Poland does not intend to give any security guarantees to Russia


Poland does not support the idea of ​​any security guarantees for Russia, as well as the discussion of such guarantees in the European Union. This was stated by Deputy Head of the Polish Foreign Ministry Pavel Yablonsky during the meeting of the Foreign Ministers of the EU countries.


In his opinion, reasoning on this topic is a strategic mistake.

Earlier, Emmanuel Macron noted that after the end of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the Russian Federation should be involved in building a new security architecture in Europe and Moscow should be provided with the necessary security guarantees. Also, the owner of the Elysee Palace expressed confidence in the end of hostilities as a result of negotiations, but the decision on this should be made by the Ukrainians.

However, the head of European diplomacy, Josep Borrell, stressed that it was premature to talk about the security of the Russian Federation, since Ukraine should receive such guarantees first.

Meanwhile, the Kremlin does not consider the words of the French president to be a sign that the need for a diplomatic solution to the Ukrainian issue is brewing in Europe. This was announced yesterday by the press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. trampoline instructor (Cotriarch Peril) 12 December 2022 15: 42
    +1
    Poland after the III section was called the "Kingdom of Poland" as part of the Russian Empire, in 1939 it was divided once again by Stalin and Hitler.

    Poland does not intend to give any guarantees of Russia's security.

    The only place where this unfortunate Poland can fit in is the Kaliningrad region of Russia, and it would be simply shameful for Russia to ask Poland for any security guarantees.

    PS The unhealthy minuser "Anton Kuzmin" should turn to a specialized doctor.
    1. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
      Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 16 December 2022 22: 21
      0
      firstly, Stalin, in the course of natural historical processes, returned the ancestral lands of the Eastern Slavs to the USSR. For to consider the Brest-Polish city such a thing ...

      further, and where did Poland take it after the Second World War, if Stalin allegedly divided it ??? unexpectedly, but the Polish People's Republic was revived thanks to Stalin. having taken away from her the historical lands to which the USSR had the right, German land was added to Poland.

      further, Poland, after the third partition of the Commonwealth, was not called the Kingdom of Poland ... because as a result of the three partitions of the Commonwealth, the lands of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (except for Suwalkia, which ceded to Prussia) passed to the Russian Empire, and the indigenous Polish lands inhabited by ethnic Poles were divided between Prussia and Austria ... Part of the lands inhabited by Poles like Warsaw, Lodz and others became the Kingdom of Poland as a result of the Napoleonic Wars and the victory of Russia in them. 3 years have passed between the 20rd partition and the Kingdom of Poland
      1. Captain stoner Offline Captain stoner
        Captain stoner (Captain Stoner) 16 December 2022 23: 53
        0
        Everything is mixed up very bizarrely: Stalin, the Second World War, the Eastern Slavs, Brest, Stalin, the Polish People's Republic, after the III partition of the Commonwealth, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, the indigenous Polish lands, Prussia-Austria, the Napoleonic wars, 20 years.

        If you decide to give a lecture on history here, then do it at least in chronological order - from the III partition of Poland to Poland, and not vice versa - from Stalin to the III partition of Poland.
  2. Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 12 December 2022 16: 05
    +5
    Everything is based on reciprocity.
    Russia should not give security guarantees to Poland.
    1. isofat Offline isofat
      isofat (isofat) 12 December 2022 17: 21
      0
      Bakhtiyar, reciprocity is something not entirely clear, and even ambiguous. But the question of trust through the efforts of the collective West rested on the amount of distrust. laughing
  3. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
    goncharov.62 (Andrei) 12 December 2022 16: 30
    0
    Are we asking Poland for something? Well, I don't mean the country, but its head? And on Mikron with a scarführer, I’m going to poop, actually. "If only my native country would live, and there are no other worries..."
  4. isofat Offline isofat
    isofat (isofat) 12 December 2022 17: 54
    +2
    It would be more correct to say that the current leadership of Poland does not guarantee its citizens that they will live with Russia in peace and friendship. yes

    Citizens of Poland, pay attention to this.
  5. 1_2 Offline 1_2
    1_2 (Ducks are flying) 13 December 2022 00: 28
    +2
    Polish clown made the nuclear Iskanders of Kaliningrad laugh)
  6. Soviet Union Offline Soviet Union
    Soviet Union (Victor) 14 December 2022 06: 54
    +1
    Guarantees from Poland..? A bullet in the forehead of this rabid hyena. Poland must end as a state.
  7. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
    Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 16 December 2022 22: 22
    0
    the only solution that will give Russia security guarantees is the further improvement of its nuclear triad. and all these agreements and promises are not worth the paper on which they are written