Expert: In 2023, a direct clash between Russia and the United States may occur

December 31 2022 16

In 2022, Russia finally acquired a militarypolitical и economic sovereignty. This opinion was expressed by expert Boris Rozhin in an interview with military commissar Yuri Kotenok, summing up the results of the outgoing year and predicting further events.

During the conversation, the expert assessed the geopolitical struggle for a place "under the sun" in the future multipolar world, Moscow's allies, as well as the threat of a direct clash with the West and a new cold war. In his opinion, the existing world order is being destroyed, so the success of the Russian Federation will directly depend on the correctness of the decisions made by the leadership.

I like the changes in society, but they are still not enough. Some more time must pass before we fully pay off the “holy 90s” and pay all bills on them

- he said.

Among the allies of the Russian Federation, he named China, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, Belarus and Cuba, in which he was not disappointed. He also drew attention to the policy of Turkey, which tries to sit on two chairs and is guided solely by its own benefit. Despite the supply of weapons to Kyiv, Ankara remains useful to Moscow. At the same time, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is not a friend of Russia, but only a temporary companion who does not need to turn his back.

As for the risk of a direct military clash between Russia and the United States, it remains quite high. Such an open confrontation is possible as early as 2023, since Washington will not be able to defeat Moscow and will be forced to raise the stakes in the Great Game. At the same time, the Russian Federation is not interested in another nuclear crisis on a planetary scale and does not threaten the West with destruction, although Western "partners" understand only force.

2022 was the first year of a war that will not necessarily last only 2 years. Given the experience of the Iran-Iraq and Indo-Pakistani wars, as well as the experience of Syria, such a war could go on much longer. The United States frankly plans to accompany the war until 2025-2026. We must do the same, forming the readiness and ability to wage such a war for several years, simultaneously dealing with the issues of modernizing the country to the current realities

he suggested.

Rozhin believes that the new cold war will last for a very long time, regardless of the timing and results of the end of the conflict in Ukraine. He recalled that the end of the hot phase of the war in Korea did not lead to the end of the previous cold war. Therefore, the Russians need to tune in to a long process and serious work to develop Russia in the new conditions.

He stressed that in the foreseeable future, the West will not lift anti-Russian sanctions. Moreover, there is a possibility of new conflicts, where the interests of the Russian Federation and the United States will collide on the territory of third countries. This was the case in the previous Cold War, so it could happen again.

Regarding purely military successes at the front (in the NVO zone in Ukraine - Ed.), it all depends solely on the military and how they will conduct the 2023 campaign of the year

- summed up the expert.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

In passing

+3

31 December 2022 11: 47

Yankees go home. This is what should become a global trend. Not right from the beginning of the New Year, but gradually. Russian politicians should already understand that they are needed only as Gauleiters, and by no means all of them, to manage "assets" in Russia. And if there are any, there is the FSB for this, not everyone rides on helicons. There will always be a cold war, because the ball is one and not rubber. So wherever you can, Yankees go home.
Afinogen

+4

31 December 2022 11: 59

Expert: In 2023, a direct clash between Russia and the United States may occur

Or it may not happen.
Alex D

+5

31 December 2022 12: 01

Quote: In passing
Russian politicians should already understand that they are needed only as Gauleiters, and by no means all of them, to manage "assets" in Russia.

Putin is done with the compradors. But there is also the wrecking Central Bank and other departments and ministries. For 10 years, the people have been greatly exhausted by the antics of pests. Squeezed like a lemon! The war in Ukraine, in Little Russia is a direct product of the Gorbachev-Yeltsin policy.
The comment was deleted.
Alexey Davydov

-2

31 December 2022 12: 46

In 2022, Russia finally gained military-political and economic sovereignty.

Unfortunately, this is nothing more than a projection of our expectations and hopes into reality. She doesn't really care about them. It is affected only by actions, their results and outcome.
Since the arrival of Yeltsin and the formation in Russia of comprador power subordinate to the United States there has never been a release from this subjugation.
Can anyone say how, when and by what forces Russia managed to free itself? Did one "superhero" Putin do this? Or did the States suddenly become uninterested in a nuclear power capable of destroying them, and they gave up on it? Give your own reasonable answer to these questions..
They probably needed Russia for some purpose, and they put Putin (with his entourage) to "sharpen" Russia for it.
I guess, that The United States has turned Russia, like Ukraine, into a "expendable tool" for fomenting war in Europe, and weakening it with the hands of the Russians in order to enslave. Russia itself must now be destroyed by the hands of the Europeans, and the United States is going to use its nuclear weapons from its territory against China. They plan, without getting dirty in anyone's blood (if possible), to reign on two continents.
The presence of its own puppet government under Putin is hidden by the States not only from us, but from the whole world, and even from themselves - that is, from their public. The reason is the purpose for which it is done. The official puppet state in the role of an aggressor against their vassal, Europe, is uncomfortable for them. They need the blame to lie entirely with the "damned Russians".
They probably have two independent lines.
One, official, mass, is developing a strategy for the destruction of Russia and its government, as a completely autonomous adversary.
The other, hidden from everyone, is implementing a multi-year plan.
Thus, the NMD in Ukraine, while formally fulfilling the tasks of protecting Russia, actually serves the US plans to pit Russia against Europe on the territory of Ukraine.
Russia has actually shown itself to Europe as an aggressor who seized foreign territory and appropriated it. Now a provocation or just a decision by the United States is enough in Ukraine and it will be drawn into a deadly war with NATO.
The clash with the USA, which is the master of this combination and its actors for us - the only way liberation from the fate prepared for us, so we acted foolishly in trying to avoid it.
Only forcing the United States and Britain to retreat with the threat of a nuclear war can still stop our slide into war with NATO, and the world into a third world war.
1. In passing
  
  +2
  
  31 December 2022 13: 53
  
  Alexey Davydov, how are you going to force? All summer and all autumn, Russia and its "partners" signed a bunch of papers about the impossibility of a nuclear war. And again it was said about our retaliatory strike. Do another "Caribbean crisis"? Europe is exactly the same robber as the states, and they got involved in the war in the hope of profiting from us, because of the sanctions and hoping that the Russian economy will give up. But it didn't. Got a boomerang. And it is not in the interests of Russia to finish it off. Someday they will come to their senses, and will take revenge on the states, even in the slightest form. And maybe they will establish relations with Russia in a new way. Only America would gladly crush Europe, Russia, China (in succession), because there is no more room on the ball.
  1. Alexey Davydov
    
    -1
    
    31 December 2022 15: 28
    
    In passing (Galina Rožkova):
    ...how are you going to enforce? All summer and all autumn, Russia and its "partners" signed a bunch of papers about the impossibility of a nuclear war. .
    
    Are you, a prudent woman, suggesting that Russia submit to fate and follow the shepherd to the slaughter?
    I think the definitive answer is change the shepherd.
    
    In passing (Galina Rožkova):
    Do another "Caribbean crisis"?
    
    What's bad about it? We will force the enemy to retreat, we will avoid death. Then it was possible with the same Americans. Europe will only be glad to be freed from the fate that they have prepared for it.
    Well, if we fail, then at least we will take the enemy with us, destroy Evil, and not leave it on Earth as winners
    1. In passing
      
      +2
      
      31 December 2022 18: 06
      
      Where did you find pro submit? I write - to displace wherever possible! Not taking it to extremes. You will always have time for that world. In the meantime, Happy New Year!
      1. The comment was deleted.
2. usm5
  
  0
  
  31 December 2022 14: 14
  
  In fact, history is not created by people, but by the action of the fundamental laws of nature on them. Our consciousness is only 10% of what drives us and it is insignificant before the infinity of nature. To understand the true mechanisms of control of human civilization, one must understand for what purposes nature created man, why she placed this thinking matter on a thin crust of a hot ball called "planet Earth". One thing is clear, that human civilization has entered into a clear contradiction with the laws of nature, which are not fully known to us. But someone in this conflict must die, and perhaps not someone, but the whole civilization. But what I do not exactly agree with is your logical construction of the background of the historical events of recent history. It actually doesn't work that way for people. Putin, at best, is a helmsman in a boat that moves in a turbulent stream of historical patterns. At least analyze your life - we all had many plans, which, for the most part, ended exactly the opposite.
3. Accidentally
  
  0
  
  2 January 2023 08: 44
  
  Alexey. I have a feeling that you are a student of Tatyana Vasilyevna Gracheva, a colonel teacher at the Military Academy of the General Staff of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. And only she could clearly and simply explain what is happening in Russia. other brains do not have enough to think of a simple truth. the fact that we are rapidly flying into a collision with the United States and NATO writes about this T. V. Gracheva. I do not rule out a military coup in Russia and a new government that is able to rally the Reds and the Whites and the Blues. greens and blacks and monarchists into a single whole. which is terrible for the US and NATO. to industrialize. and the nationalization of strategic facilities in Russia. rely on the people. deal with the thieves. restore order in the country ...
vlad127490

+2

31 December 2022 13: 00

A direct clash between the Russian Federation and NATO is a nuclear war. Russia does not need a nuclear war. I can't say anything for NATO, I don't know. There are many idiots in the world. War comes when no one expects it.
1. Alexey Davydov
  
  -2
  
  31 December 2022 13: 38
  
  A direct clash between the Russian Federation and NATO is a nuclear war. Russia does not need a nuclear war.
  
  The United States does not need it either, moreover, this is their biggest nightmare.
  The question is who pays what price. We are already condemned. War with NATO will be fatal for us. The United States, on the contrary, has a lot to lose. The one who has such an opportunity will retreat. We don't have it, but they do. So they will retreat. Just like in 1962 with their "decapitation" missiles from Turkey and Italy. Just like the Germans in 1942 near Moscow
usm5

0

31 December 2022 13: 56

It seems that a clash between the Russian Federation and the United States is inevitable. At the same time, Russia can be saved only by a preventive global thermonuclear strike against the United States and its main allies, if it is, of course, feasible. Otherwise, sooner or later, such a blow will be struck against Russia, and if it is successful, then China will surrender once again and will again wait for centuries for a chance for itself.
Vladimir Tuzakov

+1

31 December 2022 18: 40

Why is the choice left - the war of the Russian Federation with the United States. Previously, the USSR was ideologically attractive and had many followers and friends around the world. Only the decay of the leadership of the USSR and the state apparatus associated with it, with the zealous collapse of the USSR by Western enemies, reduced the USSR to bureaucratic corruption and self-destruction .. Today, the Russian Federation is also in an unattractive form, not only for foreign governments and citizens, but also for its own citizens,. This means that the first thing is the construction of a just state, which today is clearly not fair for the main layers of citizens of the Russian Federation. The main battles await us on the domestic front, with elections, and other legal actions. NWO is becoming a forge of citizenship and a mortal enemy of parasites around the neck of Russia. Conclusion: Put your garden in order, then others will be friends and there will be no basis for a war with NATO, because a hundred and fifty million country and people who are confident in their rightness cannot be defeated.
1. ivan2022
  
  +1
  
  1 January 2023 12: 15
  
  Battles on the home front do not await us. The people completely lost them 50-30 years ago. And I didn’t even understand what kind of battles they were.
radvas

+1

3 January 2023 14: 12

This war is for a long time, because the Russians are at war with the Russians. And these are the best warriors who always won if they were not betrayed by the authorities.
radvas

0

3 January 2023 14: 15

On the home front. A cleanup is needed inside the country. Stalin was right when he prepared for the inevitable war, including the purge of the fifth column.