The EU can restore the energy bridge with Russia

At an industry meeting hosted last week by the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, executives, politicians and consultants were asked if the European Union would make Russia its main gas supplier again. The results of the survey were striking: opinions were divided 40 to 40%, the rest were undecided. This indicates that the situation on the market is such that it is impossible to guarantee anti-Russian consistency and stubbornness of the West. Bloomberg columnist Javier Blas writes about this.

I wholeheartedly vote for a positive answer

- without holding back emotions, the expert writes.

Even as European leaders vow not to return to business as usual with Russia in the aftermath of the conflict in Ukraine, the inevitable realities of geography and markets can overwhelm even the most determined politicians. Moscow has always been the gas champion in the EU market, and it is impossible to get rid of this fact.

Whether this happens or not matters not only for European energy markets and their industrial giants, but also for the future of gas investment in countries from Qatar to Mozambique to the US. Billions of dollars invested in gas export facilities are at stake.

So far, IEA forecasts predict a reduction in the supply of raw materials from the Russian Federation until 2025. But further options are already possible. If we leave the level of theoretical abstractions and get closer to the daily practice of managing cities and infrastructure, then the wishes become obvious. For example, Michael Kretschmer, head of the German state of Saxony and a prominent conservative politician, said last month that a perpetual absence of Russian gas would be historically ignorant and geopolitically wrong.

So if the EU wants to keep its chemical, food and heavy industries competitive, it will need a lot of cheap gas. And for Europe, there is no gas cheaper than Russian gas, which is why the restoration of an energy bridge with the Russian Federation may become a reality in the coming years, Blas concluded.
  • Photos used:
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dust Offline Dust
    Dust (Sergei) 13 December 2022 10: 04
    England blew up SP1 and SP2, in principle, Russia can also respond. Blow up pipelines Norway-Poland, Norway-England ... Destroy transatlantic cables. A lot of captured weapons were taken in Ukraine, and who told you that "gas carriers" coming from Qatar cannot be destroyed by Javelins? It will not be difficult to put American weapons into the hands of "bormaley" who hate the West. Then the main question is to restore SP1 and SP2 at whose expense? And then, until the frozen money is returned to Russia, no gas can be supplied.
  2. Vladimir80 Offline Vladimir80
    Vladimir80 13 December 2022 10: 09
    1. Pivander Offline Pivander
      Pivander (Alex) 13 December 2022 11: 26
      In your 404 pans, Well, that's up to you to judge.
  3. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 13 December 2022 11: 26
    It was only the thirteenth day of winter, and in Europe day by day it became more and more "more fun" ....
    Europeans, remember that you will also answer for helping Ukraine .....
    1. skeptic Offline skeptic
      skeptic 13 December 2022 11: 31
      Quote: prior
      It was only the thirteenth day of winter, and in Europe day by day it became more and more "more fun" ....

      To destroy Russia, the European military-industrial complex needs both oil and gas, in large volumes. Everything according to Brzezik is the destruction of Russia, at the expense of Russia, by means of Russia.
  4. viktor goblin Offline viktor goblin
    viktor goblin (viktor goblin) 13 December 2022 15: 33
    After the words of Merkel ... Communicate with these ... - do not respect yourself. Only on the snout.
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 13 December 2022 15: 40
      Quote: viktor goblin
      Communicate with these ... - do not respect yourself

      And when did we respect ourselves?