NATO is not ready for war: the annual supply of shells of the US Army APU is fired in two weeks


The North Atlantic Alliance continues to supply Ukraine with weapons, but such supplies are not endless. In the near future, the United States and other Western countries will only have weapons necessary to ensure their own security, or systems that are technically difficult to remove.


NATO is not ready for a large-scale military conflict in Europe and has a very limited stock of weapons. Thus, according to the CNBC TV channel, the annual volume of ammunition production in the United States is fired by the Ukrainian armed forces within two weeks, while the Russian ones - sometimes in 12 hours. However, Russia does not lack guns and ammunition, and in this regard does not depend on foreign supplies.

In this regard, the United States and NATO as a whole face a dilemma: either seriously increase the production of weapons and shells, which requires time and serious investments, or allow the Armed Forces of Ukraine to lose the confrontation with the allied forces. If the pace of production and shipment of weapons slows down, Kyiv will soon face a massive shortage of weapons.

In addition, the outcome of the conflict may be seriously affected by partial mobilization in Russia, which will significantly increase the number of Russian units in the combat zone.

Meanwhile, to secure a better negotiating position with Russia, the Ukrainian regime may initiate an offensive. The absence of a dialogue with Moscow threatens Kyiv with big problems, which can be aggravated with the immersion of NATO countries into a tough economic a crisis.
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. trampoline instructor (Cotriarch Peril) 28 September 2022 18: 51
    +2
    the outcome of the conflict could be seriously affected by partial mobilization in Russia, which would significantly increase the number of Russian units in the combat zone.

    An increase in numbers without an increase in quality can hardly be called a positive thing. As far as I remember children's books, Suvorov bequeathed to fight not by numbers, but by skill. I doubt that in 3 months it is possible to seriously mobilize something to teach.
  2. Bakht Online Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 28 September 2022 20: 34
    0
    M.Onufrienko "The media are blatantly lying"
    https://t.me/Mikle1On/6561
  3. zuuukoo Offline zuuukoo
    zuuukoo (Sergei) 29 September 2022 00: 07
    +2
    No matter how I hint at anything, but the ammunition of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and NATO "is about to run out" for 6 months already, according to the peppy articles of our "experts".
    But in fact, there is a suspicion that in the 60s-80s, not only the USSR was preparing supplies in case of a big war.

    By the way, it would be interesting to know what happened to our reserves. They are certainly huge, but hardly infinite.
    Yes, and sold a lot of things.
  4. Alex D Offline Alex D
    Alex D (Alex D) 29 September 2022 04: 10
    0
    It seems to me that, if desired, NATO could provide a reserve in a short time. Apparently they do not want a special war.
  5. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 29 September 2022 09: 08
    0
    then they write that

    NATO is not ready for a large-scale military conflict in Europe and has a very limited stock of weapons

    the fact that NATO will attack/attack/attack Russia.

    There is a conflict of methods
  6. Vamp Offline Vamp
    Vamp (wamp) 29 September 2022 13: 41
    +1
    Production always adjusts to real consumption.
  7. svit55 Offline svit55
    svit55 (Sergey Valentinovich) 29 September 2022 21: 49
    0
    Lies, today is not present - tomorrow will be. You might think that since the Vietnam War, military production has been closed, and blanks are fired at exercises ...
  8. The comment was deleted.