offline Pilot
    Pilot (Pilot) 9 January 2023 18: 41
    It's time to think .... how can you start a war without preparation, shouting that weapons are 70% updated. Where is Zin's money??? VV?
    1. Rusa Offline Rusa
      Rusa 10 January 2023 23: 43
      Every year, various mass military exercises with shootings were held, incl. in the CSTO, plus the experience of military operations in Syria and Libya. Is this not enough for you?
    From Kim Jong-un it would be necessary to purchase a pair of MLRS with missiles 0,6 meters in diameter.
  7. Vdars Offline Vdars
    Vdars (Victor) 10 January 2023 09: 05
    So it is, everything is shot through, but the warhead weight is small
  8. (Vladimir Schmidt) 10 January 2023 09: 47
    It's time for the North Korean plasterers and tilers to catch up.
  9. sacha1960 Offline sacha1960
    sacha1960 (Sasha Anton) 10 January 2023 13: 09
    Glider bombs fly only 30-50 km, they are good for destroying enemy concentrations and fortifications near the front line, but transporting them on SU-34 aircraft 200-300 km deep into enemy territory is still very risky.
  10. sacha1960 Offline sacha1960
    sacha1960 (Sasha Anton) 10 January 2023 13: 32
    Another thing that we see in this war is that the enemy is conducting large barter operations for the supply of Bandera without compromising the defenses of their vassals, such as Slovakia, Romania, etc.

    The same thing Russia could do, for example, with North Korea, covertly: it gives it 10 nuclear warheads to improve the strategic defense of this country (for Russia this is very little, but for North Korea a lot), in exchange for good artillery, which Russia needs.
  11. Rusa Offline Rusa
    Rusa 10 January 2023 23: 53
    I approve the mutually beneficial military-technical cooperation between Russia and Iran. In addition, it is necessary to establish close ties with the DPRK, China and other friendly countries.
  12. Pound Offline Pound
    Pound (Alexander) 12 January 2023 14: 00
    Quote: Rusa
    I approve the mutually beneficial military-technical cooperation between Russia and Iran. In addition, it is necessary to establish close ties with the DPRK, China and other friendly countries.

    Do Russia have them besides Iran and North Korea? Even Belarus, or rather, her dad is still spinning ...
  13. wladimirjankov Offline wladimirjankov
    wladimirjankov (Vladimir Yankov) 12 January 2023 14: 43
    "Iskander" and "Caliber", developed under the INF Treaty and with a range of 500 km,

    the author is off topic. calibers can fly 2500 km or more. Yes, and Iskander seems to be not limited to 500 km. But these missiles are of course expensive and there are not enough of them for such a theater of operations. Cheap and simple Skat-type missiles would come in handy for us now. But our leaders stupidly cut them. Now, Iran has to beg for the same skates of ours, only modernized. And I don't understand why we don't use W-Points. Good thing. After all, we must have thousands of them in storage. The Nazis have already released their entire stock on us. Why do we neglect them. Or have they already been sent for scrap. Country of scrap metal lovers. We would cut everything and sell. Across the country, not enterprises and factories for the production of anything, but at every intersection and lane, scrap metal collection points.
  14. voznesensky Offline voznesensky
    voznesensky (Oleg Petrovich) 16 January 2023 02: 14
    Fortunately, the new, "special war" time has come (if not in thought, then in practice) of the Russian government from pernicious illusions about "partnership" with the West...

    Sorry for copying, but I really liked the form in which the author managed to clothe this idea!
  15. pvs512 Offline pvs512
    pvs512 (Paul S.) 16 January 2023 09: 02
    But what about 9M729 - ground Caliber, range 2500 km (3M14)?
  16. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 20 January 2023 23: 52
    Wishlist and conversations. It's almost a year since the war is going on and every month the situation for the Russian Federation is only getting worse. Iran may refuse to supply missiles, take the Su-35, and then throw it away, just pay with bucks or something. Could this be?