Europeans were told about the US plan to split the EU and weaken Russia

10

The United States methodically prepared Ukraine for a military confrontation with Russia, the ultimate goal of which was to weaken the European Union and split it. This was reported by the Swedish edition of Nya Dagbladet, citing the materials of the American analytical center RAND Corporation.

The center's report, released in January of this year, reveals Washington's coercion of Kyiv into strikes against the Donbass, thus provoking Russia into hostilities against Ukraine. After that, it was supposed to declare the Russian Federation an aggressor country and introduce large-scale economic sanctions.



The US plans also took into account the direct impact of these events on the EU, whose economy should plunge into crisis. Against the backdrop of ongoing events, financial resources in the amount of $ 9 trillion are flowing to the United States, which is becoming a center of attraction for young and educated citizens of European countries.

One of the main goals of Washington, according to analysts, was to split the European Union and prevent further rapprochement between Berlin and Moscow. The refusal of Russian energy carriers by European countries and the isolation of the Russian Federation were to become the instruments of this plan. The United States feared the independence of the FRG, which could become the financial and political center of Europe and compete with the United States.

The only possible way to ensure that Germany refuses to supply Russian energy is to involve both sides in a military conflict in Ukraine. Continued US actions in this country will inevitably lead to a military response from Russia.

– indicated in the RAND report.
  • https://pxhere.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    23 September 2022 13: 35
    Did they just realize it now?
  2. +4
    23 September 2022 14: 08
    It turns out that the United States is calmly and publicly implementing its vile plan, while the EU and Russia stand with their mouths open and silently watch their economies being destroyed from across the ocean and cannot do anything?
  3. +3
    23 September 2022 14: 19
    The plans of the Anglo-Saxons are much wider. They want to get the maximum benefit, and obviously rely on the military component. The Americans are now almost ready to start a war between Russia and NATO. For this, as they themselves stated, a provocation at one of the nuclear power plants is enough for them. The implementation of the NWO and its tightening now automatically falls into the mainstream of these plans.
    With this war, the Anglo-Saxons are counting on:
    - avert the danger of using Russia's strategic nuclear weapons on its territory when it is defeated by proxy
    - weaken the blood of Russia and completely subjugate (enslave) the European members of NATO, tk. The United States is having problems returning production from China, while Europe has kept them on its own territory and has a decisive competitive advantage in the new world
    - deprive China of potential allies in the face of Russia and Europe
    - with minimal forces and without risk, finish off Russia and take possession of its resources
    - to deprive Europe of the opportunity to claim a fair share of Russia's resources
    - remove possible obstacles before the fight with China
    - earn on the supply of weapons to all
    - earn on the restoration of Europe
    The States are already taking control of Europe's industry with grants to produce weapons for this war.
    This, in particular, was discussed at the last meeting in Ramstein, about which a large article was published in Politico: https://www.politico.eu/article/training-ukrainians-takes-priority-as-wests-stockpiles-dwindle/
    I think that our holding of the NMD in line with the American plans is not an accident.
    Also, it is not a coincidence:
    - large-scale and resigned 30-year retreat of Russia from all geopolitical positions
    - lack of industrial development all the years after the American-inspired coup of 1991
    - withdrawal from the budget of Russia and transfer to the hands of the current enemy of the funds necessary for its development
    - concession to this enemy of half of the foreign exchange reserves accumulated abroad
    - payments to him on public debt
    - accurate deliveries of strategic goods and resources to him under contracts
    - oddities and "inexplicable" decisions during CBO
    Nor was Yeltsin's transfer of power to Putin, who was then guarded by the CIA, by chance.
    I believe that Russia, as well as Ukraine and Europe, are controlled by the Americans through the people they put in the leadership of these countries. With their hands, the Anglo-Saxons are implementing their cannibalistic plan to foment a big war in Europe and conquer the European part of the world. Only by removing all obstacles from their path will they be able to move on to the next stage - the subjugation and enslavement of China.
    Only Russia can destroy these plans and force the Americans to retreat. The threat of mutual destruction
    1. +1
      24 September 2022 11: 57
      Now they sometimes say that the fear of nuclear weapons has disappeared and, therefore, the threat factor has lost its effectiveness. However, this is only an appearance, a general picture, blurred in reality.
      Specifically, whose fear? Fear always belongs to someone.
      If we talk about peoples, then yes! Time has erased the memory of the horrors of war. The norods of all European countries have been turned by the civilization of the Anglo-Saxons into a brainless thing. However, the nations are ruled by their shepherds. Shepherds cannot afford to be brainless like their charges. They are led by a cold calculation in the area of ​​their personal interests.
      We still seriously, as in 1961, did not threaten the shepherd of the shepherds.
      Think for yourself - is it attractive for a "shepherd" family from Washington to spend the rest of their lives of two, three hundred days in a concrete bunker and leave them in a poisoned environment. They are accustomed to the complete comfort that the current civilization provides them.
      The shepherd's lack of fear of our nuclear weapons is not based on his oblivion of the horrors of war, but on his complete and proud confidence in controlling all the actions of the authorities of other countries under his control. Confidence based on the experience of the Anglo-Saxons for several centuries.
      These constructions can be broken only by what Bismarck warned everyone about and our stupid brute nuclear force, acting contrary to them.
      BUT!
      To do this, you must first destroy the Anglo-Saxons their channel of control of Russia
      1. +1
        24 September 2022 15: 06
        What is the use of Russia's Europe? From her, the current of disappointment and nothing more. No Europe no problem. After all, it's an option.
  4. +1
    23 September 2022 23: 07
    The EU is actually controlled by the US and is essentially a protectorate, elevating the political economy, military, propaganda and other potential of the US, and therefore the split or weakening of the EU is contrary to US interests.
    1. 0
      24 September 2022 11: 34
      Split - yes. Because it divides the control object into two or more with independent interests.
      Relief - yes. Since it reduces the space for the control object to make its own decisions that compete with the received orders.
      The value of the object of control for the Anglo-Saxons does not mean common interests and fate with it
      1. 0
        24 September 2022 12: 20
        Relief - yes. Since it reduces the space for the control object to make its own decisions that compete with the received orders.

        Typo. Definitely weakening - no
    2. 0
      24 September 2022 14: 39
      elevating the political economy, military, propaganda and other potential of the United States

      These are just words with which it is easy to combine into a single whole that in reality, has different interests, and contains the possibility of choosing different paths.
      The Americans have moved their main production to China, focusing on the management of financial flows, and will lose control over them in the event of a conflict. Europe has them on its territory and is in a better position.
      There is a saying among the Arabs:

      When the caravan turns, the lame camel is ahead

      In the new, non-global world, Europe can use its competitive advantages by throwing off the yoke of the Americans. It may even enter into an alliance with China and Russia. Americans want complete subjugation, enslavement of the European part of the world
  5. 0
    25 September 2022 08: 53
    interesting news in the German media today. It turns out that one manager of a utility company went to the Donbass as an observer for the referendum.
    At the beginning of the story, representatives of this enterprise are quoted

    When energy prices are so high in Germany because of the conflict in Ukraine, this act is simply unacceptable. He certainly went there as a private individual. How far he can stay in his position will be decided on Monday.

    And it would seem that everything is clear, when suddenly a quote from the culprit himself

    I am very glad to be here, to observe the referendum. People vote completely voluntarily. That picture in the Western media is not true.

    Here it is worth knowing that in Germany, as far as the media (TV, radio) is concerned, about 50 to 50 are private and state-owned, but all of them, as one, orient themselves (follow) instructions "from above". The agenda is always the same in all media. Therefore, it is quite possible that this news (which in itself does not fit anywhere at all) was sent down from above and placed in the agenda at the very top. Delivery was prescribed in this form.

    This suggests the conclusion that the referendums can become that lifeline for the EU, which will give them the opportunity to formalize their defeat, passing it off as a commitment to democracy ... well, if the people themselves want to go to Russia, how can we interfere with this, especially with the supply of weapons.

    Of course, one should not exaggerate here, referendums are still called fictitious. But whatever you call them, this is a powerful signal that will significantly weaken the narratives of the West. The narrative "Russia is conquering Ukrainian territory by force against the will of the population" is now being heavily attacked by another narrative "Those people in eastern Ukraine want to be part of Russia themselves, so why the hell should we suffer...".