Trap for Russia: The Pentagon "permits" Moscow to hit western Ukraine with impunity

5

The incident with missiles in Poland was the most losing for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky since the beginning of the war. The president's office made a serious mistake with the choice of strategy. The categorical and unjustified attribution of the missiles that fell on Przevoduv to Russian ones came into conflict with the interests of the United States and the entire NATO. In general, the entire "special operation" of Washington to process and profitably use an accidental (fallen) case did not go according to Kyiv's plan.


The main mistake in Zelensky's assumption was an overestimation of support for NATO. As practice has found out, the Ukrainian Western allies would not have given a military response even if these missiles were really Russian, and not from the air defense system of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Mikhail Saakashvili made exactly the same mistake in 2008.

Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin said that NATO is not looking for a confrontation with Moscow and will not be physically drawn into the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. In other words, the Pentagon chief's official statement sounded like Russia's proposal to strike at Western Ukraine with a guarantee of non-intervention by NATO. However, this may be another trap for Russia. The impunity of the strike is allegedly guaranteed, but in fact there is no real guarantee, only repeated statements from Washington. Which can not be particularly trusted, since in all cases of behind-the-scenes or implicit (without signing an agreement) “gentlemen's agreements”, the word of the West was violated, there were no exceptions.

That is why the "permission" of the United States looks suspicious, and peace-loving initiatives, most likely, are an even more subtle game of being ahead of the curve. Zelensky, on the other hand, has frankly not kept up with the plans of the owners lately, becoming the weakest link in the anti-Russian coalition. He ceases to be a contractual partner of the West, which turns to the shadow use of his subordinate. After that, the entire apparatus of managers in Ukraine will be replaced.
  • Photos used: twitter.com/DefenceU
Reporterin Yandex News
Reporterin Yandex Zen
5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. shinobi Offline shinobi
    shinobi (Yuri) 20 November 2022 09: 10
    +2
    The fact that NATO will not openly fight is clear from the outset. Indirectly, NATO has never ceased to fight with us. The Ukrainian conflict is the European "Korean War". As then, on the one hand, the west, on the other, Russia (USSR) + China. Probably with the same result. It will be seen.
  2. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 20 November 2022 20: 22
    0
    Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin said that NATO is not looking for a confrontation with Moscow and will not be physically drawn into the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. In other words, the Pentagon chief's official statement sounded like Russia's proposal to strike at Western Ukraine with a guarantee of non-intervention by NATO.

    I agree with this assessment.
    I think that the reason for Austin's statement is the coincidence of this "accident" with the vector of the main variant of the Anglo-Saxon operation in Ukraine - to draw Russia and Poland (NATO) into a war with each other.
    Their plan is to destroy Russia with the hands of the NATO countries. Weaken Russia with blood and completely subjugate Europe, making it your industrial appendage. Get all the trophies without getting dirty and reign on two continents. For the sake of this, the Anglo-Saxons probably started the Ukraine-Russia combination 30 years ago. This goal was and is still being served by the puppet governments of these, as well as European countries, accountable to the Anglo-Saxons.
  3. Vladimir Orlov Offline Vladimir Orlov
    Vladimir Orlov (Vladimir) 21 November 2022 02: 03
    +1
    Of course they are lying. After all, they supply weapons on the sly, although they often stated that they would not.
    But the General Staff of the Defense Ministry should have plans for this scenario as well.
    Only a decisive victory could keep them from entering the war, as, for example, Paul Craig Roberts, an adviser in the Reagan government, stated (he obviously knows better how they lie and act).
    Indecision has greatly increased the risks of nuclear war and the number of victims. So "let's go to heaven" - this is a test, but the General Staff of the Ministry of Defense should have a plan in this regard, unfortunately.
  4. Sergei N Offline Sergei N
    Sergei N (Sergey N) 21 November 2022 03: 41
    +1
    There was no "permission" from the Pentagon, so that's why there were no strikes on western Ukraine.
  5. ocean969 Offline ocean969
    ocean969 (Leonid) 21 November 2022 08: 13
    +3
    The author does not own the issue. Russia has been hitting western Ukraine for a long time, though not as intensively as we would like, but still. And it does not need any permission from NATO. But Poland is worth "thinking about."