How the Kremlin thwarted 3 out of 5 US plans to drag Russia into a series of wars


The United States has long conceived the destruction of Russia. Washington planned to tie Moscow's hands with simultaneous conflicts on several fronts, dragging the Russian Federation into a whole series of wars of varying intensity.


According to the ZeRada Telegram channel, the Kremlin thwarted 3 out of 5 ideas of the Americans. In August 2020, Western "partners" tried to carry out a coup d'etat with the help of street protests. If the plan had been implemented, then Moscow would have lost its only real military ally, and Minsk is now, probably, actively helping Kyiv. But President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko managed to retain power.

In October 2021, ex-President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili arrived from Ukraine in Batumi. Then he quickly moved to Tbilisi to organize another color revolution in his homeland. But the local authorities showed promptness, their self-preservation instinct worked, so Saakashvili was promptly sent to a pre-trial detention center. If Saakashvili managed to launch a stormy activity, then he could again get power in the country. After that, he would have tried to return Abkhazia and South Ossetia and, of course, would have supported Ukraine in the conflict with the Russian Federation. It should be noted that the existing support for Saakashvili from the Ukrainian side is the main irritant of the current Georgian government, which has taken an emphatically neutral position in sorting out relations between Moscow and Kyiv.

In January 2022, “theychildren” tried to seize power in Kazakhstan in order to create a wide Asian front in front of Russia, or at least a large zone of instability. This third Maidan, which has become a favorite tool of the West, also failed. The self-preservation instinct of the Kazakh authorities also worked in time. They turned to the CSTO for power support and the color revolution quickly “dissolved”.

For 2022, Kyiv planned an offensive by the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Donbass, after which the DPR and LPR were to cease to exist. Then the Armed Forces of Ukraine were supposed to take over the Crimea. But Moscow played ahead of the curve.

If the West had succeeded in realizing the three color revolutions described above, then the position of the Russian Federation would now be much worse. Russia would hardly have managed with partial mobilization.

The Kremlin managed to avoid this scenario. That is why they are in a good mood there, the situation is not going according to the plan of Western scriptwriters, and this is already an achievement

- we are confident in "Zerada".

In addition, the Western "partners" have one more option in store for a "snack". Moldova, led by Maia Sandu, can ignite a new round of confrontation with Transnistria at any moment. Moreover, it will be more difficult for Moscow to defend Tiraspol this time.

At the moment, Russia has effectively stopped 3 out of 5 threats in the perimeter of the near abroad, which helps the Kremlin feel confident enough in a military conflict, even if it drags on indefinitely. Everything should have been much harder

- summed up in the analysis of "ZaRada".
  • Used photos: http://kremlin.ru/
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 24 December 2022 10: 19
    +1
    You can also write that the Kremlin disrupted the landing in Taiwan, the vote for secession in Spain, and separated Britain from the EEC.
    Win on win...

    But in real life, Old Man has already leaked everything. They wanted to attack him, but no documents have yet been found ....
    1. Snail N9 Offline Snail N9
      Snail N9 (Snail) 24 December 2022 20: 59
      +1
      What a good "Kremlin" we have, it saves the country everywhere, and it also saved the kittens of their rivers and moved the old woman across the road ... True, at the end of February, he poured all these achievements into the toilet ....
    2. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 25 December 2022 05: 55
      +1
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      They wanted to attack him, but no documents have been found so far ....

      He showed some kind of card to Putin. He probably remembered how he served in the border troops. Red lines, huh....
  2. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 24 December 2022 10: 48
    -10
    All these dubious examples, like a "frame", surround one - chief and undeniable, the place of which is left empty - the "frame" itself speaks about it.
    Putin himself got into a hot war with the West. And he did it in a few quite meaningful steps.
    First, the truth was assigned to the Crimea (a classic case-belli). Then troops were brought into the territory of another state, and finally part of the territory of this state was again annexed to Russia, as in the case of Crimea. So in the eyes all over the world Putin made Russia a de jure aggressor. These steps have two options for diametrically opposed goals:
    - if Russia is ready to clash with the West
    - if Russia is not ready for this
    In the latter version, we can talk about the participation of the leadership of Russia (free or involuntary) in the plan of the West, (or rather, its owner - the United States) to bring it to defeat and create a legally justified reason for this.
    1. Alexander Dutov Offline Alexander Dutov
      Alexander Dutov (Alexander Dutov) 24 December 2022 14: 21
      -8
      The concept of aggression includes the facts of the appropriation of foreign lands, and it doesn’t matter how, namely Novorossia, Crimea, Polissya, Volyn, Transcarpathia, Sloboda, Chernihiv, etc.
      1. isofat Offline isofat
        isofat (isofat) 24 December 2022 18: 42
        +1
        And the execution of the murderer, is this also aggression? laughing
    2. Alexander Dutov Offline Alexander Dutov
      Alexander Dutov (Alexander Dutov) 24 December 2022 14: 26
      -3
      PS And as for de jure aggression, look at the United States in Syria ...
      1. boriz Offline boriz
        boriz (boriz) 25 December 2022 00: 13
        0
        Why only in Syria?
      2. Elena123 Offline Elena123
        Elena123 (elena) 25 December 2022 09: 05
        0
        What about Syria? The United States did not declare it to be its territory, like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya. Yes, they destroyed everything in these countries, it's true.
    3. borisvt Offline borisvt
      borisvt (boris) 24 December 2022 14: 34
      +5
      What do you think, if Crimea remained with the current Ukrainian authorities, would it be better? Not to mention the sad fate of the Russian-speaking population, NATO ships would have been in charge in Sevastopol, and the Black Sea is an internal NATO. The beauty!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 24 December 2022 17: 53
        -1
        I say not about the justice of these our actions, but about their final result for the fate of Russiawhich is now taking shape before our very eyes. If we were NOT READY for a fight with the whole West, and she will, then what Putin did is bungling with millions of victims or sabotage.
        So it was necessary to act differently from the very beginning. Not to give up NATO's positions in 2004 and subsequent years, but to go for tough opposition to them when they themselves were not yet ready for it. Much would have turned out differently if Putin and his team had not voluntarily gone all this time to surrender our positions to the United States and NATO
        1. borisvt Offline borisvt
          borisvt (boris) 24 December 2022 18: 10
          +2
          I agree with you, earlier it was necessary to start to resist, as soon as strongmen appeared after Chechnya. But now, I’m sure, they didn’t give Crimea correctly at all, but from there everything today follows, unfortunately.
          Yes, the game is not developing according to our scenario, you are right, but speaking in chess terms, you can’t just leave the board like that. Therefore, we are trying to play the Sicilian or Spanish defense there in order to bring it to a draw at least for the time being - apparently. I would like, like you, victory, but the enemy is strong ((
          1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
            Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 24 December 2022 18: 30
            0
            Therefore, we are trying to play the Sicilian or Spanish defense there in order to bring it to a draw at least for the time being - apparently.

            We there are no levers in order to force the opponent to give up his victory, and agree to a draw. It is not provided. This changes everything. We are guaranteed death in the war with NATO, the unleashing of which, through the efforts of Putin, no longer depends on us - we are US hostages in Ukraine. Any sabotage at nuclear power plants and that's it. The fact that this would be the case should have been understood back in 2004, when he calmly agreed to the next major expansion of NATO and then too.
            The threat of nuclear war on the brink, as in 1962, gives us the opportunity to achieve not only a draw, but also the retreat of the enemy to the original state. However, this has always been the case, and in 2004 - too.
            I think that the reason that prevented him from doing it then is preventing him now. This reason in his dependence on them
            1. vladivan Offline vladivan
              vladivan (Vladimir) 25 December 2022 02: 38
              -1
              Roughly speaking, we defended in words, but in reality we drove everything for export from gas to weapons! Who defended the country furiously in the UN Security Council, only Churkin. show on Roskanals. Lavrov after Syria began to mumble about Ukraine. You come to the conclusion that the GDP has been reading to the population for 20 years what they will write to it. Not a single program for the development of the Russian Federation has been presented before the presidential election for 20 years, has never been at a debate. His friends decide everything for him! he simply read to the population and gave a press conference for the people. Dependence not on the West, but on his friends, associates, who brought him to power like Chubais, Sobchak, Gref, Berezovsky. GDP owes them all! , before the presidential election, they completely cleared the field of competitors, bought everyone out. Two are no longer alive. As Chubais hit the road, so the GDP began to collapse. Without them, it is zero.
            2. borisvt Offline borisvt
              borisvt (boris) 25 December 2022 09: 06
              0
              Respecting your position and agreeing that only the threat of American territory can calm them down, with this opinion of yours

              I think that the reason that prevented him from doing it then is preventing him now. This reason is in his dependence on them

              disagree. Of course, a person is also not sinless))
              Forced to interact - yes, if he depended, he would have given up a long time ago.
              1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
                Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 25 December 2022 13: 06
                -1
                Yes, if I depended, I would have given up a long time ago

                Probably not, because the Anglo-Saxon plan has not yet been fully implemented. I already wrote that the Anglo-Saxons themselves refused to destroy Russia in the 90s.
                You can not just take and command the country to surrender to the enemy. The Anglo-Saxons would have to risk and shed their precious blood. A more profitable plan appeared (or was originally) - to destroy Russia with the hands of Europe and, having weakened it with the hands of Russia, assign it as a production appendage. For this plan, they gave themselves time and made Russia under the leadership of Putin a convenient "tool". Chubais, Serdyukov and others are the "foremen" of this work. It's completed

                The same person, of course, is not sinless

                Least of all, we, the citizens of Russia, should worry about his moral character and problems. Moreover, he created a "Potemkin village", which closed the truth to the people all this time and cleared the political field of alternatives. Even if he was a "dummy", behind whose back everything happened - it's all the same betrayal. Think for yourself
          2. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
            Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 25 December 2022 06: 03
            -2
            Quote from borisvt
            only strongmen appeared after Chechnya.

            What other strengths?
        2. In passing Offline In passing
          In passing (Galina Rožkova) 25 December 2022 02: 07
          +1
          What is the opposition? Peace, friendship, chewing gum. Russia-NATO negotiations. From Vladivostok to Lisbon. And they understand this as surrender, and act accordingly and continue in the same way. And then - it's none of your business who we want, we take into NATO. Greyhound. The Kremlin and those around the grandmother do it, they believe that they are their own, capitalists, with their "partners". Yep, canned food. In line to be eaten, after Gaddafi, Saddam and others. I hope that this will finally reach Abramovich as well. All this means only one thing - we must resist, we must learn to win.
        3. Nelton Offline Nelton
          Nelton (Oleg) 26 December 2022 17: 43
          0
          Quote: Alexey Davydov
          - if Russia is ready to clash with the West
          - if Russia is not ready for this
          In the latter version, we can talk about the participation of the Russian leadership (voluntary or involuntary) in the plan of the West
          ...
          go for tough opposition to them when they themselves were not yet ready for it.

          The question of readiness / unreadiness - it is so ...
          A year ago, the readiness of the RF Armed Forces was rated high, while the readiness of the economy was low.
          For the 11th month of the NWO and sanctions, the Russian economy is holding up much better than expected, but the Armed Forces are somewhat disappointing.
          But as the NWO drags on, the opinion begins to appear that the Western arsenals are not bottomless and not omnipotent.
          About the Western economy "on the verge of collapse" who just has not written over the past 100 years, and still nothing.
          But nevertheless, time has worked and is working for Asia, against the West.

          So it’s definitely good that they didn’t get into a conflict in 2004, 2008, 2014 ....
          And it would be better if they delayed it for another year or two or 10.
      3. zenion Offline zenion
        zenion (zinovy) 25 December 2022 17: 21
        0
        If, yes, if only, yes, mushrooms grew in the mouth. Hitler also founded the attack on the USSR, he did not want to, but the people wanted to eat and forced him. If it were not for him, then they would help him to make it as if he were himself. Those who were in the know with the US somehow died. And the US remained clean and white. And it would be exactly like that thief - if not for me, someone else would have done it and I would be to blame. If we succeeded, there was a reason, if we didn’t succeed, we are peaceful people and our armored train is always ready.
    4. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
      Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 24 December 2022 16: 23
      +2
      Putin did the right thing with Crimea. but what I later gave back is, of course, ...
      1. In passing Offline In passing
        In passing (Galina Rožkova) 25 December 2022 02: 10
        +1
        Well, somehow the plan was not to chop off the territory of a neighboring country. And how it went. Now we can only fight, since we don’t know how to use cookies.
      2. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 25 December 2022 06: 05
        0
        We talked a lot about how we have been waiting for the reunification of Russia and Crimea for 23 years. And then the wise head of the Department of History, Doctor of Historical Sciences, summed up: “Dear electors, we have been waiting for this hour to return to Russia. But we had the idea that we would return to Soviet Russia.”

        https://literator35.ru/2022/02/theme/rossiya-prekratit-svoe-sushhestvovanie-leonid-ivashov-o-gotovyashhejsya-vojne/
    5. isofat Offline isofat
      isofat (isofat) 24 December 2022 18: 37
      -1
      Alexey Davydov, you have completely lost your shame, dear, you pass off your cropped version of those events as a true story. laughing
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 24 December 2022 18: 55
        0
        Give Yours Out - Uncircumcised
        1. isofat Offline isofat
          isofat (isofat) 24 December 2022 19: 08
          -2
          Alexey Davydov, do you agree if we start discussing a series of events from the seizure of power in Ukraine, which was not successful? laughing
          1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
            Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 24 December 2022 19: 21
            +1
            I don't need to be asked.
            Ask the Americans - will they want to use this operation of ours to bring troops from Poland and other NATO countries into Ukraine?
            With a corresponding transition from helping Ukraine to an official war with Russia.
            If they lose their footing in Ukraine, this will be tantamount to the beginning of their retreat. Do they want it?
            I think no. For this reason, any action in ukraine that threatens to seriously change the status quo in our favour, we will force the US to move on to the next planned phase - a NATO war with Russia.
            Now (and for a long time) something completely different is needed. We need to force the retreat of the very owners of this war - the United States.
            I have written about methods before. You can learn this from our glorious ancestors who successfully did this in 1962 on the same population
            1. isofat Offline isofat
              isofat (isofat) 24 December 2022 19: 27
              0
              Alexey Davydov, how you briefly state the "truth" and dodge the answer for a long time. I am impressed. laughing
            2. In passing Offline In passing
              In passing (Galina Rožkova) 25 December 2022 02: 12
              0
              Have you already asked Cuba?
              1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
                Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 25 December 2022 02: 41
                0
                We no longer need the deployment of advanced divisions near the borders of the United States.
                The division in Cuba solved two problems:
                1. He "balanced" the danger of decapitation by the States of the Soviet Union with a blow from Italy and Turkey. To strike our division in Cuba against the United States, he did not have to receive a command from Moscow. He had the right to independently decide on a strike on the United States in certain conditions and situations, for example, when attacking him.
                2. By its very existence, it created an unacceptable threat for the United States in the long term due to an unacceptably high risk, and was a good "commodity" for trade in negotiations on the withdrawal of "decapitation" missiles from Turkey and Italy that violated the strategic balance and created the danger of an attack with impunity .
                I think - due to the irrelevance of "decapitation" for us at the present time (the enemy does not have missiles with the necessary flight time, new technical solutions, "dead hand", etc.), paragraph 1 is probably no longer relevant.
                Point 2 can be provided by the deployment of Poseidon systems off the coast of the United States, even in a "simplified version", and in other ways.
                Finally, the main and most reliable means, as then, is the threat of nuclear war and our land-based missiles. Despite the flight time, the enemy will be "sentenced" already at the time of launch. As for the retaliatory strike, it is not as important for us, already "sentenced to death", as it is for the USA and Great Britain. This last one is the most important.
            3. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 25 December 2022 06: 10
              -1
              Quote: Alexey Davydov
              I don't need to be asked.
              Ask the Americans

              Zampollitra, or what? I fell asleep on such a stream of consciousness.
  3. Alexander Popov Offline Alexander Popov
    Alexander Popov (Alexander Popov) 24 December 2022 10: 54
    +3
    Maybe stop talking and blowing soap bubbles?
  4. Vox_Populi Offline Vox_Populi
    Vox_Populi (vox populi) 24 December 2022 10: 57
    +4
    How the Kremlin thwarted 3 out of 5 US plans to drag Russia into a series of wars

    A stunning statement (from the series: even stand, even fall) ... winked
  5. aslanxnumx Online aslanxnumx
    aslanxnumx (Aslan) 24 December 2022 13: 13
    -7
    If not the Kremlin, then we were in ... but the fact that we are in the ass is not the Kremlin's fault.
    1. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
      Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 24 December 2022 16: 21
      -1
      yeah ... and they raised the retirement age for themselves, and 2 million die out in three years because they don’t want to live in spite of the Kremlin ...
  6. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
    Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 24 December 2022 16: 20
    -7
    where does Putin and Saakashvili? also say that it was Putin who forced the Georgian authorities to put this tie-eater on the wanted list and open a criminal case ...
  7. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 24 December 2022 18: 56
    +2
    now they just don’t come up with just to justify the obvious failure of the SVO and mediocrity, stupidity and stupidity of the political leadership
    1. isofat Offline isofat
      isofat (isofat) 24 December 2022 19: 46
      -2
      VictorAre you saying you don't understand what's going on? You are not alone, in the USA they are also racking their brains, money was needed again, I had to call Zelensky ... laughing
  8. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 24 December 2022 20: 11
    +2
    Quote: isofat
    VictorAre you saying you don't understand what's going on? You are not alone, in the USA they are also racking their brains, money was needed again, I had to call Zelensky ... laughing

    you don’t think for me, if you are mentally the same as the political leadership, then don’t comment on my posts, I will do without your cleverness
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. Watching Offline Watching
    Watching (Alex) 25 December 2022 02: 14
    -2
    Quote: Alexey Davydov
    Putin himself got into a hot war with the West. And he did it in a few quite meaningful steps.

    The Anglo-Saxon Empire (aggressions against Yugoslavia, Syria, Iraq, etc.), which did not have UN permission, is also a de jure aggressor, so the argument of "Russian aggression" is powerless. In the world of today, already without laws and the force of treaties, it is necessary to take advantageous actions into our own hands. What do you want to choose? Power to the Anglo-Saxons? Or power to yourself? Mission of Russia = justice. Is there anything to dispute?
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 25 December 2022 05: 24
      +1
      Mission of Russia = justice. Is there anything to dispute?

      We can argue with you and we won't. But the rest, even China, will challenge such impudence, and will be in their right. But with them, with everyone, it will not be easy for us to argue. So don't create problems for yourself out of the blue.
    2. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 25 December 2022 06: 13
      0
      Quote: Watching
      Mission of Russia = justice. Is there anything to dispute?

      There is something to dispute, however. Afghanistan, for example.
      1. In passing Offline In passing
        In passing (Galina Rožkova) 25 December 2022 13: 26
        0
        In Afghanistan, they bet on the wrong one. In general, it makes no sense to get into a civil war on one side. All parties must be kept in touch. The Americans sat for quite some time on this policy, but failed to buy the Taliban. They made grandmas and washed off, leaving a powder keg at our side.
        1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 25 December 2022 15: 48
          0
          Quote: In passing
          They made grandmas and washed off, leaving a powder keg at our side.

          Yeah ... As one company commander told me: "Vovan! I send my guys in zinc, and the generals carry drugs in coffins.
  11. zenion Offline zenion
    zenion (zinovy) 25 December 2022 17: 15
    0
    At least the Americans know what they were up to and why they didn’t. It did not work out for them, they did not answer and were not going to. As one said, Hershko by name, they called me, I did not come, I did not know where to go. It was still true. Then it turned out that they were going to come, but they were afraid of this Hershko. He worked at the transshipment and was a healthy Jew, he could stuff their faces with everyone, but no luck, they did not come and did not write where he should come, they did not even say.