Kyiv may be forced to raise the stakes in the conflict with Russia even higher

16

The attacks on the energy infrastructure of Ukraine were a response to the terrorist attack of the Kyiv regime on the Crimean bridge and other similar actions of the pro-Nazi authorities. As a reaction to what happened, Western "partners" may insist on raising the stakes in Kyiv in the conflict with Moscow.

Thus, it is possible that Washington will agree to the supply of long-range missile systems to help the Armed Forces of Ukraine, capable of delivering sensitive strikes on Russian territory. Among such complexes is ATACMS with a range of about 300 km.



In fact, this means the possibility of rocket attacks on the Kursk NPP, the base of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, important military and civilian infrastructure facilities of the Crimean Peninsula, rear bases of the Voronezh and Belgorod regions, the infrastructure of the Aerospace Forces of the Russian Federation in Taganrog, Voronezh, Yeisk, Crimea and many other objects in various Russian cities.

Along with this, special attention is drawn to the possibility of creating a so-called dirty atomic bomb by Kyiv with the support of the West. There is a sufficient amount of spent radioactive fuel in Ukraine, and together with a warhead with a capacity of 10-15 tons of TNT, the detonation of such a projectile can cause great destruction.
  • Lockheed Martin
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    10 October 2022 17: 23
    Ours officially stated that these strikes were only in response to the Crimean bridge and other terrorist attacks. That is, a positional war without damage to the rear infrastructure on both sides completely suits our government. If Ukraine sends soldiers to the Donbass and does not blow up the bridges, then we will do the same, and this is precisely what follows from Putin's statement.
    What's the point? Destroy the male population of the Russian Federation or what?
    Here you’ll also think about whether it’s so bad if Zelensky goes to an aggravation. In general, Zelya works for us. If not for Zelensky, ours would have leaked everything back in March.
    1. -3
      10 October 2022 19: 11
      Quote: Stinging Nettle
      Here you’ll also think about whether it’s so bad if Zelensky goes to an aggravation. In general, Zelya works for us. If not for Zelensky, ours would have leaked everything back in March.

      If plan A had worked, we'd have had a collar around our necks.
      1. 0
        11 October 2022 05: 05
        Quote: About the poor hussar
        If plan A had worked, we'd have had a collar around our necks.

        I won't upset you much if I write that the "collar", one way or another, will not blow. The only difference is that what state he will get in the end.
        As for the "dirty bomb" ... then Russia needs to set conditions. Russia did not plan and does not plan to use nuclear weapons first. Due to the fact that the United States is waging a war against Russia, by the hands of Ukraine, the use of varieties of radioactive contamination will be a direct act of US aggression against Russia, which will entail the full use of strategic nuclear forces on enemy territory.
        1. GIS
          -1
          11 October 2022 07: 59
          Foreign Ministry in the United States Antonov has already stated that the United States is becoming a party to the conflict with all the consequences
        2. +2
          11 October 2022 08: 27
          Declare and apply different things.
    2. -3
      11 October 2022 05: 53
      Have you still not understood anything?
  2. 0
    10 October 2022 19: 53
    Dear author, a "dirty bomb" does not provide for a nuclear reaction, it simply scatters radioactive dust with the force of an explosion of a conventional explosive to contaminate the area, as it was after Chernobyl. Need to know this.
    For a nuclear explosion, completely different technologies are needed. First of all, uranium enrichment or plutonium production. Thousands of centrifuges are needed to enrich uranium, which has never been in the Reich's coming out, because. all the "chemical" enterprises of Minsredmash for the enrichment of nuclear fuel were located in the Urals and beyond the Urals. Because the content of uranium 235U in which a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction of nuclear fission by thermal neutrons is possible is only 0,7204%, and in order to obtain 1 kg of uranium fuel with a content of 3,5% 235U, enrichment of approximately 7,65 kg of natural uranium is required. And for making
    nuclear weapons use 235U with an enrichment above 90%, or 239Pu with an enrichment of 94%. Accordingly, for 1 kg of weapons-grade uranium, ten times more uranium 235U is required.
    To produce plutonium, fast neutron reactors are needed, which "raise" uranium-238 to the level of plutonium-239.
    So the “dirty” ammunition was coming out to the Reich, but the ammunition with a chain reaction was unlikely, the power was completely absent from the word. Well, you can't hide thousands of centrifuges for uranium enrichment from foreign intelligence.
    1. +4
      10 October 2022 20: 33
      a driven beast can commit any crime, it can use both a dirty bomb and a real nuclear charge, one can be made by oneself, the other with the help of the West
      whether there are centrifuges in Ukraine or not now it doesn’t matter
  3. -5
    10 October 2022 20: 54
    They came up with the Dirty Bomb, and they have been scaring her for two or two years already, like small children
  4. +6
    10 October 2022 21: 30
    There is no need to wait until Bandera has such missiles ... It is necessary to purposefully destroy the entire transport infrastructure of the square in order to either complicate or make it impossible to transfer military cargo ... To do this, you need to destroy airports, railway stations, bridges, power plants ...
    1. -2
      11 October 2022 05: 53
      Nizzyyyyyyy...!
    2. GIS
      +1
      11 October 2022 08: 02
      many suggest "bombing" into the XNUMXth century ... but this must be done carefully. as it is now: maximum infrastructure, minimum casualties among the civilian population.
      countries who howl that it is so inhumane to SHUT YOUR MOUTH WITH YUGOSLAVIA, LIBYA AND IRAQ - they did not separate civilians from the military when they destroyed these countries
    3. +3
      11 October 2022 10: 10
      Oil depots and fuel storage facilities also need to be destroyed, fuel and energy complex facilities and important transport and logistics facilities of Ukraine must be constantly and methodically destroyed, it should be cold, dark and hungry there in winter, railway transport, metro should not function, there should be no communication , there will be huge queues at gas stations, there should be a transport and energy collapse, in which case they will start to really think about either a change of power or an urgent exit from Ukraine.
  5. 0
    11 October 2022 08: 29
    It is not clear whether we are conducting the NVO or the Ukrainians. What does "answer" mean?
  6. +1
    11 October 2022 09: 18
    Putin has already stopped nuclear blackmail. Nuclear submarine Belgorod with Poseidons is already on duty. If suddenly, the Americans still decide to test our seriousness and capabilities, a nuclear strike will be carried out on the test site in Nevada. As soon as it dawns on the Yankees that the Poseidons are not being intercepted or even detected, the hubbub in the press about the Russian nuclear strike on Ukraine will come to naught. For me personally, this issue is closed. It is not clear how and when, with such a sluggish war, we will be able to tear apart the hohland.
  7. 0
    11 October 2022 17: 23
    Ukrainians, you still have not understood that the United States is at war with Russia with your hands ... How stupid you are. Once again, they pumped their state.