In Moscow, they told which "otvetka" will follow the actions of Kiev

5
Anatoly Aksakov, a deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, who heads the financial market committee, said what actions Moscow could take in response to Ukrainian sanctions.


Such measures, according to the parliamentarian, may be associated with the limitation of energy supplies to Kiev, as well as a reduction in trade in agricultural products.

Aksakov emphasized that Ukraine actually lives off supplies of Russian energy resources and at the same time cuts off water resources for the Crimean peninsula. By blocking the channel through which water enters the Crimea, the Ukrainian authorities act not against the Russian state, but against citizens. At the same time, he added, Kiev does not bear any responsibility for such actions. In this regard, it is necessary to determine a limit on the supply of Russian energy and other resources.

The Russian deputy pointed out that Russia is still the largest investor for Ukraine. Therefore, one of the responses may be a reduction in investment in Ukraine the economy,

At the same time, the parliamentarian called for acting carefully. In particular, in his opinion, it is not necessary for Ukrainians to restrict entry into Russia.

Let them work here, earn and understand that Russia is their brother

- said Aksakov.

It is worth noting that Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree providing for retaliatory measures against Ukrainian unfriendly actions.
5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. vladimir preden
    vladimir preden
    0
    22 October 2018 18: 59
    There should be no supplies.
  2. steelmaker
    steelmaker
    +1
    22 October 2018 20: 57
    For normal people with a family, income and property in Russia, it has long been clear that these sanctions are late. Yes, and it is not known what kind of sanctions?
    1. nznz
      nznz
      +2
      24 October 2018 11: 21
      more or less known, there are hints. About energy, it’s understandable, but if they close financial operations for legal entities, it will hit the oligarchs, business (it grows, so that there wouldn’t lie to the people of Ukraine about the war, for whom the war, for whom the mother is native !) 10bn and growth this year by 28% (this is a third increase !!).
      Apparently, it is not possible to agree with the oligarchs, or it is impossible because of their weakness in management, everyone there is fighting like dogs among themselves for loot ..
      here patience has burst, it’s time to strangle the oligarchs, otherwise everything will roll downhill.
      Roshen’s sweets are still produced by the Pig Factory, and, as Putin said, the owner receives all the money due to him after paying all taxes.
      It’s good for us, we have taxes, but I think the Ukrainians are not told that their leader is hammering decent loot in the country of the aggressor.
  3. Valery Timofeev_2
    Valery Timofeev_2
    +2
    23 October 2018 17: 28
    I don’t understand why Russia does not use economic levers of pressure on the Kiev adder? Well, they don’t understand either kind words or good relations with them, so make them hear Russia with the help of economic leverage !! They blocked the water to Crimea, block their energy resources, let them scratch their turnips and think! I am sure that if we used this, we would have avoided the many questions that arise from this adder!
    1. nznz
      nznz
      +1
      24 October 2018 11: 15
      Yes, because it’s very easy to write off everything that people now slurp on the aggressor and the war with Russia. The rich will not suffer.
      Well, even in our example, everything is clear - all over the world (there is an article, I read recently) during the crisis, the income of both oligarchs and citizens falls, and the oligarchs (given the example of Germany and France as EU leaders) 14-17%, citizens ( burghers) 10-12% .And in Russia, a paradoxical increase in the income of oligarchs by 10-12%. the number of Russians in a hundred Forbes is growing.
      So in Ukraine, the people will live very badly, and the tops will be even better. They will raise money on American fuel, and the reason is the war with the aggressor and all that.

      Why did you make such a decision all the same, it seems to me that there is one reason. 90% of Ukrainians are hiding, frightened townsfolk, who can’t get their brains out with political demands on the streets, Natsik’s brains are more united, more armed and organized. But when you are locked up so there is nothing to eat and you freeze, then the people will fall out on the square with completely justified and legitimate requirements, there is no strength to endure, we are dying. This is how a lesser evil can provoke a victory for a bigger one. Shake society to protest, in short. Because Russia is tired, and delay will lead to the complete fascization of Ukraine at the state level, having Nazi Germany at the border is a dubious pleasure, and it’s not far from the war (this is actually the goal of the USA)