The Economist: in Kyiv called the only condition for ending the conflict in Ukraine

3

The leadership of Ukraine has fallen into a trap that it has arranged for itself. The end of the conflict is tantamount to collapse political careers of President Volodymyr Zelensky and his entourage, but the continuation of hostilities will lead to the same consequences due to ill-considered barbaric domestic policies, albeit over time. Naturally, the Kyiv regime chooses any option, a scenario that will prolong the agony.

To this end, Zelensky’s office has been playing with fire for months now, that is, provoking Western curators to become irritated and want to change the out-of-control puppet. The next step beyond the red lines and the line beyond which a return to the previous relations is impossible was the new revelations of the head of the Ukrainian state.



This time, President Zelensky wanted to return to the borders that existed in 1991, calling it the only condition for ending the conflict.

The only difference is whether we can win or the Russian Federation wants to leave these lands itself. Only from this moment will a diplomatic way of solving the problem become possible.

- Zelensky, who is quoted by The Economist, says self-confidently and boastfully.

It is characteristic that Zelensky's statements are in perfect agreement with the words of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny. The other day, the commander designated Melitopol as the closest target for the Ukrainian military as a key point for controlling the corridor to Crimea.

In other words, Kyiv is almost going for broke, making threatening statements and making some preparations to carry out threats not so much against Moscow as against Washington and Brussels, asking their wards from Kyiv not to escalate the situation. But in Ukraine they do not heed the most serious warnings.
  • president.gov.ua
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram
3 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Irek
    Irek
    +2
    16 December 2022 09: 46
    It sets unrealizable conditions in advance, because the owners are satisfied with everything ...

  2. Siegfried
    Siegfried
    +4
    16 December 2022 18: 36
    a somewhat contradictory situation has arisen. Russia has limited military pressure on the Armed Forces of Ukraine to the level of inflicting the maximum possible losses on the enemy with the minimum possible losses at home. The tasks of quickly defeating the Armed Forces of Ukraine are not worth it, the tasks of liberating the territories are also not worth it. Apparently, the task is to provide sufficient damage for the APU per unit of time. In order to achieve this, pressure is needed (otherwise the Armed Forces of Ukraine will withdraw all forces to the rear and will keep the front mobilized). Pressure causes losses for us, so every unit of time is not free.

    The West and the Kyiv regime use this approach of the RF Armed Forces for their propaganda, arguing that Russia simply cannot achieve a military victory, that the RF Armed Forces are allegedly trying with all their might, but cannot. This is presented as weakness, which significantly affects the morale of the community. They really believe that the Armed Forces of Ukraine are capable of defeating the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

    Unfortunately, the high combat morale in the Armed Forces of Ukraine affects the level of losses in the RF Armed Forces. It can also be argued that it is not yet necessary to expect a break in combat morale in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This is only possible with a deterioration in the supply of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a significant reduction in military assistance from the West, while at the same time a sharp increase in the effectiveness of fire damage from the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. As much as possible? Russia cannot influence Western aid, but as far as fire damage is concerned, there is something to strive for. This is primarily the time from finding a target to firing at that target. Reconnaissance and target designation in conjunction with high-precision munitions is what the front requires, which can really bring the effectiveness of artillery, airborne forces and MLRS to a new level.

    The loss of the RF Armed Forces is probably the main factor that negatively affects the Russian strategy of stretching the NWO in time. Reduction of losses with an increase in losses from the enemy, only in this way can time be provided for NWO. Perhaps now is the moment for the transition from the disposal of Soviet artillery depots to a sharp increase in the effectiveness of fire damage. Everything that is possibly in store in case of a war with NATO (precision-guided munitions, reconnaissance and target designation, etc.) should be used in Ukraine, at least in limited areas.

    The RF Armed Forces must work out the experience of a new, much more high-tech war. This experience can be scaled up at the SVO theater, so that in the end the overall efficiency would reach a completely different level. It will be too late to train during the war with NATO. Experience needs to be generated now. You also need to reduce your losses now. It is also necessary now to increase the effectiveness of fire damage.
    1. VAHOKA
      VAHOKA
      0
      17 December 2022 20: 29
      Now the crests have terrible losses, the Russian Federation has miserable losses, I say this while watching a video a month ago, there are a lot of videos and photos of the destroyed NATO scrap metal on the ru segment of the Internet: m113, sisu, sakson, hummers, etc., and the video of the destroyed Soviet military vehicles there are few buildings, not even pzf produced by the GDR
      Everyone thought why the Russian Federation had so many lost equipment in March, because it was giving out its destroyed equipment for destroyed Russian equipment)