The Washington Post: Kyiv "felt" a new effective method of pressure on Russia


Kyiv officials do not get tired of assuring American politicians, generously giving help, that the donated weapons will not be used to strike at targets in the territory of Russia itself. However, Ukrainian forces are now so close to the border that they can hit targets, even using their less advanced weapons than they already have. Simply put, Ukraine is deceiving the West, which does not control its ward at all. This is written by The Washington Post.


On Saturday, a new wave of strikes hit the Belgorod region in western Russia, killing at least one person and injuring two others. World media openly report that in the evening Ukraine struck Valuyki, just 16 kilometers north of the Russian-Ukrainian border. Russian officials said one civilian was killed and there was a temporary failure in the local power grid.

Russia blamed Ukraine for the attacks, but Kyiv did not claim responsibility for the strikes on Russian targets, although it is clear which side it came from. This contradiction is one of the features of the new stage of the conflict on the part of Ukraine. It is the other side of the partially successful counteroffensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, at least in the Kharkiv region. In this regard, the Ukrainian military command in some way "groped", intuitively felt a new way and method to put pressure on the Russian Federation and President Vladimir Putin.

Not being able to stop the shelling of the border areas for the time being, the Russian authorities begin to take out, evacuate the population deep into Russia. Now the citizens of the Russian Federation are also beginning to seriously feel the direct impact of the ongoing NWO, forced to participate in internal resettlement. Moreover, the geography of temporary resettlement is expanding. Obviously, not all citizens perceive this forced with enthusiasm. This is the effectiveness of pressure on the top leadership of the Russian Federation and Putin himself.

Also, the most serious danger for the West in terms of the Kyiv doctrine under consideration is its insistence on long-range missiles, which immediately raises the question of how the Ukrainian leadership is going to use them: in Ukraine or in Russia? The fact of open deceit (or sly pretense) worries Washington. Ukraine is trying to advance, incurring losses, violating the plans of the allies, but using the situation for importunate requests bordering on blackmail, new types of heavy weapons (tanks), more shells and long-range missiles. Simply put, it is no longer clear who is in charge of the situation at the front, who is the "senior" in tandem? West or Kyiv?
  • Photos used: twitter.com/DefenceU
6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 18 September 2022 13: 40
    +7
    what difference does it make who is older there, the main thing is that the Kremlin superheroes are again chewing snot and saying that they have not started anything yet, it’s not a pity for Russians from the outskirts, this is understandable, but compatriots are already dying here or these completely impotent people in power
    1. Corsair Offline Corsair
      Corsair (DNR) 18 September 2022 15: 08
      +1
      Not being able to stop the shelling of the border areas for the time being, the Russian authorities begin to take out, evacuate the population deep into Russia.

      What does ancient wisdom say about this?

      - Those who want to do it look for a way, those who don't want to do it look for a reason.
  2. Bulanov Online Bulanov
    Bulanov (Vladimir) 19 September 2022 09: 54
    +1
    Not being able to stop the shelling of the border areas for the time being, the Russian authorities begin to take out, evacuate the population deep into Russia.

    Everything shows that the Russian authorities did not draw conclusions from the retreat near Kharkov.
    But it was only worth dismantling the crossings on the western borders of Ukraine and roads with bridges. And then there would be no retreat near Kharkov. The Armed Forces of Ukraine would not have had so many weapons to attack successfully.
    And now NATO is calmly transferring tanks along the railway, and the RF Armed Forces look at it completely indifferently.
    In 1943, partisans staged a "rail war" to help the Red Army win the Battle of Kursk. But the experience of ancestors is not being used now. Therefore, NATO shells freely shoot the civilian population not only of Ukraine controlled by Russia, but also of Russian territory. And what to do?
  3. Siegfried Offline Siegfried
    Siegfried (Gennady) 20 September 2022 02: 24
    0
    The Kyiv regime may be telling the West something like - "You included us in this war, they said that it was a sure thing, the sanctions would tear the Russian economy apart in a month, the people would pour out into the streets, the army would refuse to shoot at the fraternal people and scatter home, that you would overwhelm us weapons to the very tonsils and we will ride on Abrams to Moscow. You forced us to abandon Minsk, forced us to threaten the Crimea and Donbass, intensify shelling, talk about nuclear weapons, then wrecked the agreements in Istanbul. And sho teper?"

    And now - "You have Zelya for two months, then you will have to be drained, you fucking drug addict"
  4. assault 2019 Offline assault 2019
    assault 2019 (assault 2019) 20 September 2022 20: 13
    +2
    It is necessary not to relocate people from the border with Ukraine to the central regions, but to place Moscow officials closer to the front line so that they can experience rocket and artillery attacks in their own skin and take all measures to create a "security belt" along the perimeter of Russia's borders.
  5. Grancer81 Offline Grancer81
    Grancer81 (Grencer81) 24 September 2022 04: 36
    +1
    The question was put incorrectly. Not Kyiv groped, but NATO.