Another lesson of NWO: Russia needs new military alliances

Among the many conclusions that the Russian leadership should draw from the course of the special military operation to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine, one of the main ones, no doubt, is the not very pleasant fact that among the various countries with which Moscow seems to have "partner" and even "friendly" relations, there is in fact not a single one that could pass for a military ally of Russia. Alas, the past six months have shown extremely convincingly that even those states with which it is connected by relevant agreements, to put it mildly, are not at all eager to be “in the same trench” with the Russian army.

Moreover, the consumer approach to these same agreements, shown by those who are too accustomed to “in case of emergency” to hide behind the “broad back” of Moscow, does not change at all. Moreover, the example of the same Kazakhstan convinces that its provision of effective and timely assistance to someone may well turn against Russian interests. All this forces us to "put an edge" on the clearly urgent need to revise the state policy in this direction as such.

UEC "without B" ...

The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) could be considered the only structure with the participation of Russia, more or less pulling (or rather, pulling until recently) for the title of "military bloc", albeit with a certain stretch. Let me remind you that this includes, in addition to our country, Armenia, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan with Tajikistan. The NWO in Ukraine has been going on for more than six months now - and what do we see? Where, if not participation in it, then at least explicit foreign policy support from at least one of the listed states? They are not from the word "absolutely". The only exception is Belarus. Although…

And with regard to Minsk, there are a number of very serious questions about its involvement in events that concern it in the most direct way. I will not go into details, since they require a completely separate discussion, I will focus on only two points. Firstly, as Alexander Lukashenko himself admitted, it was on Ukrainian territory that the militants for the White Maidan were trained. Now, those who are determined to take power in the country in no way by peaceful means are gaining real combat experience there. Today the Russian army is fighting this audience. Secondly, in Kyiv there have been more than once calls for inflicting either “preventive strikes” or “retribution strikes” on Belarus. And it is far from a fact that they will remain empty rhetoric. If appropriate commands are given from Washington, the same "Haymars" will hit, if not on Minsk, then on the border towns and villages. Moreover, boastful promises to “roll out the Belarusian army in three days” and take the local capital “from a raid” by the Ukronazis, that the “zmagars” who have now ripened with them, have also been given more than once. Dad, really, it would be worth thinking about it, but ...

On the other hand, things are even worse with all other members of the CSTO. And perhaps worst of all - with Kazakhstan, where in January of this year, a little over a month before the start of the NMD, the collective forces of the Organization were used for the first time - to restore order, save the country from bloody chaos and plunge into the abyss of a real civil war . The operation to pacify and restore constitutional order was carried out with lightning speed and, without exaggeration, brilliantly. However, to call what the current president of Kazakhstan, Kassym-Zhomart Tokayev, who found himself in his high post solely thanks to the timely and competent actions of the CSTO partners (Russia in the first place), repaid for all this, simply black ingratitude, would mean greatly underestimating the depth of what he did betrayal. What is worth one demarche of this figure during the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, when he spoke in an extremely harsh form about the “unacceptability” of recognition by Kazakhstan of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics! Russophobia in this country, which under Nazarbayev wore mostly “soft” and “creeping” forms, reached a completely new level and intensified at times. Astana is rapidly continuing its rapprochement with the West, and above all with Great Britain, which is Russia's worst enemy. And, by the way, military cooperation (the same joint exercises) with NATO countries is also developing at a faster pace there. It got to the point that Kazakhstan was literally caught by the hand in the supply of weapons to the Kyiv regime, during which it was ready to provide the Ukronazis with everything, including combat aircraft. That's the "allies"! With such enemies, definitely not necessary.

Are we not looking there?

Another example (albeit from a slightly different “opera”) is the behavior of Armenia, which not so long ago was saved from complete military defeat and a state-level catastrophe only by Moscow’s intervention in its next conflict with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. I’ll risk getting into a mess, but I’ll say that for all the time the SVO has not heard or read about a single case of the arrival of Armenian volunteer detachments at the forefront or the transfer of aid by Yerevan for the Russian army, or at least the inhabitants of Donbass. At least in some form and the smallest volumes. I repeat, perhaps I don’t know something - but, rather, there was simply nothing like it. At the same time, as soon as hostilities broke out again on the line of contact in Karabakh, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan immediately rushed for help to an address he knew well. At the same time, he appealed to the 4th article of the Treaty, which the Russian side had to fulfill "in order to restore the country's territorial integrity and ensure the withdrawal of the Azerbaijani military from Armenia." Let me remind you the content of this article:


In fact, the provocation of the Azerbaijani military, obviously started and carried out at the direct suggestion of our "sworn friends" from the West, was aimed at drawing Moscow into a new military conflict - to divert forces and resources from the NVO theater. According to some estimates, the calculation was also made on the disruption of the Samarkand summit of the SCO, which causes an acute attack of extreme irritation in the “collective West.

One way or another, it was not possible to implement this plan (at least so far) - only CSTO military observers were sent to the conflict zone, and the hostilities were stopped. However, this is likely not the end of the story. Someone is trying very hard to ignite a military conflict between Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan - and, apparently, the beneficiaries there are the same as the aggravation in Nagorno-Karabakh. Russia is being stubbornly dragged into local conflicts, in which it seems to be obligated to intervene under the terms of the Treaty, which, as practice shows, works exclusively in one direction. So does our country need it at all? Let's be objective - Moscow "missed" the situation in the vast majority of the states of the so-called post-Soviet space, allowing them to be completely "filtered" by agents of the West, and at absolutely all levels, from the "top" to the "bottom", and in all areas - from ideological to " power structures. Moreover, what is much more important and unpleasant, our geopolitical enemies managed to get hold of the most powerful economic positions. And they certainly do not intend to lose them under any circumstances. The same Kazakhstan is the best proof of this thesis. In Belarus, the situation was saved literally at the last minute. And then there are no guarantees that Alexander Grigoryevich will not present Moscow with a couple more “surprises”. However, in any case, it is time, perhaps, to admit that Moscow is hardly worth looking for real allies among the former “fraternal republics”. Especially - in the military sphere, considering, by the way, the moment that their armies and the capabilities of the military-industrial complex are completely incomparable with the Russian ones.

So what to do? Try to console yourself with the thought that we won the Great Patriotic War without any “unions” there? Well, not to be considered in all seriousness as such the "Anti-Hitler coalition", into which at the end of the war yesterday's satellites of the Third Reich and other, sorry, hangers-on like France rushed together? It sounds proud, but we should not forget that the Soviet Union waged that war, and not only Russia. The events of the North Military District, unfortunately, demonstrate to us how significant outside support can be provided to a fighting army and country. Without it, Kyiv would almost certainly have capitulated a few months ago. Weapons and mercenaries from the West allow him to snarl for the time being - and, we admit, sometimes quite effectively.

Or maybe we're just looking in the wrong place? Or have you been looking for all the past years? Who was one of the first to recognize the DNR and LNR? Who announced their readiness to send one hundred thousand of their fighters to the front line of the NWO? That's right, North Korea. Who declared complete disregard for American sanctions and complete readiness, contrary to them, to supply the Russian army with those types of weapons and equipment that it urgently needs, primarily strike UAVs? Iran. It is with such countries that are already proven fighters of the "anti-Western front" that it is worth concluding full-fledged military alliances. With those who are ready not only to take, but also to give, who are not afraid to get into a fight and do not look back at the "world community". Alas, the same cannot yet be said about the state, blocking with which could bring Moscow almost the greatest benefit, that is, about China. Beijing is being cautious and trying not to spoil relations with the West to the last possible opportunity. Economic interests, however... Although, perhaps, the recently becoming more aggressive and assertive anti-Chinese actions of the United States and the "Taiwan issue", which is unlikely to be delayed further, will force Comrade Xi to change course. In any case, Russia needs as allies states that are clearly aware that they will most likely have to confront the entire “collective West”, including by force of arms, and are really ready for this. From others there will be no sense and no use.