Project 1144M nuclear cruiser began to receive weapons


As part of the modernization of the heavy nuclear missile cruiser Admiral Nakhimov, work began on the installation of weapons. According to Moscow's plans, the ship should become the flagship of the Russian Navy, since it will be the most powerful cruiser in the Russian Navy and can radically change the balance of power in a certain direction of a possible theater of operations.


At the moment, electrical installation work is actively carried out, in which more than 150 major suppliers are involved. Power supply and fuel are being received.


In August 2020, the Project 1144M ship was moved to a special quay for completion and the start of the second stage of modernization.

The Admiral Nakhimov will be equipped with new air defense systems, the 3S14 (UKSK) universal shipborne rifle system, the Paket-NK (4x4) small-sized anti-submarine system for combat in the near zone, and the Otvet anti-submarine system based on the 91RE1 missile.

In addition, the ship will receive an A-190 "Universal" artillery mount of 100 mm caliber, four six-barreled 30-mm automatic ship gun mounts K-630 and other weapons. The displacement of the cruiser will be 24 thousand tons.

Next year, steam will be received for the installation, commissioning, as well as the coordination of all systems and their adjustment. Along with this, in the process of upgrading the ship, a number of complex innovative solutions regarding life support systems will be introduced.
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 12 December 2022 18: 37
    -4
    the leader of frigates in the Barents Sea, although the dimensions and dimensions of the battleship concept are, of course, outdated, too big ... but let it serve
    1. Vladimir Dashchenko (Vladimir Dashchenko) 13 December 2022 10: 47
      +2
      Oh, thank you, dear father, for allowing me to serve ...
      1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
        Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 13 December 2022 11: 14
        -2
        please allow me, but what hurt you so much?
    2. savage3000 Offline savage3000
      savage3000 (Savage) 17 December 2022 20: 04
      0
      why is it outdated? this is an excellent ship with constructive protection.
      1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
        Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 17 December 2022 21: 00
        -2
        obsolete in size and structural protection
        1. savage3000 Offline savage3000
          savage3000 (Savage) 17 December 2022 23: 00
          -1
          ?????

          interesting nonsense, sorry. )))
          1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
            Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 18 December 2022 20: 59
            0
            !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, I'm sorry, I put on your nonsense expressed in the meaningless repetition of question marks tongue more exclamation points than you, so I beat you! tongue Well, why can't my opponents connect a couple of phrases, but only mumble? firstly, the battleships sank in Tsushima and became obsolete in the century before last, no one else does solid armoring of ships, ... here, take a tank, unlike any BMP armored personnel carrier and car, it survives from shrapnel, but .. a direct hit by a small rocket from a projectile and that's it, it's over .... so the armor does not save, so they abandoned it in the fleet where the surface ship is visible to everyone and vulnerable, and even more than a tank hidden in the bushes and pressed to the ground, .... 1144 has an armored conning tower, the reactor itself is made of steel 15-20 cm thick, of course it does not have solid armor and it makes no sense, it will sink from its weight .... but it is too big, therefore it is more vulnerable than a corvette, although compared to the terrible Kuzey 1144 it has a developed unsinkability system , compartments, but just as on earth they abandoned bridge armored trains in favor of tanks, so all the fleets of the world abandoned battleships like 1144 in favor of corvette frigates
            1. savage3000 Offline savage3000
              savage3000 (Savage) 22 December 2022 13: 21
              0
              Outdated by constructive protection .... These are some mushrooms that need to be bitten to say so.

              Yes, and it’s pointless from your second text that it’s amazing: armadillos have died out, but 1144 reservations are selective. The tank saves from splinters, but does not save from ATGMs (where did you get that, by the way), so, apparently, tanks need to be canceled.
              1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
                Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 22 December 2022 16: 52
                0
                where did you get the idea that you need to cancel the tanks? your idea to cancel the tanks is crazy, the tank is small and hard to get into, so tanks are needed, and you can’t hide 1144 in the bushes, so a DIRECT hit with powerful anti-ship missiles and death is likely
                1. Alex777 Offline Alex777
                  Alex777 (Alexander) 28 December 2022 01: 06
                  0
                  Japan, with its new ASEV missile defense ships, is looking at you in amazement.
                  VI of the order of 20 tons. They are considered promising.
                  1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
                    Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 19 January 2023 21: 04
                    0
                    if you have no arguments other than "everyone does it" (and in reality very few or better to say almost no one does) or "the Japanese are smart and we can't compete with them with our little mind" ... then it's better for you to keep quiet or try all the same think logically with your mind and give technical tactical and strategic arguments ... imagine a big ship, it is sailing on the sea, it is met with difficulties, dangers, a coastal missile (there is no curtain of the ship like a moscow cruiser) there are still planes, submarines all see it, and he sees them No....
      2. Daniel K Offline Daniel K
        Daniel K (Daniil Koshevoy) 4 January 2023 04: 16
        0
        Uh-huh, one smaller one has already taken off the flagship. Also fully protected.
  2. Afinogen Offline Afinogen
    Afinogen (Afinogen) 12 December 2022 18: 48
    -5
    I've posted here several times. There has never been a Russian ship in the history of the fleet with the name "Admiral Nakhimov" so that it does not disappear. Well, what is difficult to rename???? How many worthy names. We'll see what happens with it.

    1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
      Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 13 December 2022 10: 57
      +1
      don't be a superstitious fifteen year old captain! and do not believe any fiction of journalists,
      1. Afinogen Offline Afinogen
        Afinogen (Afinogen) 13 December 2022 16: 29
        -2
        I really want to be wrong, really. But judging by 100% statistics, everything goes to trouble. Just wondering what evil fate has prepared for this glorious ship sad And all you need to do is rename the ship and that's it.
  3. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 12 December 2022 21: 23
    +1
    The sad experience of "Moscow" with the arrival of 2 Neptunes on board indicates the main thing for the ship today, its air defense. (According to various reports, "Moscow" could not defend itself against super low-flying (1-2 m) Neptunes due to outdated air defense). That's why arming according to the latest air defense models, like everything else. It's hard to learn from your mistakes, you need to learn useful solutions from hard lessons. Big ship, big voyage, seven feet under the keel....
    1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
      Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 12 December 2022 21: 44
      -2
      according to some reports, 1164 never had combat-ready air defense at all, due to the bungling and eyewash of the Gorshkov Navy of the USSR, although they were formally considered the basis of air defense kug ... I hope the problems are resolved, and 1144 will receive combat-ready air defense
      1. Sergey3939 Offline Sergey3939
        Sergey3939 (Sergei) 13 December 2022 07: 04
        +2
        At Nakhimov, there will be multi-level air defense. From Poliment-Redoubt to AK 630 or Pantsir M.
        1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
          Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 13 December 2022 11: 20
          -5
          it would be nice, Klimov wrote that in general the Russian Navy does not have a workable air defense, but there are fraudsters and sawmills not planted .... to hide the fraud, they burned a ready-made corvette at the northern shipyard, his brother from air defense Zaslon, according to Klimov, is not combat-ready in terms of air defense ... .... but maybe the shells will save?
          1. Sarmat Sanych Offline Sarmat Sanych
            Sarmat Sanych (Sarmat Sanych) 14 December 2022 10: 24
            +1
            vladimir1155, guys, years later it would be time to stop listening to the infantil "Klimov", this is the blogger of the swindler Ashurbeyli, and the blogger is not versed in reality and does not own up-to-date information. Specialists have already declassified him dozens of times. "Barrier" by the way, in principle, is the most effective system in the world among its class, Western and Asian counterparts are extremely degenerate, this is described in detail. And the nonsense about "burned for concealment" is not even worth commenting on, it's like discussing how the Independents dug up the sealaughing
            1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
              Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 14 December 2022 19: 09
              0
              about air defense, I’m not special, I read Klimov, I read you, I would like you to be right .... about arson, it’s obvious to me personally - arson, the time was chosen at the border of shifts so that I could mix with the crowd, for some reason they brought paint to the corvette and a lot ????... Is it a fuel depot or a ship under construction? you can’t paint in winter ..... and no one in their right mind will place paint there, because they will plunder, which means they intentionally placed it for arson
            2. Daniel K Offline Daniel K
              Daniel K (Daniil Koshevoy) 4 January 2023 04: 19
              0
              No barrier helped Moscow
        2. savage3000 Offline savage3000
          savage3000 (Savage) 17 December 2022 02: 00
          0
          polymer redoubt? looks like fairy tales. left the old s-300.
        3. Daniel K Offline Daniel K
          Daniel K (Daniil Koshevoy) 4 January 2023 04: 18
          0
          Moscow also had multi-level air defense and even s300, so what? The result is dry on the scoreboard
      2. Pavel57 Offline Pavel57
        Pavel57 (Paul) 13 December 2022 21: 54
        0
        Sectoral air defense with S300F had dead zones. Maybe now it has become circular.
        1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
          Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 13 December 2022 21: 56
          0
          worse! they wrote that supposedly no one knew how to use it and therefore it was never used in exercises .... only volcanoes were used ...... maybe with the advent of Shoigu, something improved, sudden checks appeared
    2. Pavel57 Offline Pavel57
      Pavel57 (Paul) 13 December 2022 21: 56
      0
      The ship must be modernized in time every 15-20 years
    3. savage3000 Offline savage3000
      savage3000 (Savage) 17 December 2022 01: 59
      0
      where are the puffs?

      and most importantly, in general, all his weapons were turned off, including the s-300.
    4. The comment was deleted.
  4. Yyrp Offline Yyrp
    Yyrp (Valentine) 12 December 2022 21: 58
    -1
    Three years, took part in the construction of this ship. We in the USSR built it in four and a half years. It cost the state one billion three hundred million rubles. Now he is under repair and modernization, twenty-three years old, and when he will return to service, only the Almighty knows. How much it will finally cost to repair and modernize it is not known for the current state. They say that several billion dollars have already been invested in it now.
    1. Sergey3939 Offline Sergey3939
      Sergey3939 (Sergei) 12 December 2022 22: 26
      +2
      He hasn't been on modernization for so many years. Stood at a standstill.
  5. 1_2 Offline 1_2
    1_2 (Ducks are flying) 13 December 2022 00: 31
    0
    the larger the ship, the more submarines are needed to protect it
  6. Vlad Sirs Offline Vlad Sirs
    Vlad Sirs (Sirius NVL) 13 December 2022 01: 30
    -1
    A large and expensive vessel, good only for parades and demonstrations of strength. Apparently vulnerable to being hit by anti-ship missiles and torpedoes, the cruiser Moscow is an example of this.
    1. Sergey3939 Offline Sergey3939
      Sergey3939 (Sergei) 13 December 2022 07: 01
      +2
      Tell us, great naval commander, why does the United States have so many aircraft carriers and other countries of the world are building aircraft carriers and UDCs if they are destroyed by anti-ship missiles and torpedoes from your words?
      With Moscow, a weak example. (((
      1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
        Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 13 December 2022 10: 34
        -2
        because in the USA there are also a lot of budget cutters and even more than ours, and because the US world gendarme attacks weak countries that do not have Neptune-type missiles, and even more so that do not have submarines
    2. savage3000 Offline savage3000
      savage3000 (Savage) 17 December 2022 02: 01
      0
      exactly? there passive protection you know what??? armor under 100 mm.
    3. savage3000 Offline savage3000
      savage3000 (Savage) 17 December 2022 20: 05
      0
      not an example. And anyway, why are you talking nonsense?
  7. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 13 December 2022 10: 30
    -2
    The future of the cruiser Admiral Nakhimov is the fate of the cruiser Moskva, the fate of the Kuznetsov.
    I don't want it, but it's obvious to me.
    But what a jackpot for cutting!
    1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
      Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 13 December 2022 10: 41
      0
      Kuzya needs to be sold, but no one will buy Nakhimov, let him serve in the Barents Sea, even his loss is an opportunity to slightly delay the arrival of American nuclear submarines in the Barents Sea and catch our SSBNs there, you need to let the SSBNs go to combat positions in the ocean and shoot back, water guard ships the area in the Barents Sea is clearly not enough, and our admirals, inert and traitors, have assembled frigates and corvettes in closed seas where they have no real value and will not survive a day ... while the Barents Sea is not protected enough, and in Kamchatka there is only one PLO pair mpk and a couple of corvettes .... the main staff of the navy retired along with the admirals taken for treason!
  8. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 13 December 2022 12: 47
    -1
    Russia needs rank 1, 2, 3 cruisers. There were also aircraft carriers in the Soviet Union. The cruiser "Moskva" in the Black Sea was alone, without support and without cover, the fact that it was drowned is a crime of the admirals of the Navy. Two cruisers and a dozen frigates and the entire northwestern Black Sea would be closed to NATO. Odessa would have been taken from the sea. Today's war with Ukraine has shown that it is urgent to carry out the reconstruction of the waterway from the White Sea, the Baltic Sea through the Volga - the Sea of ​​Azov to the Black Sea, as well as to the Caspian Sea. This must be done for the transfer of ships within Russia, in accordance with the military situation in Ukraine. They must ensure the passage of a vessel up to 250 meters in length, a width of 80 m, a depth of 20 m. Tankers, container ships and other vessels will go inside Russia from south to north.
    1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
      Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 13 December 2022 13: 45
      +1
      even a bunch of battleships, cruisers and frigates would not help to land troops near Odessa ... there are almost no minesweepers! and how to land a BDK with a battalion of personnel? to be melted down by Neptunes? such losses are unacceptable! what did you think that if there was a squadron there, then Moscow would not have been sunk? nonsense! they would simply melt the entire squadron and all the BDK, don’t you think that the Nazis had only one Neptune or a couple? There, it’s not enough tasks for RTOs and MPKs, the minesweeper and RTOs, MPKs already go by inland waterways, so you don’t need to dig anything, ..... transfer all surface ships of 1st and 2nd rank ships to the North and Kamchatka, don’t build udk, Kuzya to sell, all the more so not to build first-rank surface ships, Nakhimov barely found tasks in the Barents ... we need nuclear submarines, submarine minesweepers, PLO aircraft, the more the better, coastal missiles and aircraft and a small number of PLO frigates and corvettes for Kamchatka and the north .. .. stop laying down RTOs, they are already quite new for the closed seas, taking into account those already started in construction, but it is possible to start building karakurts of the MPK and air defense and Dugong Chamois for the closed seas
      1. VICTOR VALENTINOVICH (VIKTOR VALENTINOVICH) 19 December 2022 02: 13
        +1
        All right said.
        1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
          Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 19 December 2022 09: 25
          0
          thank you for understanding all the real experts
  9. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 13 December 2022 13: 56
    0
    Quote: vlad127490
    Must ensure the passage of the vessel up to 250 meters in length, width 80 m, depth 20 m

    Can you imagine such a building of the century? measure the length of the volga of the don and neva and also attach a volgobalt to them ..... take a shovel and dig tongue
  10. Amper Offline Amper
    Amper (Vlad) 13 December 2022 14: 47
    +1
    I would like to know, how serious is the protection of the flagship from spontaneous combustion and self-detonation of ammunition? Has experience been taken into account? fellow
  11. Vladimir Mudov Offline Vladimir Mudov
    Vladimir Mudov (Vladimir Mudov) 13 December 2022 17: 55
    +2
    Will this handsome ship miss the very first volley of the enemy fired at it, as happened with the cruiser Moskva!?
    1. Yyrp Offline Yyrp
      Yyrp (Valentine) 13 December 2022 21: 56
      +1
      In general, the Project 1144 Orlan cruisers, unlike the Project 1164 Atlant cruisers, are not badly armored, they have a hundred mm of armor, and not every "arrival" will do anything to them.
      1. savage3000 Offline savage3000
        savage3000 (Savage) 17 December 2022 02: 02
        +1
        absolutely right. and in Moscow, air defense was turned off. did it ever work at all?
  12. asr55 Offline asr55
    asr55 (asr) 15 December 2022 00: 24
    +1
    All photos and videos are old. In fact, all weapon systems have already been installed. There is a debugging of electrical systems for starting and supplying voltage from a standard source. Preparation of documentation for closing and delivery. The preparation of the TARK for tests is in full swing, in which the delivery team and the trained crew will participate. Surprised by the amount of poison and various nonsense that is poured in the comments.
  13. asr55 Offline asr55
    asr55 (asr) 15 December 2022 00: 34
    0
    Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
    The sad experience of "Moscow" with the arrival of 2 Neptunes on board indicates the main thing for the ship today, its air defense. (According to various reports, "Moscow" could not defend itself against super low-flying (1-2 m) Neptunes due to outdated air defense). That's why arming according to the latest air defense models, like everything else. It's hard to learn from your mistakes, you need to learn useful solutions from hard lessons. Big ship, big voyage, seven feet under the keel....

    What other Neptunes, what are you talking about? Don't believe Kakelov's fakes. With such air defense for Moscow, Neptunes are like flies for a cow. But who ordered not to install an automatic fire extinguishing system during the repair of the ship is a crime for which it is necessary to prosecute. By the way, this is not the first case of a fire with detonation of ammunition on a cruiser. Installed on Varyag and Ustinov.
  14. savage3000 Offline savage3000
    savage3000 (Savage) 17 December 2022 01: 57
    0
    100mm??? you didn't mix it up? they didn’t seem to want to change the artillery there. like the s-300, the old one will remain. rave.

    but thanks for the news. hasn't been for a long time. you need to watch the video from Sevmash.

    1144 - the coolest pennant! )
  15. VICTOR VALENTINOVICH (VIKTOR VALENTINOVICH) 19 December 2022 02: 08
    0
    The incident with Moscow showed that the air defense on Russian ships is at a low level. We hope that the leadership of the Navy has drawn at least some conclusions from the incident with Moscow ???