Pentagon: the outcome of the conflict in Ukraine will determine the policy of the XXI century


The "defensive" alliance of NATO member states does not stand still and tries to expand as much as possible, even in the absence of danger from other countries that are not members of the alliance. At the same time, logic and meaning are lost, unless it consists in eliminating the “danger” by including all the powers of the world without exception in a mutual defense treaty. But this, of course, is an unfeasible absurdity.


In other words, NATO is still an aggressive organization striving for expansion and conducting covert military operations.political operation against Russia, surrounding it with Russophobic republics, sincerely hating everything connected with it. However, this is so obvious.

Therefore, all statements by Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin that NATO is not a threat to Russia are false and serve as a kind of “disguise” for the true intentions of Washington, the leading member of the alliance.

The “exclusion” method, when those states that are not bound by a major treaty or agreement almost automatically become enemies, in itself shows the completely non-peaceful nature of NATO and quite simply refutes Austin’s words.

According to the head of the US defense department, the outcome of the conflict in Ukraine will determine the policy and security system of the XNUMXst century. In this case, this is the trend that the White House, under any administration, not just Joe Biden, is trying to prevent, trying to maintain a monopolar world and eliminate political diversity. The foreboding of global changes cannot be hidden; in the United States, they notice this very well and draw certain conclusions.

In this sense, it is America that is the "anchor" that slows down the entry of the world geopolitical system into a new future. Washington is trying to preserve the old way of life with all its problems and accumulated unresolved issues. Simply put, his very existence in his old hegemonic role will destabilize the world far more than all the changes combined.

Therefore, the aspirations emanating from across the ocean, and the brainchild of NATO's past, as structures caused by the XNUMXth century, are outdated, not suitable for changing conditions and even for the near future. As Austin's words showed, in the West this is well understood, but they continue to do what they can. And these inherent qualities do not include the ability to change.
  • Photos used: twitter.com/SecDef
4 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 20 November 2022 10: 34
    +1
    NATO menacingly puffs out its cheeks only in the absence of war.
    One nuclear strike on any of the NATO countries is enough, as the block will crumble into spare parts and be blown away like a leaky balloon.
    Are there really those among the NATO countries who are ready to burn in the fire for the sake of the existence of others?!
    So nuclear blackmail against NATO is good and should be used.
    And let their perverted little souls tremble with fear.
    1. In passing Offline In passing
      In passing (Galina Rožkova) 20 November 2022 11: 48
      +2
      Blackmail is deliberate intimidation in order to achieve some benefits, to force them to do something against their own interests. NATO serves the interests of the military-industrial complex, and nothing more. This is where conflicts unleash everywhere. It is enough if Russia has an arsenal that guarantees unacceptable losses for gentlemen. And it's time to take care of our own economy, so that the idea of ​​multipolarity promoted by Russia would be attractive to both distant neighbors and neighbors. And then they have all the interests in London. And then SVO starts.
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 20 November 2022 20: 00
        0
        Blackmail is a deliberate intimidation in order to achieve some benefits, to force them to do something against their own interests.

        The definition is correct and universal. Any coercion of the enemy to retreat is also his blackmail. For Russia, which has no other way to force the Anglo-Saxons to retreat, nuclear blackmail is the only and legal means to avoid destruction by the aggressor.
        This tool was already successfully used by the USSR in 1962 against them for the same purpose, in a similar hopeless situation.
        So the negative connotation of the word in the Russian language is a label attached by the "fifth column" to the only tool for saving Russia. The task of this tool is not the destruction of the West, and not suicide, but the salvation of the country and the people from destruction, providing them with the time necessary to restore the power of the people over the country and put it on the path of development.
        This is the way to restore, together with other countries of the world socialist system, to build a just society on the planet, as an alternative to the Anglo-Saxons establishing global fascism on it
  2. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 21 November 2022 10: 59
    0
    Pre-monopoly competition within the framework of national state formations is giving way to competition and "call fights" of transnational monopoly associations for the spheres of capital investment, in whose hands state formations are just an instrument and conductor of their interests, which only exacerbates and intensifies crisis phenomena, leads to a redistribution of spheres of influence and the establishment of a global domination. Based on this, clashes of interests of transnational associations, their alliances and coalitions, military conflicts will become less frequent, but larger and with greater consequences for the whole world, both economic and geographical redistribution of the boundaries of state formations