NYT explained why Ukraine is in a hurry to conduct offensive operations


Russia and America arranged political "Roll call", which should be heard in Kyiv. The speech of Russian President Vladimir Putin at a celebratory meeting in the Kremlin regarding the admission of new territories to the Russian Federation, it seems, was heard in the United States. The answer followed, although not official, but quite distinct and understandable.


Observers of the well-known American publication The New York Times (NYT), referring to experts, indirectly explain why Ukraine is conducting chaotic offensive operations in different sectors of the front, drawing in more and more reserves, incurring losses.

According to Western experts cited by the publication, Kyiv's aspirations are understandable: an application for a quick entry, or at least a MAP, cannot be implemented at the moment. The thing is that Ukraine is fighting, and admission to the alliance activates, as you know, the fifth article of the charter of the bloc. Therefore, certain statements about the need for a ceasefire (against the will of London) have already been made on both sides of the Atlantic.

In other words, Kyiv understands that the application will not be considered too quickly, especially during active hostilities, and, resigned to the loss of territories, finally wants to seize as much of its former lands as possible, even if these are little-known settlements. At least, this is what the experts invited by the well-known publication believe.

However, in order to achieve the goal of joining the alliance, Kyiv needs to fulfill a number of conditions and reforms. However, everyone is well aware that in the leadership of the military bloc no one will pay attention to these “formalities”, the main thing is not to sign an agreement with the prospect of a world war (therefore, they ask for a freeze on the conflict or a peace treaty). Given these circumstances, in the coming weeks and months, Ukrainian troops will try to attack everywhere, and then stop and try to freeze the conflict when the forces run out. Their task is clear, albeit impossible.

Perhaps in this case, the alliance will try to quickly push through the decision to accept what is left of the entire territory of Ukraine. Moreover, already 9 out of 30 countries of the bloc are ready to accept it even now, despite all the risks.
  • Photos used: president.gov.ua
5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 3 October 2022 11: 30
    +3
    There will be Kyiv in NATO, there will be no Kyiv in NATO, a war with NATO is inevitable.
    So why not hit the US first?!
    1. Vladimir Orlov Offline Vladimir Orlov
      Vladimir Orlov (Vladimir) 3 October 2022 12: 34
      0
      and ready to sit in bomb shelters, or turn into ashes ..? It was necessary to apply quietly, and a long time ago. As the Americans themselves do (our Wagner in Syria), or sometimes the Iranians.
      So that their annual losses would be at least like in Vietnam, with all the rallies, hippies, etc. that result from them. Now, 50-60 years later, few people remember this grief, because "the death of someone else always looks somewhat abstract." But since 1999, we have allowed them to bomb millions of civilians in other countries carelessly, with minimal losses, into the asphalt. Now it's our turn.

      Ukraine will be accepted into NATO, according to anyone, since the goal of the United States is to prevent us from winning.

      For us, the only window is a lightning attack on Kyiv. Can we..? Do you believe in it, after Estuary, Izyum, etc.?
  2. ivan2022 Offline ivan2022
    ivan2022 (ivan2022) 5 October 2022 04: 33
    +1
    As for the "chaotic" offensive actions of Ukraine, not a bad move. We, therefore, are simply not in a hurry ...... Or are we having chaotic retreats? It is necessary to oppose something to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  3. zuuukoo Offline zuuukoo
    zuuukoo (Sergei) 5 October 2022 07: 49
    0
    Quote: prior
    So why not hit the US first?!

    More recently, they have already "hit first" on Kyiv.
    The result of the blow was the understanding that the real state of our aircraft is very far from the ostentatious popular prints.

    Aren't you afraid that the result of the "first strike" against NATO will be the realization that the "nuclear shield and sword" is the same fiction? I'm not surprised at all by this.

    ZY: Judging by a lot of testimonies from various sources, we have one and a half and a half cripples left on our western borders.
  4. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 5 October 2022 23: 58
    0
    There is a solution for Ukraine. To establish justice and peace, the Russian Federation must legislate that the entire territory of Ukraine, captured by the separatists with the help of NATO, is the territory of Russia. In the presence of the Law, the RF SVO carried out in Ukraine is the liberation of the territory of Russia occupied by separatists, the restoration of the territorial integrity of Russia, the reunification of peoples, the inclusion of the economy, population, territory of Ukraine in the sphere of economic activity of Russia.
    The law will set the goal. A strategy will be formed. Tactics were developed, tasks were set and the enemy was named.
    The presence of the Law will give certainty about the future of citizens. Citizens living on the territory of Ukraine will not have to be afraid in the future for themselves, for persecution by the fascist regime. The military personnel of Ukraine will en masse go over to the side of the Russian Federation, knowing that in the future they will become citizens of Russia and, if desired, military personnel of the Russian Armed Forces.
    All actions of the Russian Army on the territory of Ukraine will comply with the Law of Russia.
    The law will not allow Ukraine to quickly join NATO. The law will not allow NATO to intervene, to introduce troops from Poland, Romania, Hungary into the territory of Ukraine, and the annexation of Ukraine by these countries will automatically disappear. The law will not allow to conclude a confederal treaty between Ukraine and Poland, which is part of NATO, and Ukraine will not be able to become a member of NATO.
    The probability of adopting such a law is small, the authorities do not need it.