Kyiv explained why it does not expect any offensive from the territory of Belarus

5

The head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ukrainian Defense Ministry, Kirill Budanov, expressed the opinion that the weapons concentrated on the territory of Belarus are of an exclusively defensive nature.

In this regard, Kyiv does not expect strikes from Minsk. Budanov believes that all the rumors about a possible offensive from this direction are "an echo of a Russian special operation."



In addition, the head of the intelligence department of Ukraine suggested that the stocks of high-precision weapons in the Russian Armed Forces are coming to an end and the Russian troops supposedly have missiles for only a few massive strikes.

At the same time, the Financial Times writes about Russia's attempts to freeze the Ukrainian conflict for the winter months. The American newspaper quotes NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who believes that Moscow is thus accumulating forces to intensify hostilities with the onset of spring. On the whole, there are currently no preconditions for ending the military confrontation in Ukraine.

Meanwhile, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to conduct offensive operations in the Krasnoliman direction. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense on December 7, Russian units are occupying advantageous lines, pushing the enemy out of there. Over the past 130 hours, more than XNUMX Ukrainian militants have been destroyed by artillery and aviation strikes in the region, two infantry fighting vehicles and a car have been hit.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    5 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. 0
      7 December 2022 16: 57
      It seems that with their arrivals from Ukraine at the airfields of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, they planned 3 major attacks on Ukraine. In order to reduce the number of warheads in Russia for planned strikes and downplay the role of launching the Crimean bridge. Maybe this is due to the planned adoption of the US budget. Given that Surovikin is the commander-in-chief of the air defense and airborne forces, including the chief of airfields, the provocation was clearly targeted. And the answer was expected, just like for the Crimean bridge. It turns out that retaliation strikes are planned in Kyiv, against themselves, but to solve some of their political goals. And we are only reacting to their provocations and "pulling the tiger's mustache."
    2. 0
      7 December 2022 17: 07
      Meanwhile, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to conduct offensive operations in the Krasnoliman direction.

      Interestingly, and what was released at the same time? Real: positional fights.
    3. -1
      7 December 2022 17: 36
      the strategic mistake of our leadership was that there was hope for anti-fascists in Ukraine, but there were none, but not only that, it turned out that a community of stubborn fascists was formed there ... from the old Bandera weathervanes repainted from communists and Komsomol members, to the Hitler Youth and ready-made women poison all Russians ... our leadership needs to realize this, if missiles start to run out, then this is legally called ...

      26. In the framework of the implementation of strategic deterrence measures of a power nature, the Russian Federation envisages the use of high-precision weapons.

      27. The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction against it and (or) its allies, as well as in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened.

      The decision on the use of nuclear weapons is made by the President of the Russian Federation.

      the military doctrine of the Russian Federation .... and spending iskanders and calibers for the delivery of non-nuclear ammunition = wastefulness, you need to save the lives of our brave soldiers and officers and inflict such stunning damage on the Nazis in Ukraine so that they don’t get up, but at the same time make it clear to people there behind the Iron Curtain, that we have a baton for these American guys and we will definitely use it, we will not be afraid, so we will establish peace and prosperity on earth if the aggressors understand our determination and are afraid to attack us ..... ps. I don’t feel sorry for anyone in Lvov, did they feel sorry for the Russian soldiers in the Donbass, ordinary residents of Donetsk?? did they take pity on the 100 Lvov Jews in 1941? Did they take pity on the inhabitants of Khatyn?
    4. +1
      7 December 2022 17: 42
      1) "father" lover of 2 chairs has long been known
      2)

      stockpiles of weapons are running out

      - is no longer new. They've been talking about it since July.
      It is quite possible that we are using: Chinese and North Korean ammunition. They have this ammunition, millions, and we now have an increased consumption of ammunition.
      As history shows: at the time, few states manage with their weapons. In WWI and WWII, only the United States did not buy, almost, weapons. Somewhere there was infa that they were in Brazil, they were buying something, perhaps rubber?
    5. 0
      8 December 2022 21: 26
      The Armed Forces of Russia do not have enough manpower for an offensive in the Artemovsk region, in the Krasnolimansky direction, and the General Staff of the Russian Federation drove an army with equipment to Belarus to guard Lukoshenko's backside? Let them announce mobilization in the country. What kind of game is in the heads of the General Staff of the Russian Federation! I really hope I'm wrong. With each passing day of the NWO, I associate this war with a big top more! Not only logic is not visible, but also common sense!