Russian tactical nuclear weapons will completely change the balance of power in the NVO


The Russian special operation on Ukrainian territory has been going on for the eighth month. During this time, more than 500 thousand people were mobilized in Ukraine and the Armed Forces of Ukraine received a numerical advantage over the limited contingent of the RF Armed Forces on the line of contact, exceeding 1000 km. But tactical nuclear weapons can help Moscow completely change the alignment of forces in the NMD and quickly achieve victory, despite the efforts of Kyiv, as well as its NATO partners and allies of the bloc.


The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation are armed with tactical nuclear charges of various capacities: from 0,3 to 50 kilotons in TNT equivalent, which have a destructive power much greater than conventional ammunition. The use of low-yield nuclear munitions will ensure the complete destruction of the fortified areas of the Armed Forces of Ukraine within a radius of several tens to hundreds of meters. An additional effect will be a gamma-ray burst (a powerful release of energy in the form of gamma radiation), which can lead to the death of enemy personnel within a radius of several hundred meters to more than three kilometers. Due to the extremely high penetrating power, gamma rays easily pass into living cells, causing them damage. In addition, a high-energy electromagnetic pulse from the use of tactical nuclear weapons can disable the critically important radio-electronic equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine: communications, radar, air defense systems and various equipment.

The most massive nuclear weapon in the RF Armed Forces is the RD4-01 with a capacity of 2,5 kilotons. It is installed in shells of 152-mm caliber. Therefore, it can be used for firing howitzers D-20, 2S3 Akatsia, Msta-B, Giatsint-B, Msta-S / SM, as well as Coalition-SV. Moreover, there are also self-propelled guns 2S7 "Pion" and 2S7M "Malka" caliber 203-mm, which use nuclear weapons "Kleshchevina" and "Sapling". Modern nuclear weapons with a capacity of 5 to 50 kilotons are used in 9M723-1 missiles for the Iskander-M OTRK. The same charges can be installed in aviation weapons: Kh-47M2 Kinzhal hypersonic missiles and Kh-32 cruise missiles. They are capable of destroying entire formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, its strategic facilities and command centers. Whether the Russian leadership will agree to this is not yet clear.

We remind you that the SVO began on February 24, and on September 21, partial mobilization was announced in the Russian Federation. On September 30, the LPR, DPR, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions became part of Russia. At the same time, the Russian leadership has repeatedly stated that all the goals of the NMD will be achieved without fail, no matter how much time it takes.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Corsair Offline Corsair
    Corsair (DNR) 16 October 2022 12: 26
    +13
    And who , this nameless author of this , instigator and instigator ?

    Without tactical nuclear weapons, is the Russian army generally not capable of solving any problems?

    So maybe, at the May 9 parade, instead of front "boxes" and everything else, carry one vigorous loaf?

    We still have a lot of area of ​​​​the republic under dill, so maybe you will bang with us, well, or in Zaporozhye, there is also a sea of ​​dill?

    Those territories for which, in relation to nuclear weapons, will also be considered Russia, or the "exclusion zone", like Chernobyl?
    1. zenion Offline zenion
      zenion (zinovy) 16 October 2022 13: 18
      -7
      Corsair. Not everyone knows the word corsair. Maybe they just wrote that you are a pirate on this ship and your life is doubloons.
      1. Corsair Offline Corsair
        Corsair (DNR) 16 October 2022 13: 31
        +5
        Quote: zenion
        Corsair. Not everyone knows the word corsair. Maybe they just wrote that you are a pirate on this ship and your life is doubloons.

        Whoever I am "in life", this does not negate the fact that Putin's lack of will in the NVO led to the shelling of the Belgorod airport.
    2. opportunist Offline opportunist
      opportunist (dim) 16 October 2022 19: 44
      0
      Hello hi , all NATO is fighting on the side of their Kyiv regime, mercenaries from foreign countries are now so many in the ranks of the Ukrainian army that you wonder what language they all communicate in
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Sergey_2 Offline Sergey_2
      Sergey_2 (Za Mir) 17 October 2022 13: 39
      -1
      There is a tactical nuclear weapon, it is effective and it must be used for tactical purposes, otherwise, why is it needed at all.
    5. Saffron Offline Saffron
      Saffron (Igor) 17 October 2022 14: 02
      0
      That's right, is it possible that our country has been driven right up to the wall, that only nuclear weapons can turn the tide?
    6. Denis Z Offline Denis Z
      Denis Z (Denis Z) 18 October 2022 15: 49
      0
      Everything is said correctly. And what kind of nonsense about Chernobyl after using Yao? There is no reactor with many rods in the ammunition. After the explosion of traditional, non-dirty warheads and with yao, the area becomes radioactive for a short time. The first 72 hours are the most dangerous, the time of fission of cesium and iodine. A After three or four months, restoration work can be carried out on that territory. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are examples. True, with the amendment that there were atomic bombs, not Yao
  2. Colonel Kudasov Offline Colonel Kudasov
    Colonel Kudasov (Leopold) 16 October 2022 12: 33
    +2
    It is unlikely that tactical nuclear weapons will be able to solve something radically. In the case of its limited use, let's hope, for example, on bridges across the Dnieper, there is no doubt that the West will covertly transfer nuclear charges to Ukraine for a retaliatory strike. I don't think Russia needs
    1. Corsair Offline Corsair
      Corsair (DNR) 16 October 2022 12: 51
      +3
      Quote: Colonel Kudasov
      It is unlikely that tactical nuclear weapons will be able to solve something radically.

      Actually, I assume that this article is only information stuffing Russian intelligence services in order to probe the mood in your society and demonstrate to the West the readiness to go all the way in the NVO, including the hypothetical use of tactical nuclear weapons.

      Not finished cretins are sitting in the Kremlin and the General Staff ...
      1. borisvt Offline borisvt
        borisvt (boris) 16 October 2022 14: 47
        +3
        In fact, I heard that a meeting was held about 4 strikes of tactical nuclear weapons back in April, after our losses then. Apparently, not yet the time at all.
        I personally, if for tactical nuclear weapons, then for Rzeszow, followed by a statement that the second strike of nuclear weapons will be against Washington and the pentagon. Anyway, we'll come to this, unfortunately ((
        1. k7k8 Offline k7k8
          k7k8 (vic) 18 October 2022 10: 29
          -1
          Quote from borisvt
          I actually heard they were having a meeting

          Like you, even Vladimir Semenovich Vysotsky, back in his shaggy years, answered with a song about toothless old women and rumors

  3. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 16 October 2022 12: 57
    0
    Yes. If he sighs like Kuz'kin's mother, then maybe one is enough ....

    And when all Kremlin officials deny nuclear weapons, such articles look like a provocation in favor of the West ...
    1. zenion Offline zenion
      zenion (zinovy) 16 October 2022 13: 20
      -1
      Serge. Or maybe they are luring the West in order to end everyone with one blow in one day. If the United States sees determination, they will immediately begin to shout that it is no longer necessary.
  4. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 16 October 2022 13: 00
    -3
    hit Lviv with a nuclear Iskander, that's our task
    1. Vox_Populi Offline Vox_Populi
      Vox_Populi (vox populi) 16 October 2022 13: 29
      +4
      Hit, but not nuclear weapons, but such commentators. The effect will be useful in every way! winked
  5. padtest38gmail.com (Test Pad) 16 October 2022 13: 00
    +4
    advertising of a small nuclear war has become too intrusive and not covered, from all sides.
    1. wamp Offline wamp
      wamp 16 October 2022 13: 52
      +2
      Quote from padtest38gmail.com
      advertising of a small nuclear war has become too intrusive and not covered, from all sides.

      This is not advertising, but a "shift of consciousness", when people often hear something, and then passively perceive it or even want to see or try it.

      This is not done by the Russian authorities, since infecting / poisoning their territories is not just a huge future cost, but primitive idiocy.
      1. k7k8 Offline k7k8
        k7k8 (vic) 18 October 2022 10: 35
        0
        Quote: Wamp
        This is not done by the Russian authorities

        Not at all. Even on the website of Komsomolskaya Pravda, one under-expert ranted about the benefits and relative safety of using nuclear weapons in Ukraine
        In order not to be unfounded
        What will happen if Ukraine has to use tactical nuclear weapons
        https://www.kp.ru/daily/27457.3/4660327/
  6. blackcat190463 Offline blackcat190463
    blackcat190463 (Yuri) 16 October 2022 13: 14
    +11
    Or maybe just stop pumping gas and oil through Ukraine and pay in dollars, and close the grain deal that led to the explosion of the Crimean bridge?!!! Morons...!!! am And it will be worse am
    1. 1_2 Offline 1_2
      1_2 (Ducks are flying) 16 October 2022 15: 14
      +2
      Of course, this is worse for the West and the Bander regime, but the Kremlin believes that Western candy wrappers for buying imports are more important for the Russian Federation. in the Russian Federation for 30 years they lived with the slogan "everything will be brought to us in exchange for resources, why produce"
  7. staer-62 Offline staer-62
    staer-62 (Andrei) 16 October 2022 13: 25
    0
    All this should be directed to Europe.
  8. Vox_Populi Offline Vox_Populi
    Vox_Populi (vox populi) 16 October 2022 13: 26
    +2
    But tactical nuclear weapons can help Moscow completely change the alignment of forces in the NMD and quickly achieve victory, despite the efforts of Kyiv, as well as its partners from NATO and allies of the bloc

    Where do you come up with such statements??? What is left for a normal reader to think - is this a malicious provocation or an extreme degree of stupidity against the backdrop of jingoistic patriotism?!
    Is it really difficult to understand that a strike with nuclear weapons will not lead to victory, but will finally lead the situation to a dead end and cause catastrophic consequences ...
  9. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 16 October 2022 14: 01
    +2
    Stoltenberg and NATO are just waiting for the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine, which will untie the hands of enemies and the whole world will condemn the Russian Federation and call for intervention. In this case, NATO strikes against the Russian Federation are guaranteed with the assistance of the whole world .. The article is clearly provocative, are the inmates in the Kremlin so cornered, what to talk about. Conclusion: With such failures of the SVO, stopping the development of the state's economy for decades, it's time to change most of the bureaucrats who have sat in the Kremlin and in the government under the wing of the GDP ..
    1. Peace Peace. Offline Peace Peace.
      Peace Peace. (Tumar Tumar) 16 October 2022 15: 07
      -1
      For any action, NATO is taking even stronger opposition. The only thing to which there is no opposition or the meaning of the answer is reduced to zero is the exchange of Nuclear strikes. The Yankees are absolutely not afraid of another. So you have to unwind economically, but the Yankees also count and force by raising rates so as not to be trapped
      Grandmother's beater. Well, if so, I think the use of tactical nuclear weapons is absolutely acceptable. Now, if the Anglo-Saxons were not afraid of anything at all, even nuclear weapons, then they would boldly intervene in the conflict officially. The exchange of blows is their sore spot, so it’s worth hitting boldly. I think so.
      1. borisvt Offline borisvt
        borisvt (boris) 19 October 2022 22: 00
        +1
        So I also think that the Americans will not give up Ukraine just like that. They bought a lot there, in the form of a country house and in general, but then wash yourself and give it back, yeah! Indeed, they will start to be afraid only when they smell fried on the territory of the USA ((
    2. 1_2 Offline 1_2
      1_2 (Ducks are flying) 16 October 2022 15: 08
      +1
      don't be afraid of those who are afraid of you. This Norwegian clown wails and mumbles every day. that NATO is not a participant in the conflict, so as not to provoke the Russian Federation into nuclear strikes
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  11. 1_2 Offline 1_2
    1_2 (Ducks are flying) 16 October 2022 15: 05
    -2
    nuclear TNW is unacceptable because it infects the earth, if there were purely hydrogen charges, without uranium elements, then it could be used. in any case, MLRS, artillery and Gradov are enough to destroy the advancing bander kamikaze. the problem is that Bander is numerically larger and they take a few NWO forces into a semicircle. this forces the Ross BTG to abandon positions and retreat in order not to be surrounded. in order to prevent encirclement, it is necessary to prevent breakthroughs from the flanks. and for this you need more equipment and fighters on the flanks
  12. DO Offline DO
    DO (Dmitriy) 16 October 2022 15: 33
    +3
    It seems that the author writes this peppy provocative libel from America.
    But he does not have the brains to figure out that the next step in the escalation after tactical nuclear weapons will be the use of strategic nuclear weapons. And then the author will fly too. And he and his family will be lucky if they find themselves in the epicenter of a mushroom cloud, because the alternative is much worse.
  13. AndretzAndrey Offline AndretzAndrey
    AndretzAndrey (Andrei) 16 October 2022 16: 02
    +1
    And without tactical nuclear weapons, you can completely do without. Otherwise, open Pandora's box. It's too early to talk about it. There are vacuum ones, yes, there is everything, with which to replace low-power tactical nuclear weapons.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. k7k8 Offline k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 18 October 2022 10: 26
    -2
    National Interest gives advice on how to avoid a nuclear war over Ukraine

    Nuclear weapons are weapons of the weak.
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 18 October 2022 16: 05
      0
      Quote: k7k8
      Nuclear weapons are weapons of the weak.

      Here are the weaklings of the Americans, they have a lot of these weapons and they even used them.
      1. k7k8 Offline k7k8
        k7k8 (vic) 19 October 2022 11: 05
        0
        Yes, weaklings. The development and availability of nuclear weapons only proves the level of scientific and industrial potential.
        Yes, they did, and precisely because of weakness, even against the backdrop of Japan, because they clearly understood that in the event of a ground operation, they would not see Japan as their own ears, or in order to achieve their goals, they would have to make sacrifices incommensurate with the benefits received.
  16. gerome Offline gerome
    gerome (George) 18 October 2022 21: 22
    0
    I support the author! Do we need this meat grinder, where the Kyiv regime will throw all its able-bodied population to the front?
    1. k7k8 Offline k7k8
      k7k8 (vic) 19 October 2022 11: 07
      0
      I hope that at the end of the war you will happily move to areas that have been subjected to nuclear strikes in order to prove to everyone the firmness and inviolability of your convictions?
  17. Sergei N Offline Sergei N
    Sergei N (Sergey N) 19 October 2022 16: 10
    0
    "Can we bang?" as one of the characters in the movie "DMB" said.