Su-34 bombers strike FAB-250 on the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from extremely low altitudes

21

A video appeared on social networks in which a Russian Su-34 bomber drops FAB-250 aerial bombs on the positions of the Ukrainian armed forces.

The video demonstrates the operation of the aircraft at extremely low altitudes, thereby avoiding the fire of enemy air defense systems.





Meanwhile, according to the information of the Russian defense department on October 28, operational-tactical and army aviation, artillery and missile units of the Russian Federation attacked the command posts of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the areas of the settlements of Kupyansk (Kharkov region), Nevsky (LPR), Torskoye, Seversk, Zvanovka (DPR) and the city of Nikolaev. Also destroyed were 74 artillery units, servicemen and technique in 167 regions of Ukraine.

In addition, Russian air defense hit a Mi-8 helicopter near Novaya Kamenka (Kherson region). In Nikolsky and Berislav (Kherson region), the RF Armed Forces intercepted three enemy drones. Six HIMARS and Uragan MLRS shells were shot down in the air in the areas of Novaya Kakhovka, Tokarevka (Kherson region) and Pokrovskoye (DPR) settlements.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    21 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +9
      28 October 2022 16: 40
      To the madness of the brave we sing a song

      How much has already been said about the viciousness of such a practice ... But Vaska (MO), only listens and eats ...
      1. +11
        28 October 2022 17: 10
        Quote: Corsair
        To the madness of the brave we sing a song

        Let me further explain what I mean.

        Pilots of super modern and super expensive Su-34s, not being able to remotely hit targets with high-precision weapons, are forced to "crawl on their belly" every second at the risk of being hit by penny MANPADS ...

        Even (!!!) Iran(!!!) has at its disposal high-precision KAB with
        with a drop range of 50 km, which allows their antediluvian Su-22s to be guaranteed to hit targets without entering the enemy’s air defense coverage area.

        And in Russia, they, it turns out NO ...

        I won't stop asking Where is the money zing (Putin) ???

        PS Bearing in mind that VVP is a fan of flying in the cockpit of a combat aircraft, I want to ask - Does he have a desire to "ride" the Su-34, at low level, over the positions of the VFU?
        1. +13
          28 October 2022 17: 32
          Iran built drones, missiles, IRGC to destroy the enemy.
          And our generals built palaces, estates and cottages.
          Destroying and building are two big differences, however.
          1. +7
            28 October 2022 17: 37
            Quote: prior
            Destroying and building are two big differences, however.

            Creators Yes You have to give them credit...
          2. +8
            28 October 2022 17: 52
            Quote: prior
            Iran built drones, missiles, IRGC to destroy the enemy.
            And our generals built palaces, estates and cottages.

            I recall the history of the Second World War, and the role in it of the youngest Stalinist People's Commissar D. F. Ustinov.

            Was it permissible, even under assumptions, that the People's Commissar of Armaments built something for himself, and did not give something to the front?

            Behind him stood a tough and demanding leader - Stalin
        2. +2
          28 October 2022 17: 54
          Quote: Corsair
          I will not get tired of asking - Where is the money of Zin (Putin) ???

          money was spent on various things.
          Yarsy, Borea, Liana, Okhotnik, Su-35s...

          Somewhere excessive, somewhere insufficient.

          Within the framework of the well-known, they proceeded from 2 aspects -
          1) Strategic Missile Forces with the ability to deliver a guaranteed retaliatory strike
          2) relatively small conventional forces, irregular formations to drive.

          according to paragraphs. 2, of course, UAVs are very, very necessary, but a lot depends on the development of the component base. Let's say about the creation of their own thermal imaging matrix, only in 2016 they were able to report.
          With serial production, everything is not easy.

          But in general, a protracted conflict like the current SVO was not predicted in any way.

          But Iran - yes, was preparing for a variety of options for a non-nuclear confrontation with the "West", based on its capabilities, and some of the developments turned out to be successful, at least temporarily.

          "Geraniums / Shahedas" - obviously easily destroyed by small-caliber automatic artillery, it's only a matter of time, when the Shilka will be redeemed from Africa and sent to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
          1. +5
            28 October 2022 18: 17
            Quote from Nelton.
            money was spent on various things.
            Yarsy, Borea, Liana, Okhotnik, Su-35s...

            And on the Su-34, WITHOUT guided / corrected weapons.
            Yes, actually, and "Liana", with "Hunter", I do not see point-blank request

            So, let's put up with the "aspects", and continue to hammer in nails with a microscope?
            How long will the microscope last, and is it possible to drive nails to the very "hat"?
            1. -2
              28 October 2022 18: 41
              Yes, actually, and "Liana", with "Hunter", I do not see point-blank

              How would you like to see Liana?

              the Russian system of global satellite marine space reconnaissance and target designation (MKRTS) for the forces of the Navy, designed for continuous monitoring of the oceans to determine the location of enemy ships

              So, let's put up with the "aspects", and continue to hammer in nails with a microscope?

              We lead the NWO with what we have here and now...
              What the industry will be able to give in a month, six months, N years (and whether the SVO will still go on and by what means from the other side) - we'll see if we are alive.

              Quote: Corsair
              How long will the microscope last?

              Well, if it is also used to strike at bridges and railway junctions in the depths of the territory controlled by the Armed Forces of Ukraine and saturated with air defense, then it definitely won’t be enough for a long time.
              However, what a howl is on the resource, about "as long as the bridges are intact" ...
              1. +1
                28 October 2022 22: 19
                Quote from Nelton.
                How would you like to see Liana?

                "Kicking"? Do you think that I have no idea about the orbital satellite constellation?

                I her in want to see.
          2. +5
            28 October 2022 18: 24
            Quote from Nelton.
            With serial production, everything is not easy.

            But you know what what ... Let's unlearn how to bake BREAD again ...
        3. -1
          28 October 2022 18: 22
          And besides - is the game worth the candle, and the risk - the goals achieved? 250 is a pretty weak fab for their fortifications. At least it would be necessary to throw off half a ton, or even 3000!
          1. +3
            28 October 2022 18: 31
            Quote: Peter Koldunov
            250 is a pretty weak fab for their fortifications.

            Then the infantry will stick in there, grab the cradles, the coffins will go ...
            And at this time, an official, a politician, a general, a magnate-owner of factories, will sit and count the stolen goods for the State. defense. order...
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. -1
          29 October 2022 01: 40
          Quote: Corsair
          Pilots of super modern and super expensive Su-34s, not being able to remotely hit targets with high-precision weapons, are forced to "crawl on their belly" every second at the risk of being hit by penny MANPADS ...

          The Su-34, as you say, is ultra-modern, it has the means to counter air defense missiles.
          And he crawls because he was born to do it and he has an automatic flight at low altitudes and an armored cockpit.

          Quote: Corsair
          Iran (!!!) has at its disposal high-precision KABs with a drop range of 50 km, which allows their antediluvian Su-22s to be guaranteed to hit targets without entering the enemy’s air defense coverage area.

          Do you think that you can immediately scatter 40 pieces (well, let's say 10) high-precision bombs and immediately aim each one at the target - there will be the same carpet bombing ..
          And yes, the cost of such a bombing will be significant. laughing
          1. -4
            29 October 2022 19: 30
            Do not pay attention, the "corsair" is a fray, he has no idea what a KAB is, somewhere he heard something and no more. And how it is induced and in general what it was created for))) full 0.
    2. 0
      28 October 2022 18: 08
      Well, we will continue to lose the Su-34 since the mind has not increased ...
      1. +2
        28 October 2022 18: 51
        but if they had a mind, then he was only enough to steal!
        1. 0
          28 October 2022 19: 22
          Quote: Grei Grin
          but if they had a mind, then he was only enough to steal!

          That is not the mind, then the instinct, a hypertrophied grasping reflex.
    3. +4
      29 October 2022 00: 25
      Eight months, during the war, is a lot. We don't have adjustable aerial bombs? KAB-500L was put into service in 1975 in the USSR. It turns out that now in 2022 the industry of the Russian Federation cannot manufacture a planning high-precision air bomb. That's what the liberals-shitmocrats brought the country to.
    4. +5
      29 October 2022 10: 42
      A disgrace .. Risking a pilot and a car is the height of debilizm. You can knock him down with an anti-aircraft machine gun.
    5. -2
      29 October 2022 16: 06
      Not on bridges and so on, so that foreign countries would not be offended, but on the same poor people as in Russia.
    6. -1
      29 October 2022 19: 35
      Well done guys! There is an opportunity to shy away with bombs, so do it. These are effective and cheap weapons, and we have a lot of them. They know how to suppress and overcome air defense, Good luck!
    7. 0
      2 November 2022 11: 52
      It is difficult to imagine something more stupid, to use the super expensive Su-34 for this