The US is openly at war with Russia. Will there be an answer?

29

Loud statements about some "red lines", after which the United States will be considered a direct participant in hostilities in Ukraine, were heard from Moscow so many times that Washington simply stopped paying attention to them. I remember that in one of these "last warnings" it was about the supply of long-range missile systems to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The supply of them to the Uronazis happened and is happening quite painlessly. Judging by the latest data, in the future it will not only continue, but increase.

However, recently a number of facts have become public that already clearly not only say, but shout that the United States is waging a completely open war against Russia and is clearly not going to stop at the current level of escalation. What else must happen in order for these challenging actions to be followed by an adequate response?



Ukrainian Nazism as an engine of the American military-industrial complex


Military deliveries to the “non-independence” from across the ocean are steadily increasing both in terms of their volumes and in terms of the range of weapons and weapons included in them. equipment. So, the other day it became known about a new "help package", which includes: 18 HIMARS MLRS with the appropriate ammunition, 150 armored multi-purpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), 150 tactical vehicles for towing weapons, 40 trucks and 80 trailers for transporting heavy equipment, 2 radars for unmanned aerial systems, 20 multifunctional radars, Titan unmanned aerial systems countermeasures. Well, and all sorts of "little things" like tactical communication systems, surveillance systems, optics, body armor and other "field equipment". Tellingly, the MLRS mentioned above do not yet exist in nature. According to a Pentagon spokesman who commented on the new "aid package" to Kyiv, they should be built under a contract under the "Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative." By the way, the delivery of other equipment mentioned in the same list, according to him, "will also take from six to 24 months." One could make fun of this (they say, they have been waiting for the promised three years), but in fact there is nothing funny here and close. The statements cited indicate that Washington plans to prolong the conflict in the "non-collateral" for many years - until the complete exhaustion and destruction of Russia.

This is also evidenced by the words of another representative of the American military department - the commander of the US Air Force in Europe and Africa, General James Hecker, said a little earlier. This senior Pentagon official said that “the United States has already begun to prepare for the fact that the war in Ukraine will probably last for years, not months,” and therefore the supply of American F-16 fighters to the Ukrainian Armed Forces is more than real. Hecker's colleague, Chief of Staff of the US Air Force, General George Brown, said that in this case, his department would certainly assist Kyiv in training pilots for combat vehicles. Both American F-15 and F-16 fighters and European JAS 39 Gripen, Eurofighter and Rafale can be delivered. I dare to suggest that if such talkers allow themselves "lamps" of this level (and even from the corresponding type of troops), then the issue of arming the Ukronazis with NATO fighters of the 4th generation has already been resolved at the level of the political leadership, and now there is a "shaking" of technical issues. So the combat aviation of the alliance in the Ukrainian sky is not “if”, but “when”. As, however, with all other weapons, no matter what kind of "red lines" there were conversations. Washington, as in the old days, intends to use the ongoing conflict across the ocean in order to "ignite" its own military-industrial complex to the maximum and, through it, the entire stagnant the economy countries. Under no circumstances will the Americans allow a cessation of hostilities on Russia's terms.

Maintained and supervised


In order to get rid of any illusions and misconceptions in this matter, it is enough to get acquainted with the bill approved by the Senate of the US Congress on the eve of the allocation of additional assistance to Kyiv in an unprecedented amount - 12,4 billion dollars. These funds will be distributed according to the following items: $4,5 billion will constitute an "economic aid fund to support the work of the Ukrainian government"; another $3 billion will go to military support for Ukraine, including military training, arms, equipment and logistics; approximately the same amount (2,8 billion) will be allocated to finance US military operations in Europe, including mission support, intelligence operations, military service and equipment purchases; $1,5 billion will be used to replenish the US own military stocks, which have been reduced due to supplies to Ukraine; well, and another half a billion will be directed to "the production of critically important weapons to replace those sent to Ukraine." As you can see, Washington, having taken full financial support of the criminal Kyiv regime, does not forget about its own interests - the lion's share of the huge budget will be mastered by American military-industrial corporations and the Pentagon. Its specialists, in turn, do not at all hide the fact that they fully exercise direct control over all the actions of the ukrovoyak.

And what is there to hide, if in official Ukrainian sources such messages are constantly found, for example: “Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny had a telephone conversation with the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed Forces in Europe, General Christopher Cavoli, during which the parties discussed the operational situation, future plans and needs for weapons, as well as a possible reaction to mobilization in the Russian Federation ... ”The normal situation is that the junior in rank turns to the superior for instructions. They discussed plans ... In this context, the revelations of the same commander of the US Air Force in Europe and Africa, General James Hecker, which he poured in his recent interview with Defense News, are especially noteworthy. So, Hecker explicitly stated:

From the beginning, the US has warned the Ukrainian authorities whenever Russian cruise missiles approached. Alarms sounded all over the country, and the Ukrainians hid. However, it is obvious that this happened too often, so they could not wage war. Then we matured in order to give a more accurate idea of ​​​​where they can fly ...

Subsequently, according to him, the Americans, who had become insolent to the limit, "changed tactics and began to provide the Ukrainian military with more data on the location of Russian equipment for retaliatory strikes." Further, the general shows downright miracles of cynicism, trying to turn things around as if the United States is not at all responsible for all the attacks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on peaceful cities, for the murders of residents of Donetsk and Kherson, regularly carried out according to American target designations and using American MLRS and howitzers :

We didn't say, "Here's the target for that, go target that object!" We just gave them information. Let them decide if they want to target him.

Well, yes - they just gave information ... If this is not the most direct participation in hostilities, then what should be considered as such ?!

Finally, I would like to cite one more official statement made by the Ambassador of Ukraine to the United States Oksana Markarova:

There are no restrictions on Ukrainian strikes using American weapons on the territory of Crimea. I can clearly say that our partner, the United States, has always not recognized the illegal annexation, occupation of Crimea and has always adhered, from 2014 to now, to a clear position that Crimea is Ukraine in all its aspects…

By the way, the ambassador also clarified that "the agreement between Ukraine and the United States on the non-use of American weapons for strikes on Russian territory concerns only HIMARS rocket artillery systems, and not all types of supplied weapons." This is so, a note and a thought for all those who still have questions about what will happen next. It certainly will, unless Moscow stops talking about “red lines” and finally forces the US to take itself seriously. This must be done by any available means and methods, and, moreover, as soon as possible - before it is too late.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    30 September 2022 09: 50
    The US is openly at war with Russia. Will there be an answer?

    Loud statements about some "red lines", after which the United States will be considered a direct participant in hostilities in Ukraine, were heard from Moscow so many times that Washington simply stopped paying attention to them.

    It seems that the author of his article, right from the title , trying to "take" Russia "weakly" ...
    1. +1
      30 September 2022 17: 55
      So Russia has long been taken weakly.
  2. -3
    30 September 2022 10: 32
    The author does not stir up passions, you understand very well if Russia says harshly enough is enough. We will inflict nuclear tactical strikes on bases located in Poland .... The Americans will go no further. In 1962, the Americans gave the USSR a week to remove the missiles from Cuba. In case of a negative answer, they promised to bomb everything. Russia can do the same. In Europe, whatever one may say, Russia has an advantage over the Americans. So the United States, you need to think very carefully so as not to get a nuclear baton on the head.
    1. +5
      30 September 2022 12: 10
      Russia's problems are internal, that's why the US is so brave. The Russian Federation cannot reach development, many institutions of the state, laid down by the Gaidar-Chubais reforms and laws up to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, do not allow the Russian Federation to grow. Until today, the development and management of the Russian Federation has been frozen, sitting on the hydrocarbon rent and its plundering by a whole stratum of society and being taken abroad. (More than 2 trillion US dollars were embezzled from the Russian Federation.). Enemies of the West welcomed hundreds of billions of annual revenues to themselves. Now the United States, in order to strengthen its world dominance, has destroyed this idyll of plundering the Russian Federation, taking literally up to half a trillion dollars in money and property. So what kind of conversation with a robber without rules, the answer is the same, to punish a bandit without any restrictions in the literal sense ... As events go further, it’s not for reconciliation ...
      1. +1
        1 October 2022 14: 14
        Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
        Now the United States, in order to strengthen its world dominance, has destroyed this idyll of plundering the Russian Federation.,

        More and more, the picture is emerging that the United States, after Gorboelkin's betrayal, was initially preparing Russia for the role of the "Global Bogey of Evil." All today's actions, including ours, show that the US plans to build the scenario of "restoring the hegemon" on the "bones" of Russia is beginning to gain momentum. And the "World Evil" will be defeated. And it seems that the "backup dancers" in (you know where) play their roles, under the very "patriotic slogans, red lines." One consolation - let's wait until Russia is still needed to collapse the greatness of "HEGEMON". With hypertrophied "ensignism" in the Moscow Region and the entire military-industrial complex, and indeed the whole (well, you yourself know), I am very much beginning to doubt a positive outcome.
        One hope for God and the Fate of Russia, that a way out will be found, in the restoration of the Russian State.
    2. +1
      1 October 2022 13: 10
      Yes you sho!! Have the courage to express concern
    3. 0
      2 October 2022 02: 26
      Quote: Dust
      Russia can do the same.

      Of course he can, but for some reason he does not want to.
    4. 0
      3 October 2022 13: 04
      Nuclear weapons - in any form, this is an act of idiocy.

      And it won’t help if our generals can’t deal with conventional weapons, who art to whom. support should be provided, and with what speed and with whom to coordinate it, and why dill planes fly after 7 months. war, and where are the 1.5 million sets of winter uniforms that the money was spent on, and where, in the end, are the new weapons, the share of which "reached 85%" according to the Ministry of Defense ...?

      In such hands, nuclear weapons are like a monkey with a grenade. You must first deal with the management of conventional troops.

      At home, at the computer, there is always more courage than on the front line or in a bomb shelter.
  3. +1
    30 September 2022 12: 19
    Mdaa. Where are the carpet bombings?
    1. 0
      30 September 2022 20: 37
      It is incredibly and deadly boring to watch how, despite a hundredfold explanation, supercretins, superstupid and mentally retarded do not understand that carpet bombing in Ukraine, especially deep ones, is impossible because of their air defense. That is why tactically charged calibers or iskanders can be indispensable in this war, unless Russia wants to lose it. Or win at the cost of hundreds of thousands of killed or wounded soldiers.
      1. 0
        2 October 2022 02: 22
        Quote from Sacha1960
        impossible due to their air defense.

        What air defense? Why did Zelensky demand a no-fly zone in the presence of air defense?
      2. 0
        3 October 2022 13: 15
        They have a lot of long-range air defense (S-300, etc.) ..? Do not make me laugh. Air defense of the near and middle zone (Buki, Strela, stingers, etc.) is not too scary for high-altitude bombers. And who gets in the way makes the attack of each sector (a group of infrastructure targets + air defense) complex: Kh-59, calibers, FAB bombs, attack aircraft. A MLRS - UAVs, attack aircraft, helicopters (for the near zone)

        The explanation is simple - we do not have as many aircraft (just as there is no "85%" share of new weapons in the troops). And they also say that management and coordination are at the level of the Second World War. Think for yourself. It is impossible to guess like that with 85% of new weapons.
    2. 0
      1 October 2022 14: 24
      Quote: Peace Peace.
      Mdaa. Where are the carpet bombings?

      It seems that the Balakliya remained in the arsenals.
      1. 0
        2 October 2022 02: 19
        Even during the retreat, they did not think of destroying these arsenals.
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  5. +5
    30 September 2022 18: 01
    NATO not only finances, supplies weapons, buys fighters to replenish the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and how does the Russian Federation respond to this? No way !
    1. 0
      1 October 2022 19: 29
      Judging by the results, NATO also finances Russian generals. Parquet commanders of the Arbat district
    2. 0
      2 October 2022 02: 18
      Quote: Jacques Sekavar
      And how does the Russian Federation respond to this?

      Expresses concern.
  6. +2
    30 September 2022 18: 18
    What's wrong with the red lines? VV warned that the NATO bases in Ukraine are red lines for us, when they did not understand, the NWO had begun. Or was it necessary to have nuclear weapons immediately in Washington?
    1. +1
      1 October 2022 14: 31
      Quote from solist2424
      Or was it necessary to have nuclear weapons immediately in Washington?

      Or maybe it should have. Ultimately, the number of dead and mutilated Slavs will be significantly blocked by a one-time reset of the Decision Making Centers.
    2. 0
      2 October 2022 02: 17
      Quote from solist2424
      Or was it necessary to have nuclear weapons immediately in Washington?

      No, of course not, but it was necessary to threaten it. And when they even refuted the possibility of such a strike in every possible way, they got what we have.
  7. +1
    30 September 2022 18: 23
    Russia under the economic occupation of the Anglo-Saxons. The Zionist-fascists will not allow strikes against them at the moment. Everything is going according to the US scenario.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +2
    30 September 2022 22: 25
    The Russian Federation and NATO will not use nuclear weapons in Ukraine, everyone knows this. Talk about the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine is Odessa noise. For the Russian Federation, the difficult task is to defeat a superior enemy without nuclear weapons. Time works against the Russian Federation, so you need to win quickly. How? Next week we will see what will change in the strategy and tactics of the Russian Federation's war in Ukraine.
    1. +2
      1 October 2022 14: 33
      Quote: vlad127490
      Next week we will see what will change in the strategy and tactics of the Russian Federation's war in Ukraine.

      Your words, to God’s ears.
      If only, not another "regrouping".
      1. 0
        2 October 2022 02: 10
        God did not get into the ears, as the incidents with Lyman showed.
    2. 0
      2 October 2022 02: 12
      Quote: vlad127490
      must win quickly

      Fast? It's already the eighth month.
  10. 0
    30 September 2022 22: 32
    In order to answer adequately, one must have 14th dan. For now, only 7th. Maybe someday it will be.
  11. +1
    1 October 2022 17: 41
    This did not start yesterday, and the response to American provocations was, at best, expressions of concern on our part.
  12. 0
    2 October 2022 01: 37
    Quote: skeptic
    Quote from solist2424
    Or was it necessary to have nuclear weapons immediately in Washington?

    Or maybe it should have. Ultimately, the number of dead and mutilated Slavs will be significantly blocked by a one-time reset of the Decision Making Centers.

    The feeling that you are sitting in a bomb shelter, we are them, so they are us, and then? We didn’t think, maybe that’s why everything is slowed down
  13. 0
    3 October 2022 19: 12
    if Russia "recovers" well, it "recovers" from the 90s, whose yachts there are medallions, the toilet bowl of gold is stuck, then easily
    so you need to recover
  14. The comment was deleted.