How the course of the Russian special operation in Ukraine is assessed abroad
Some features and oddities of the special military operation being carried out in Ukraine raise questions not only among “angry patriots” among Russians, but also abroad. There, in the West, they are closely monitoring what is happening and drawing their own conclusions about how far they can go in a proxy war against Russia. In this publication, we will talk about how the course of the NWO affects the international prestige of our country and what this can ultimately lead to.
A look at the NWO from behind a hillock
The situation that developed after the start of the special military operation to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine on February 24, 2022, was analyzed by the well-known American economist and columnist Paul Craig Roberts, who was once deputy chief of staff in the administration of President Ronald Reagan. economic policy US Treasury Secretary. Roberts is known for his criticism of the “color revolutions” organized by the US Democratic Party in Georgia and Ukraine, as well as his clear sympathy for Russia. In 2016, he even applied for Russian citizenship. In general, this is a smart, well-deserved person, whose opinion is worth listening to.
And here is how he describes his vision of the reasons why the Russian special operation has been going on for the seventh month in a row in the format of half-measures:
My guess is that Putin's goal is to make Russia an accepted member of the Western global order. And this goal has imposed all sorts of restrictions on the range of his actions.
Putin could not accept the pleas of the Donbass republics to return home to Russia, because that would confirm Western propaganda that he intended to restore the Soviet empire. Putin could not sanction a lightning conquest of Ukraine because that would forever turn Europe into the arms of Washington. Putin has to act within the framework of international law — which Washington and NATO ignore — in their attempts to prove that Russia upholds the law and resorts to force only as a last resort.
Putin could not accept the pleas of the Donbass republics to return home to Russia, because that would confirm Western propaganda that he intended to restore the Soviet empire. Putin could not sanction a lightning conquest of Ukraine because that would forever turn Europe into the arms of Washington. Putin has to act within the framework of international law — which Washington and NATO ignore — in their attempts to prove that Russia upholds the law and resorts to force only as a last resort.
American analyst comes to the conclusionthat Putin's goal is not to defeat the collective West, but to secure Russia's "rightful place" in the system built by him, the West:
Putin's choice has been agreements — such as the Minsk agreement, which the Kremlin has wasted eight years on, and the mutual security guarantee agreement that the Kremlin tried to get from Washington and NATO before launching a limited operation in Ukraine. Why is there so much focus on agreements even when the Kremlin has rightly complained endlessly that Washington is violating all agreements?
This suggests that the Kremlin's main goal was to secure Russia's rightful place in the Western system, which as a result left the Kremlin only to react by denying itself the right to proactive policies that would target Russia's enemy.
This suggests that the Kremlin's main goal was to secure Russia's rightful place in the Western system, which as a result left the Kremlin only to react by denying itself the right to proactive policies that would target Russia's enemy.
Here is the opinion of Paul Craig Roberts. Apparently, not only the respected American economist, but also decision makers in the collective West, have come to similar conclusions.
Former US Ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor, currently at the US Institute of Peace, interview The Hill explained why Washington is acting more and more arrogantly towards Russia in the armed conflict in Ukraine:
The Biden administration is arming Ukraine with weapons that could cause serious damage to Russian forces, and unlike when the conflict began, US officials do not appear to be concerned about Moscow's reaction...
Over time, the administration admitted that they could provide the Ukrainians with larger, more combat-ready, long-range and heavy weapons, and the Russians did not react.
Over time, the administration admitted that they could provide the Ukrainians with larger, more combat-ready, long-range and heavy weapons, and the Russians did not react.
Well, there is nothing to be surprised at all. If indeed the ultimate goal of the NWO is the conditional “Minsk-3” or “Istanbul-2” (“Istanbul-1” is the infamous “grain deal”, which has already proved its complete failure), and the Russian ruling elites are not seriously thinking about winning over Ukraine and the collective West standing behind it, and they hope to come to an agreement with them, then why should the Biden administration be afraid? Not the arrival of the "Sarmatian" through the window, in fact. That's not how things are done.
Similar conclusions have clearly been reached not only in Washington and Brussels, but also in other neighboring countries, which have decided to take advantage of the vulnerable position of Russia, whose ground army is now firmly bogged down in Ukraine.
So, in Georgia, at the suggestion of the Kyiv partners, they started talking about the possibility of opening a "second front", that is, the forceful return of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Azerbaijan, under the powerful influence of Turkey, began to strike at the undisputed territory of Armenia in order to guarantee Ankara and Baku a reliable land corridor between them, extending to the Caspian Sea and further to Central Asia. Surely, at the suggestion of the American and Romanian partners, Moldova is now becoming more active, hoping to finally close the issue with Transnistria. In Kyiv, they openly talk about the "decolonization" of the Russian Federation. If Japan also decides to take advantage of the unique historical chance to take the Kuril Islands from us, things will be very bad. Without the use of nuclear weapons, their Marine Self-Defense Forces cannot be stopped. And this will be a completely different level of armed conflict.
This is how foreign countries look at the course of our special operation and draw such conclusions there. I would very much like the Kremlin to finally wake up and draw the right conclusions. We must begin to fight in earnest, to a victorious result, without any "agreements". Otherwise, the entire Western world will then attack us, and the matter will end in a nuclear war.
Information