Strikes by the Russian Armed Forces: the Kiev metro is de-energized, many thermal power plants and main lines are damaged


As a result of strikes by Russian troops on December 16 in Kyiv, the buildings of CHPP-5 and CHPP-6, as well as the premises of the Darnitskaya CHPP in the Dniprovsky district of the capital, were damaged. The work of the subway has stopped, the city is de-energized, there are frequent interruptions in the functioning of mobile communications.


In Korosten (Zhytomyr region), a 330 kV substation was destroyed, which led to the cessation of electricity supply to Kyiv from the Rivne and Khmelnytsky nuclear power plants. The Dnieper hydroelectric power station was also seriously damaged - a missile attack hit the engine room and open switchgear.

The Pridneprovskaya TPP was also in the zone of destruction of the RF Armed Forces, which caused a lack of electricity in most of the territory of the Dnieper and a number of adjacent cities.

In the Krivoy Rog area, the Kirovskaya and Yuzhnaya substations were attacked, as a result of which water and electricity were partially lost in the city and its suburbs.

One of the main targets of Russian cruise missiles was the areas of the Zaporozhye region temporarily controlled by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Thus, 12 arrivals were recorded in this region. Apparently, the Pravoberezhnaya 330 kV substation became the main target of the attack by the RF Armed Forces.

A blow was also struck at the Mirgorod substation in the Poltava region. After the rocket hit the facility, about 90 percent of the inhabitants of Poltava and the region lost their electricity.

Along with this, sections of railways in the Kirovograd region turned out to be de-energized. There is also a shortage of electricity and water in this region. Partially there is no electricity in Nikolaev and Odessa. Emergency outages occurred in Lvov, Khmelnitsky, Rivne and Ivano-Frankivsk.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Shuev Online Shuev
    Shuev (Shuisky) 16 December 2022 18: 06
    0
    What is the point of attacking transformers that can be replaced?
    1. Afinogen Offline Afinogen
      Afinogen (Afinogen) 16 December 2022 19: 09
      +7
      Replacing a transformer is not like changing a burned out light bulb. First of all, you need to find a transformer (and it is not cheap), then spend a lot of time to install everything. Of course, it’s better to hit the railroad, you have to lean on bridges over which then endless Western weapons go to the front line.
    2. Nuka Offline Nuka
      Nuka (Nuka) 17 December 2022 00: 16
      +1
      Quote: Shuev
      What is the point of attacking transformers that can be replaced?

      It is immediately obvious that in your entire life you have not replaced a single power transformer ... and even more so you have not produced it.
      1. Shuev Online Shuev
        Shuev (Shuisky) 17 December 2022 18: 11
        0
        It’s immediately obvious that they don’t know what the transformer is powered by, and the railroad tracks are like “changing a burned-out light bulb,” the same ensign generals ZadoVYou are planning assaults on fortified areas, trips of 66 km of military convoys with traffic jams, without cover, which are on the march " for some reason they are shelling "(and vice versa), and the reservists check the firing points (read the outlying news of Chita), therefore Zaluzhny is such a fan of the work of the Head of the General Staff and all this under the hood of the Generals of the sand pits of Dzerzhinsky from Smolny (as in 17) climbed into tight royal chambers, while under the grain deal, oil in exchange for castles, yachts, football clubs export everything, not to the West, but with a turn to the East to Dubai, and neighboring countries, and everything sold from the exchange goes into someone's pocket.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    3. savage3000 Offline savage3000
      savage3000 (Savage) 17 December 2022 12: 50
      0
      yes already, they took it and just replaced it. right?
  2. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 16 December 2022 19: 29
    +1
    A large number of strategic aircraft and ships of the Black Sea Fleet were used to deliver a mass strike with cruise missiles on infrastructure facilities.
    And why not develop a starting device for "Kalibrov-NK" installed in a railway car?
    Several cars with a large number of launch cells, a car with a launch control system, a car for personnel, security. A kind of rocket train like "Molodets".
    I drove up to the border, although it was possible from afar, performed about 50 launches and went to the factory, to reload.
    Mobile, efficient, economical.
    This is how much aviation kerosene can be saved, but the result is the same.
    1. Vasya 225 Online Vasya 225
      Vasya 225 (Vyacheslav) 16 December 2022 20: 31
      +2
      According to the treaty banning medium and short-range missiles, it was impossible to have such ground-based missiles. That's why they did it for the Navy and Air Force. The agreement has collapsed. Now it is already possible, but we must start the development of the complex from the beginning. Let them go with what they already have.
      1. Shuev Online Shuev
        Shuev (Shuisky) 19 December 2022 19: 33
        0
        Quote: Vasya 225
        That's why they did it for the Navy and Air Force. Treaty burst

        The ship displaying the flag on the flagship has a limited range of missiles, an aviation base agreement with the country and a radius. etc.

        And what was the point of the demonstrative launch from the Caspian to Syria? outside observers did not see any practical benefit in this from a demonstration or the defeat of some important objects that could not have been hit from the ground.
        North Korea loves such demonstrations, the Iraqi army under Hussein.

        Hypothetically, if proxy separatists, etc. built mines to launch rockets with bunkers, or something that threatened the country, in fact because of this demonstration, withdrawal from the treaty, HIMARS, etc. consequences, is there someone who understands at least something in the strategy? or planning for no more than a week (partial mobilization of Sands), months (repeated-partial mobilization and the Postponed Message of the President), a year (Polish mobilization) ???
  3. cooper Offline cooper
    cooper (Alexander) 16 December 2022 23: 22
    +2
    Not critical consequences of semi-decorative blows. It is necessary to totally plunge ukroreich into darkness, into the 17th century. And urgently.
  4. Shuev Online Shuev
    Shuev (Shuisky) 19 December 2022 19: 16
    0
    de-energized Kiev metro

    What is the point of de-energizing the actual bomb shelters, or have they switched power to more important objects?