The EU wants to carry out its own version of the "partial mobilization" of Russians


In the leadership of the US and the EU, feigned relaxation reigns against the backdrop of News about the initiatives of the Russian authorities with partial mobilization and holding referendums in Novorossiya. However, the nervous reaction of Washington and Brussels betrays the true attitude and says the opposite: the Western coalition is scared and annoyed. The Allies can no longer retreat, even though they are standing outside the edge of their own red lines set by common sense and European voters.


The coalition is constantly stepping on the "rake" laid out on the thorny anti-Russian path with its own hands, the consequences of such dances hit Europe and the USA more painfully, returning like a boomerang. The ban on oil and the squeezing of Russian gas from the markets is turning into a crisis of historical scale in Europe, which obediently goes to death solely for the sake of the principle of Russophobia, and not for ethical, moral, democratic considerations. Every time Europe burns bridges and then repents of it, suffers.

As a result, it turns out that by banning oil, Europe is trying to stock up on it as much as possible. Having forced Gazprom to cut supplies, the EU countries want it to return to the market in order to stabilize the situation. Having happily found a consensus on the issue of banning the facilitated issuance of visas (and sometimes establishing a complete ban on entry) to citizens of the Russian Federation, Europe suddenly turned one hundred and eighty degrees and wanted to take away his “social potential” from the head of Russia, Vladimir Putin, to open the doors wide for those who wish leave "for political or pacifist reasons" of Russians.

President of the European Council Charles Michel speaks directly about this during the UN General Assembly summit in New York. He is familiar with the (traditional) criticism of the idea of ​​"granting asylum" to Russians from the Baltics and Poland. But he is still ready to “show openness to those who do not want to be a weapon of the Kremlin,” Michel said in an interview with Politico.

Thus, under a plausible and allegedly pacifist pretext, Brussels would like to carry out its own version of the “mobilization” of Russians, directly opposite to the Russian one, namely, to call into its ranks those who decided to betray the Motherland at a crucial moment for her, stimulating cowardice. That is, "rescue" as many fugitives from the Russian Federation as possible so that they cannot lead to an escalation in Ukraine. At least this is the idea voiced by the head of the EU.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 24 September 2022 09: 05
    +1
    Granting political asylum to Russians who do not want to serve the Motherland is a blow to Russia's mobilization capabilities. No "turn one hundred and eighty degrees." The West is very consistent in its actions and is guided by the slogan "Everything for the front, everything for the Victory." And if you need to freeze to win, then Europe is ready for it. Is Russia ready for a war before Victory?

    I have noticed more than once that this author confuses God's gift with scrambled eggs.
    1. Grei grin Offline Grei grin
      Grei grin (Gray Grin) 24 September 2022 21: 07
      0
      Europe you say is ready to freeze? Did she tell you this? Are these the most tender Europeans accustomed to all the pleasures and conveniences for thirty years of plundering Russia? Do not make me laugh! Exactly, don't confuse God's gift with European devilry! The Russian people will not go to such a thing for the Victory over the world Evil, even one will go, they are no strangers, since they were betrayed by all the former allies, the former allied beggars, Russia will deal with them later and very cruelly, lowering them into the primitive communal system, from where it pulled them out ! So you will see!
    2. Alexander Bazylev (Alexander Bazylev) 29 September 2022 10: 06
      0
      The West always gives back. They are not at all ready to freeze, let's see how they sing in a month
  2. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 24 September 2022 10: 49
    +2
    If there is a war with the West against the Russian Federation, then according to the laws of war, it will only expand. The belated response of our government only aggravates our situation and losses. Is it not clear when the NATO countries adopted resolutions on supporting Ukraine until the complete defeat of the Russian Federation, who still does not understand that today the Russian Federation is in a state of de facto war with NATO. Indecisiveness, half-heartedness, lagging behind in decision-making lead to losses and, ultimately, the defeat of the Russian Federation in the NMD in Ukraine. The war that has begun, it’s like this, or you, or you, there will be no third person according to the decisions of enemies ...
  3. Sydor Kovpak Offline Sydor Kovpak
    Sydor Kovpak 24 September 2022 12: 33
    0
    Most importantly, for those who this year did not go to rest over the hill, there is a chance to rest after serving Europe due to the refusal of possible mobilization.
  4. zzdimk Offline zzdimk
    zzdimk 24 September 2022 13: 45
    0
    I have a friend who is trying to get away from alimony "for pacifist" reasons. I wonder if he will also need to become an anti-Russian in order to leave the country?
    1. Stinging Nettle Offline Stinging Nettle
      Stinging Nettle (Stinging Nettle) 25 September 2022 02: 07
      -1
      Quote: zzdimk
      I have a friend who is trying to get away from alimony "for pacifist" reasons. I wonder if he will also need to become an anti-Russian in order to leave the country?

      How can you get away from alimony for pacifist reasons?
  5. alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 24 September 2022 14: 00
    +1
    for those who want to leave "for political or pacifist reasons" Russians.

    Yes, let them roll.
  6. Grei grin Offline Grei grin
    Grei grin (Gray Grin) 24 September 2022 20: 59
    +1
    We need the Kemsk volost ourselves, but Yeltsin’s rottenness, take away all the scattered three-gender geyropa, it’s not a pity, there will be less stench and Madam Broshkina at the same time warm up, now she’s not a people’s for the Russian people, but a foreign agent, though without recognition by the Ministry of Justice, and it doesn’t matter already!
  7. NatiKoshka_87 Offline NatiKoshka_87
    NatiKoshka_87 (Ela) 24 September 2022 22: 04
    -1
    Any normal person is a pacifist and does not suffer from patriotism. Such a person is alien to national borders, identity and everything else that makes each country and state unique, different, which at the same time creates just hostility and intransigence. Creates wars. And such a person has no enemies, except for those who physically threaten with extermination. The rest is all trifles and nonsense, often imposed from the outside and someone else's propaganda.

    Therefore, any normal person must first of all protect himself, his family and his home where he lives, this does not apply to the country and the state. And only then the country and the state itself, if they completely suit him, and not from any ephemeral sense of duty and obligation. Because a person, having been born, does not choose his gender, appearance and country with a state. So the last one, he does not owe or owe anything.
    1. Bakht Offline Bakht
      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 24 September 2022 22: 12
      +4
      If you owe nothing to the state, then the state owes nothing to you personally. Should not pay for your education and treatment. Should not build roads and hospitals. You personally can not pay taxes to the state. Then the state should not maintain the police and the court. And when you are robbed in the gateway, do not call the police for help and do not go to court. After all, "the last one, he does not owe or owe anything."

      Think about it.
      1. Stinging Nettle Offline Stinging Nettle
        Stinging Nettle (Stinging Nettle) 25 September 2022 02: 16
        0
        Quote: Bakht
        If you owe nothing to the state, then the state owes nothing to you personally. Should not pay for your education and treatment. Should not build roads and hospitals. You personally can not pay taxes to the state. Then the state should not maintain the police and the court. And when you are robbed in the gateway, do not call the police for help and do not go to court. After all, "the last one, he does not owe or owe anything."

        Think about it.

        It's all right, just completely out of place.
        A normal person will kill and die only knowing the purpose.
        So far, no one has said a word about the goals of the special operation. The defeat of Ukraine as a goal, the people imagined for themselves. There may be a knife in the back and a strange world at any moment.
        In fact, people go to an endless positional war. Ammunition and military equipment continue to flow freely to the enemy. We could bomb railways and power plants, but we don't bomb them. What is the purpose of all this?
        1. Bakht Offline Bakht
          Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 25 September 2022 09: 38
          +2
          My text was absolutely right. And he touched on a very definite statement of a user who believes that a citizen of the country owes absolutely nothing to the state.
          This is a deeply erroneous opinion. A person is obliged to pay his debt to the state.

          That you ask the question "What is the purpose of all this?" can also be explained. Perhaps this is the wrong tactic. And I think that it is not "possible", but definitely a wrong tactic. But there is an explanation for all this. It is very real and no one hides it. Much is written about this. Based on this assumption, we can say that the United States wins in the geopolitical confrontation. Not Russia, not Europe, but the States. There is no talk about Ukraine at all.
          In this context, the actions of the US and Russia are quite strongly synchronized. Another thing is that the States are doing it consciously and purposefully, while Russia is forced to.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Andrey Stavropolsky (Andrei) 25 September 2022 12: 31
      +2
      What kind of nonsense are you talking about. The state, in essence, is the union of houses and families for successful survival in this world. And in order to survive, you sometimes need to fight without waiting for someone to come to your house. Normal people are just the same patriots of their country, and not like your nobody's and useless people.
      1. Monster_Fat Offline Monster_Fat
        Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 25 September 2022 16: 42
        0
        A citizen all his life, feeds the state with his money (and by the way, the army and the police, etc.) through various types of taxes and fees imposed on him, as well as buying products manufactured in this state and the same services, where these same taxes and fees are included, in addition, with his work, he creates a social, gross product in companies at enterprises, etc. where he works or manages, which deducts part of its value from its value to the state treasury through taxes, excises, etc. Therefore, to say that "the state to its citizen nothing should" - the height of hypocrisy
    3. Baobabus Offline Baobabus
      Baobabus (Baobabus) 25 September 2022 20: 48
      0
      People hire a bus driver to drive this bus and take them to the route they want.
      In the same way, people hire a president to rule the country and lead it along the path of development to universal prosperity.

      Although this is a common world practice - the usurpation of power and the juggling of laws in order to endlessly extend the terms of government. There were many such figures, and, of course, there will be more.
      But if citizens do not forget that they are primary in the history of their state, and officials are just hired workers working for the benefit of the country's citizens, then life in such a country will inevitably get better.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  8. Eustace to Alex Offline Eustace to Alex
    Eustace to Alex (Dmitriy) 25 September 2022 21: 56
    0
    Quote: Bakht
    If you owe nothing to the state, then the state owes nothing to you personally. Should not pay for your education and treatment. Should not build roads and hospitals. You personally can not pay taxes to the state. Then the state should not maintain the police and the court. And when you are robbed in the gateway, do not call the police for help and do not go to court. After all, "the last one, he does not owe or owe anything."

    Think about it.

    In my opinion, you are confusing the concepts of "Motherland" and "state". My opinion is that the state (i.e. a human agglomeration united by territories, goals, ideas, laws, resources and institutions) should set an example for a citizen, and not vice versa, since the state is a priori not comparable in capabilities to a citizen.
    I was born in the USSR, and I was taught to love and defend the Motherland.
    It would be interesting to know over the past 20 years the results of your appeals to the court, the police, medicine, etc...
    1. Bakht Offline Bakht
      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 26 September 2022 07: 03
      +1
      I don't confuse anything. It is the state that collects taxes and maintains the authorities. I have had two litigations. And I won both. I took a lawyer a couple more times. The case did not reach the court.
      Without a state, your homeland will turn into a territory that will be exploited by the enemy.
      So try to understand the main thing. There will be no homeland without a state. The one who says "I love the Motherland and do not love the state" ends up without a Motherland.
      1. Bakht Offline Bakht
        Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 26 September 2022 07: 17
        0
        I often wrote that Utkin's book "The Second World War" I consider the most powerful in terms of psychological intensity. On the factual side, he confuses the numbers of armies and divisions and cannot be recommended as a study. But I advise everyone to read it.
        Letter from Russia in autumn 1941

        The English historian cites the words from a letter sent to him from Russia. “Even those of us who knew about the vices of our government… who despised the hypocrisy of politics — we felt that we must fight. Because every Russian who survived the revolution and the thirties felt a light breeze of hope, for the first time in the history of our people. We felt like a sprout breaking through centuries of rocky soil. It seemed to us that there was very little left before the open sky. We knew that we would surely die. But our children will receive two gifts: a country free from the conqueror, and a time in which ideals will arise.

        http://militera.lib.ru/h/utkin3/index.html
  9. blackcat190463 Offline blackcat190463
    blackcat190463 (Yuri) 26 September 2022 11: 51
    0
    First, lure more pacifists to your place, and then send them to Ukraine for slaughter, after all, no one is thinking about this yet, but it will definitely be, they will not be left with a choice, either home to shame and a criminal article, or an zwei policeman, and believe me it will definitely be am