Bring back America's fear: the main problem of Russia is that they have ceased to be afraid of us


В previous In the text, we talked about the benefits and harms of the truth. But the truth is a double-edged weapon, you need to know how to use it correctly. From the very beginning of the SVO, our Ministry of Defense, represented by its speaker, General Konashenkov, as the Executive and the highest political management as the customer of the operation, commenting on its goals and the course of the operation, naturally aroused a lot of questions from the general Russian public, to which it has not received answers. As the CBO continued, the questions became more and more, but the answers to them did not increase. But nature does not tolerate emptiness. If you do not fill the information vacuum, your opponent will fill it (which he successfully does!). As a result, without receiving exhaustive information from official sources, people sink to the bottom of conspiracy theories, feeding on rumors from all sorts of telegram channels about supposedly undercover separate negotiations between the Kremlin and Washington representatives in Riyadh, where the conditions for a possible reconciliation with the Zelensky regime are being negotiated. in order not to bring the world to a thermonuclear conflict.


I myself would not have anything against the peaceful resolution of this confrontation, if not for one circumstance. The referendums held on September 23-27 in the Zaporozhye, Kherson, Donetsk and Lugansk regions recorded an iron, like a barrier, fact - the very possibility of negotiating and peacefully resolving the conflict between Moscow and Kyiv has melted away like smoke from white apple trees, now everything will be decided on the battlefield . At least the West has such plans. Nobody is interested in Zelensky's opinion here, although he is running ahead of the NATO locomotive, vetoing any negotiations with Russia by decree of the National Security and Defense Council, as long as Putin rules it. Just think about it, this is a nonentity, the player on the piano will still indicate to us with whom he will talk and with whom not. I will still laugh Homeric when this buffoon is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize (by the way, they were nominated - thank God, they didn’t pass). President of the War for the Peace Prize. Orwell is resting! The world is war!

How to beat the casino? 'Cause it never loses


In this situation, it is extremely important to explain to people what is happening, since our MO cannot do this, I will have to do it for him. To make this more intelligible, we need to return to game theory again. AT last since I did it using the example of chess, now let's take the casino as a basis. Imagine that Putin went to the casino on February 24 (which happened on February 24, I hope you have not forgotten). His first bet did not work, Putin, realizing this, tried to leave the institution, fixing a loss (those very incomprehensible negotiations of the Medinsky team with gopniks in tracksuits, which are incomprehensible to you). But it was not there, the casino did not allow him to do this, forcing him to continue the game.

Realizing that he was not allowed to leave with the preservation of his face and wallet, Putin continued, and closer to the night a couple of bets still played him (Kherson and the Northern Sea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbAzov), but the casino was not at a loss, having robbed him on the exchange of chips (Kharkov retreat ). Putin tried to leave the establishment for the second time, this time taking profits, but the casino, as you all know, never loses, and therefore it did not release it again. What to do?

I had to play on, but the casino increased the stakes, tripling them, and our hero's money is already running out. The six-carat ring he was going to stake (our 360 billion dollars of gold and foreign exchange reserves placed in securities and national currency in the banks of the G7 issuing countries) was taken from him at the entrance for “responsible storage” by the security of the institution, and when our the hero tried to get his gas pistol (SP-1 and SP-2), he was insolently taken from him by the owner of the casino. And what in this situation will you order our hero to do?

And in this situation, our hero should first admit that it is impossible to win against the casino as long as he plays by its rules. Arriving at the casino, he tried to get guarantees of his own security from his owner by withdrawing NATO to the 1997 borders. How did it end? At first, one henchman of the owner, whom he appointed to the position of a croupier, fixed in the Constitution of the country entrusted to him the course towards joining the North Atlantic Alliance, that is, our hero could only dream of withdrawing NATO from its borders. And the next henchman, who replaced the previous one in this post, has already reached the point that, through the National Security and Defense Council, he secured the right to negotiate with Russia only if the president is replaced there. That is, our hero is given in every possible way to understand that he will not leave the casino alive. Not only will he be stripped to his underpants, this is not enough for the owner of the casino, he also needs a public humiliation of our hero, so that he is rolled around the city in a barrel of tar and sprinkled with feathers, after which they perform a public execution on him, something like that how Slobodan Milosevic ended (he died on the bunk, if anyone does not know). In this situation, our hero, if he still wants to get out of this casino alive (albeit with empty pockets, but alive), has no choice but to change the rules of the game, raising the stakes not by an order of magnitude and not a hundred times, and 100500 times by offering the owner of the casino to play Russian roulette with him, where the stake is life. And not on gas pistols, but on nuclear ones.

Changing the rules of the game


The whole point is that we are no longer afraid. The Caribbean crisis of 1962 was resolved only because two superpowers, the USSR and the USA, participated in it. Now, in the Caribbean/Ukraine crisis of 2022, one superpower, the United States, and one former superpower, the Russian Federation, have converged. Our opponents do not take Russia seriously as their equal. Who is Russia? How many divisions does she have? How many divisions it has, the Russian Federation has already shown on the Ukrainian battlefields and did not convince from the word "absolutely". So why did she decide that someone would communicate with her as an equal to himself, especially the owner of the casino, who imagined himself to be the vicar of God on Earth?

No matter how many red lines there are with a felt-tip pen, no one will simply notice them, even if you break the felt-tip pen. And the owner of the casino will finish what he started, he will not let our hero out of the casino until he destroys his country. Therefore, our hero needs to stop pretending to be D'Artagnan in all white and stupidly smash this establishment into the trash, offering its owner a duel not with swords, but with missiles, and hypersonic ones, even without a nuclear filling. Believe me, after that, our Lord of the Rings, the master of the world and the viceroy of God on Earth, will instantly begin to be blown away, because it’s one thing to fight Russia in the Ukrainian theater of operations with conventional weapons, in which you have an advantage, without particularly risking anything, because you are on an island in thousands of miles from a war zone, and it's quite another thing when they give you a revolver with one cartridge in your hands and offer to fight with rockets in which your opponent outnumbers you 1000 times.

For those who have forgotten, I will remind you that the “Caribbean crisis - 1.0” ended in peace, despite the fact that the United States at that time outnumbered the USSR in nuclear warheads by 17 times. John F. Kennedy then asked his generals: "Is there any chance that Russian missiles will reach America?" We now outperform the United States in this component by three orders of magnitude. The state of their nuclear triad I investigated here, it’s sad, at the moment they can only compete with us in naval carriers (NSNF), in other components of the strategic nuclear forces they are inferior to us at times and will be able to improve the situation no earlier than 2030 (and we still do not cite our hypersound as an argument! ). So why give them this time if they are already now, not having parity with us in the nuclear component, sitting on our heads? Isn't it time for the hegemon to point to his place near the bucket?!

Our army is not designed to conduct a database in such large theaters of military operations as the Ukrainian one, it was created as a professional contract army for conducting regional wars in local theaters of operations. In the Ukrainian theater of operations, we are losing even the Armed Forces of Ukraine, stuffed with NATO weapons. So why fight in obviously unfavorable conditions for us, announcing partial mobilization and substituting more and more of our guys under Ukrainian weapons? Stop fighting with every jackal! If Putin grew up in a St. Petersburg courtyard and from childhood learned the rules of street fighting - strike first, then he should know better than I do that in a fight you need to choose the healthiest of opponents and break him. The rest of the jackal will scatter itself when it sees that they have failed their Sher Khan.

We need to bring fear back to America!


If we want to win this war, we need to return fear to America! In Ukraine, she went too far, she imagined that it was here and now that her finest hour had struck, and she could once and for all solve the “Russian question”, just as the “German question” was resolved by the Allies in 1945 - they drove the Germans into a stall, where they have been standing for 77 years. Feeling our weakness in the Ukraine, the Yankees, having bitten the bit, break through the rod. We need to bring them back to reality. They imagined themselves to be gods, superhumans, it is necessary to put them on the ground. You need to force yourself to be respected, and this can only be done with the help of force. For thousands of years of its existence, humanity has not come up with anything else.

In the American rule book on which their world is based, our "red lines" do not exist, because they consider themselves superior to us - we are no match for them (the problems of the Sheriff's Indians, as you know, do not care!). Therefore, the only thing that can stop the United States in this situation is fear - an animal primitive fear for their own skin (so far they are only risking Ukrainian and European skins). I'm talking about creating a threat directly to the States, a real threat to existence. It is necessary to stop fighting with Ukraine, and instead present an ultimatum to the Yankees - either they retreat from Ukraine, or - the end of their City on the hill, the real end without any options. Our conflict with Ukraine is their scenario, we must offer our own, where the right to choose weapons remains with us. Either they crawl away, or they crawl away. There is no third! Otherwise, death, we go to heaven, they go to hell: “Why do we need a world in which there is no place for Russia ?!”

To get out of this vicious circle, we need to break it, because otherwise there is no chance to win at the casino. His owner has great visions for the future. The Yankees are already drawing up their long-term plans for a war with the Russian Federation by the hands of brainless and disenfranchised Ukrainians for years to come, loading their own and the European military-industrial complex with forward orders for the medium and long term (a year or two or more, up to five years). At the same time, none of this is a secret. They consider it below their dignity. We are second-class people for them, why throw pearls in front of pigs?

I am afraid that not everyone here understands and does not realize what awaits us further if we cannot stifle this Bandera mold in Ukraine. And we, it seems, have already signed our own impotence and again dragged on a dull hurdy-gurdy about negotiations (both Putin and Matvienko spoke about them again - this is a very bad sign!). If we don’t defeat Ukraine now and leave this abscess in any capacity on our borders, it will be stuffed with NATO weapons through the roof and the newly recruited Janissaries will be dragged to the best NATO training grounds, so that later they can be released on us again or constantly threaten us demanding obedience. And this will already be a million-strong army armed with the best NATO weapons (there will already be Abrams and Leopard tanks, and NATO F-15 and F-16 aircraft). If we leave everything as it is, in a couple of years we run the risk of finding a NATO strike force on our southern borders. Dumb and merciless, imprisoned for war with us.

But the saddest thing is that even if, by the end of 2023, by the end of XNUMX, through great sacrifices on both sides and by straining all our resources, we will be able to defeat this brutalized Ukrainian army, then already on the western borders of this fascist premature cub, strangled by us, we will be waiting for its Polish continuation, let and without a touch of small-town fascism, but with the same tasks. Finally, understand that until we defeat their leader, this hydra will grow more and more new heads to replace the ones we have cut down. The Yankees will have enough of these heads for our whole life, and Armenia and Kazakhstan have already signed up among their friends - their leaders have already decided to follow the Ukrainian path. And do not rush to blame them for this - you showed your own weakness in Ukraine, and Armenia was also denied protection, they wipe their feet on the weak, “to betray in time is not to betray, but to foresee!” (Charles Talleyrand). Therefore, it's time to show our strength, not exchanging for fights with any jackal, to present an ultimatum to their leader. I urge you to clearly and unambiguously mark the edges of it. Or either! Next is death! Only in this way can we solve all our problems until he solves his at our expense.

That's all I have on this topic. So let's win! Your Mr. Z
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 11 October 2022 09: 20
    -1
    if you strike a nuclear strike on Lviv, then fear will return to America
    1. Corsair Offline Corsair
      Corsair (DNR) 11 October 2022 09: 38
      +1
      Quote: vladimir1155
      if you strike a nuclear strike on Lviv, then fear will return to America

      Well, yes, if the vaunted contract army is not capable of fighting and winning, and besides, it also strives to scatter, then of course, without a nuclear club - well, no way! No.

      Sad dry residue after six months of hostilities

      Today's article on Military Review, I recommend reading it.

      https://topwar.ru/203079-neradostnyj-suhoj-ostatok-posle-polugoda-boevyh-dejstvij.html

      PS If guns (war) are the last argument of kings, then nuclear weapons, in a war that can be won by conventional weapons, are the argument of weaklings.
      1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
        Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 11 October 2022 10: 05
        +3
        you write nonsense, weaklings are cowardly, and the strong go to the end, yao in the Russian Federation There is also this just a weapon, this is strength, not weakness, that strength that is respected ... if we hit the lions from the Americans, they will understand that we can hit Washington and New York and not we will be afraid and our hands will not falter ... then they will begin to respect us ... the alternative to strike at Lviv with ground forces is more complex and involves losses ... but only strength is respected
      2. Nelton Offline Nelton
        Nelton (Oleg) 11 October 2022 10: 43
        +4
        Quote: Corsair
        if the vaunted contract army is not capable of fighting and winning

        Well, in order to defeat the crowds of reservists, the "vaunted contract army" needs a qualitative superiority over these reservists.
        Communications, thermal imagers, swarms of UAVs, operational engagement of high-precision weapons.
        Electronic warfare equipment so that the UAVs of the adversary fall from the sky.
        What was it? nothing.
        That's the result.

        Well, the big question is, why call for purely civilians, if in our country millions of people wear epaulettes.
        Until all of them pass (for 100 days at the front line) through the NWO, calling on civilians, and even indefinitely (until they are killed) is the height of cynicism.
        1. Corsair Offline Corsair
          Corsair (DNR) 11 October 2022 11: 43
          +4
          Quote from Nelton.
          to defeat crowds of reservists, you need a qualitative superiority over these reservists.
          Communications, thermal imagers, swarms of UAVs, operational engagement of high-precision weapons.
          Electronic warfare equipment so that the UAVs of the adversary fall from the sky.
          What was it? nothing.

          During the time the GDP was in power, military spending on the army increased more than seven times. In 2000, they amounted to only 9,23 billion dollars, and in 2021 - already 65,9 billion.

          For 21 years, Putin sent $ 1,1 trillion to military spending (I can't even imagine how many zeros there are).

          "Where is the money, Zin?" What are they spent on? if volunteers have to purchase elementary things for the army, including PPE and uniforms ...
          1. Nelton Offline Nelton
            Nelton (Oleg) 11 October 2022 15: 07
            +2
            Quote: Corsair
            "Where is the money, Zin?" What are they spent on?

            in the country, according to estimates in 2020, 2.6 million people wore shoulder straps.
            All of them receive above average salaries, allegedly for the risk that in which case they will be the first to meet the enemy with their breasts.
            All of them have the right to early retirement, again increased, which they receive for many years, unlike ordinary peasants, whose average life expectancy is less than the retirement age.
            This is not only the case with us, it is in most countries - the defense budget is mainly spent on the maintenance of active and retired warriors.

            There were other expenses as well.
            Boreas, Ash trees, Yarsy, Glonasses - all that, thanks to which they continue to be careful with us and not to escalate.
          2. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
            Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 11 October 2022 22: 59
            -1
            Quote: Corsair
            Where is the money, Zin?" What are they spent on? If volunteers have to buy basic things for the army, including PPE and uniforms ...

            Borisov and Bulgakov sawed into an unnecessary aircraft carrier
        2. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
          Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 11 October 2022 21: 36
          0
          the traffic police and the State Fire Supervision definitely need to be mobilized without exception
      3. Vyacheslav Krylov (Vyacheslav Krylov) 11 October 2022 18: 09
        +1
        A joyless dry residue after six months of hostilities,
        Today's article on Military Review, I recommend reading it.
        https://topwar.ru/203079-neradostnyj-suhoj-ostatok-posle-polugoda-boevyh-dejstvij.html

        I read it, it is interesting, I answered the author.
    2. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 11 October 2022 17: 28
      +1
      Respect to the author for "seeing the root." The main enemy of the United States, or rather the state under the yoke and control of the world financial clan (mostly Jewish). There are two ways, the first is to destroy this world parasitic malignant outgrowth of financiers with the zeroing of the dollar as the main force of this world bloodthirsty parasite. A more difficult path, the defeat of the United States itself. But this is a wrong way to compete in a war with American citizens, they are more stupid than the Ukrainian Slavs, and more than anyone else in the world with centuries of propaganda. It means to be the first to reach the consciousness and awareness of the American citizen, to wake up from the propaganda chimeras of financial capital. The war for the US citizen is the main one today. What the US propaganda made a lie with the Ukrainian citizens, it is necessary to return the truth to the citizens of the USA, indicating justice and truth in the world. Such hybrid wars for the consciousness of millions are becoming the main weapon today.
    3. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Vladimir) 11 October 2022 18: 42
      +2
      A strike on the territory of Ukraine will not stop anyone (on the contrary, they will make the Russian Federation a pariah country in the full sense of the word), a strike on the territory of Europe will not be considered as critically important, as critically dangerous. Only the threat of a strike on the territory of the United States, real, not hypothetical, can force the hegemon to retreat
      1. andreyserdtsev Offline andreyserdtsev
        andreyserdtsev (Andrei) 12 October 2022 08: 34
        +1
        Vladimir, I have no idea how this can be done. Could you elaborate on a possible scenario? The nuclear doctrine of the Russian Federation, as far as I know, does not provide for a first strike, only in response. Those. we cannot say, conditionally, if we find at least one more supply of weapons to Ukraine from the United States, missiles will fly. Yes, even if our doctrine provided for the first strike, most likely, these scumbags would only laugh and ignore. They know that no one, including themselves, is ready to launch the first nuclear strike against an adversary who can retaliate symmetrically.
        1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
          Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 12 October 2022 10: 35
          0
          Russian military doctrine does not prohibit the first nuclear strike, both limited to Ukraine, which will not be able to respond, or a massive disarming strike on the United States if US preparations for nuclear or non-nuclear aggression against Russia and Belarus are revealed
          1. andreyserdtsev Offline andreyserdtsev
            andreyserdtsev (Andrei) 12 October 2022 11: 18
            +1
            I agree, I was wrong. Thanks for the correction! But in general, my message has not changed from this: the United States is confident that the Russian Federation will not dare to launch a first nuclear strike.
        2. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 12 October 2022 17: 53
          -1
          (Andrey) For the Russian Federation, the entire information field of the West is closed, there is no way to officially speak the truth. It remains to create a powerful stream with small streams. It is the Internet and telephone capabilities to connect millions of connections with American citizens, public organizations, public sites of interest, etc., to make contacts and enter into dialogues, let them see that the Russians are not cannibals and there is another, real truth. This is how to open the eyes of US citizens, and not only, to get rid of the implanted anti-Russianness. . Here you can be cunning, first portraying those who disagree with the policy of the "Kremlin" and gradually begin normal dialogues and statements ... In our country, you need a cry: "In defense of the Motherland, everyone becomes a fighter." It is a long road, but as they say, a long road is overcome from the first step. And you can’t hesitate, all methods for victory are suitable, because a hybrid war is going on to destroy Russia ...
  2. Alex D Offline Alex D
    Alex D (Alex D) 11 October 2022 09: 22
    0
    Of course, it was necessary to immediately create contiguous threats to the US territory.
    1. Corsair Offline Corsair
      Corsair (DNR) 11 October 2022 09: 49
      +1
      Quote from Alex D
      Of course, it was necessary to immediately create contiguous threats to the US territory.

      Yes, what did you agree on, having eaten henbane?

      One, vigorously brandished with concrete, the other set out to inflate the SVO into a world fire ...

      After all, you yourself will be the first to whine, like those banderlogs - What about us? Oh, and sho tse flew in like this? ...
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 11 October 2022 11: 09
        -1
        After all, you yourself will be the first to whine, like those Banderlogs - And why are we? Oh, and sho tse flew in like this? ...

        Strange things you say, Corsair.
        That's what a US worker might be saying here, keeping us horrified about our nuclear weapons.
        This is war sir! It chooses the target that decisively affects the success of the operation, and the weapon that is capable of suppressing this target. The same is true of forcing a retreat by means of a threat.
        In attacks with conventional weapons on the enemy, does the possibility of a response stop you?
        Do you think that they themselves will not think that, having responded to the threat with launches, they will receive a full-fledged answer from here?
        Do you know another way to force the States to retreat?
        What doesn't fit with you
        1. Corsair Offline Corsair
          Corsair (DNR) 11 October 2022 11: 28
          +2
          Quote: Alexey Davydov
          This is war sir! It chooses the target that decisively affects the success of the operation, and the weapon that is capable of suppressing this target.

          Quote: Alexey Davydov
          What doesn't fit with you

          It just fits in with me, because I read this document - http://www.kremlin.ru/supplement/461
          Read it too. This will help you get rid of the illusion that you can swing a "vigorous loaf" at random and when you "just want to" ...
          1. Carmela Offline Carmela
            Carmela (Carmela) 11 October 2022 11: 54
            +1
            And since then there have been no changes in military doctrine? Enlighten me please.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. Corsair Offline Corsair
              Corsair (DNR) 11 October 2022 13: 39
              +3
              Quote: Carmela
              And since then there have been no changes in military doctrine? Enlighten me please.

              I answer and enlighten.

              There were changes yes in terms of determining the conditions under which nuclear weapons can be involved.
              But the CBO, these "gates", well, does not climb in any way ...
              "Wrong format" and the wrong threat and the wrong conditions ...
          2. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
            Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 11 October 2022 12: 42
            -1
            Are you saying that this document can prevent Russia from saving itself if the only way out is to threaten the enemy with nuclear weapons? Or how?
            If you are right, it follows from your words that he was accepted by the traitors of Russia.
            If not, there is no conversation.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. Corsair Offline Corsair
              Corsair (DNR) 11 October 2022 13: 40
              +3
              Quote: Alexey Davydov
              Are you saying that this document can prevent Russia from saving itself if the only way out is to threaten the enemy with nuclear weapons? Or how?

              Don't pull the owl on the globe stop
              And the Khan's owl will be, and fuck up the globe.

              I want to say, and I say - at this stage of the operation, the war (call it what you want) in accordance with the doctrine, there are no those threats and conditions under which the use of nuclear weapons, even tactical nuclear weapons, is justified ...
          3. Vyacheslav Krylov (Vyacheslav Krylov) 11 October 2022 18: 24
            +1
            Doctrines and rules exist so that anyone does not violate them. And the one Who Needs can quickly change them and violate them in any order.
            1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
              Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 11 October 2022 19: 32
              -1
              a strike on the Crimean bridge is a typical situation when a threat is created to the very existence of the state, so it is possible and necessary to use nuclear weapons ... because this strike can be followed by strikes on Moscow and St. Petersburg ... The Rubicon has been passed and the doctrine is not a decree for us, they themselves wrote the doctrine themselves and they changed it .... so if the Ukrofascists continue terror, they will receive a response from nuclear weapons, the mercy of President Putin that the lions have not yet been turned into hell, but as far as I know ..... in general, I would be in the place of Lviv residents of Ivano-Frankivsk and residents Lutsk urgently left for Poland while still alive, ... there will be that same scorched buffer zone in order to make it easier to resist NATO ..... they are fools that they bombed the Crimean bridge
            2. Corsair Offline Corsair
              Corsair (DNR) 11 October 2022 19: 52
              +3
              Quote: Vyacheslav Krylov
              Doctrines and rules exist so that anyone does not violate them. And the one Who Needs can quickly change them and violate them in any order.

              For those fool that they are "swinging a birch", and in every possible way convincing that a strike on the ukrovermacht of tactical nuclear weapons is the only way to win - this is the statement:
              https://t.me/rian_ru/181225

              Russia does not threaten anyone with the use of nuclear weapons, it is in the West that nuclear rhetoric is being introduced into circulation, trying to present the matter as if Moscow is preparing to strike using weapons of mass destruction, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told RIA Novosti
              1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
                Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 12 October 2022 10: 38
                0
                the main talent of a diplomat = to hide his thoughts and say only the right things that do not cut the ear, the main talent of a politician = not to pay attention to words and act quickly and decisively
  3. Pat Rick Offline Pat Rick
    Pat Rick 11 October 2022 09: 54
    -5
    If we want to win this war, we need to return fear to America!

    The thesis itself is rather controversial.
    So far, America is blowing up the Russian gas pipeline, and not vice versa.
    Further, we have practically no common borders with America, if only we take Chukotka, from where it is several hundred meters to Alaska. A battle between a bear and a whale is likely, but in general the balance will not be in favor of the bear.
  4. Eduard Aplombov Offline Eduard Aplombov
    Eduard Aplombov (Eduard Aplombov) 11 October 2022 10: 14
    +5
    not so long ago, one smart reader expressed an interesting idea about publishing the addresses of finding global players, clans, from the Rothschilds, Rockefellers to the most non-public families
    those who determine the strategic tasks of the West, those who appoint presidents and prime ministers in the West
    and think about if you hit these addresses and persons, you can hit not only with a rocket, but also with another method
    after all, it is possible not only to publish addresses and appearances, but to develop a discussion about what and who these secret masons are for the planet, what they bring to the inhabitants of the earth, etc.
    bring to light those who are a direct threat to the people of many countries
  5. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 11 October 2022 10: 31
    -2
    It is becoming more and more obvious that it is unrealistic to achieve the initially set goals - non-expansion of NATO and return to the borders of 1979, denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine, and therefore the desire to complete the NMD through negotiations and agreement is understandable.
    Energy problems and the resulting economic recession threaten social instability and push the West to negotiate. The initiative of the Mask, one of the richest men in the world and a major contractor for the Pentagon, speaks of a split in the ruling class. This is also evidenced by the contradictory statements of public figures like D. Trump and official representatives.
    The decisive influence on the internal disagreements of the US ruling class is exerted by the position of the former metropolis - Britain, which is trying to benefit from the confrontation between NATO and the Russian Federation and strengthen the shaken status of a great world power by reducing the role of Nemetchyna in the EU and expanding its influence in Eastern Europe - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania , Poland, Ukraine.
    Therefore, to begin with, it is necessary to put Britain in its place, and then interpret with the United States.
    1. Corcap Offline Corcap
      Corcap 11 October 2022 10: 47
      +3
      Quote: Jacques Sekavar
      Therefore, to begin with, it is necessary to put Britain in its place, and then interpret with the United States.

      And where is banderia on this list? What, the goals of the NWO have already been achieved?

      Maybe, first of all, close the "question" with Banderstadt, and then, as a winner, raise and interpret?
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 11 October 2022 13: 01
        -4
        Maybe, first of all, close the "question" with Banderstadt, and then, as a winner, raise and interpret?

        And this is now, when everything is ready to draw Russia in Ukraine into a deadly war with NATO for us? Well, what kind of victory can there be, and even more so - "the rights of the winner", if NATO stands ready behind the back of the "Banderstadt", and the master of the war stands in the shade and grins? I'm sorry, but I don't believe in your stupidity
      2. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
        Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 11 October 2022 18: 52
        +2
        Britain colonized half the world and repeatedly tried to bite off a piece from Russia:
        – interventions in the Far East Vladivostok, Petropavlovsk, Chukotka (Provision T. Moore, a monument to D. Cook in the Schmidt settlement)
        – in the European north in Murmansk and Arkhangelsk
        - in the Caucasus, Crimea and Central Asia
        - after the Second World War, she supported Ukrainian nationalists, forest brothers in the Baltic States, any anti-Soviet and nationalist forces in the USSR, and after the Yeltsin coup d'etat - Yegorka Gaidar, Misha 2%, Borya Nemtsov and other "democrats" of the Russian Federation
        Each time, a brutalized British lion cub got hit in the face in Russia, but did not calm down and staged provocations in 2006 with the poisoning of a Litvinian, in 2018 with violins. If conflicting signals are coming from the United States regarding the NVO of the Russian Federation in Ukraine, then the brutalized British lion cub is an ardent supporter of Ukrainian nationalists and is quite possibly related to sabotage on the northern streams in order to undermine the economy and weaken the role of the Nemetchyna in the EU, to raise its influence in Europe and the status of a world power , and it is not known who rules whom - the United States over Britain, or vice versa.
        Therefore, it is extremely important to pinch the tail of the evil lion cub - it will be calmer in the Middle East, in Europe, Asia, Africa, America, and it will be more convenient to calm down the banderia
    2. soloist2424 Offline soloist2424
      soloist2424 (Oleg) 11 October 2022 15: 12
      +2
      It becomes more and more obvious that it is unrealistic to achieve the initially set goals - non-expansion of NATO and return to the borders of 1979, denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine...

      Why? Personally, I see that Russia is increasing pressure on the enemy. Partial mobilization was carried out, Ukrainian infrastructure was hit. And ahead of Europe is a winter without sufficient gas reserves. There are trump cards, just experienced players do not immediately lay them out.
      1. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
        Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 11 October 2022 18: 58
        +3
        There is only one option for the denazification of Banderia - its complete occupation, and the course of the SVO inspires great doubts about this.
        1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
          Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 11 October 2022 21: 40
          +1
          not occupation, but liberation from the Nazis
  6. kriten Offline kriten
    kriten (Vladimir) 11 October 2022 10: 53
    +5
    The king is prone to compromises, and they lead to a betrayal of our interests and never bring a win.
    1. Carmela Offline Carmela
      Carmela (Carmela) 11 October 2022 11: 58
      0
      Did you notice what kind of face Putin had when Bastrykin said that in addition to the special services of Ukraine, citizens of the Russian Federation and third countries were also involved in the explosion? And in what tone did he answer: "Thank you"? He was deceived again, they promised that if he did not bomb Ukraine's infrastructure, then "third countries" would not allow our infrastructure to be bombed. But they screwed up again.
      1. soloist2424 Offline soloist2424
        soloist2424 (Oleg) 11 October 2022 15: 15
        0
        Quote: Carmela
        He was deceived again, they promised that if he did not bomb Ukraine's infrastructure, then "third countries" would not allow our infrastructure to be bombed.

        These are your guesses.
  7. Avarron Offline Avarron
    Avarron (Sergei) 11 October 2022 13: 04
    -2
    A rare case when I did not finish reading, because I said approximately the same thing at the very beginning - you need to bring down the godfather, the riffraff will be blown away by itself.
    It would have been a long time since they’d blasted a hypersonic blank without a nuclear filling across the Nevada desert, everyone would have understood everything, and it would have been quiet and smooth for a long time, but God’s grace, until the pndos screwed up their hypersound.
    But in a good way, you need to use the window of opportunity and tear the United States like a heating pad until they can’t oppose anything to our Sarmatians and others like them.
    If the United States is given time and left to exist on the planet, then there will be another fifty million dead in the next ten years due to the wars that have unleashed and will unleash the United States. When they cope with hypersound, all previous years will seem like paradise to the planet. And we, Russia, will sooner or later be crushed by this vile evil spirits, since we are already dying out as a nation.
    Therefore, you need to bang, I think. Either Russia or the US, someone will have to leave. And I'd rather the States go.
    1. soloist2424 Offline soloist2424
      soloist2424 (Oleg) 11 October 2022 15: 16
      -1
      Starting a nuclear war is easy, finishing is hard. And if the Americans are not afraid? ..
      1. Avarron Offline Avarron
        Avarron (Sergei) 11 October 2022 16: 33
        +1
        Then they will be destroyed.
    2. Corsair Offline Corsair
      Corsair (DNR) 12 October 2022 10: 08
      +4
      Quote: Avarron
      Long ago they would have banged a hypersonic blank without a nuclear filling in the Nevada desert, everyone would have understood everything, and for a long time there would have been peace and quiet, and God's grace

      After such an irresponsible provocation, the American missile early warning system will give out information about an attack on the United States from our side (we are the aggressor).
      And there will be a "response" - a rocket with a real nuclear warhead.

      And then, only the Lord will determine - who goes to heaven, and who goes to hell ...
      1. Avarron Offline Avarron
        Avarron (Sergei) 12 October 2022 10: 56
        0
        So the bottom line is that if they are not reassured now, they will repose us in the next 20 years. They will smash and tear apart with a probability close to 95%. And then Russia will not be, but there will be a bunch of motley folks fighting among themselves. Even if they managed to pit Ukraine and Russia against each other, then other peoples will definitely push each other. So what's the point of pulling, what to hope for?
        Here or pan or gone.
        The only thing that can change this scenario is a revolution and civil war in the United States itself, as it seems to me.
  8. 1_2 Offline 1_2
    1_2 (Ducks are flying) 11 October 2022 15: 09
    +3
    until the Tsar gets rid of the pro-Western billionaires (nationalization) and the pro-Western inner circle, bureaucrats, embezzlers of state funds, Zionists Russophobes at all levels of the country, from the media - theaters to the bureaucrats of the governors, the West will continue to struggle, not without reason cherishing the hope of a forceful displacement ( , maidan, coup) of patriots of the Russian Federation in power
    1. Vyacheslav Krylov (Vyacheslav Krylov) 11 October 2022 18: 20
      +2
      Will not get rid of. Our King is gone. Such dependence is even pleasant and convenient for him, the elections in 2024 ...
  9. Teacher Online Teacher
    Teacher (Wise) 11 October 2022 15: 32
    +3
    We still do not understand the mortal danger hanging over us. There is no provision for a safe way out for Russia from this war. Defeat, disintegration, complete annihilation. And this is not a joke or a fantasy.
    I support a strike on Western Ukraine. We still can't see her. So let it burn for the good of mankind (the best part of it - the Russians). No one will respond to Russia with poison. weapons, because not on them. But they will put it in your pants tightly - what you need.
    I never thought that I would support this, but now, looking at my children and grandchildren, and knowing what danger they face, I am for it!
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 11 October 2022 15: 44
      0
      I support a strike on Western Ukraine. We still can't see her. So let it burn for the good of mankind (the best part of it - the Russians). No one will respond to Russia with poison. weapons, because not for them

      The fact that they will destroy Russia in the war with NATO, I understand - does it bother you?
      And if it is guaranteed to us by them anyway - why don't we strike the NW in the States, and right now?
      If we can strike now, being ready for it - maybe first we will still try to threaten them to retreat. Since the USSR successfully did this with the Americans in 1961.
      A grenade in the hands of a person sentenced to death is a good tool for influencing his executioner. She can change fate.
      To squeeze Ukraine and take revenge on her nuclear weapons - to put your head on the chopping block prepared by the Anglo-Saxons
  10. Teacher Online Teacher
    Teacher (Wise) 11 October 2022 16: 53
    -1
    Maybe first we will try to threaten them to retreat. Since the USSR successfully did this with the Americans in 1961.

    How is it a threat? Shoe on the podium or lips squeeze harder? Can you draw a red line? What the USSR could do, we are now unable to do. Maybe now Russia will put missiles in conditional Honduras? We have been unable to dislodge a battalion of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from Sukhoi Headquarters for six months.
    Do you think in 1945 after Hiroshima, the USSR did not try on the fate of Japan?
    And now, having incinerated the snake's nest (Lviv), we will force the United States to try on the same fate.
    1. Monster_Fat Online Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 11 October 2022 18: 56
      -3
      "Regain fear"... How about "regain trust"? winked
      1. Avarron Offline Avarron
        Avarron (Sergei) 12 October 2022 11: 01
        0
        Are you dying? Return the production sharing agreement, tsrushnikov in Arzamas-16, the Ministry of Finance and the FSB? What kind of nonsense under "restore trust"?
    2. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 11 October 2022 22: 45
      0
      how are thunderstorms? Shoe on the podium or lips squeeze harder?

      Don't write nonsense. In 1961, no one in the US paid any attention to tight lips and boots.
      Noticed something else:
      1. The fact that they themselves put us in a stalemate by placing missiles of a guaranteed decapitation strike in Turkey and Italy. At the same time, they were ready to move their main nuclear forces into the open gap of the decapitated country. They could start a war with a guaranteed victory at any moment.
      2. Our first-strike missiles already deployed in Cuba (Operation Anadyr), ensuring parity in the results of the first days of a nuclear war, with unacceptable damage to the Americans from its conduct.
      3. A warning shot of a nuclear weapon at the test site on Novaya Zemlya from the test site in Zabaykayle (Tulip exercises), fired by a standard R-14U ballistic missile with a thermonuclear charge, across the whole country, which showed them that we and our weapons are ready.
      The USSR then was really on the verge of death (like we are now), was pressed against the wall and was really ready to start a nuclear war on US soil. The Americans, despite the fact that they were ready and hot, understood everything correctly and retreated, abandoning the prepared plan.
      And now the owner of the threat needs to be threatened. His home.
      As they say in Russian fairy tales: here is the answer for you, here is the advice. But will you understand? Or not?
    3. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 11 October 2022 23: 27
      0
      Maybe now Russia will put missiles in conditional Honduras?

      You do not understand. Rockets in Cuba played a different role in 1961. They just filmed the beheading issue for us. The Americans could be sure that the commanders in Cuba were given the authority to decide on the strike themselves. Missiles in Turkey and Italy for them in this case lost their meaning. However, the situation of mutual destruction remained for us.
      Now there is no factor of our decapitation, and ordinary strategic missiles are enough for the threat. The death of the enemy will be guaranteed at the moment we press the "button", but, as in 1961, again within the framework of mutual destruction
  11. Valera75 Offline Valera75
    Valera75 (Valery) 11 October 2022 18: 00
    +1
    Quote from Nelton.
    in the country, according to estimates in 2020, 2.6 million people wore shoulder straps.
    All of them receive above average salaries, allegedly for the risk that in which case they will be the first to meet the enemy with their breasts.
    All of them have the right to early retirement, again increased, which they receive for many years, unlike ordinary peasants, whose average life expectancy is less than the retirement age.
    This is not only the case with us, it is in most countries - the defense budget is mainly spent on the maintenance of active and retired warriors.

    I don’t know if it’s true or not, but as they wrote that these people wearing epaulettes who received nishtyaks from the country, on February 24, a third of them stupidly broke their contracts and ran away. ?Which is why I am sure that it will continue to go on, but very quietly and imperceptibly, and in the spring there will be a second powerful wave.

    I am afraid that not everyone here understands and does not realize what awaits us further if we cannot stifle this Bandera mold in Ukraine. And we, it seems, have already signed our own impotence and again dragged on a dull hurdy-gurdy about negotiations (both Putin and Matvienko spoke about them again - this is a very bad sign!). If we don’t defeat Ukraine now and leave this abscess in any capacity on our borders, it will be stuffed with NATO weapons through the roof and the newly recruited Janissaries will be dragged to the best NATO training grounds, so that later they can be released on us again or constantly threaten us demanding obedience. And this will already be a million-strong army armed with the best NATO weapons (there will already be Abrams and Leopard tanks, and NATO F-15 and F-16 aircraft). If we leave everything as it is, in a couple of years we run the risk of finding a NATO strike force on our southern borders. Dumb and merciless, imprisoned for war with us.

    So Mr. Z is at a loss what the top is doing there and what games they began to play. I myself am in quiet shock and I’m not even convinced by the strikes on Banderostan’s boiler rooms with hundreds of missiles and the new head of the SVO, and partial mobilization generally finished off, especially what was revealed in the MTO and I didn’t fully understand why they were put on the front end when we can take these 300t from the 1m900t that is currently in service, trained and undergoing frequent exercises. Either a fit fighter or a 35-40 year old hard worker with a bunch of sores and hernias from a civilian.
  12. Alex D Offline Alex D
    Alex D (Alex D) 11 October 2022 18: 39
    0
    If it is known that NATO servicemen are firing at us from MLRS, then why don’t our troops start firing back at NATO territory from the same MLRS, say, at Poland, Romania, France, at least somewhere in NATO? What are these games for? They need to be scared, otherwise they will not be scared.
    There is no need for nuclear weapons, no need to take US threats seriously, because. it might be a bluff. It is worth seriously thinking about the fact that the country is in an economic and already possible humanitarian blockade (they are going to block Kaliningrad, they are introducing new trade bans for our country). All this creates real threats to the deterioration of the lives of our citizens!
  13. zenion Offline zenion
    zenion (zinovy) 11 October 2022 18: 51
    0
    Just think about it, this is a nonentity, the player on the piano will still indicate to us with whom he will talk and with whom not

    And one nonentity drawing houses in Vienna and so on, unleashed the Second World War. As Stalin said, troubles begin when we underestimate the enemy. The artist captured the whole of Europe, and those who did not capture became his friends and worked for him. It is not necessary about the enemy with respect, but it is not necessary to drive a blizzard when the snow has not yet fallen. If the general became president of Ukraine, would it be easier for Russia?
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. Moscow Offline Moscow
    Moscow 12 October 2022 00: 57
    +1
    Our Konashenkov must fill in Surovikin's plate: Arrivals from Ukraine to a facility in Russia - Russia's response to arrivals + our interest on arrivals + Russia's prevention of Kyiv's actions, no matter what they think. This gives transparency to all activities of the Russian Defense Ministry and the General Staff of the Russian Federation. The whole country will see that nothing remains unanswered. Moreover, Russia is doing even more to win. The FSB of the Russian Federation says that Ukraine shelled the Belgorod region 100 times in a week, then shelled Donetsk 30 times, etc. How did Russia respond? 85 missiles in Kyiv on 10.10.23/30/11.10.22, XNUMX missiles in Dnepropetrovsk on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, etc. Then it will be clear to everyone that the answer was, will be and will still arrive in the load. It should be standard, daily work, but only in our favor. This will be the Victory over America, which stands behind Ukraine.
  16. Pacer Offline Pacer
    Pacer (Pacer) 12 October 2022 01: 05
    0
    For those who have forgotten, I will remind you that the "Caribbean crisis - 1.0" ended in peace, despite the fact that the United States at that time was superior to the USSR in nuclear warheads by 17 times.

    It is not true!
    Just the facts


    By the total number of nuclear weapons - 6,5 times
    For ICBMs USSR = 48PU USA = 151PU -3,15 times
    According to DA USSR = 214 (Tu-95A, Tu-95K, M-4), USA = 600 B-52 -2,8 times
  17. staer-62 Offline staer-62
    staer-62 (Andrei) 12 October 2022 04: 14
    -1
    We will always have time to deal with the United States, the closest enemy to us is Europe. We have a lot of reasons to start using nuclear weapons against Europe. Either they leave NATO and become neutral, or we will have to help them do it. Let's see if the US will go for the exchange of nuclear strikes when we deal with Europe.
    Without air defense, just for example.
    A task for a 4th grade student of a secondary school and the political leadership of Russia. Given. Aircraft TU 160 takes on board 45 tons. Let's say the weight of one tactical nuclear bomb is 200 kg. How many bombs will fit on a plane? If one bomb is dropped over the territory of the European Union and NATO countries every five kilometers, how long will the strip of continuous nuclear explosions be?

    From Warsaw to the Atlantic coast of Portugal, one flight of TU-160 is enough.
  18. Muscool Offline Muscool
    Muscool (Glory) 12 October 2022 08: 37
    0
    Quote: vladimir1155
    if you strike a nuclear strike on Lviv, then fear will return to America

    Does anyone have confidence that our nuclear forces are not in the same condition as the rest of the army?
  19. Muscool Offline Muscool
    Muscool (Glory) 12 October 2022 08: 39
    0
    Quote: staer-62
    From Warsaw to the Atlantic coast of Portugal, one flight of TU-160 is enough.

    Tu 160 will be shot down as soon as it flies up to the border of Hohland, not to mention NATO.
  20. cooper Offline cooper
    cooper (Alexander) 12 October 2022 09: 05
    0
    The Russian society has long had a question for the authorities - why have not all the ways / means of delivery of Western weapons to Ukraine been cut off yet ??! This is especially true against the background of the mobilization among the people deployed by the authorities. Western weapons supplied to the Ukronazis are killing our soldiers! And in general, the war does not end with our victory. How long, Russian leadership?!
  21. Sancym Offline Sancym
    Sancym (Alexander ) 12 October 2022 22: 21
    -1
    Too much verbal fluff! Be humble and simple. If you follow these conditions, the people will reach out to you!
  22. Jozin z bažin Offline Jozin z bažin
    Jozin z bažin (Jožin z bažin) 15 October 2022 00: 18
    0
    We need another "hot spot" on the planet. In East Asia. Then NATO will not be up to Ukraine and we will calmly complete what we started. Hope for you, Comrade Kim ... or Comrade Xi.