CIA intelligence officer suggested why Ukrainians attacked Russian airfields


Carrying out drone strikes on Russian airfields, the Ukrainian side pursued obvious political goals. This was stated in an interview with YouTube channel Judging Freedom by former CIA officer Phil Giraldi.


The Ukrainian Armed Forces did not appear to have any far-reaching military goals, as Russian radar systems and satellite systems would not allow a repeat of what happened. Consequently, the intelligence officer is sure, there has been no turning point in the hostilities in Ukraine in favor of Kyiv.

Therefore, the goals of this operation, again, are purely political: it is needed to achieve an escalation, so that Russia takes some really stupid and provocative step in response, to which NATO and the United States will react the way Zelensky wants

Giraldi suggested.

At the same time, the ex-CIA officer is sure that there are many advisers from the United States surrounded by the Ukrainian president, who influence him accordingly.

On Monday, December 5, the airfields of Dyagilevo in the Ryazan region and Engels in the Saratov region were attacked by Ukrainian drones. As a result of the actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, three people were killed and four were injured. The next day, a Ukrainian drone attacked the Kursk airfield, which caused a fire at the oil reservoir.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
    mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 6 December 2022 18: 04
    0
    Quote: Giraldi
    for Russia to take some really stupid and provocative step in response, to which NATO and the United States will respond in the way Zelensky wants

    And the local turbo-patriotic party reacts exactly like that, slandering the Russian "idren baton"
  2. Moscow Offline Moscow
    Moscow 6 December 2022 19: 46
    +1
    Russia, having the most modern air defense system, specifically missed missiles in order to be able to carry out another major act of retaliation? And Ukraine is provoking Russia to run out of missiles faster.
    1. Sergey Obukhov Offline Sergey Obukhov
      Sergey Obukhov (Sergey Obukhoa) 6 December 2022 21: 54
      +1
      A very interesting thought. Substitute your vigorous ass for a NATO kick. It would be funny if it weren't so sad. It turns out that the Carcasses did not even have elementary shelter, not only from missiles and grenades of UAVs, but even from precipitation.
      1. Ru_Na Offline Ru_Na
        Ru_Na (Rustam) 6 December 2022 22: 46
        +2
        Quote: Sergey Obukhov
        It turns out that the Carcasses did not even have elementary shelter, not only from missiles and grenades of UAVs, but even from precipitation.

        Well, in this regard, we are not alone, US Air Force bombers.



        1. Cetron Offline Cetron
          Cetron (Peteris) 6 December 2022 23: 10
          +1
          US bombers are stored in Arizona or Nevada, in the desert, where it rains once every hundred - one hundred and fifty years!
          1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
            mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 7 December 2022 10: 26
            0
            1. Rain does not interfere with the maintenance of aviation equipment outside the storage facilities. Especially such a large one.
            2. And what does the rain have to do with it?
      2. vik669 Offline vik669
        vik669 (vik669) 8 December 2022 23: 00
        0
        BECAUSE Russian radar systems and satellite systems will not allow a repetition of what happened - and somehow it’s not funny at all!
  3. Peace Peace. Offline Peace Peace.
    Peace Peace. (Tumar Tumar) 6 December 2022 20: 16
    +3
    It is strange that the ex-intelligence officer says that the clown from NarkoZelensk decides or undertakes something there. Management is the most direct and absolute from the USA.
  4. svit55 Offline svit55
    svit55 (Sergey Valentinovich) 6 December 2022 20: 32
    +5
    Khokhols know where to hit, on airfields, if they were taught this, then the teachers are good. Who would have prompted our strategists, since they themselves have no mind.
  5. Valera75 Offline Valera75
    Valera75 (Valery) 6 December 2022 21: 21
    +1
    for Russia to take some really stupid and provocative step in response, to which NATO and the United States will respond in the way Zelensky wants

    because he wants NATO and not a clown. He, or rather the warriors, was shown the corridor along which NATO should launch UAVs, which means it is at their suggestion and with their direct participation, using their satellites and everything that flies around Russia and collects information from AWACS to NATO UAVs.
  6. zuuukoo Offline zuuukoo
    zuuukoo (Sergei) 6 December 2022 21: 55
    +2
    If the goal is purely political, that's fine.
    Worse, if it is probing the ground for the possibility of an "instant global strike."

    Z. Y. : In general, I would not be surprised if it was an attempt to thwart another blow to the infrastructure. Or at least weaken (the planes were just getting ready, and with a successful hit, it wouldn’t seem enough).
  7. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 6 December 2022 22: 04
    0
    It seems that all these ideas have nothing to do with meaning. Purely for gullible "consumers" who have already forgotten even military fiction from the USSR.
  8. Moscow Offline Moscow
    Moscow 6 December 2022 23: 21
    -2
    While there is no photo, what flew to the airfields? Not a single fragment or part of the missiles. At the same time, photos taken at airfields, including from the lowest points, are circulating on the Internet. Why is there no photo of rocket debris?
  9. cooper Offline cooper
    cooper (Alexander) 7 December 2022 00: 29
    +5
    Demolish the center of Kyiv along with the so-called. government quarter, totally deprive ukroreykh of electricity.
  10. Watching Offline Watching
    Watching (Alex) 7 December 2022 01: 16
    +1
    Quote: Moscow
    Russia with the most modern air defense system

    Indeed? And where is the proof?
  11. Pilot Offline Pilot
    Pilot (Pilot) 7 December 2022 02: 10
    0
    Someone should go to Kamchatka as a lighthouse keeper. Just look Forward at the water, something that cannot be done on land.
  12. Foe Pshekov Offline Foe Pshekov
    Foe Pshekov (Arkady) 7 December 2022 04: 39
    -1
    For the Russian Federation, there is one very important and useful result from this situation. Now we can launch a retaliatory nuclear strike in accordance with all international standards. Because according to our doctrine, the enemy (no matter what) attacked a specific object of our nuclear triad. At the same time, we may not specify which enemy attacked us so that we can launch a retaliatory nuclear strike both on Ukraine and on NATO countries, referring to this incident.
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 7 December 2022 20: 34
      +2
      Arkasha, would you go to your Israel and preach nuclear strikes on Iran there ...
  13. Muscool Offline Muscool
    Muscool (Glory) 7 December 2022 08: 20
    +1
    Quote: Moscow
    Russia, having the most modern air defense system, specifically missed missiles in order to be able to carry out another major act of retaliation? And Ukraine is provoking Russia to run out of missiles faster.

    https://vk.com/video711300862_456239167
    I advise you to spend an hour of time and get acquainted with the most "modern" air defense