Why in Britain they supported Trump, who refused the INF Treaty

3
Now the former "mistress of the seas" does not have significant military strength. She relies entirely on Washington in this matter. Although the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States, London was perceived as clearly cool. What bad words did not call Trump the media and British officials during this time. But now the attitude towards him has reversed. "Misty Albion" literally gushes with delight in relation to the owner of the White House.


And there is nothing surprising in this. Frank Russophobia can work and not such "miracles." After all, Trump decided to withdraw from the agreement on the elimination of intermediate and shorter-range missiles (INF Treaty) and blamed Russia on what was happening. And since this question was already in detail described, we are more interested in Britain, or rather the attitude of the hosts of life there to what is happening.



So, the first to start shouting “bravo” is British Secretary of Defense Gavin Williamson. This, in every sense and relationship, an unconventional gentleman, very warmly supported Trump in this matter. And he literally began to confess to him tender feelings. The rest will soon catch up, there is practically no doubt about it.

Our close and long-term ally is, of course, the United States, and we strongly support the United States in insistently delivering a clear signal: Russia should respect the obligations under the treaty that it signed. It was Russia that violated it, and Russia needed to put things in order

the minister said to the Financial Times, claiming that Moscow has turned the INF Treaty into a "mockery."

And you can only imagine those wild delights that will be heard from London when Trump refuses the START-3 treaty as well, about which сообщалось earlier. After all, START-3 concerns the reduction of strategic offensive weapons. Winter is coming, and let's hope that it’s not nuclear.
  • https://news.cgtn.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

3 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    22 October 2018 09: 51
    ... out of habit, ardently supporting his beloved ally and master, Mr. Williamson hardly even had time to think about who, in fact, these very Russian intermediate and shorter-range missiles actually threaten - this is certainly not the United States. In general, the quality of modern "elites" in the West, or rather their complete degradation, and this is absolutely in every sense of these words, makes you really afraid of what these even outwardly not very normal citizens are capable of reaching and where all this will lead us all. After all, these natural room urges ... dy really run the still strong states, sometimes possessing nuclear weapons. Let the positions of all these former empires today are not at all such that they could solve any world problem on their own, but to organize such a world problem, and with the worst outcome, please ...
    1. +1
      28 October 2018 01: 21
      ... Mr. Williamson hardly even had time to think about who actually these same Russian medium and shorter-range missiles actually threaten - this is certainly not the United States ...

      Why is it not in the United States? And from Chukotka, through the Bering Strait?
      Exactly half of the US covers!
  2. +1
    28 October 2018 01: 16
    And they know that the first volleys of missiles will take their territory. Therefore, they are for any answer.