The basis of the special operation to undermine the Crimean bridge could be NATO intelligence


Developments, deployed on the Crimean bridge on October 8, allow us to say that it was a well-planned special operation of the enemies of Russia. Moreover, it can be based on the intelligence of NATO countries.


It should be noted that the synchronization of a truck filled with explosives (fertilizers) and a train with fuel became possible most likely thanks to satellite intelligence. In addition, it is simply impossible to accurately select the place of the explosion and determine the best time for this without a long and thorough study.

It could take at least a month to track the echelon schedule, prepare and calculate everything to the smallest detail, delve into the issues of safety and security of the engineering structure so that the explosion occurs exactly opposite the passing train. Perhaps the enemy even held "rehearsals", hiring some kind of truck to transport anything and just watching his movements.

Without spacecraft continuously monitoring from orbit, it would be very difficult to pull off such a covert combination. Then it would be necessary to involve more various specialists, agents on the ground, air reconnaissance and marine (underwater) drones, which could lead to the opening of what was planned by the Russian special services and made it impossible or seriously complicated the conduct of a sabotage action.

That is why information from satellites of NATO countries is most likely the foundation of a special operation, along with information about design features. Moreover, since it was necessary to meet the time interval of less than a minute for the truck to be in front of the fuel tanks, the sabotage action was carried out in real time. The organizers could not allow the truck to blow up before or after the train passed, as the high combustion temperature affects the structure of the facility and contributes to destruction.
  • Photos used: Maxar Technologies
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich (Dmitriy) 9 October 2022 11: 54
    +2
    Tracking fuel trains - most likely the observation of local agents.
    The explosion itself could be carried out by a GPS signal from a truck, and most likely was conceived while passing through the arched trusses of the bridge.
    Then the damage would be much worse. The shift of coordinates due to GPS signal interference saved us from this scenario.
    And the explosion in the tail of the train with fuel also speaks in favor of this version - he did not have time to catch up with him when the reaction to reaching the "necessary" coordinates worked.
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 9 October 2022 12: 12
      -1
      All observations are possible from satellites with real-time coordination of sabotage. So the plan of sabotage was developed. The driver did not know about the cargo from explosives, he was set up "into the dark", as can be seen from the actions at the checkpoint. Further, in the right place they blew up by radio signal. Clearly, the joint work of the United States and IEDs. The explosion may have been carried out from a car in front in the distance, in the visibility of a truck. The investigation will reveal the details, but this is how the main version is seen.
  2. zuuukoo Offline zuuukoo
    zuuukoo (Sergei) 9 October 2022 12: 17
    +3
    Let's just say that if the version with the truck is true, then NATO's "help" was not needed there.
    Billions were written off for "security", and in fact the inspection was reduced to a lone gay man who looked into the trailer.
    Moreover, I won’t be surprised that they will make the gays extreme. Figley, he did not provide himself with a service dog and at least some x-ray frames.
    And this is despite the fact that from Kyiv they promised in plain text to do something bad with this particular object.

    Z. Y. : The story of how a fic was mined on the territory of the Russian Federation knows how much explosives (I wouldn’t be surprised if it was under a ton), loaded it into a truck and drove more than one hundred kilometers with it, also deserves a separate article.
  3. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich (Dmitriy) 9 October 2022 12: 23
    0
    Quote: calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich
    Tracking fuel trains - most likely the observation of local agents.
    The explosion itself could be carried out by a GPS signal from a truck, and most likely was conceived while passing through the arched trusses of the bridge.
    Then the damage would be much worse. The shift of coordinates due to GPS signal interference saved us from this scenario.
    And the explosion in the tail of the train with fuel also speaks in favor of this version - he did not have time to catch up with him when the reaction to reaching the "necessary" coordinates worked.

    And it also suggests that the driver was used "blindly" - otherwise he would have pressed the button in the "right place". It is necessary to unwind the origin of the explosives, the owner of the transport is most likely also out of business - he undertook to transport the cargo, and that's it.
    WHERE was it loaded? I won’t be surprised if it turns out that it’s somewhere in Tajikistan, because “The Regional Cooperation 2022 military exercises began on August 10 in Tajikistan under the command of the United States.”
    https://iz.ru/1383746/2022-08-23/patrushev-nazval-prichinu-uchenii-ssha-v-tcentralnoi-azii
    The article spoke about the study of a possible "theater of military operations" as a reason, but they could also bring in the necessary materials for sabotage along the way.
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 9 October 2022 12: 58
      +1
      By details. The explosion was connected with the echelon of tanks, to destroy the railway bridge, otherwise it would be at the foot of the arch, to drop it from the support, followed by deformation ... During combustion and temperatures, the steel loses its properties, it was also expected to remove the railway metal bridge., therefore explosion at this location. The calculation of sabotage is far-sighted, the hand of the Anglo-Saxons is present ...
  4. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
    Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 9 October 2022 12: 51
    +4
    What other NATO intelligence? Loaded the truck. The driver was used in the dark. We waited for the train with fuel to be sent. They estimated when he would be on the navigable span. And rushed to the cell phone. But the car was a little off. Weak point of cargo control at the entrance. That's all. As Chernomyrdin said: This has never happened before, and now, again!
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 9 October 2022 13: 13
      0
      Naive, or with other goals to confuse the essence. Such operations bless the top leadership, and not Ukraine. There is no place for amateur performances: . deliver a dozen tons of explosives, pack explosives in boxes of other goods, deliver and load a dozen tons of explosives, work out the company and transportation documents from and to the place, bring them under the echelon with tanks - this is the work of intelligence, not gangsters ...
      1. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
        Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 9 October 2022 21: 14
        +2
        Well, what intelligence does NATO need? There are SBU agents in Russia. Ukrainians travel around Russia without restrictions. There are also Russians - opponents of Russia. Fuel trains are visible for kilometers, you can’t hide them, even satellites are not needed. And the movement, even freight trains, is on schedule. And the question of such an amount of explosives, of course, is: where to get it? Well, NATO is not dropping from satellites. But, our borders are full of holes.
  5. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 9 October 2022 13: 25
    +4
    If the passage of trains across the bridge was carried out according to a constant schedule, the task for a successful sabotage was greatly simplified.
    Why did the traffic of cars not stop during the passage of the train with dangerous goods?
    Someone must have thought of this!
    Apparently the idea was to blow up the truck while the train was passing through the navigable span, but the train was somewhat delayed. I had to blow it up due to circumstances.
  6. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich (Dmitriy) 9 October 2022 14: 01
    +1
    Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
    By details. The explosion was connected with the echelon of tanks, to destroy the railway bridge, otherwise it would be at the foot of the arch, to drop it from the support, followed by deformation ... During combustion and temperatures, the steel loses its properties, it was also expected to remove the railway metal bridge., therefore explosion at this location. The calculation of sabotage is far-sighted, the hand of the Anglo-Saxons is present ...

    At the site of the explosion, the road and railway tracks are separated in height, and on the arches of the bridge they are on the same level, and the arched bridge is metal.
    From this it follows that the ideal place for undermining is the center of the arches, and the train just managed to enter the arch. Everything was calculated correctly - if not for the premature detonation due to GPS signal distortion, they would have succeeded. The truck would have caught up with the center of the train at the center of the arch bridge.
    All this speaks of a terrorist attack technique that does not use military technology - only a household GPS navigator. It looks like an amateur SVU.
  7. In passing Offline In passing
    In passing (Galina Rožkova) 9 October 2022 14: 49
    0
    Explosives are key. Find a carrier company and a driver hired on a flight to spit, if there are "papers" for the cargo. And then stand at the bridge and press the "button", knowing the speed of traffic, also just spit. And knowing about our "inspection", too. Russia has two troubles - fools and roads.
  8. Watching Offline Watching
    Watching (Alex) 9 October 2022 19: 40
    +1
    What did you think, comrades? After all, the Ukrainians promised that the bridge would be blown up, and they would blow it up for sure. It is only the Kremlin humanists who feel sorry for the Ukrainian bridges. The wonderful Russian air defense promised that the Crimean bridge was reliably protected, so what? Who already believes such statements? The Armed Forces of Ukraine are stronger every day, and more modern. How could this war be so screwed up? All enemies observe the strange twitches of the AFRF, and unfortunately quickly learn how to beat them. When will the Russian government wake up?
    1. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
      Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 9 October 2022 21: 17
      0
      The question is now: what is our answer?
  9. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 10 October 2022 17: 35
    0
    And if a hypersonic missile flew in and the explosion was voluminous. The roadbed was simply blown away by the shock wave. The truck and car were out of luck. The version with a truck is beneficial for the authorities.