Is New Russia coming back? The authorities again spoke of left-bank Ukraine

8
Is New Russia coming back? Immediately after the reunification of Crimea and Sevastopol with the Russian Federation in early 2014, a logical continuation was the further annexation of the territories historically belonging to our country, which is now occupied by Nezalezhnaya.


According to some representatives of the Kiev regime, at that time in Ukraine there were no more than one battle-worthy battalion. Russian troops could pass like a knife through oil to Kiev, or even to Lviv. However, this was not done, to which the propagandists immediately found a thousand explanations.



After almost four years, Russian-Ukrainian relations have deteriorated as much as possible: military-industrial cooperation, major production chains are broken, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church breaks away from the Russian Orthodox Church, a NATO base is being built near Ochakovo, military exercises are being held in Ukraine together with the Americans. Now, at a high level in Russia, they are forced to recognize the growing direct military threat from the once fraternal state, as a corresponding statement has been submitted to the State Duma. The authors of the initiative propose to develop a certain Act in support of freedom in Ukraine.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky, sometimes called the “mouthpiece of the Kremlin,” spoke in support of this statement. LDPR leader considers aggressive policy Kiev in relation to Russia may end for its Independent partition. In this case, the entire left-bank Ukraine can go to Russia, and the right-bank - to Western countries, where it can be included in NATO and the European Union.

Never give alien lands. These are Russian lands with a Russian population.

- said Zhirinovsky.

But weren’t they too late to remember about Novorossia, which they “buried” in Minsk?
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    20 October 2018 09: 38
    And I wonder how many people need to be killed in the Donbass, so that the guarantor begins to do something? Where is this red line?
    1. -1
      20 October 2018 15: 48
      Nothing personal, just business (s)
    2. +3
      20 October 2018 17: 16
      Quote: steel maker
      And I wonder how many people need to be killed in the Donbass, so that the guarantor begins to do something? Where is this red line?

      Who do you mean? Germany, France? They are on a par with Russia, and in the same quality and with the same responsibilities ..... Do you know who signed the Minsk agreements as guarantors? And who is designated as a performer in them?
      Are you thinking something, sitting down at the keyboard?
  2. +2
    20 October 2018 18: 33
    Odessa and Nikolaev are native Russian lands.
  3. +2
    20 October 2018 23: 06
    Woke up, but late already. The outskirts have completely lost their mind over these four years, and in New Russia apathy and resentment towards Russia. Although, if everything is left that way, it will be even worse. Wherever you throw, there’s a wedge everywhere.
  4. +1
    21 October 2018 06: 19
    It remains only to attract people not by "other capitalism with a human face", but by a new socially just system ...
  5. 0
    22 October 2018 08: 12
    Robbed, driven into utter poverty, that’s what will happen next.
  6. +1
    22 October 2018 13: 35
    Since when did Zhirinovsky become the mouthpiece of the Kremlin? He has always been, is and will be the mouthpiece of Israel. And his game is a hypocritical game of Russian national feelings in the interests of Israel. And these hysterical remarks about the seizure of the ancestral Russian lands from Ukraine are only a provocation in the faint hope that something will happen here and Russia will leave Syria because of Ukraine, which will untie the hands of the Israeli military.

    Take a close look at everything that Zhirinovsky says and does. His motives are very easy to understand when you know that he works for Israel. For example, when he screamed that Russia had to go to Persia as a war, then Iran would not exist. And then he let slip. This is Israel’s golden dream: that there be no Iran.

    Zhirinovsky and the Kremlin - have different motives. Do not equate them. Do not succumb to the provocation of the Jewish fifth column.