Russian drone filmed the work of the Su-34 on the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the help of OFAB bombs


In the process of Russia's NWO in Ukraine, evidence periodically appears about certain events recorded by participants or eyewitnesses. A video from a Russian drone appeared on the Web, which captured in detail elements of the combat work of the Su-34 bomber of the Russian Aerospace Forces on Ukrainian territory.


The footage shows how the aircraft is approaching the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near the village of Spornoye near Seversk in the Donetsk region, firing off numerous heat traps for MANPADS and air defense missiles. Then the bomber makes use of aviation means of destruction (ASP), dropping high-explosive fragmentation bombs (OFAB).

Having carried out the bombing, the Su-34 makes a sharp turn, without stopping releasing heat traps, and lays down on the opposite course. The flight was successful. At the same time, a UAV located nearby impartially documented all this.


It should be noted that the Russian Air Force is armed with a large range of various ASPs, ranging from concrete-piercing and incendiary to anti-submarine and volumetric detonating bombs. For example, only in Syria since 2015, 14 of their varieties have been involved.

Taking into account the peculiarities of Ukraine, the range of ammunition used by Russia can significantly expand from the minimum FAB-50CK (weight 60 kg, b / h 25 kg), to the maximum FAB-9000-M54 (weight 9407 kg, b / h 4297 kg in TNT equivalent) ). We remind you that in the spring at the Azovstal plant in Mariupol, where the nationalists dug in, used FAB-3000-M46 (weight 3000 kg, b/h 1400 kg), dumping them from Tu-22M3 bombers.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alex Samoletov Offline Alex Samoletov
    Alex Samoletov 15 September 2022 15: 44
    0
    Only the fab 9000 is not able to take on any of the aircraft in service. tu 22m3 maximum caliber 3000kg, tu95/160 pure missile carriers.
    1. Corsair Offline Corsair
      Corsair (DNR) 15 September 2022 18: 26
      +1
      the bomber makes use of aviation weapons (ASP), dropping high-explosive fragmentation bombs (OFAB)

      The last time, with my own eyes, I observed a similar work of bombers just at Azovstal, and only at night.
      It is gratifying that, probably at the risk, the Su-34 pilots nevertheless place bombs "pointwise", and not in the same way as, for example, helicopter pilots (and attack aircraft) from afar, aimlessly using NURSs from a fashionable, but stupid "cabriar" ...
  2. dub0vitsky Offline dub0vitsky
    dub0vitsky (Victor) 15 September 2022 16: 24
    -1
    Quote: Alex Samoletov
    Only the fab 9000 is not able to take on any of the aircraft in service. tu 22m3 maximum caliber 3000kg, tu95/160 pure missile carriers.

    There is a message that was used in Afghanistan. It was TU_22M that were carriers. Convinced of inefficiency. The shock wave weakens in proportion to the fourth power of distance. So, they died from a shock wave only at a distance of 60 meters, then they remained alive, although they were seriously shell-shocked. A much greater effect can be achieved by several, thrown at a distance, not far, with a sum of masses equal to these elephants. Much larger areas are affected.
    1. Alex Samoletov Offline Alex Samoletov
      Alex Samoletov 15 September 2022 18: 35
      +1
      Fab 9000 in Afghanistan was used with Tu16.
    2. Eduard Aplombov Offline Eduard Aplombov
      Eduard Aplombov (Eduard Aplombov) 15 September 2022 22: 46
      0
      from the point of view of the theory of destruction from a bomb, you may be right, but in practice, from the enormous power, most of them are affected by fragments of earthen buildings, wood chips, metal, stones, etc.
      i.e. the defeat from the explosion is much greater and whoever did not hide in the ground is either 200 or even more 300x
    3. Ksv Offline Ksv
      Ksv (Sergei) 16 September 2022 22: 43
      0
      That is, at a distance of 65m from a dropped bomb with an explosive mass of 5000kg, you will remain alive ?! Oh is...
      So the evidence of WWII veterans about the strength of 150mm shells falling just next to the trench is a lie
  3. SIP Offline SIP
    SIP (Sergey Sergeev) 15 September 2022 21: 53
    +3
    Carrying OFAB-34 or 250-100 on the Su-120 is just a disgrace. Risking such a machine to drop a few unguided bombs is a betrayal.
  4. sgrabik Offline sgrabik
    sgrabik (Sergei) 18 September 2022 19: 15
    +1
    It has long been necessary to produce and use more adjustable and planning bombs, although they are somewhat more expensive, but at the same time they are an order of magnitude more accurate, and this means more efficient.
  5. wladimirjankov Offline wladimirjankov
    wladimirjankov (Vladimir Yankov) 21 September 2022 21: 14
    0
    It is not the bomber that has dropped non-guided land mines at low altitude that is striking, but the picture of the fields around the bombardment site. It's like a lunar landscape. It becomes clear where our artillery and MLRS are hitting. Through empty fields and squares, where not even traces of any Nazi positions are visible. It looks like they were shooting just in the direction of the enemy, without adjustment and sparing no ammunition. But what is the use of this is not clear. Report that they fired more shells than Bandera? If you shoot stupidly like that, we won’t have enough stock of shells from the USSR for the whole of Ukraine.
  6. wladimirjankov Offline wladimirjankov
    wladimirjankov (Vladimir Yankov) 21 September 2022 21: 30
    0
    Why can't we make, like the Americans, equipment for simple high-explosive bombs in service. So that, thanks to her, "cast iron" from aircraft could be launched from a safe distance for them and at the same time also control and correct the flight path of these bombs. I read that the cost of this equipment (expandable wings and control unit) is not higher than the cost of the bomb itself.